Jump to content

Theme© by Fisana
 

Photo

Cricket World Cup Thread


  • Please log in to reply
3815 replies to this topic

#281 traveller

traveller

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 620 posts

Posted 02 March 2003 - 03:11 PM

Looking at 5 runs an over. gets risky now!!
  • 0

#282 tedward

tedward

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 147 posts

Posted 02 March 2003 - 03:12 PM

The barmy army has a placard saying 'aussies stick to soccer' ha ha.

The boundaries are starting to roll now.




edit: Bichels batting at number ten
  • 0

#283 tedward

tedward

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 147 posts

Posted 02 March 2003 - 03:12 PM

50 runs from 58 deliveries.
  • 0

#284 zxb

zxb

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 4574 posts

Posted 02 March 2003 - 03:13 PM

Bichel might be man of the match even if the Ozzies lose and he goes for less than 10. Second best figures in world cup history is an impressive achievement. None of the Ebgland players have really excelled themselves to that extent.
  • 0

#285 traveller

traveller

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 620 posts

Posted 02 March 2003 - 03:18 PM

I reckon Gospel's out on the piss. Drinking that warm stuff! Pre-celebrating. What will happen if the Aussies win this? England will withdraw from the EU and become the 52nd state of the US. teach us to play soccer! (oops, football)
  • 0

#286 tedward

tedward

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 147 posts

Posted 02 March 2003 - 03:18 PM

yeh i just couldnt temp fate by saying 'match winning' Its a good game at any rate.


EDIT: ZXB Are you listening to this on the radio?
  • 0

#287 traveller

traveller

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 620 posts

Posted 02 March 2003 - 03:21 PM

45! run rate coming down!
  • 0

#288 zxb

zxb

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 4574 posts

Posted 02 March 2003 - 03:23 PM

No. Just looking at the score card.

I think we're losing our advantage now. :(
  • 0

#289 tedward

tedward

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 147 posts

Posted 02 March 2003 - 03:25 PM

Its been a while since australia has been involved in a nailbiting game like this. The advantage has been changing so many times today.
  • 0

#290 zxb

zxb

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 4574 posts

Posted 02 March 2003 - 03:28 PM

Bet we'll lose it at the last minute. By 1 wicket in typical England style. Like Henman at wimbledon. ;)
  • 0

#291 traveller

traveller

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 620 posts

Posted 02 March 2003 - 03:28 PM

35 in 48 HMMMM! Barmy's are pissing thmselves I think.
  • 0

#292 tedward

tedward

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 147 posts

Posted 02 March 2003 - 03:30 PM

and now cadick returns
  • 0

#293 traveller

traveller

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 620 posts

Posted 02 March 2003 - 03:30 PM

Stiff upper lip there z!
Have a cold one for me. when the match is over have to drive traveller2 to the airport 2 hrs away. send the bitch back to oz, rainbow beach! Lost her bloody tan she has!
  • 0

#294 Agnostic

Agnostic

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 9978 posts

Posted 02 March 2003 - 03:31 PM

33 required in 36 balls. Who'll bet on England now?
  • 0

#295 traveller

traveller

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 620 posts

Posted 02 March 2003 - 03:33 PM

OOH Caddick back. bodes ill for the antidiluvians! slow down the runs maybe!
  • 0

#296 traveller

traveller

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 620 posts

Posted 02 March 2003 - 03:35 PM

Need a big slog here! Go the Aussies!!!
  • 0

#297 Agnostic

Agnostic

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 9978 posts

Posted 02 March 2003 - 03:35 PM

Or probably he gets the hiding of a lifetime and the runrate changes all over again?
  • 0

#298 zxb

zxb

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 4574 posts

Posted 02 March 2003 - 03:37 PM

Perhaps if we bowl the next 4 overs purely with beamers, we'll stand a chance? :confused: :eek:
  • 0

#299 tedward

tedward

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 147 posts

Posted 02 March 2003 - 03:38 PM

arrrr 22 needed from 21 - the preasure, the preasure.
  • 0

#300 Agnostic

Agnostic

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 9978 posts

Posted 02 March 2003 - 03:40 PM

Something tells me Anderson will pull out a rabbit from his hat.
  • 0




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users


    Bing (1)
Copyright © 2016 Pravda.Ru