Jump to content

Theme© by Fisana
 

Photo

Cricket World Cup Thread


  • Please log in to reply
3815 replies to this topic

#21 zxb

zxb

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 4574 posts

Posted 11 February 2003 - 03:51 PM

Hogg 3 for 54, Harvey 4 for 58 did the damage. Quite a conclusive victory. :(
  • 0

#22 Agnostic

Agnostic

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 9978 posts

Posted 11 February 2003 - 03:59 PM

The man responsible for the win is Symonds. I believe he learnt his cricket at Gloucestershire and now plays for Australia because he wasn't picked for England. Incidentally he is Kent's overseas recruit.

BTW,
We'll be cheering for the Union Jack on the 22nd when Blighty plays Pukestan.

Happy and Glorious.....:( :) :D
  • 0

#23 traveller

traveller

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 620 posts

Posted 11 February 2003 - 05:23 PM

Go OZ! really put together a show after some early lapses. Good to see Symonds come good after some dubious innings in the past. But can they keep it up? Losing Warnie was a baaaaad blow! If he did it knowing, hang him. But if he did without they should hang the whole ACB medical and training staff.

Bangladesh I fancy.

Are the Poms going to Zim or not?
  • 0

#24 Gospel

Gospel

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 81 posts

Posted 11 February 2003 - 05:54 PM

Lol..a contentious point but, shouldn't England
be declared the winners of the Ashes series is
Warne's B sample tests positive. After all it this
were the Olympics they'd have to give their
'medals' back.

Also should the ICC re-schedule the
England v Zimbabwe match?
  • 0

#25 wali

wali

    Banned

  • Banned
  • PipPipPip
  • 7667 posts

Posted 11 February 2003 - 06:35 PM

Are the Poms going to Zim or not?
nope! the game has been called off, but it may be reshedualed to be played in SA. Zimbabwe though say they wont play the game in SA.
  • 0

#26 traveller

traveller

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 620 posts

Posted 11 February 2003 - 06:48 PM

Get the Zim team out of Zim, Cancel and reschedule the Zim matches, finish the World Cup.
Give the team asylum in SA or wherever.
Hell, SA was a world sporting pariah for years
  • 0

#27 traveller

traveller

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 620 posts

Posted 11 February 2003 - 06:59 PM

Go the canuks:
Bangladesh 119 for 8!!!!
  • 0

#28 zxb

zxb

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 4574 posts

Posted 11 February 2003 - 07:06 PM

Canada has posted 180 all out in just over 49 overs, their highest ever score in international cricket and is on the verge of their first ever win in international cricket. Amazing. :(
  • 0

#29 Gospel

Gospel

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 81 posts

Posted 11 February 2003 - 07:07 PM

Canada WIN!!!

Excellent. :(
  • 0

#30 zxb

zxb

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 4574 posts

Posted 11 February 2003 - 07:08 PM

120/9
  • 0

#31 zxb

zxb

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 4574 posts

Posted 11 February 2003 - 07:10 PM

120 all out. Codrington 5 for 27. Nice to see Canada on top for a change. :(
  • 0

#32 Gospel

Gospel

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 81 posts

Posted 12 February 2003 - 11:28 AM

India 204 all out against Holland?!?!?

Ag what's up with ya boys?
  • 0

#33 Agnostic

Agnostic

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 9978 posts

Posted 12 February 2003 - 12:12 PM

Beats me mate.
They deserve to be shot at sight, according to me. And they didnt even play out the full 50 overs.:mad:

And Canada beating Bangladesh was fairytale stuff. Good for them.

Re Warnie:
What he is supposed to have taken was a diuretic, not a steroid drug. Diuretics weaken you by dehydration. There is more to Warnie's case than meets the eye.
  • 0

#34 Agnostic

Agnostic

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 9978 posts

Posted 12 February 2003 - 12:38 PM

Holland Zero for 1.
  • 0

#35 Gospel

Gospel

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 81 posts

Posted 12 February 2003 - 02:14 PM

Lolol.. 70/7. Methinks honor is about to be restored, Good for them. :o
  • 0

#36 zxb

zxb

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 4574 posts

Posted 12 February 2003 - 02:30 PM

van Bunge, 37 and 25 extras seem to make up most of their score.

82/8. :o
  • 0

#37 zxb

zxb

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 4574 posts

Posted 12 February 2003 - 03:59 PM

136 all out. Not a bad little recovery, albeit temporary. :o
  • 0

#38 traveller

traveller

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 620 posts

Posted 13 February 2003 - 02:47 PM

Looks like a close one NZ v. WI
  • 0

#39 Agnostic

Agnostic

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 9978 posts

Posted 13 February 2003 - 02:56 PM

Can the Windies get 98 runs in 69 balls?
Jacobs and Sarwan are in a face-saving partnership.
Only the pacemen to come after one of these gets out.
Thriller of a match.:D
  • 0

#40 traveller

traveller

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 620 posts

Posted 13 February 2003 - 03:24 PM

UH oh they got sarwan!
Should be tense from here. Big slog coming!!!
  • 0




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Copyright © 2016 Pravda.Ru