Cricket World Cup Thread
Posted 18 February 2003 - 02:44 PM
That's just a game for Northerners and has more to do with a 'class-revolt' and later; money (early professionalism of 'rugby') than sport. In England we use RL as a prooving ground for Union. Which is what's happening in OZ to I believe. e.g. Wendall Sailor.
Rugby League is doomed. But without it Union would never have evolved to the spectator sport it is today.
Posted 19 February 2003 - 02:47 PM
and shortest game ever.
bad luck for the canucks,lowest score ever!
Namibia need 100 of 13 overs which is certainly do-able, with the batters 4 and 5 quite settled in . Although surely England will win it.
Namibia seem to be no push-over... however I'd be surprised if they have much depth in their batting ----- lol..I hope.
zxb it is the longest innings i checked, and one of the longest recent ones was athertons 185 against the south africans - i remember watching it, it was possibly the dullest thing i have ever seen.
Posted 19 February 2003 - 11:32 PM
as for sheer boredom i dont think i have ever seen a greater exponent of the forward defensive than Chris Taveree.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users