Jump to content

Theme© by Fisana
 

Photo

Answer the damn question, don't just view it.


  • Please log in to reply
21 replies to this topic

Poll: Pretend inspections were increased and given ample time. Would they find anything? (0 member(s) have cast votes)

Pretend inspections were increased and given ample time. Would they find anything?

  1. Yes, they would probably uncover the hidden WMD's (12 votes [46.15%])

    Percentage of vote: 46.15%

  2. No, they would find nothing. (14 votes [53.85%])

    Percentage of vote: 53.85%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#21 SmallMind

SmallMind

    Banned

  • Banned
  • PipPipPip
  • 387 posts

Posted 15 February 2003 - 10:53 PM

High probebality Saddam dont have any WMD's. Mostly because they were not very effective even with US assistance. Yes they got a few bunkers which they could not in the Iran war but WMD's are ineffective in most cases. It works for the US because they can use it to get the few remaining tough guys and they also haev effective recourse on it being ineffective on themselves, IE using it in other countries who can go to waste and not care if their own families have to live in it. Just opening up the dam was a lot more effective than the WMD's.


Of course having a working Nuke is a whole another matter.

Also I dont think France and Russia would stand up unless they got reassurances from Saddam that they were not hiding WMD's.

Now the matter of the missing 30000 shells. What good are 15 year old ammo that is lost lying somewhere under some desert sand? I cant help wonder that saddam has lost track of the because the ammo itself is useless after such a long time just like most of the other rockets he got in storage which are more dangerous to the users than the enemy.
  • 0

#22 KoWT

KoWT

    Guest

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 8238 posts

Posted 08 March 2004 - 06:45 PM

remember?
  • 0




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Copyright © 2016 Pravda.Ru