Jump to content

Theme© by Fisana
 

Photo

Absolute proof


  • Please log in to reply
138 replies to this topic

#1 TerraHertz

TerraHertz

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 627 posts

Posted 27 September 2010 - 06:58 AM

At last, an ABSOLUTELY CLEAR original video of the huge cascade of molten steel, falling from the WTC South Tower shortly before it collapsed.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZMlMqGwGwGc

The crucial details are hidden in plain sight in this video, because there is so much else going on in the picture. The steel cascade doesn't stand out unless you force your eyes to remain on a particular area of the image. But if you do, there's no mistaking it. A huge 'waterfall' of yellow-hot molten steel, emerging from the very point at the corner of the building where the collapse begins a little more than one minute later. The falling substance is clearly molten steel - it is so heavy it falls directly vertically, in a very narrow plume. It is not deflected at all by the wind, so must be very dense. It stays brightly yellow-hot all the distance it visibly falls (tens of stories) so must have a very high heat capacity. At the point of origin there are bursts of smoke much whiter than any of the other dark, sooty smoke from the building, further substantiating Thermite as the only possible source of such hot liquid steel. The cascade of molten steel continues (though at varying rates) from around the 2:16 mark, up until only seconds before the collapse begins at 3:46. It must have involved a HUGE amount of yellow-hot liquid steel, and thus large volumes of Thermite.

This video was recently obtained from NIST, though they had to be forced by means of a Freedom of Information lawsuit to release it. See:
http://911blogger.co...and-videos-nist
International Center for 9/11 Studies Secures Release of Thousands of Photos and Videos from NIST

There are several videos linked to in that article, and the points made in the text regarding them are all valid. However I noticed that the 911Blogger writer seems to have overlooked something highly significant in the video titled "Visible Explosions at WTC".


It has been mentioned elsewhere on the net before that molten steel poured from the building before collapse. However I don't think there has been any very clear video of the ongoing cascade of steel, showing the full context. In this video the cascade of molten steel is clearly visible, from start to finish.

Here's a frame capture from the video during the steel cascade, with the cascade indicated.

Posted Image

Watch the video, keeping your eye on the 'origin' point. There's absolutely no question about this. Large amounts of molten steel, falling from the South Tower. Such molten steel at that time, can only have been created by large volumes of Thermite. That Thermite must have been emplaced well beforehand, with the sole purpose of cutting the massive steel supporting columns of the building. This proves, finally and totally, right in front of our eyes that 911 was an inside job. And *everything* said at the time and since attempting to prove otherwise, was merely lies by those implicated. Fabrications by the US government and complicit mainstream media, attempting to push the Neocon political agenda of foreign wars and domestic enslavement. Not to mention saving themselves from arrest, trial and execution for Treason, Conspiracy, Mass Murder and War Crimes.

Given the ultimate proof provided by this video, and the mountains of other damning evidence collected over the last nine years by tireless independent 911-Truth researchers, there is no longer any excuse for inaction on the part of law enforcement. If the true perpetrators of the 911 mass murder are not under arrest by Christmas 2010, it means all hope of Justice in America has died. Which means America itself has died.

Incidentally, here are some lists of the prime suspects. Arrest them all, sort them out under questioning.

http://www.whodidit.org/cocon.html
Suspected 9-11 Criminal Coconspirators

http://www.afterdown...rg/warcriminals
50 Top U.S. War Criminals

http://www.wrmea.com...04/0407027.html
2004 Top Ten Career Recipients of Pro-Israel PAC Funds

http://www.fourwinds...hp?q=1252000476
http://theinfounderg...8d6399cd9f4ee14
Israel did 9/11, ALL THE PROOF IN THE WORLD!!

http://rightweb.irc-...ne.org/profile/
Know Your Neocons - A Comprehensive List
  • 0

#2 TerraHertz

TerraHertz

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 627 posts

Posted 27 September 2010 - 09:52 AM

Silence?
  • 0

#3 Firoz Ali

Firoz Ali

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 7500 posts

Posted 27 September 2010 - 10:13 AM

Silence?

surprised????
  • 0

#4 Albion

Albion

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 890 posts

Posted 27 September 2010 - 11:45 AM

Thermite or not, those towers were reduced to dust and the dust pile was a few stories high. That clearly indicates the towers were being disintegrated even before they fell. As we see here in the above images. That does not happen in acts of demolition. Does it ? The towers are still standing. And when the towers finally disintegrate it happens in seconds.
Energy weapons. Simple. With a few thermite flashes thrown in to confuse everyone about what is really happening.

It's not thermite which is disintegrating the radio mast. Is it ? That too is turning in to dust at the moment the towers are disintegrating also. Thermite is a nonsense 'explanation'.

Thermite is only a cover story. The reality was the destruction/disintegration of two giant steel towers with minimal 'explosions' and the destruction of thousands of cars in close proximity by the same cause. By energy weapons which literally disintegrated these massive steel structures. The debris piles say so conclusively. The substance of these structures literally rising in to the air and being spread widely.

http://www.drjudywood.com/
  • 0

#5 TerraHertz

TerraHertz

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 627 posts

Posted 27 September 2010 - 01:54 PM

surprised????


Sigh. No, not really. It's become clear the entire 911 issue has for some time entered the twilight zone of awkwardness and guilt. In which everyone knows who did it, but no one knows how to proceed. Without personally sticking their necks out, that is.

So almost the only people still saying anything, are the paid shills with their strident denials of reality, and the even stupider 'well poisoning' claims like disintegrator beams from space, etc.
  • 0

#6 HunAvar

HunAvar

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 3273 posts

Posted 27 September 2010 - 02:23 PM

Silence?

You have to give time to the shills to concoct an "explanation" or come-up a concerted way the derail the thread.

They are likely a little flummoxed by all that glowing molten steel.

They've found out that the molten aluminum "explanation" doesn't fly, because it has been pointed out thousands of times that aluminum doesn't glow in its melted state.

  • 0

#7 HunAvar

HunAvar

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 3273 posts

Posted 27 September 2010 - 03:34 PM

Seeing all that discrete visual, material, and on-the-spot human descriptions, I believe that there were multiple events (redundancies) built into the scenario. It could be to confuse and/or to have back-up in the case of failure of the primary demolition method.

We don't really know the real effects of nanothermite, we know some, but not necessarily all.

The dustification of most everything - including ALL the massive steel box columns in the core is a huge question mark; the videos and stills are plenty clear that steel dustification took place.

And the there are those strangely burnt and weirdly destroyed vehicles which just don't compute at all; even with the thermite factor they are mysterious, and the "official version" is just dead silent about those vehicles completely, because that really does't square with their fairy tale. (pics at: www.drjudywood.com)

  • 0

#8 Guenter

Guenter

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 662 posts

Posted 27 September 2010 - 04:44 PM

Silence?


The silence comes from loss of interest. This senario has long since been addressed and proven incorrect.

This shows up on the forum on a periodic basis,

It simply makes no sense to comment or go over ground already covered.

Waste of alot of time.
  • 0

#9 Gregoriooo

Gregoriooo

    Banned

  • Banned
  • PipPipPip
  • 4336 posts

Posted 27 September 2010 - 05:02 PM

The silence comes from loss of interest. This senario has long since been addressed and proven incorrect.

This shows up on the forum on a periodic basis,

It simply makes no sense to comment or go over ground already covered.

Waste of alot of time.


Agreed, makes no sense to continue to debate a mute point.
  • 0

#10 HunAvar

HunAvar

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 3273 posts

Posted 27 September 2010 - 07:27 PM

Silence?

That's a cool post...
The shills have run out of bulldung. :lafn:
They don't know how to counter.
So they are ignoring it with the lame comments: "This subject run its course"
They have CAPITULATED!
:clap: :clap: :lafn:
  • 0

#11 Gregoriooo

Gregoriooo

    Banned

  • Banned
  • PipPipPip
  • 4336 posts

Posted 27 September 2010 - 08:04 PM

That's a cool post...
The shills have run out of bulldung. :lafn:
They don't know how to counter.
So they are ignoring it with the lame comments: "This subject run its course"
They have CAPITULATED! :clap: :clap: :lafn:


Yes, we have capitulated. Be all means, please feel free to continue amongst yourselves.
  • 0

#12 Mandrake

Mandrake

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 43857 posts

Posted 27 September 2010 - 08:09 PM

That's a cool post...
The shills have run out of bulldung. :lafn:
They don't know how to counter.
So they are ignoring it with the lame comments: "This subject run its course"
They have CAPITULATED! :clap: :clap: :lafn:


Yep, you win and stuff.:congrats:
  • 0

#13 Jannerbob

Jannerbob

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 773 posts

Posted 27 September 2010 - 08:19 PM

Just before 9:52 a.m., puffs of smoke and/or dust were expelled from multiple locations on the north face near the east edge. Almost immediately a bright spot appeared at the top of a window on the 80th floor four windows removed from the east edge, and a glowing liquid began to pour from this location. This flow lasted approximately 4 s before subsiding. Many such liquid flows were observed from near this location prior to the collapse of the tower. Several were accompanied by puffs of dust and smoke that were now occurring frequently. (NCSTAR 1-5)

NIST offer no explanation,the pseudo scientific bullshitting brigade argue that the molton metal was Aluminium, defying logic,common sense and rudimentary metallurgical knowledge.

Posted Image
The Iron kettle is glowing orange,800 degrees + celcius,the Aluminium is silver because it has high reflectivity to light and radiant energy.


The bright spot NIST noted was extremely bright and seeing as we see heat in the visible spectrum we can deduce was extremely hot.

[QUOTE]
  • 0

#14 HunAvar

HunAvar

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 3273 posts

Posted 28 September 2010 - 12:09 AM

NIST reported maximum upper layer air temperatures of about 1,000 degrees Celcius (1,800 degrees Fahrenheit) in the WTC towers.

NIST has got to be lying.
Anybody with chemistry knowledge knows that there was NO BLOODY WAY for the kerozin to burn at that temperatue (1000 Celsius) either momentarily, nor in a sustained (a MUST) manner in ambient air. For that temperature you need perfect atomization(!) PLUS oxygen. NOT AIR, but OXYGEN.
By the way, that kind of fire sucks all the oxygen out of the air. In the vicinity of such fires people die of lack of oxygen if they are protected from the fire's radiant heat. (Examples: Tokyo fire bombings, Dresden fire bombing Feb.13 1945)

I've been to Aluminum smelters. (Shawinigan and Kitimat, Alcan, Canada) Molten aluminum looks like room temperature mercury. No glow, none, nada, zero. It flows much thinner than melted iron/steel.
  • 0

#15 Guest_Coastal_*

Guest_Coastal_*
  • Guests

Posted 28 September 2010 - 12:22 AM

We don't really know the real effects of nanothermite, we know some, but not necessarily all.


That's easy....

Nanothermite can do anything the kooks need it to do. :lol:

If they need it to explode.... it explodes. If they need it to cut silently and laterally through 40 inch box columns.... shazamm! It's done. If they need it do do all of this, without flaring like it should.... no problem.

It's super-duper nanothermite, man! Awesome stuff!! :lol:

By the way.... Which perimeter column was being cut in the "nanothermite" video you posted? There are dozens of photos of the spill out there.... many close-ups. Grab one and show me what column was cut.

One more thing.... Why is that the only place that shows a "nanothermite reaction"? Did both towers fall from that one cut?? :lol:
  • 0

#16 Mandrake

Mandrake

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 43857 posts

Posted 28 September 2010 - 12:23 AM

NIST has got to be lying.
Anybody with chemistry knowledge knows that there was NO BLOODY WAY for the kerozin to burn at that temperatue (1000 Celsius) either momentarily, nor in a sustained (a MUST) manner in ambient air. For that temperature you need perfect atomization(!) PLUS oxygen. NOT AIR, but OXYGEN.
By the way, that kind of fire sucks all the oxygen out of the air. In the vicinity of such fires people die of lack of oxygen if they are protected from the fire's radiant heat. (Examples: Tokyo fire bombings, Dresden fire bombing Feb.13 1945)

I've been to Aluminum smelters. (Shawinigan and Kitimat, Alcan, Canada) Molten aluminum looks like room temperature mercury. No glow, none, nada, zero. It flows much thinner than melted iron/steel.


What about a hot campfire?:devil:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=58lSZkOEdNI

I wonder why that aluminum glows? Maybe aluminum cans are different or something?
  • 0

#17 HunAvar

HunAvar

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 3273 posts

Posted 28 September 2010 - 02:25 PM

What about a hot campfire?:devil:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=58lSZkOEdNI

I wonder why that aluminum glows? Maybe aluminum cans are different or something?

You're a shill - we know that.
So you make or have a clip on hand just for this purpose, taken in the middle of the night, which will show a faint glow of molten aluminum simply because it's dark.

Do you really think that you don't have a discernible pattern marking you dead-on as a shill??

In the aluminum smelters where I have been, it's indoors. There are windows high up for daylight, and there is artificial lighting. There is no glow. NOT any, even in that relatively low light inside - compared to outdoors during the day.

The WTC videos (several were taken) are in broad daylight. The molten metal is bright orange-yellowish glowing - indicating it's super hot. Sputtering like molten steel does. It's flow consistency is heavier than of aluminum, also very consistent with molten steel.

  • 0

#18 Jannerbob

Jannerbob

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 773 posts

Posted 28 September 2010 - 03:56 PM

What about a hot campfire?:devil:



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=58lSZkOEdNI

I wonder why that aluminum glows? Maybe aluminum cans are different or something?


Do you not understand what visible light reflectivity is?.Light will not be reflected if it is dark when there is a limited ambient light to reflect.F/F to 27 seconds when a torch light is shone at the molton pool it turns silver because that light is being reflected right back again.Aluminium has high light reflectivity and low emissivity,molton aluminium appears silvery in artificial light and in sunlight.

Seeing as our eyes see heat in the visible spectrum here is the photograph of the bright light.

Posted Image

This can easily be described as white hot,totally inconsistent with diffuse hydrocarbon flames.

Posted Image

Look at the extremely intense flames coming from the corner and the white smoke.This is an Aluminothermic reaction,in action.

We have the high temperature corrosion of steel,we have the documented extreme high temperatures from the dust samples,we have photographs of white hot flames and we have molton IRON! pooring from the exact corner where collapse initiation occurred.
Take one corner of a box away and the box loses all of its structural integrity,that is why the corner was attacked.
  • 0

#19 Guest_Coastal_*

Guest_Coastal_*
  • Guests

Posted 28 September 2010 - 04:24 PM

Again....

What load bearing column was this "thermite" cutting?
  • 0

#20 Jannerbob

Jannerbob

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 773 posts

Posted 28 September 2010 - 05:28 PM

Again....

What load bearing column was this "thermite" cutting?



Not having any super powers, like X ray vision,it is impossible to state.Nonetheless I will reiterate what has been said.The extreme high temperatures,reaching 5000 degrees f,that are documented by numerous sources,added to the high temperature corrosion,that is accepted as fact,added to a brilliant white light,accepted by NIST and shown in the photograph are categoric proof of temperatures that are impossible in a diffuse flamed carbon fire.We see heat as colours whether iron,Aluminium or any other metal.We associate the colours red and white as being hot,red hot and white hot.When we see something glowing white hot then that temperature is extreme and is a temperature that should not be there,nor should there be vapourized Aluminosilicates or molton molybdeum in the dust yet there it is,in huge amounts.RJ.LEE state that 6% of the dust contained iron rich spherules that had been in a molton state,that is thousands and thousands of ton's of molton iron that you and your ilk deny even existed.It was there as a definitive statement and why would it not be there when we know, for fact ,that the temperatures inside those buildings was nearly double the amount of heat needed to melt iron.

Those extreme temperatures added to the freefall collapse of WTC7,for 2.25 seconds are not speculation they are ABSOLUTE FACTS! and they are physically impossible.
  • 0




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Copyright © 2020 Pravda.Ru