Jump to content

Theme© by Fisana
 

For Pacific


  • Please log in to reply
6 replies to this topic

#1 Guest_Seven_*

Guest_Seven_*
  • Guests

Posted 04 March 2003 - 09:51 AM

I know how you like Military stuff, especially Russian military. I came accross this link, has a bunch of videos on it. If you havent seen it

http://www.rusarm.ru/video/video.htm
  • 0

#2 pacific

pacific

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 6441 posts

Posted 04 March 2003 - 06:14 PM

Hydrodynamic, Aerodynamic, Balistic, are the same thing the same mechanical laws.
A car is not most different from a tank.
A Ship is not most different from an aircraft.
The military equipments (the vehicles airsealand) are not very different from the civil equipments ( airsealand).
The military equipments are the thermometer of the times and of the threat to the Peace and to the status quo.
The military equipments are a menace a threat but someone said that to buy submarines or other military equipments is not a threat to the neiboroughs.
I look the thermometer and i know how is the weather everywhere in the world.
Money is part of the thermometer the military equipment are expensive.
The Videos are reclames.
I don't buy military vehicles (airsealand) i look what they are and what they can make thus i know where is arrived the technology (Top Tech. High end).
The technology is good and bad, the cultural level is strictly tied to the technological level and to the money expence in military equipments.
The basic axioms are always a big value everywhere and in everytime.

:cool:

U.S. Unmanned Combat Aerial Vehicles X-47
GucciGucci
Senior Member

Registered: Feb 2003
Location: Silicon Valley
Posts: 173
U.S. Unmanned Combat Aerial Vehicle X-47


Tests are still being performed on this new UCAV.

---------------------

Northrop Grumman

X-47 Pegasus

Picture:

http://www.geocities...es2000/x47.html

http://www.geocities...-47_Pegasus.jpg

http://www.geocities...2000/ucav_n.jpg

The Navy, after seeing the Air Force's plans for an ambitious Unmanned Combat Aerial Vehicle, issued a requirement for its own UCAV. Unlike the X-45, the naval UCAV would need to land on an aircraft carrier and overcome the substantial engineering challenges of that requirement. Northrop Grumman has risen to the occasion with its X-47 Pegasus.

The X-47 is a kite-shaped UAV that will demonstrate autonomous flight, takeoffs, and landings. The plane has currently progressed through its taxi testing, in preparation for a first flight. Prior to the aircraft's unveiling, Northrop Grumman used an F/A-18 Hornet to validate the aircraft's GPS-based carrier landing system.

If Northrop Grumman is selcted to build the naval UCAV, the production X-47 will be larger and incorporate a greater degree of stealth, particularly in the intake, exhaust, and radar-absorbing skin coatings.

pacific
Senior Member

X-47 first flight is gone very well
Precision landings, precision touch and go, cruise flight and agility.
All well done more than the waiting performance it outperformed the design and it could be better than today easily.(more Agile)


GucciGucci
Senior Member

This is only the first generation of unmanned combat aerial vehicles.

The 2nd and 3rd generation vehicles should be far, far superior (fast, stealthy, agile, smart).

It's just a matter of time.


pacific
Senior Member

Do you know the Mines?

They are like the UCAV or UCV or UCSSS.

UCAV = Unmanned Combat Air Vehicles
UCV = Unmanned Combat Vehicles
UCSSS = Unmanned Combat support surveillance and Suppression (fix) or
FUCSSS = Fixed Unmanned Combat Surveillance and Suppression Systems (Camo Rotating Turrets inside the ground like the mines with guns and missiles) FUCSSS don't distinguish a man from a Child (the same UCAV and UCV).
You draw your conclusions now that you know what they are.

MINES = UNMANNED COMBAT SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS.

NONE OF THE ABOVE KNOW ALWAYS FRIEND OR FOE LIKE HUMAN PEOPLE (Failures, Malfanctions, Out of Control and Order).

The MINES don't recognize FRIEND and FOE or ADULT and CHILD.

UCAV, UCV, UCSSS are like the MINES.

TRY TO FIND YOUR SUM.

MINES ARE BANNED FROM MOST (A LOT) OF THE COUNTRIES OF THE WORLD.

They (UCV) are MOBILE MINES more dangerous than a NUKE.


pacific
Senior Member

At the moment X-47 is only a UAV (Unmanned air vehicle) a technology demonstrator of Unmanned Air Vehicle.

The UAV is not at the moment an UCAV it could be an airplane in the future.

An UCAV Bomber is more dangerous than a Nuke.

A Cruise Missile is an UCAV BOMBER at least but an UCAV FIGHTER BOMBER is Hazardous a Risk a Danger a Menace to all the people of the world everywhere.


GucciGucci
Senior Member

These UCAVs will have the ability to identify friend or foe.

They will most likely use the same secure system that is installed in US fighters. The system identifies the fighter as a friend so it won't be shot down by surface-to-air missiles or other friendly aircraft.

A UCAV is not a dumb mine.

I would consider a UCAV as a smart flying watch dog.

Just send it up in the air to patrol a certain territory. If an enemy enters the territory, then it will attack. If a friend enters the territory, then it will not do anything but keep watch.

They aren't more dangerous than a nuke. That is stupidity.

03-01-2003 10:11 PM

pacific
Senior Member


There is the Jamming Technology on air I don't tell dumb fables.

The first Unmanned experimental vehicles were on ground and not on air.
Only few people knows about the experiments and the results.

They are more dangerous than mines.

Try to defuse a mobile Mine if you want I can assure you that it's impossible within it's in function or malfunction or failure.
The UCV cannot be defuse when they are in function with failure and malfunction or out of control. We can defuse the UCV only when they are stopped. The Life is a very important value to everyone in this world.

Last edited by pacific on 03-02-2003 at 02:54 PM


From politic Forum the above written
  • 0

#3 zxb

zxb

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 4574 posts

Posted 04 March 2003 - 09:01 PM

Very good seven. Wonder if Ivan has seen this thread. He seems to know a lot about the Russian military. :)
  • 0

#4 pacific

pacific

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 6441 posts

Posted 04 March 2003 - 09:48 PM

In the Sky everything have a IFF system.
In the ground how many have IFF systems?
In the sea everything could have a IFF system.

These are the differences.

The modern or future Jamming could go mad the IFF systems.

This is the danger, the hazard, the risk.

:D
  • 0

#5 pacific

pacific

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 6441 posts

Posted 05 March 2003 - 06:14 AM

http://www.monde-diplomatique.fr/

:cool:
  • 0

#6 pacific

pacific

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 6441 posts

Posted 05 March 2003 - 04:54 PM

They cannot distinguish a Man from a Child, a Soldier from a Civil one.
:D :o :cool:
  • 0

#7 pacific

pacific

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 6441 posts

Posted 24 April 2005 - 12:55 PM

:disagree: :cheers:
  • 0




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Copyright © 2016 Pravda.Ru