Jump to content

Theme© by Fisana
 

Photo

Pentagon Prepares To Kill Everyone On Earth


  • Please log in to reply
111 replies to this topic

#41 Zharkov

Zharkov

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 31199 posts

Posted 16 June 2015 - 03:34 PM

Vatican supports radical depopulation in the name of "climate science."

 

(NaturalNews) The depopulationists are on the move again, pushing hard for the elimination of six billion people on planet Earth in order to bring the planet down to what's being touted as its "sustainable carrying capacity of one billion people."

But this time, the depopulation agenda may be codified by the Vatican. Professor John Schellnhuber has been chosen as a speaker for the Vatican's rolling out of a Papal document on climate change. He's the professor who previously said the planet is overpopulated by at least six billion people. Now, the Vatican is giving him a platform which many expect will result in an official Church declaration in support of radical depopulation in the name of "climate science."

"The teaching document, called an encyclical, is scheduled for release on June 18 at Vatican City," reports Breitbart.com. "Perhaps with the exception of the 1968 encyclical on contraception, no Vatican document has been greeted with such anticipation."

A new Planetary Court to hold power over all nations... one ring to rule them all
Schellnhuber daydreams about a "Planetary Court" guided by a new "Earth Constitution" which would hold power over every nation and government on the planet. As he explains himself in this document on HumansAndNature.org, he's a proponent of an all-powerful, climate-focused world government that would rule over the planet... a literal "science dictatorship" based on whatever "science" the climate change proponents can fudge together each year.

As Schellnhuber says:

Let me conclude this short contribution with a daydream about those key institutions that could bring about a sophisticated -- and therefore more appropriate -- version of the conventional "world government" notion. Global democracy might be organized around three core activities, namely (i) an Earth Constitution; (ii) a Global Council; and (iii) a Planetary Court. I cannot discuss these institutions in any detail here, but I would like to indicate at least that:

- the Earth Constitution would transcend the UN Charter and identify those first principles guiding humanity in its quest for freedom, dignity, security and sustainability;

- the Global Council would be an assembly of individuals elected directly by all people on Earth, where eligibility should be not constrained by geographical, religious, or cultural quotas; and

- the Planetary Court would be a transnational legal body open to appeals from everybody, especially with respect to violations of the Earth Constitution.


Schellnhunber, in other words, believes a new world government can create "freedom" for humanity by dictating to it with a new Planetary Court guided by an Earth Constitution which will no doubt begin by declaring the planet can only sustain one billion people. The other six billion or so simply have to go. So instead of a Bill of Rights, this new Earth Constitution will be founded on a Bill of Deaths and a global government that might order the extermination of billions of human beings in order to "save the climate."

"In an unprecedented encyclical on the subject of the environment, the pontiff is expected to argue that humanity’s exploitation of the planet’s resources has crossed the Earth’s natural boundaries," reports The Guardian. "...[T]he world faces ruin without a revolution in hearts and minds."

The Guardian goes on to report:

The pope is "aiming at a change of heart. What will save us is not technology or science. What will save us is the ethical transformation of our society," said Carmelite Father Eduardo Agosta Scarel, a climate scientist who teaches at the Pontifical Catholic University of Argentina in Buenos Aires.

California Governor worried that too many people exist
Interestingly, California Governor Jerry Brown might welcome such a depopulation agenda organized under a new world government. He recently tweeted about California having too many people, saying, "At some point, how many people can we accommodate?" Gov. Brown goes on to say that climate change is the reason the current drought is so much more worse than anything they've seen in the past.

Apparently, California has too many people, Gov. Brown says, and that means California needs to be deliberately depopulated.

With this, the Vatican and Jerry Brown join the efforts of other depopulation advocates like Bill Gates, who once said that vaccines can help reduce the world population by 10 to 15 percent.

True to that claim, vaccines given to young women have now been discovered to be intentionally laced with sterilization chemicals, according to the Kenya Catholic Doctors Association, a pro-vaccine organization funded in part by UNICEF.

Similarly, a shocking 75% of children given vaccines in a small town in Mexico ended up hospitalized or dead after a recent round of vaccine shots that many have speculated might be part of a depopulation test run.

Fast depopulation vs slow depopulation
Since YOU are one of the targets of global depopulation, you may want to increase your awareness of how it might be accomplished. When it comes to depopulation, there are two approaches considered by the globalists:

SLOW DEPOPULATION: This method focuses on covert sterilization via vaccines, free birth control pills, and "social services" education efforts that try to convince women to have fewer children. The idea is to slowly let the current population of 7 billion die off while the birth rate plummets, causing the total population to shrink over time. You might call this the "non-violent" way to gradually reduce the population over time. Nobody has to prematurely die for this to be pulled off, in other words.

FAST DEPOPULATION: This method involves fast-kill strategies to essentially murder billions of people while blaming it on something else. The most likely candidates include the release of an aerosolized bioweapon (Ebola 2.0?), the insertion of aggressive cancer viruses in vaccines (see the confession of former Merck vaccine scientist Maurice Hilleman for background), global nuclear war, the intentional release of EMP weapons that destroy the power grid, and so on. These are obviously the more nefarious, dastardly depopulation pursuits, and they would obviously consist of global murder on a massive scale.

"Slow depopulation" methods have been tried since the 1970's. They haven't worked. As world population continues to rise, the global power brokers now seem to be experimenting with "fast depopulation" approaches to achieve their goal of eliminating six billion people from the planet.

Deliberate depopulation vs. unintentional depopulation
Another dimension in this discussion emerges in the distinction between "deliberate" and "unintentional" depopulation.

Deliberate depopulation is, of course, the pursuit of actions and policies which are intended to directly and quantifiably reduce the number of humans living on the planet.

Unintentional depopulation is what happens when catastrophe strikes and the systems keeping modern civilization humming along suddenly collapse: a power grid failure, for example, or a runaway genetic pollution of crops that leads to global starvation. The climate change scientists insist that the release of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere will somehow cause the catastrophic collapse of society, leading to the deaths of millions or billions of people.

Accordingly, the globalists see themselves as being compassionate for humanity by invoking deliberate depopulation, thereby preventing catastrophic, unintentional depopulation (i.e. a global die-off following the catastrophic collapse of the global ecosystem). That's how they justify covert vaccine sterilization programs, for example, or talk of eliminating six billion people on the planet. In other words, when they are murdering you and six billion of your brothers and sisters, just remember that in their own minds, they LOVE life and are protecting the ecosystem!

But how, exactly, do you go about eliminating six billion people if you're a globalist pushing for mass murder in the name of climate science?

How do they kill six billion people? Twelve monkeys!

Killing one person is called murder. Killing six billion people is called "climate science."

 

But how do you pull it off, exactly?

It's easier than you might think. As depicted in the movie Twelve Monkeys, all it takes is the release of a weaponized, genetically engineered virus in any major airport, anywhere in the world. (I'm not saying this is true because it was in a movie. That would be absurd. Rather, in this case, the movie correctly depicts the reality of how easily a bioweapon could be spread by someone with the intent to destroy human civilization as we know it.)

From there, the virus replicates and spreads globally, causing widespread death and depopulation while simultaneously empowering world governments to control their populations with medical police state powers such as forced quarantines, restrictions on travel, forced immunizations, medical checkpoints on highways and so on. (It's sort of the perfect police state model if you think about it, and it gives governments the justification to insert medical tracking RFID chips into everybody's bodies at gunpoint. C'mon you control freaks, you know how excited you get when you think about microchipping the population! It's FUN!)

The U.S. military already possesses biological weapons which could kill one billion or more
It's an undebatable fact that the U.S. military has long engineered and tested such viral bioweapons to potentially use as weapons of war. (I previously wrote about the airborne Ebola that ran wild through a U.S. Army medical research facility in 1990, killing an entire building full of monkeys before they "nuked" the building with sterilization chemicals.)

While international treaties claim such research has been abandoned, only a fool believes such hollow promises are ever kept. In reality, the research is merely shifted into covert status, continuing as normal on "black budgets." Today, the United States government possesses viral strains which could decimate humanity in less than a year's time... and they could be "accidentally-purposely" released anywhere on the planet without notice.

Of course, if you were going to release a deadly virus to decimate humanity (the word "decimate" means to kill 1 in every 10, by the way, it does not mean to "eradicate"), you would first make sure all your elite globalist buddies received vaccine shots against the virus. Naturally, those vaccine shots would be manufactured without any of the mercury, aluminum, formaldehyde and MSG found in vaccines given to the general public, thereby making them significantly safer. The CDC, of course, would stay completely silent on this pandemic, just as they've maintained absolute silence on the confession of their scientist Dr. William Thompson, who publicly admitted to taking part in scientific fraud at the CDC to hide the links between vaccines and autism in African-Americans.

The public would be left to fend for itself. And in this scenario, guess who would be most likely to survive? People who use medicinal herbs and immune-boosting superfoods. Those who are wiped out by the weaponized population control virus would largely consist of the elderly, the immunosuppressed, and the malnourished.

That might be precisely who the new "Planetary Court" world government wants to eliminate in the first place, sparing the able-bodies workers who pay confiscatory taxes to governments and produce economic output that can be exploited by the globalist corporations.

So I now throw the question back to the Pope, Professor John Schellnhuber, Bill Gates, Ted Turner and other depopulation fanatics: How exactly are you planning to eliminate six billion people from this planet?

The truly hilarious part in all this is that the world's masses are already so totally brainwashed by climate propaganda that if you ordered them to voluntarily report to "eco-friendly euthanasia chambers" to save the planet by killing themselves, they'd line up in droves to comply! Heck, they'd buy tickets!

Interestingly, that might not be such a bad idea just to invoke the global Darwin award and invite the world's most idiotic, obedient sheeple to voluntarily remove themselves from the human gene pool in a sort of modern-day mass sacrifice to Gaia. The Aztecs did it, and that worked out just great! (Just ask all the Aztecs that are still around.)     What could possibly go wrong?

http://www.naturalne...population.html


  • 0

#42 Gilgamesh

Gilgamesh

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 48 posts

Posted 18 June 2015 - 12:07 AM

I read Zharkov's article about Deagle and then did research on my own (which he could have done) and found out Deagle was Edwin Deagle, a private individual with no connection to any government. Just another conspiracy "nut" with no proof of what he claimed. Zhakov just repeated all of the urban myth stuff that people have made up about him without checking anything.

I won't say that stuff is not happening, but it does not help when people repeat bull.


  • 0

#43 Zharkov

Zharkov

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 31199 posts

Posted 19 June 2015 - 11:26 PM

Try spelling the name right.   Maybe your "research" will amount to something?

 

A Partial List of Deagel Partners 

National Security Agency – http://www.nsa.gov/
North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO – OTAN) – http://www.nato.int/
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) – http://www.oecd.org/
Russian Defense Procurement Agency – http://www.fsoz.gov.ru
The World Bank – http://www.worldbank.org/
United Nations (UN) – http://www.un.org/

 

http://www.deagel.com/

 

Deagel is a US government contractor.

The Pope's personal advisor agrees with them.

The Pope agrees, saying the earth is so overpopulated that humanity has created a filthy mess.

The UN agrees and Agenda 21 was created to implement it.

The Georgia Guidestones agree.

Bill Gates agrees with the overpopulation argument.

Nearly every article I posted points to the exact same conclusion.

 

I think the bull comes from people who willfully ignore what they are saying.

 

It's important to listen to them.   Read what they write.   They mean what they say.


Edited by Zharkov, 19 June 2015 - 11:52 PM.

  • 0

#44 Zharkov

Zharkov

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 31199 posts

Posted 10 July 2015 - 10:31 PM

Modern Wheat Is The ‘Perfect Chronic Poison’ Says Expert

NATASHA LONGO
preventdisease.com
May 23, 2013

The world’s most popular grain is also the deadliest for the human metabolism. Modern wheat isn’t really wheat at all and is a “perfect, chronic poison,” according to Dr. William Davis, a cardiologist, author and leading expert on wheat.

Approximately 700 million tons of wheat are now cultivated worldwide making it the second most-produced grain after maize. It is grown on more land area than any other commerical crop and is considered a staple food for humans.

At some point in our history, this ancient grain was nutritious in some respects, however modern wheat really isn’t wheat at all. Once agribusiness took over to develop a higher-yielding crop, wheat became hybridized to such an extent that it has been completely transformed from it’s prehistorical genetic configuration. All nutrient content of modern wheat depreciated more than 30% in its natural unrefined state compared to its ancestral genetic line. The balance and ratio that mother nature created for wheat was also modified and human digestion and physiology could simply could not adapt quick enough to the changes.

Davis said that the wheat we eat these days isn’t the wheat your grandma had: “It’s an 18-inch tall plant created by genetic research in the ’60s and ’70s,” he said on “CBS This Morning.” “This thing has many new features nobody told you about, such as there’s a new protein in this thing called gliadin. It’s not gluten. I’m not addressing people with gluten sensitivities and celiac disease. I’m talking about everybody else because everybody else is susceptible to the gliadin protein that is an opiate. This thing binds into the opiate receptors in your brain and in most people stimulates appetite, such that we consume 440 more calories per day, 365 days per year.”

Asked if the farming industry could change back to the grain it formerly produced, Davis said it could, but it would not be economically feasible because it yields less per acre. However, Davis said a movement has begun with people turning away from wheat – and dropping substantial weight.

“If three people lost eight pounds, big deal,” he said. “But we’re seeing hundreds of thousands of people losing 30, 80, 150 pounds. Diabetics become no longer diabetic; people with arthritis having dramatic relief. People losing leg swelling, acid reflux, irritable bowel syndrome, depression, and on and on every day.”

To avoid these wheat-oriented products, Davis suggests eating “real food,” such as avocados, olives, olive oil, meats, and vegetables. “(It’s) the stuff that is least likely to have been changed by agribusiness,” he said. “Certainly not grains. When I say grains, of course, over 90 percent of all grains we eat will be wheat, it’s not barley… or flax. It’s going to be wheat.

The Nutrional Value of Wheat is Practically Non-Existent In Its Current Form

So-called health experts in nutrition who continue to promote the health benefits of wheat are extremely uninformed about the nature of modern wheat and its evolution from growth to consumption. It is shocking how many professionals in public health still recommend wheat products without an assessment of their individual requirements, especially considering the amount of evidence regarding its lack of nutrition and health risks for proportionally large segments of the population.

The majority of wheat is processed into 60% extraction, bleached white flour. 60% extraction–the standard for most wheat products means that 40% of the original wheat grain is removed. So not only do we have an unhealthier, modified, and hybridized strain of wheat, we also remove and further degrade its nutritional value by processing it. Unfortunately, the 40% that gets removed includes the bran and the germ of the wheat grain–its most nutrient-rich parts. In the process of making 60% extraction flour, over half of the vitamin B1, B2, B3, E, folic acid, calcium, phosphorus, zinc, copper, iron, and fiber are lost. Any processed foods with wheat are akin to poison for the body since they cause more health risks than benefits. The body does not recognize processed wheat as food. Nutrient absorption from processed wheat products is thus consequential with almost no nutritional value.

Some experts claim if you select 100% whole wheat products, the bran and the germ of the wheat will remain in your meals, and the health benefits will be impressive. This is again a falsity promoted by the wheat industry since even 100% whole wheat products are based on modern wheat strains created by irradiation of wheat seeds and embryos with chemicals, gamma rays, and high-dose X-rays to induce mutations. Whether you consume 10% or 100% of wheat is irrelevant since you’re still consuming a health damaging grain that will not benefit, advance or even maintain your health in any way.

Dr. Marcia Alvarez who specializes in nutritional programs for obese patients says that when it comes to nutrition, wheat may be considered as an evil grain. “Modern wheat grains could certainly be considered as the root of all evil in the world of nutrition since they cause so many documented health problems across so many populations in the world.” Dr. Alvarez asserted that wheat is now responsible for more intolerances than almost any other food in the world. “In my practice of over two decades, we have documented that for every ten people with digestive problems, obesity, irritable bowel syndrome, diabetes, arthritis and even heart disease, eight out of ten have a problem with wheat. Once we remove wheat from their diets, most of their symptoms disappear within three to six months,” she added. Dr. Alvarez estimates that between the coming influx of genetically modified (GM) strains of wheat and the current tendency of wheat elimination in societies, that a trend is emerging in the next 20 years that will likely see 80% of people cease their consumption of wheat from any form.

It’s Really A Wheat Issue

Some health resources, such as the Mayo Clinic, advocate a more balanced diet that does include wheat. But Davis said on “CTM” they’re just offering a poor alternative.

“All that literature says is to replace something bad, white enriched products with something less bad, whole grains, and there’s an apparent health benefit – ‘Let’s eat a whole bunch of less bad things.’ So I take…unfiltered cigarettes and replace with Salem filtered cigarettes, you should smoke the Salems. That’s the logic of nutrition, it’s a deeply flawed logic. What if I take it to the next level, and we say, ‘Let’s eliminate all grains,’ what happens then?

“That’s when you see, not improvements in health, that’s when you see transformations in health.”

Health Effects

A powerful little chemical in wheat known as ‘wheat germ agglutinin’ (WGA) which is largely responsible for many of wheat’s pervasive, and difficult to diagnose, ill effects. Researchers are now discovering that WGA in modern wheat is very different from ancient strains. Not only does WGA throw a monkey wrench into our assumptions about the primary causes of wheat intolerance, but due to the fact that WGA is found in highest concentrations in “whole wheat,” including its supposedly superior sprouted form, it also pulls the rug out from under one of the health food industry’s favorite poster children.

Each grain of wheat contains about one microgram of Wheat Germ Agglutinin (WGA). Even in small quantities, WGA can have profoundly adverse effects. It may be pro-inflammatory, immunotoxic, cardiotoxic … and neurotoxic.

Below the radar of conventional serological testing for antibodies against the various gluten proteins and genetic testing for disease susceptibility, the WGA “lectin problem” remains almost entirely obscured. Lectins, though found in all grains, seeds, legumes, dairy and our beloved nightshades: the tomato and potato, are rarely discussed in connection with health or illness, even when their presence in our diet may greatly reduce both the quality and length of our lives. Yet health experts dismiss the links between disease and wheat despite all the evidence.

Dr William Davis has documented several hundred clinical studies on the adverse effects of wheat. These are studies that document the neurologic impairments unique to wheat, including cerebellar ataxia and dementia; heart disease; visceral fat accumulation and all its attendant health consequences; the process of glycation via amylopectin A of wheat that leads to cataracts, diabetes, and arthritis; among others. There are, in fact, a wealth of studies documenting the adverse, often crippling, effects of wheat consumption in humans.

The other claim is that wheat elimination ‘means missing out on a wealth of essential nutrients. Another falsity. Dr. Davis states that if you replace wheat with healthy foods like vegetables, nuts, healthy oils, meats, eggs, cheese, avocados, and olives, then there is no nutrient deficiency that develops with elimination of wheat. Dr Davis also states that people with celiac disease may require long-term supplementation due to extensive gastrointenstinal damage caused by wheat.

People with celiac disease do indeed experience deficiencies of multiple vitamins and minerals after they eliminate all wheat and gluten from the diet. But this is not due to a diet lacking valuable nutrients, but from the incomplete healing of the gastrointestinal tract (such as the lining of the duodenum and proximal jejunum). In these people, the destructive effects of wheat are so overpowering that, unfortunately, some people never heal completely. These people do indeed require vitamin and mineral supplementation, as well as probiotics and pancreatic enzyme supplementation.

Due to the unique properties of amylopectin A, two slices of whole wheat bread increase blood sugar higher than many candy bars. High blood glucose leads to the process of glycation that, in turn, causes arthritis (cartilage glycation), cataracts (lens protein glycation), diabetes (glycotoxicity of pancreatic beta cells), hepatic de novo lipogenesis that increases triglycerides and, thereby, increases expression of atherogenic (heart disease-causing) small LDL particles, leading to heart attacks. Repetitive high blood sugars that develop from a grain-rich diet are, in my view, very destructive and lead to weight gain (specifically visceral fat), insulin resistance, leptin resistance (leading to obesity), and many of the health struggles that many now experience.

Wheat gliadin has been associated with cerebellar ataxia, peripheral neuropathy, gluten encephalopathy (dementia), behavioral outbursts in children with ADHD and autism, and paranoid delusions and auditory hallucinations in people with schizophrenia, severe and incapacitating effects for people suffering from these conditions.

According to statistics from the University of Chicago Celiac Disease Center, an average of one out of every 133 otherwise healthy people in the United States suffers from Celiac Disease (CD). However, an estimated 20-30 percent of the world’s population may carry the genetic susceptibility to celiac disease–and the way to avoid turning these genes ‘on’ is by avoiding gluten.

When you consider that undiagnosed CD is associated with a nearly four-fold increased risk of premature death, the seriousness of this food sensitivity becomes quite evident. The primary disease mechanism at play is chronic inflammation, and chronic inflammatory and degenerative conditions are endemic to grain-consuming populations.

Changes in genetic code and, thereby, antigenic profile, of the high-yield semi-dwarf wheat cultivars now on the market account for the marked increase in celiac potential nationwide. “Hybridization” techniques, including chemical mutagenesis to induce selective mutations, leads to development of unique strains that are not subject to animal or human safety testing–they are just brought to market and sold.

Wheat-Free Options

* Note that many of the wheat-free options still contain gluten and many people sensitive to wheat may still experience digestive problems and bloating. Experiment in see what works best for you. Caution is advised with cereal grains if you have diagnosed with gluen intolerance.

1. Cereal Grains: Barley, millet, oats, rice, rye, sorghum, tef and wild rice are all in the same cereal grain family as is wheat. All flours ground from cereal grains may be used as a wheat substitute. Commonly available are barley, buckwheat, rice and rye flour. The less utilized flours may be purchased online or from natural food stores. Note: people with a gluten allergy must also avoid barley, oats and rye.

2. Non-Cereal Grains: Amaranth, quinoa and buckwheat are three grain-like seeds unrelated to cereal grains. (Despite its name, buckwheat is not a wheat-relative.) It is rare for anyone to develop a sensitivity to these non-cereal grains. Amaranth, quinoa and buckwheat are gluten-free and therefore not suitable for making leavened bread; however, they make excellent quick breads and cookies.

3. Nut Meal: Ground nuts such as almonds, hazelnuts or walnuts make the richest flour substitute for cookies and cakes. Because their fragile fatty acid content gives them a brief shelf life, it’s preferable to grind your own nuts in a food processor just prior to use. Nut meal requires a binding agent such as eggs. Because chestnuts are lower in fat than other nuts, chestnut flour has a longer shelf life. It is available online.

4. Bean Flour: Dried beans, such as navy, pinto and chickpeas may be milled and used, in combination with other flours, as a wheat alternative. Bean flour is, however, not always recommended. It tastes like beans and makes baked goods dense and hard to digest.

5. Other Flour Substitutes: Potato starch, arrowroot powder, and tapioca are thickening agents that substitute for wheat in sauces and gravy. In baked goods these starchy ingredients serve as a binding agent.

Natasha Longo has a master’s degree in nutrition and is a certified fitness and nutritional counselor. She has consulted on public health policy and procurement in Canada, Australia, Spain, Ireland, England and Germany.

http://www.infowars....on-says-expert/


  • 0

#45 Zharkov

Zharkov

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 31199 posts

Posted 22 July 2015 - 12:07 AM

 

“World War III is a guerrilla war against humanity with no division between military and civilian participation.”     (paraphrased) Marshall McLuhan (1911-1980), Canadian thinker

 

nano.jpg


Edited by Zharkov, 22 July 2015 - 12:51 AM.

  • 0

#46 Zharkov

Zharkov

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 31199 posts

Posted 22 July 2015 - 12:55 AM

hrp-immune-iss032e009080_0.jpg?itok=-8GL

Does he know this is intended go wrong?


  • 0

#47 Zharkov

Zharkov

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 31199 posts

Posted 22 July 2015 - 01:18 PM

‘We are talking about extinction’  - California Governor Jerry Brown

 

dissident-roundups-300x154.jpg


Edited by Zharkov, 22 July 2015 - 04:45 PM.

  • 0

#48 Shura

Shura

    Advanced Member

  • Guests
  • PipPipPip
  • 25707 posts

Posted 24 July 2015 - 02:35 AM

If you go to a bakery in Eastern Europe, you can smell the bread from afar, you can also taste it, too. American bread is destined to starve you to death


  • 0

#49 Zharkov

Zharkov

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 31199 posts

Posted 28 July 2015 - 02:34 PM

 

Ebola is a Genetically Modified, Lab-Made Virus

In a recently released report titled “Estimating Ebola Treatment Needs, United States,” the CDC is still playing down its latest round of fear-mongering for the virus which was “meant to infect every man, woman, and child in the US.” To date, and by their own admission there have been only 10 cases in the entire U.S.

How disappointing for the makers of the Ebola vaccine. Especially when publications like the Liberian Observer, in a piece by Dr. Cyril Broderick, expose how its “likely manufactured by Big Pharma.”

Dr. Cyril Broderick is a former professor of plant pathology at the University of Liberia’s College of Agriculture and Forestry, and is on tenure as an associate at Delaware University.

Broderick claims that the Ebola virus which recently ran rampant in Western Africa was genetically modified, made in a lab by Western pharmaceutical companies, and administered to unsuspecting civilians through United Nations vaccination programs. The Washington Post called it a wild conspiracy theory, but is there actually truth to these shocking allegations?

The truth is in this video. Dr. Broderick references Dr. Leonard Horowitz in the Liberian Observer article. He presents substantial evidence which explains this tidbit:

    “[Horowitz]. . .unearthed and reprinted stunning scientific documents and National Institutes of Health contracts proving that chimpanzees, contaminated with numerous viruses, were used to produce hundreds of hepatitis B vaccine doses administered to central African Blacks along with homosexual men in New York City at precisely the time Dr. Myers and colleagues claim the origin of HIV ‘punctuated event’ occurred.”

Not only was the HIV virus likely man-made, but so was Ebola. Who knows which other pandemic diseases are created so the mainstream medical system can profit from them.

 

http://www.infowars....lab-made-virus/


Edited by Zharkov, 28 July 2015 - 02:36 PM.

  • 0

#50 Gilgamesh

Gilgamesh

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 48 posts

Posted 03 August 2015 - 05:13 PM

When I read Pravda I laugh. Most of the posts read like sci-fi. When I read the post about Ebola I needed to hold my sides. They said America patented Ebola and they posted a link to it (they should not have done it). The patent was about Ebola but was a patent for a procedure to detect Ebola.

So many distortions of facts. Yellow journalism abounds! So mush is written against the USA, bit Russia is engaged in worse. The USA did not attack the Ukraine. Russia even admitted to shooting down the Malaysian MH17 airliner. Putin is trying to bring back the Cold War and wants Russia to return to a totalitarian state, but do you talk about that? No, you try to !make another country into "the Boogyman." The good book said it all 2000 years ago; "take the log out of your own eye before trying to remove the splinter from your brother's eye."


  • 0

#51 Zharkov

Zharkov

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 31199 posts

Posted 03 August 2015 - 11:42 PM

When I read Pravda I laugh. Most of the posts read like sci-fi. When I read the post about Ebola I needed to hold my sides. They said America patented Ebola and they posted a link to it (they should not have done it). The patent was about Ebola but was a patent for a procedure to detect Ebola.

So many distortions of facts. Yellow journalism abounds! So mush is written against the USA, bit Russia is engaged in worse. The USA did not attack the Ukraine. Russia even admitted to shooting down the Malaysian MH17 airliner. Putin is trying to bring back the Cold War and wants Russia to return to a totalitarian state, but do you talk about that? No, you try to !make another country into "the Boogyman." The good book said it all 2000 years ago; "take the log out of your own eye before trying to remove the splinter from your brother's eye."

Pathetic, really pathetic, to believe the exact opposite of reality.  

 

Russia denied shooting down MH17 and it was proven to be the case that Russia did not shoot down the airliner.   It wasn't Putin that bragged about spending $5 billion to overthrow the Ukrainian government, it was Obama's assistant that said so.

 

Putin tried to avoid war and that includes the cold war that Obama started up again after Russia did many favors for the Bush Administration in allowing military supplies to tranship across its borders into Afghanistan.   Putin still has hopes that Russia and the US will eventually be trading partners and allies again.

 

Putin today has close to 90% support among the Russian people, compared to Obama's declining level at 39% and Congress's 7% approval rating.

 

So it is rather obvious that Gilgamesh has not the slightest clue about the real Russia.   Keep watching American t.v. news and don't bother to investigate the truth.    You don't want to know.   It might change your mind.  


  • 0

#52 Gilgamesh

Gilgamesh

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 48 posts

Posted 04 August 2015 - 04:49 AM

The veto in the Security Council was their admission. Look at the voting record; whenever Russia had their hands dirty they would veto, if they were clean they would be the first to insist on an investigation. Putin controls the poling so the figures fall flat. You said he tried to avoid war, but gave no evidence. Obama is not carrying out excursions into Putin's security zone, hiding submarines in territory waters that he had no sovereign right. Obama is not carrying on the Cold War, Putin is. Obama will be going on speaking tours while Putin plays out his imperialistic longings. I read Skynews, NDTV.com, Al Jezeera, Australian Broadcast News, BBC and, of course Pravda (the quality had gone down). There are several American sites as well. When I was a very young boy the current Premier was travelling through my country by train. When he reached my town he jumped off the train, to stroll through our town, unaccompanied. I met him at a park near the train station. I know the old Russia. I have met many from the new, as well as those still there. I am of the Ruus, the Men who Row. Do you know that Russia?


  • 0

#53 Zharkov

Zharkov

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 31199 posts

Posted 04 August 2015 - 02:59 PM

The veto in the Security Council was their admission. Look at the voting record; whenever Russia had their hands dirty they would veto, if they were clean they would be the first to insist on an investigation. Putin controls the poling so the figures fall flat. You said he tried to avoid war, but gave no evidence. Obama is not carrying out excursions into Putin's security zone, hiding submarines in territory waters that he had no sovereign right. Obama is not carrying on the Cold War, Putin is. Obama will be going on speaking tours while Putin plays out his imperialistic longings. I read Skynews, NDTV.com, Al Jezeera, Australian Broadcast News, BBC and, of course Pravda (the quality had gone down). There are several American sites as well. When I was a very young boy the current Premier was travelling through my country by train. When he reached my town he jumped off the train, to stroll through our town, unaccompanied. I met him at a park near the train station. I know the old Russia. I have met many from the new, as well as those still there. I am of the Ruus, the Men who Row. Do you know that Russia?

There could be plenty of other reasons to veto something.   It has little evidential value in proving anything.   Bush blocked the 9/11 investigation from the beginning, does that mean he is the guy who ordered the attack?

 

Putin showed restraint when Georgia forces attacked Russian soldiers and tried to start a war.  Russia showed restraint again when the US was planning to bomb Libya.   Putin avoided a US war with Iran by proposing alternatives.   What you are saying is that none of that matters, yet it really does matter.    It is important to show that Putin is not in favor of a new cold war and tried to avoid that.

 

You say that Obama is not carrying out excursions into Russia's security zone, yet NATO is conducting exercises a few miles from Russia's borders, so that simply is not true.   Gorbachev and Reagan agreed that NATO would not expand towards Russia, and Obama is pushing that expansion as fast and hard as he can.   So you are not being realistic in believing that Obama has done nothing to start a cold war.   Obama placed sanctions on Russia before any other country even thought of doing that, and for no good reason.    It was Obama who allowed Nuland to spend $5 billion to obtain the violent overthrow of the Ukrainian government, not Putin.

 

Your view of Russia seems off in many ways.   The Russian government is not interested in reacquring old USSR territory, because they had several opportunities to do that in former Soviet Georgia, former Soviet Ukraine, and did not.   NATO, however, has coveted those regions, among others, and is actively pushing towards Russia in violation of the Gorbachev-Reagan understanding.

 

Regardless of whether you like Russia or not, it's obvious that Russia did not start the cold war again and Putin had done all he could to prevent that from happening.   It's Obama who pushed that agenda, not Putin.   Unless you can account for why Nuland named in advance, before any elections were held and before the revolution was over, who she wanted to be president of the Ukraine, you have to admit that it was Obama who began that war, and that is what got this new cold war going again.   

 

I get it that you don't like Putin.   But that doesn't change the facts that it isn't Putin who is conducting NATO exercises a few miles from the Russian border.   It was not Putin who started the war in Georgia or overthrew the government of the Ukraine, and it wasn't Putin who bombed Libya in violation of a UN resolution.   And it wasn't Putin who is airdropping supplies to ISIS in Syria.

 

You will have to find other reasons to not like Putin.   The new cold war is not his fault.   A reasonably fair mind with current knowledge of these events would see that the cold war was made in the USA.

 


Edited by Zharkov, 04 August 2015 - 03:22 PM.

  • 0

#54 Zharkov

Zharkov

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 31199 posts

Posted 04 August 2015 - 03:32 PM

INSTALLING THE FOURTH REICH IN THE UKRAINE:

$5 BILLION FOR ... WHAT?


  • 0

#55 Gilgamesh

Gilgamesh

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 48 posts

Posted 04 August 2015 - 04:59 PM

Russia held maneuvers just a few miles from Poland. Russia has submarines go into Swedish fjords. Maybe someone should have a submarine at Vladivostok? Yeltsin even regretted selecting Putin. At the end Yeltsin said the Putin had betrayed the Russian people. Russia attacked Georgia, not the other way around. I noticed that you did not know the Ruua? A little short on your history?


  • 0

#56 Shura

Shura

    Advanced Member

  • Guests
  • PipPipPip
  • 25707 posts

Posted 04 August 2015 - 05:23 PM

When I read Pravda I laugh. Most of the posts read like sci-fi. When I read the post about Ebola I needed to hold my sides. They said America patented Ebola and they posted a link to it (they should not have done it). The patent was about Ebola but was a patent for a procedure to detect Ebola.

So many distortions of facts. Yellow journalism abounds! So mush is written against the USA, bit Russia is engaged in worse. The USA did not attack the Ukraine. Russia even admitted to shooting down the Malaysian MH17 airliner. Putin is trying to bring back the Cold War and wants Russia to return to a totalitarian state, but do you talk about that? No, you try to !make another country into "the Boogyman." The good book said it all 2000 years ago; "take the log out of your own eye before trying to remove the splinter from your brother's eye."

Are you a new Mossad story teller here to replace Bishadi? Russia did not shoot down no airplane, It is jew Ihor Kolomoiski who admitted shooting MH17 down. The video of his admission is right here on this site. Do not try to catch up with Kolomoiski he is hiding in Tel Aviv, with the rest of the jewish murderers Nevzlin brothers and the rest.


  • 0

#57 Gilgamesh

Gilgamesh

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 48 posts

Posted 04 August 2015 - 11:04 PM

You so funny. I am of the Ruus. Check your history.So many of you are concerned with those of the Jewish faith. Every forum article has many people trying to blame others for their problems. Scapegoating seems to be a big thing. Oligarchs pulled from KGB/FSB are your problem. In the switch from communism your country is going through motions that others had gone through before. The oligarchs are similar to the robber barons of the 1800's and early 1900's in the USA. However, if you need a storyteller, I have some I could tell, say about how Russia was brought back to the peace talks ending the Serbian conflict, but perhaps the Central Bank may not want it to be told. I will ask.......


  • 0

#58 Zharkov

Zharkov

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 31199 posts

Posted 04 August 2015 - 11:11 PM

Russia held maneuvers just a few miles from Poland. Russia has submarines go into Swedish fjords. Maybe someone should have a submarine at Vladivostok? Yeltsin even regretted selecting Putin. At the end Yeltsin said the Putin had betrayed the Russian people. Russia attacked Georgia, not the other way around. I noticed that you did not know the Ruua? A little short on your history?

 

I think even a government-paid troll should know that the US State Department admitted that it was Georgia who first attacked Russian soldiers.   You can Google it and see for yourself.

 

The attack was completely unprovoked - Russia's military did nothing to incite a murder of their soldiers, and spokesperson Patrick Kennedy at State finally said so.

 

Ms. Rice agreed:   A BBC article confirmed what many people have been saying:
Speaking at an event organised by the German Marshall Fund in Washington, Ms Rice acknowledged that Georgia had fired the first shots in the breakaway region of South Ossetia.

“The Georgian government launched a major military operation into Tskhinvali [the capital of South Ossetia] and other areas of that separatist region,” she said.

“Regrettably, several Russian peacekeepers were killed in the fighting,” she added.

 

____________________________________________________________________

Tbilisi admits misjudging Russia

Georgia did not believe Russia would respond to its offensive in South Ossetia and was completely unprepared for the counter-attack, the deputy defence minister has admitted.

Batu Kutelia told the Financial Times that Georgia had made the decision to seize the South Ossetian capital of Tskhinvali despite the fact that its forces did not have enough anti-tank and air defences to protect themselves against the possibility of serious resistance.

“Unfortunately, we attached a low priority to this,” he said, sitting at a desk with the flags of Georgia and Nato (to which Georgia does not belong) crossed behind him. “We did not prepare for this kind of eventuality.”

The Georgian military felt there was only a low probability of a massive Russian counter-attack, despite the bloody way in which Russia destroyed Chechnya, on the other side of the Caucasus mountains, in two wars during the 1990s and the fact that separatists in South Ossetia and Abkhazia had Russian backing.

Georgian forces were unprepared when the Russian counter-strike came, Mr Kutelia said. “I didn’t think it likely that a member of the UN Security Council and the OSCE would react like this,” Mr Kutelia said.

His amazement that Russia would use force against a smaller neighbour was echoed by David Darchiashvili, head of the parliamentary European integration committee. “No one expected Russia would mobilise and invade,” he said

http://www.freerepub...s/2066740/posts

____________________________________________________________________

 

Now it should be noted that your idea of recent events is seriously mixed-up because the evidence is that you are flat out wrong on who started the war between Russia and Georgia.

 

Likewise, you ignore the provocations done by the Obama administration to start a cold war, and you ignore who overthrew the Ukraine's elected government.   So when someone calls you a government troll, one may conclude that they are correct.   Ordinary posters would have researched the issues and not taken a stand that is so contrary to the facts.  

 

The big question remaining is whose government does Gilgamesh work for, Israel or the US?

 

I would assume not the US because the State Department has publicly retracted their initial claim that Russia started the Georgia war.   There would be no point to instructing their trolls to deny what they've already admitted.   Israeli trolls should at least check their facts before posting silly misinformation because when you are so obviously wrong, it makes answering your replies a waste of time.   Unless you really don't know, in which case, Google time is in order.


Edited by Zharkov, 04 August 2015 - 11:32 PM.

  • 0

#59 Gilgamesh

Gilgamesh

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 48 posts

Posted 04 August 2015 - 11:52 PM

I'll accept "troll," being that I am on the Internet; but remember that you started it. I believe that "government-paid" is a moniker that fits you better than me.  I subjected the forum to statistical analysis long before I ever posted.  Russian peacekeepers? Please.  We endured the same labels from your country while it was under communism, and billions of people did not believe it then. I am not paid by any government. I am supranational. I am of the Ruus.


  • 0

#60 Zharkov

Zharkov

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 31199 posts

Posted 05 August 2015 - 12:28 AM

My country is the US, not Russia, but only the people at Pravda would know that for certain if they check the IP address.

I just happen to believe that innocent nations should not be punished with lies, sanctions, threats, and insults.

 

It is particularly galling to see a former enemy want to be friends and then have dirt kicked in their face by NATO and the US, which promised not to expand NATO towards Russian borders.  

 

I don't take the Russia side in everything, but when they tell the truth, that truth is worth defending.

 

Truth is especially worth defending against the lies perpetrated by US leaders from the Bohemian Grove and Bilderberg, you know, the ones who lie to us daily with network news from Operation Mockingbird, the ones who killed innocent people with Operation Gladio, and the ones who planned 9/11 with Operation Northwoods.   They are the same people who issued press releases saying Russia attacked Georgia when they know it was not true, and then retract it many months later in tiny print at the back of your news site.

 

If you saw your leaders worship a stone owl representing Moloch, engage in satanic rituals, embrace perversion of all kinds, and were deep into narcotics smuggling, you might begin to think differently about the US government.   Putin doesn't do any of that.


  • 0




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Copyright © 2017 Pravda.Ru