Jump to content

Theme© by Fisana
 

Photo

Vaccination


  • Please log in to reply
702 replies to this topic

#1 Hansel

Hansel

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 5288 posts

Posted 04 July 2014 - 01:08 PM

Vaccination

After my experiences  in the hospital system and thoroughly examining both sides of the vaccination debate, it is clear that the issue is not ‘settled long ago, and laid to rest’ as most of the medical profession says it is.

The history of vaccination is more complicated than most people understand.  The anti-vaccine movement is hundreds of years old. It heated up in the 1800s, when parents in the UK became fed up with watching their healthy infants and children become ill or die shortly after the smallpox vaccinations or get sick from smallpox anyway.  Parents and doctors who refused smallpox vaccines, risked losing their homes, their furniture and their livelihoods if Judges found against them.

The smallpox vaccines were made from pus scraped off of diseased cows’ belly sores, contaminated with disease matter from a variety of animals and in some cases, humans.  The smallpox vaccine history is not what you think it is, if you think vaccines wiped out smallpox.

Doctors and those administering vaccines are supposed to obtain “informed consent” before vaccinating.  Informed consent is not possible because parents are not given all the information they would require in order to understand the most important issues.

I do not consider it my place to tell anyone whether to vaccinate or not. It is my place to understand as much as I can about vaccines and give people a more complete understanding from which to make their choices. This has never been a priority to the public health services. In fact there is ample documentation that the priority was quite the opposite, and actually to quell “any possible doubts, whether well founded or not” regarding vaccines.
The following document is the American 1984 DHHS federal register, which listed final rules pertaining to the polio vaccination campaigns in USA after three decades of scandal and misinformation.

Screen shot 2014-03-22 at 7.24.28 PM

That priority has placed many lives in jeopardy as major problems with vaccination were and are overlooked by vaccine policy makers.

There are many problems with the science that underpins vaccine information. I’ve yet to meet a pediatrician who is informed enough to offer informed consent. Infant immunity has been misunderstood by immunologists, as the immunology literature admits to. Only recently have some important questions been answered about why infant immune systems don’t function like adult ones. There is good reason for the tolerance that an infant has, and the answer is not to interrupt the program with aluminum and vaccines to ramp it up. That is now known to have long term consequences.

There is a paucity of studies comparing never vaccinated children, with partially or fully vaccinated children. In terms of safety studies, a major issue is that most vaccine studies use another vaccine as the control placebo, or use the background substance of the vaccine.  There is only one recent study (Cowling 2012) where a true saline placebo was used, rather than another vaccine or the carrier fluid containing everything except the main antigen.That study showed no difference in influenza viral infection between groups but astonishingly it revealed a 5-6 times higher rate of non-influenza viral infections in the vaccinated. It is no small wonder more true placebos are not used in vaccine research.

In this  article, “Neonatal outcomes after influenza immunization during pregnancy: a randomized controlled trial,”  we see a clear example of how false placebos are regularly used. Needless to say, giving untested  vaccines which can often be unknowingly  contaminated, and with unproven-effectiveness vaccination is a “medical experiment”, and in my opinion, violates the core principles of the Nuremberg Code (informed and unambiguous consent).  Most vaccines have never undergone carcinogenicity testing for example, and likewise are rarely studied in pregnant women, which results in people taking vaccines, either by a proclaimed “emergency”; by a “public health” order from the WHO; or by threat of loss of rights over one’s children or of imprisonment; or by threat of being abandoned by the medical professionals supposedly providing care.

“Informed consent” is devoid of all meaning when people are tricked into taking vaccines by the use of misleading or frightening “information.”

Parents must learn the ways to take care of their children when they get the common childhood illnesses, whether they vaccinate or not, since vaccinated children can still get the diseases they were vaccinated against.  In the case of unvaccinated children, who experience childhood maladies, effective home-nursing most often allows children to recover naturally, and in most cases, the child will have long-term immunity.

Some vaccine policies have robbed teenagers and adults of the opportunity to get re-exposed and continue with natural immunity.  For example, in mothers who were vaccinated against measles, placental transfer of antibodies is limited to a few months instead of over a year in naturally immune mothers.

The above exemplifies but one of the many potential consequences we face as a result of vaccination for measles and the other childhood illnesses such as rubella.

Medical schools do not educate about the contents, dangers, effectiveness or necessity of vaccines. Most medical doctors are fearful of the natural childhood illnesses because they don’t have any idea how to safely assist patients through them; and the limited mainstream treatment options I learned, often caused the diseases to be worse than they had to be.  Yet surprisingly, I discovered other methods which work extremely well, but were never presented as part of my medical education.

In a short article “Tapping the Immune System’s Secret”,the limitations of immunology are plainly spelled out.  The public is repeatedly deceived in order to maintain participation in vaccination.  All sorts of tactics are used. One of the most popular, is to say that everyone should get vaccinated in order to protect the un-vaccinated.  This is commonly known as “herd immunity.”  HERE is an article I wrote on the subject.

Doctors repeat the advice, “We have to vaccinate them while they are young so the ‘take rate’ is high.”  A case-in-point is an article for which I was interviewed where one of Maine’s supposed top experts is giving misleading advice. In the article titled, “Bangor Metro: “A Shot to The Heart”, ”he says: :

    Concerns about how much a young child’s immune system can handle at one time have prompted some parents to stagger vaccinations. But Fanburg points out that there is no medical data to support the practice, adding that it’s actually more beneficial to vaccinate infants, rather than wait until they are older. “Children have a better ‘take’ of vaccines in their first two years of life,” he says. “There is a higher rate of immunogenicity, which is the child’s ability to produce antibodies to the vaccine antigen.

This vaccine expert seems to lack understanding as to how an infant’s immune system develops and why.  If he understood, he would pause for some time, before making such a dogmatic statement.

A baby’s immune system produces only very small amounts of IL-1B and TNF-alpha.  There was a time when experts thought that this was simply a DEFECT in all newborn humans.  In 2004, a study by Chelvarajan suggested that if vaccine manufacturers added various immune system kickers into vaccines, this would solve the problem and fix these perfectly normal children’s immune systems, which are so often described in terms of “defective”, or “inadequate”, when they are completely age appropriate, with characteristics shared by all land mammals.

Subunit vaccines like HepB,  Strep Pneumo, Hib and Meningococcal  have potent “adjuvants” - such as aluminum.  Without them, the baby’s immune system sits there and does nothing.  An adjuvant creates a red-alert situation forcing the infant’s innate immune system to respond in the opposite manner to the way it should function in the first year of life.  Pro-vaccine immunologists see nothing wrong with this.

However, by 2007, 2007, Chelvarajan was seeing things differently, and stated in the last paragraph, that whereas in the past, they had considered this a “defect”, they now considered it:an important developmental program when he said:

    This anti-inflammatory phenotype may be beneficial to the neonate at a time when tissue growth and remodelling events are taking place at a rapid pace… thus the inability of the neonate to respond to infection with encapsulated bacteria may be the risk the organism takes for successful development.

In order to adjust to the world appropriately, an “anti-inflammatory phenotype” is critical to an infant. Breast milk acts as a stand-in innate immune system, which protects the baby from toxin-mediated and other diseases, by supplying anti-inflammatory substances in the milk along with other immune particles which prevent bacteria and viruses from adhering, or kills them outright.

This protects the baby, acting as “in loco” defense, while the infant immune system is being programmed to know self from non-self.  This same pattern of development is seen in laboratories where they study non-human mammals, and is ubiquitous across mammals, showing that the anti-inflammatory phenotype is crucial to successful survival both short and long term.

A more recent article by Elahi in 2013, showed that infant immune cells have full functional capacity, but are clamped down for a higher purpose while learning what is self, what is a healthy commensal micro-organism, and what should later be attacked.

During this period of ‘clamping’ which is approximately 2 human years (extrapolated from animal studies), the infant is well compensated by the mother’s human milk, which continues the educational process and kills unwanted organisms. What then, could be the effect of vaccines, which interfere with the quiescent state of the infant’s immune system master plan, adding large amounts of aluminum—do?

With breastmilk support, an infant immune system develops appropriately and systematically - in it’s own due time, according to the genetic program placed in the baby from the day the child was conceived.  What is that master plan? To enable the infant to safely transition into immunological independence with the minimum level of inflammation possible.  Can that system be derailed?  Yes it can.  What can derail the neonatal immune system?  Anything which triggers an inflammatory response in the mother while she is pregnant and in the baby by the use of a vaccination.

Ironically the medical research is very clear about one thing.  It’s not the “infection” per se that causes the problem.  It’s the activation of the immune system.  How do they know it’s not just the infection?  Because stress, toxins and other non-infectious antigens can trigger the immune system cascade, in very similar ways to infection.

If it is important for successful development of a baby to allow the RISK of infection by NOT allowing two key parts of the primary infection defense to “fire”, what’s the OTHER risk you might take, if you force an immune system to do something it’s not supposed to do?  A vaccine by definition, causes repeated, chronic inflammation at set time intervals.  Vaccines are designed to create peripheral inflammation, and vaccine adjuvants and antigens can cause brain inflammation, create allergies, and autoimmunity – resulting in constant inflammation all around the body.  For some children vaccines can also cause mitochondria to stop working properly.

So, you might now be thinking…if a baby’s default position is to NOT respond to toxin-mediated bacterial diseases, what chance does a baby have to survive in this world? If you would like to learn more about neonatal immunity, read this 3 part blog series, and take note of the medical articles used:

Infant immune system development.

Provaccine doctors sometimes cite “peer reviewed literature” to supposedly prove their point, yet a closer look at their own literature often proves otherwise – as does a closer look at the sick population of vaccinated children they supposedly care for.

Furthermore a close look at medical text books down the decades reveals a very interesting trend.  In the 1920s and 30s, doctors were often quite relaxed over diseases which today are presented as more deadly than the plague.  Many grandparents today are completely bemused at the way the medical profession describes infections which were to most of them, straightforward holidays off school.

This is not stating that there were never serious consequences.  There sometimes were.  However, today, most parents erroneously believe that every child will die from diseases which most grandparents found were nuisance value only.

The medical system now considers measles more dangerous than the plague, and the most dangerous disease known to man.  Yet there is no need to be afraid of measles, because well-nourished children who get adequate vitamin A have an unremarkable course to recovery.  Boredom might be their biggest whine.

I have discovered that whooping cough isn’t something to be scared of either.  In the days when my only tool was an antibiotic, whooping cough occasionally caused me considerable concern, but not today.  I’ve watched many parents all over the world treat whooping cough every simply by using high doses of vitamin C and occasionally homeopathy. They see rapid improvement and no serious complications.  But you will not read about these cases in “peer reviewed literature” and your doctor doesn’t know about them, because sick children – the ones they see and often create – are the only ones counted in the morbidity statistics.  Healthy children who uneventfully recover, are not seen by the medical system and therefore are not counted.

The serious consequences from most childhood diseases comes from just a few things; infant formula, cow’s milk, common medical drugs especially antibioitcs, malnutrition, and vaccines, as well and a lack of knowledge about simple methods of home nursing.

All of these barriers to recovery are completely avoidable in the USA and many other countries and that is WHY we see so many healthy unvaccinated children who were never vaccinated, when we take the time to look.

See how mortality for the common illnesses had declined significantly long before the vaccines were created.

us-deaths-1900-19651.jpg

Here are a few common misconceptions about NOT vaccinating:

    You are putting other people at risk by not vaccinating.  At risk for what?  Chicken pox? Ask your grandmother if she knew anyone who died from measles.  Different diseases have different degrees of severity in different age groups.  The misconception that “if you don’t vaccinate, you place others at risk” is based on an assumption that vaccinated people do not get the disease they were vaccinated for.  Did you know that a controlled study published in BMJ in school age children showed that of all the whooping cough that was diagnosed, over 86% of the children were fully vaccinated and up to date for the whooping cough vaccine? There are similar studies showing that mumps and measles breakouts often effect the vaccinated. People who are vaccinated can have their immune systems altered in a manner that leads to susceptibility to other infectious diseases, and can also leave them vulnerable to the disease they were vaccinated for due to a phenomenon called “original antigenic sin”.  What is ”original antigenic sin”?  This is where an injected vaccine antigen programs the body to react in a manner that is incomplete, and different to the natural response to infection .  When the vaccinated contact that disease again, they are unable to mount an effective response to the pathogen because vital first steps are missing.  The whooping cough vaccine is an example of this.

A very noteworthy study was published in 2013, looking at baboons, which are susceptible and manifest whooping cough like humans do. In the study by Warfel, baboons who were either vaccinated or not vaccinated were later exposed to pertussis bacteria, something that cannot be done experimentally in humans (due to ethical considerations), but which yields very important data. Expectedly, the baboons that had never been infected got the cough and remained colonized with bacteria for a maximum of 38 days. Baboons that were previously vaccinated and immune vaccine-style, became colonized upon later exposure for a longer time than the naïve baboons; 42 days. However unvaccinated baboons that recovered naturally and were later exposed to the bacteria did not become colonized at all – zero days.

So, who is providing better herd immunity in the face of bacterial exposure? Vaccinated individuals who presume they are immune, yet remain asymptomatically colonized for 42 days spreading bacteria? Unvaccinated kids who get infected and remain colonized for 38 days? Or the naturally convalesced who are not able to be colonized and therefore do not spread bacteria at all upon re-exposure? Better still: natural convalescence makes for decades longer, solid immunity than vaccination.

Many vaccine enthusiasts like to invoke the term “herd immunity” to make the argument that the non-vaccinated pose a risk to the vaccinated.  But the concept of herd immunity has no relevance to the vaccinated as it was coined in reference to natural immunity in populations and what level the least epidemics occurred.  There is no evidence whatsoever that having an 85% or 95% vaccination rate protects from outbreaks.  This theory has been disproved time and again in highly vaccinated populations.

    The non-vaccinated spread disease.  Actually it is the opposite.  Live vaccines are known to spread to close contacts.  Here is one recent example.

       Live vaccines can spread disease.

We also know that in pertussis (whooping cough) those who are vaccinated are more likely, due to original antigenic sin, to be carriers of the bacteria longer than the non-vaccinated, even when asymptomatic.  In his article published in Clinical Infectious Disease in 2004 Full text article available here, Dr. James Cherry pointed out that adults, re-vaccinated against pertussis, don’t develop any antibacterial activity whatsoever. He went on to explain why. The current vaccines contain a few antigens, which create “original antigenic sin”, whereby the immune response to the vaccine is abnormal. That first-learned response then becomes the default position the immune system takes, on future booster shots. So in the case of the whooping cough vaccines there are key protein virulence factors which have not been included in the vaccines including ACT, TCF, TCT, as well as BrkA and DNT.

Because the first three are not included, the default immune response does not prevent colonization, and furthermore, Cherry stated that the “original antigenic sin” results in the vaccinated being unable to clear the bacteria from their lungs. The non-vaccinated have immunity to all the front line virulence factors and very quickly clear the bacteria on re-exposure.

Mothers who have been vaccinated, may develop surrogate markers which can be measured in a laboratory, but these do not guarantee efficient immune responses after exposure to the natural disease, because their first “learned response” was incorrect. Furthermore, they are still not sure “what” the surrogate marker actually is for pertussis.

There is similar information on measles, the other disease that has been portrayed by the media as a danger to the population due to non-vaccinated children.  But this information is not accurate, nor is measles a dangerous disease in people who have sufficient vitamin A.  Damien pointed out that the vaccinated are 5-8 times more susceptible to asymptomatic infection than the non-vaccinated.  How then, are the non-vaccinated solely responsible for the recent outbreaks in measles?

Many vaccines are said to be “attenuated” or modified-live and supposedly do not infect, but over the decades we have seen how those attenuated viruses mutate once they are in a human and can spread more virulent disease than what is being vaccinated for.  The oral polio vaccines in Nigeria today is a case in point.  But this can happen with any attenuated viral vaccine.

The original Salk polio vaccines were supposed to be killed vaccines and yet they infected thousands of people, the household contacts and the community, killing and paralyzing over 200 people. This figure is thought to be a gross underestimate of the damage done.

It is not uncommon to see a child recently vaccinated for chicken pox develop shingles or chicken pox.  We see this often enough. I’ve also seen shingles vaccine (which has 14 times the amount of virus as the chickenpox vaccine) provoke shingles in an elderly woman days after the vaccine was given. And strange enough, it sent all the doctors taking care of her reading to see if shingles vaccines can cause shingles, because doctors know almost nothing about vaccines.

Here are things to consider when you hear of an outbreak of an infectious disease: ”How many of the affected were fully vaccinated and how many people died or were hospital? Were the cases verified with laboratory tests or are the reports based on community doctor reports?”

Another question to bear in mind is, “Were the people hospitalized because the disease was really serious, or because the family didn’t know how to deal with it, and responded to a medical profession hard-wired to believe everyone with that disease can die?”  In other words, “Was the admission to hospital really necessary?”

    Deaths from these terrible diseases that once plagued humanity will return to prevaccine levels, if we do not keep up the vaccines.  We can see from the above graph that the mortality of these diseases was drastically declining prior to vaccination.  But in addition, you might want to know the more rational explanation for deadly disease decline in modern times.  It’s not vaccination. It has been shown to be hygiene  In this article: ‘What is the evidence for a causal link between hygiene and infections?’ the authors offer the epidemiological evidence between hygiene practices and infections.

What is the evidence for a causal link between hygiene and infections?

Here is something else you may not have been informed of by your health care professional:

All the reduction even for TB in USA, was achieved BEFORE any vaccines of any sort were offered, and most of the reductions for all diseases, were achieved before antibiotics became commercially available in about 1950 as well. So what did that? It wasn’t vaccines.  Yet all the countries which used the BCG as front line “protection”, saw an identical decline to the one which we saw in USA using no TB vaccine.

If you compare graphs for death decline in diphtheria and scarlet fever, they are almost identical.  Yet there never was a widely used vaccine for scarlet fever. Scarlet fever and its resulting complication, rheumatic fever – has clearly been shown in the medical literature, to be nutritionally driven.  This is why if you do find someone who says they had scarlet fever, it is primarily in more impoverished, war-torn, hungry and poverty stricken countries.  In developed countries where rheumatic fever is an issue, it’s primarily seen in the less educated groups, whose nutritional understanding is limited, or their access to good food is limited.

Yet under-educated people in stable social environments, without much money, who understand and follow effective nutritional pathways, will be on the scale of low susceptibility because it really is the nutrition and well being, that counts.  It just so happens that low education, homelessness and low money often co-exist.

The reason it’s a significant problem in the less educated, less nourished groups where poverty is rampant, is because poor nutrition, which historically correlated with higher rheumatic fever.  All of us carry Strep A regularly, but the well-fed amongst us don’t get scarlet fever, let alone it’s complication, rheumatic fever.

This point is well studied enough to lay aside any concern over whether or not correlation implies causation.

Historically, in the case of infectious diseases, good nutrition has been and still is, a major preventive factor, that has led to enormous declines of morbidity and mortality from most infectious diseases.

If you made it to the end of this, and would like to discuss vaccination further, we can do that on the phone, in person, or via skype.  Please schedule an appointment, where your questions can be answered, and you can be directed to the resources that best serve your individual needs.

Suzanne Humphries, MD| contact: drsuzannehumphries@gmail.com | DrSuzanne.net
- See more at: http://drsuzanne.net...h.10EPWjFZ.dpuf

 

Background as written in Dissolving Illusions


Edited by Hansel, 04 July 2014 - 01:12 PM.

  • 0

#2 Mandrake

Mandrake

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 43805 posts

Posted 04 July 2014 - 02:12 PM

http://abcnews.go.co...ation-refusals/


The largest whooping cough outbreak since 1947 has been linked to clusters of unvaccinated children according to a new study.

The 2010 outbreak of pertussis, also known as whooping cough, in California infected 9,120 people and was linked to 10 deaths. Although health officials suspected the outbreak was the result of some children not being vaccinated, the new study confirms these suspicions.

Researchers examined the location of whooping cough cases and compared them with the areas where parents opted not to vaccinate their children for personal beliefs, not for medical reasons.

Published in the Pediatrics Journal last week, the study found that people living in areas where a large number of people had opted out of vaccines were 2.5 times as likely to live in an area with a large number of pertussis cases.

In addition, the outbreak did not come from areas with poorer socioeconomic households, where there may be less access to health care. Instead the clusters of both pertussis infections and those who opted out of vaccinations were in areas with higher socioeconomic characteristics.

In these regions people were more likely to be highly educated, have fewer children and make more money annually.

Hundreds of Students Face Suspension for Vaccination Lapse

“It’s people who are consciously deciding not to do [vaccinations],” said Jessica Atwell, lead author on the study and a Ph.D. candidate at the Johns Hopkins University School of Public Health. “I think that they’re basing these decisions on misinformation.”

Atwell points out that whooping cough and measles are very virulent diseases. While a person with the flu can expect to infect one to two unvaccinated people, a person with pertussis can infect approximately 13 to 15 people if they are not vaccinated.

Atwell said in order to keep a virulent disease like pertussis from spreading, a community must have an immunity rate of between 93 percent and 95 percent.

“When you make that comparison, people understand this will go through a community like wildfire,” Atwell said.

Pertussis is particularly dangerous for young infants. According to the Center for Disease Control, about half of the infants less than 1 year old who get pertussis will be hospitalized. Of those hospitalized, one or two out of 100 will die.

Only infants six months or older can be fully vaccinated against the disease, and adults or older children can be carriers for the disease without showing any symptoms.

“I think to be honest people didn’t really fear pertussis anymore,” Atwell said. “They don’t realize how fragile our control of diseases like this is. They will come back.”

The 10 deaths during the 2010 outbreak were all infants.

Atwell said following the outbreak, the state government took clear steps to help promote vaccinations.

The California health department has started to offer pertussis vaccinations for parents at birthing centers so their newborns will be more protected

In addition, a new law passed by the California state legislature and set to go into effect next year will make it more difficult for parents to get non-medical vaccine exemptions for their children.

“I think every parent has to do what they think is best for their child and [also think] how it will affect the rest of the community,” said Atwell, who clarified that without a herd immunity, “it’s much more dangerous.”
  • 0

#3 Hansel

Hansel

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 5288 posts

Posted 04 July 2014 - 07:15 PM

you are wrong!

you are a perfect jumping board for the use less media


  • 0

#4 Zharkov

Zharkov

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 32729 posts

Posted 04 July 2014 - 07:43 PM

The human bloodstream is totally enclosed and protected by skin for a reason - human blood is not designed to combat massive, direct contamination from external sources.    There are mechanisms to isolate bacteria from accidental cuts, but those same mechanisms cannot cope with a massive dose of chemicals injected directly into the blood.   

 

If the US government was seriously concerned about disease transmission, it would require health certificates for all legal and illegal immigrants, and not vaccination of disease-free citizens.    No other country in the world allows immigration without health inspection and physical examination.   Only the Obama regime deliberately ignores immigration laws to spread disease across America, and is in the process of being sued for that.

 

Vaccination has proved worthless for many diseases including the common flu virus.    And that is why vaccination remains a matter of personal choice and cannot be legally mandated because our bodies belong to us, not the government.


  • 0

#5 Mandrake

Mandrake

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 43805 posts

Posted 04 July 2014 - 08:31 PM

you are wrong!
you are a perfect jumping board for the use less media


Don't bitch to me, I didn't write the article. Write an email to Johns Hopkins and explain to those doctors about how they are wrong and that you are right because you read some articles on the internet.
  • 0

#6 Hellboy

Hellboy

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 9370 posts

Posted 05 July 2014 - 02:05 AM

You just have to use logic.

 

Vaccines are a scam. Just figure it out logically.


  • 1

#7 Mandrake

Mandrake

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 43805 posts

Posted 05 July 2014 - 03:01 AM

You just have to use logic.
 
Vaccines are a scam. Just figure it out logically.


Again, explain to doctors and immunologists about how they are wrong and that you are smarter than them about this stuff.

I get a tetanus shot every time I'm due because I don't trust that the internet experts are correct that I won't get lockjaw after getting gashed by rusty metal like I always do at least once a month.

Edited by Mandrake, 05 July 2014 - 03:04 AM.

  • 0

#8 Zharkov

Zharkov

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 32729 posts

Posted 05 July 2014 - 03:56 AM

Mandrake is a textbook example of the typical American failure to weigh the risks against the benefits.

 

Tetanus Surveillance --- United States, 1998--2000

. ... The average annual incidence of tetanus during 1998--2000 was 0.05 cases per million population among persons aged <20 years, ...
cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/ss5203a1.htm
 
The risk from vaccination is far higher than 0.05 cases per million even if the vaccination was effective, which it usually is not.
 
Tests of residual immunity after vaccination indicate the vaccination immunity lasts only a few weeks to a few months at most.

  • 0

#9 Mandrake

Mandrake

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 43805 posts

Posted 05 July 2014 - 04:00 AM

Mandrake is a textbook example of the typical American failure to weigh the risks against the benefits.
 
Tetanus Surveillance --- United States, 1998--2000
. ... The average annual incidence of tetanus during 1998--2000 was 0.05 cases per million population among persons aged <20 years, ...
cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/ss5203a1.htm
 
The risk from vaccination is far higher than 0.05 cases per million even if the vaccination was effective, which it usually is not.
 
Tests of residual immunity after vaccination indicate the vaccination immunity lasts only a few weeks to a few months at most.


No, I'm just not a doctor and think that internet blogs by k ooks can get you killed. Remember the morons that took colloidal silver and turned blue permanently and got sick due to moron advice?
  • 0

#10 Mandrake

Mandrake

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 43805 posts

Posted 05 July 2014 - 04:03 AM

Anyway, lockjaw and grinning death were common during WW1 before the tetanus shot came out. Your stats show the results of the shot....nobody gets lockjaw except morons that step on rusty nails and get deep puncture wounds and refuse to get the shot.

Personally, I think morons that don't get vaccinated are a way of culling the human herd and are good for me. Go ahead and die horribly so that my life will be better.

People that get vaccinated are stupid....nobody should get vaccines except people I like.


I hope Putin never gets any vaccinations for anything.

Maybe he will get shingles? I won't, I've been vaccinated against shingles, but he might enjoy it.

Edited by Mandrake, 05 July 2014 - 04:09 AM.

  • 0

#11 Mandrake

Mandrake

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 43805 posts

Posted 05 July 2014 - 04:11 AM

BTW, bubonic plague is still around, especially in the Southwest US. It will probably go out and spread its joy soon, but I don't worry since I have been vaccinated against it and have been exposed and couldn't get it. Enjoy.

I guess I wouldn't worry, though. I mean, bubonic plague isn't fatal, right?

Edited by Mandrake, 05 July 2014 - 04:15 AM.

  • 0

#12 Zharkov

Zharkov

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 32729 posts

Posted 05 July 2014 - 04:38 AM

Anyway, lockjaw and grinning death were common during WW1 before the tetanus shot came out. Your stats show the results of the shot....nobody gets lockjaw except morons that step on rusty nails and get deep puncture wounds and refuse to get the shot.

Personally, I think morons that don't get vaccinated are a way of culling the human herd and are good for me. Go ahead and die horribly so that my life will be better.

People that get vaccinated are stupid....nobody should get vaccines except people I like.


I hope Putin never gets any vaccinations for anything.

Maybe he will get shingles? I won't, I've been vaccinated against shingles, but he might enjoy it.

 

 

People who get vaccinated for non-lethal diseases are risking their lives with the vaccine.    Any doctor will tell you that.   

 

Thousands of people die every year from vaccination complications, such as bacterial infections on heart valves, fatal reactions to chemicals added to vaccines, infection from live virus in vaccines, etc.    Quite a number of kids in Africa got polio from their polio vaccinations.    In California, most of the kids who caught whooping cough were the ones who were vaccinated for it.  

 

Nobody ever gets tetanus from stepping on rusty nails, but you might get tetanus from unsterilized dental work, or washing an open sore with sewage.    Tetanus is only fatal if one gets infected - and is not treated.

 

Chicken Littles who get vaccinated for everything usually end up with Parkinson's Disease or worse.

 

 

Bill Gates' Polio Vaccine Program Caused 47,500 Cases of Paralysis Death.
The international incidence of non-polio AFP is said to be 1 to 2/100,000 in the populations under 15 (32, 33). ... http://nsnbc.me/2013...ortunate-story-of-thirty-seven-deaths-from-a-good-vaccine/
nsnbc.me/2013/05/08/bill-gates-polio-vaccine-progr...
 
Gardasil Vaccine Caused Deaths
As of June 22, 2011 there have been a total 68 VAERS reports of death among those who have received the Gardasil® vaccine.
http://www.drhansen....causing-deaths/

Flu Vaccine Blamed for Death
by Dr. Steve Novella
http://www.randi.org...-for-death.html   

Vaccines cause autism: Supporting evidence
http://www.naturalne...m_vaccines.html

Why You Should Avoid Taking Vaccines
Dr. James R. Shannon, former director of the National institute of health declared,
"the only safe vaccine is one that is never used."
http://www.sott.net/...Taking-Vaccines
 
The “Free” Whooping Cough Vaccine Can Cause Brain Damage and Death
A search of the National Vaccine Information Center incidence reports for the DTap vaccine alone on July 21, 2013 showed 52,835 negative reactions were submitted
http://www.vaccinati...mage-and-death/

Edited by Zharkov, 05 July 2014 - 05:38 AM.

  • 0

#13 Zharkov

Zharkov

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 32729 posts

Posted 05 July 2014 - 05:28 AM

Do Vaccines Actually Prevent Disease?

This important question does not appear to have ever been adequately studied. Vaccines are enormously profitable for drug companies and recent legislation in the U.S. has exempted lawsuits against pharmaceutical firms in the event of adverse reactions to vaccines which are very common. In 1975 Germany stopped requiring pertussis (whooping cough) vaccination. Today less than 10 % of German children are vaccinated against pertussis. The number of cases of pertussis has steadily decreased[3] even though far fewer children are receiving pertussis vaccine.

Measles outbreaks have occurred in schools with vaccination rates over 98 % in all parts of the U.S. including areas that had reported no cases of measles for years. As measles immunization rates rise to high levels measles becomes a disease seen only in vaccinated persons. An outbreak of measles occurred in a school where 100 % of the children had been vaccinated. Measles mortality rates had declined by 97 % in England before measles vaccination was instituted.

In 1986 there were 1300 cases of pertussis in Kansas and 90 % of these cases occurred in children who had been adequately vaccinated. Similar vaccine failures have been reported from Nova Scotia where pertussis continues to be occurring despite universal vaccination. Pertussis remains endemic[4] in the Netherlands where for more than 20 years 96 % of children have received 3 pertussis shots by age 12 months.

After institution of diphtheria vaccination in England and Wales in 1894 the number of deaths from diphtheria rose by 20 % in the subsequent 15 years. Germany had compulsory vaccination in 1939. The rate of diphtheria spiraled to 150,000 cases that year whereas, Norway which did not have compulsory vaccination, had only 50 cases of diphtheria the same year.

The continued presence of these infectious diseases in children who have received vaccines proves that life long immunity which follows natural infection does not occur in persons receiving vaccines. The injection process places the viral particles into the blood without providing any clear way to eliminate these foreign substances.

Why Do Vaccines Fail To Protect Against Diseases?

Walene James, author of Immunization: the Reality Behind The Myth, states that the full[5] inflammatory response is necessary to create real immunity. Prior to the introduction of measles and mumps vaccines children got measles and mumps and in the great majority of cases these diseases were benign. Vaccines "trick" the body so it does not mount a complete inflammatory response to the injected virus.

Vaccines and Sudden Infant Death Syndrome SIDS

The incidence of Sudden Infant Death syndrome SIDS has grown from .55 per 1000 live births in 1953 to 12.8 per 1000 in 1992 in Olmstead County, Minnesota. The peak incidence for SIDS is age 2 to 4 months the exact time most vaccines are being given to children. 85 % of cases of SIDS occur in the first 6 months of infancy. The increase in SIDS as a percentage of total infant deaths has risen from 2.5 per 1000 in 1953 to 17.9 per 1000 in 1992. This rise in SIDS deaths has occurred during a period when nearly every childhood disease was declining due to improved sanitation and medical progress except SIDS. These deaths from SIDS did increase during a period when the number of vaccines given a child was steadily rising to 36 per child.

Dr. W. Torch was able to document 12 deaths in infants which appeared within 3½ and 19 hours of a DPT immunization. He later reported 11 new cases of SIDS death and one near miss which had occurred within 24 hours of a DPT injection. When he studied 70 cases of SIDS two thirds of these victims[6] had been vaccinated from one half day to 3 weeks prior to their deaths. None of these deaths was attributed to vaccines. Vaccines are a sacred cow and nothing against them appears in the mass media because they are so profitable to pharmaceutical firms.

There is valid reason to think that not only are vaccines worthless in preventing disease they are counterproductive because they injure the immune system permitting cancer, auto-immune diseases and SIDS to cause much disability and death.

Are Vaccines Sterile?

Dr. Robert Strecker claimed that the department of defense DOD was given $10,000,000 in 1969 to create the AIDS virus to be used as a population-reducing[7] weapon against blacks. By use of the Freedom of Information Act Dr. Strecker was able to learn that the DOD secured funds from Congress to perform studies on immune destroying agents for germ warfare.

Once produced, the vaccine was given in two locations. Smallpox vaccine containing HIV was given to 100,000,000 Africans in 1977. Over 2000 young white homosexual males in New York City were given Hepatitis B vaccine that contained HIV virus in 1978. This vaccine was given at New York City Blood Center. The Hepatitis B vaccine containing the HIV virus was also administered to homosexual males in San Francisco, Los Angeles, St.Louis, Houston and Chicago in 1978 and 1979. U.S. Public Health epidemiology studies have disclosed that these same 6 cities had the highest incidence of AIDS, Aids related Complex (ARC) and deaths rates from HIV, when compared to other U.S. cities.

When a new virus is introduced into a community. It takes 20 years for the number of cases to double. If the fabricated story that green monkey bites of pygmies led to the HIV epidemic, the alleged monkey bites in the 1940s should have produced a peak in the incidence of HIV in the 1960s at which time HIV was non existent in Africa. The World Health Organization (WHO) began a African smallpox vaccination campaign in 1977 that targeted urban population centers and avoided pygmies. If the green monkey bites of pygmies truly caused the HIV epidemic the incidence of HIV in pygmies should have been higher than in urban citizens. However, the opposite was true.

In 1954 Dr. Bernice Eddy (bacteriologist) discovered live monkey viruses in supposedly sterile inactivated polio vaccine[8] developed by Dr. Jonas Salk. This discovery was not well received at the NIH and Dr. Eddy was demoted. Later Dr. Eddy, working with Sarah Stewart, discovered SE polyoma virus. This virus was quite important because it caused cancer in every animal receiving it. Yellow fever vaccine had previously been found to contain avian (bird) leukemia virus. Later Dr. Hilleman isolated SV 40 virus from both the Salk and Sabin polio vaccines. There were 40 different viruses[9] in these polio vaccines they were trying to eradicate. They were never able to get rid of these viruses ontaminating the polio vaccines. The SV 40 virus causes malignancies. It has now been identified in 43 % of cases of non-Hodgekin lymphoma[10] , 36 % of brain tumors[11] , 18 % of healthy blood samples, and 22 % of healthy semen samples, mesothiolomas and other malignancies. By the time of this discovery SV 40 had already been injected into 10,000,000 people in Salk vaccine. Gastric digestion inactivtes some of SV 40 in Sabin vaccine. However, the isolation of strains of Sabin polio vaccine from all 38 cases of Guillan Barre Syndrome[12] GBS in Brazil suggests that significant numbers of persons are able to be infected from this vaccine. All 38 of these patients had received Sabin polio vaccine months to years before the onset of GBS. The incidence of non-Hodgekin lymphoma has"mysteriouly" doubled since the 1970s.

Dr. John Martin, Professor of Pathology at the Univ. of Southern California, was employed by the Viral Oncology Branch of the Bureau of Biologics (FDA) from 1976 to 1980. While employed there he identified foreign DNA in the live polio vaccine Orimune Lederle that suggested serious vaccine contamination. He warned his supervisors about this problem and was told to discontinue his work as it was outside the scope of testing required for polio vaccine.

Later Dr. Martin learned that all eleven of the African green monkeys used to grow the Lederle polio virus Orimune had grown simian cytomegalovirus from kidney cell cultures. Lederle was aware of this viral contamination as their Cytomegaloviral Contamination Plan[13] clearly showed in 1972. The Bureau of Biologics decided not to pursue the matter so production of infected polio vaccine continued.

In 1955 Dr. Martin identified unique cell destroying viruses termed stealth viruses in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome. These viruses lacked genes that would enable the immune system to recognize them. Thus they were protected by the body's failure to develop antiviral antibodies. In March of 1995, Dr. Martin learned that some of these stealth viruses had originated from African green monkey simian cytomegalovirus of a type known to infect man.

The Lederle vaccine experience suggests that the higher-ups are not concerned about sloppy and dangerous preparation of vaccines. Animal cross infection is a huge unsolved current problem for all vaccine manufacturing. If this vaccine production sounds like an unbelievable mess to you, you are right.

The influential Club of Rome has a position paper in which they state that the world population is too large and needs to be reduced by 90 %. This means that 6 billion people must be reduced to 500 to 600 million. Obviously, creating famines and genocidal wars such as wrecked havoc in Africa, and loosing new laboratory-created diseases (HIV, Ebola, Marburg[14] , and probably West Nile virus and SARS) can help reduce the population. Other elitist groups (Trilaterals, Bildenbergers) have expressed similar concerns about excess people on planet Earth.

The company that was projected to produce the new smallpox vaccine in the U.S. was in serious trouble in England because of unsatisfactory quality of operations before setting up their facility in the U.S. Why would their performance here be any better than it was in England?

If there are important powerful groups of people that are determined to reduce the world population, what could be a more diabolically clever way to eliminate people than to inject them with a cancer-causing vaccine? The person receiving the injection would never suspect that the vaccine taken 10 to 15 years earlier had caused the cancer to appear.

Other Dangers From Vaccines

In the March 4, 1977 issue of Science Jonas and Darrell Salk warn, "Live virus vaccines against influenza or poliomyelitis may in each instance produce the disease it intended to prevent. The live virus against measles and mumps may produce such side effects as encephalitis (brain damage).

The swine flu vaccine was administered to the American public even though there had never been a case of swine flu identified in a human. Farmers refused to use the vaccine because it killed too many animals. Within a few months of use in humans this vaccine caused many cases of serious nerve injury (Guillan Barre syndrome).

An article in the Washington Post on Jan. 26, 1988 mentioned that all cases of polio since 1979 had been caused by the polio vaccine with no known cases of polio from a wild strain since 1979. This might have created a perfect situation to discontinue the vaccine, but the vaccine is still given. Vaccines are a wonderful source of profits with no risks to the drug companies since vaccine injuries are now recompensed by the government.

The steady escalation in the number of vaccines administered has been followed by an identical rise in the incidence of auto-immune diseases (rheumatoid arthritis, subacute lupus erythematosus, psoriasis, multiple sclerosis, asthma) seen in children. While there is a genetic transmission of some of these diseases many are probably due to the injury from foreign protein particles, mercury, aluminum, formaldehyde and other toxic agents injected in vaccines.

In 1999, the rotavirus vaccine was recommended by the Center for Disease Control for all infants. When this vaccine program was instituted several infants died and many had life endangering bowel obstructions. Prelicensure trials[15] of the rotavirus vaccine had demonstrated an increased incidence of intussusception 30 times greater than normal but the vaccine was released anyway without special warnings to practitioners to be on the lookout for bowel problems. Children's vaccines are often not studied for toxicity possibly because such study might eliminate them from being used.

A large study from Australia showed that the risk of developing encephalitis from the pertussis vaccine was 5 times greater than the risk of developing encephalitis by contacting pertussis by natural methods.

Naturally acquired immunity by illness evolves by spread of a virus from the respiratory tract to the liver, thymus, spleen, and bone marrow. When symptoms begin, the entire immune response has been mobilized to repel the invading virus. This complex immune system response creates antibodies that confer life long immunity against that invading virus and prepares the child to respond promptly to an infection by the same virus in the future.

Vaccination, in contrast, results in the persisting of live virus or other foreign antigens within the cells of the body, a situation that may provoke auto-immune reactions as the body attempts to destroy its own infected cells. There is no surprise that the incidence of auto-immune diseases (rheumatoid arthritis, subacute lupus erythematosus, multiple sclerosis, asthma, psoriasis) has risen sharply in this era of multiple vaccine immunization.

Vaccine Induced Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus

Dr. John Classen has published 29 articles on vaccine-induced[16] diabetes. At least 8 of 10 children with Type 1 (insulin needing) diabetes have this disease as a result of vaccination. These children may have avoided measles, mumps, and whooping cough but they have received something far worse: an illness that shortens life expectancy by 10 to 15 years and results in a life requiring constant medical care.

Dr. Classen has shown in Finland, the introduction of hemophilus type b vaccine caused three times as many cases of type 1 diabetes as the number of deaths and brain damage from hemophilus influenza type b it might have prevented.

In New Zealand, the incidence of Type 1 diabetes in children rose by 61 % after an aggressive vaccine program against hepatitis B.. This same program has been started in the U.S.A. so we can now look forward to many cases of Type 1 diabetes in children. Similar rises in Type 1 diabetes have been seen in England, Italy, Sweden, and Denmark after immunization programs against Hepatitis B.

Toxic Substances Are Needed To Make Vaccines.

Vaccines contain many toxic substances that are needed to prevent the vaccines from becoming infected or to improve the performance of the vaccine. Among these substances are mercury, formaldehyde and aluminum.[17]

In the past 10 years, the number of autistic children has risen from between 200 and 500 percent in every state in the U.S. This sharp rise in autism followed the introduction of measles, mumps and rubella vaccine in 1975.

Representative Dan Burton's healthy grandson was given injections for 9 diseases in one day. These injections were instantly followed by autism. These injections contain a preservative of mercury called thimerosal. The boy received 41 times the amount of mercury which is capable of harm to the body. Mercury is a neurotoxin that can injure the brain and nervous system. And tragically, it did.

In the United States the number of compulsory vaccine injections has increased from 10 to 36 in the last 25 years. During this period, there has been a simultaneous increase in the number of children suffering learning disabilities and attention deficit disorder. Some of these childhood disabilities are related to intrauterine cerebral damage from maternal cocaine use, but probably vaccines cause many of the others.

Many vaccines contain aluminum. A new disease called macrophagic myofasciitis causes pain in muscles, bones and joints. All persons with this disease have received aluminum containing vaccines. Deposits of aluminum are able to remain as an irritant in tissues and disturb the immune and nervous system for a lifetime.

Nearly all vaccines contain aluminum and mercury. These metals appear to play an important role in the etiology of Alzheimer's Disease. An expert at the 1997 International Vaccine Conference related that a person who takes 5 or more annual flu vaccine shots has increased the likelihood of developing Alzheimer's Disease by a factor of 10 over the person who has had 2 or fewer flu shots.

When we take vaccines we are playing a modern version of Russian Roulette. We not only get exposed to aluminum, mercury, formaldehyde and foreign cell proteins but we may get simian virus 40 and other dangerous viruses which can cause cancer, leukemia and other severe health problems because the vaccine pool is contaminated due to careless animal isolation techniques. Congress has protected the manufacturers from lawsuits, so dangerous vaccines simply increase profits at no risk to the drug companies.

U.S. children aged 2 months began receiving hepatitis B vaccine in December 2000.No peer-reviewed studies of the safety of hepatitis B in this age bracket had been done. Over 36,000 adverse reactions with 440 deaths were soon reported but the true incidence is much higher as reporting is voluntary so only approximately 10 % of adverse reactions get reported. This means that about 5000 infants are dying annually from the hepatitis B vaccine. The CDC's Chief of Epidemiology admits that the frequency of serious reactions to hepatitis B vaccine is 10 times higher than other vaccines. Hepatitis B is transmitted sexually and by contaminated blood, so the incidence of this disease must be near zero in this age bracket. A vaccine expert, Dr. Philip Incao, states that "the conclusion is obvious that the risks[18] of hepatitis B vaccination far outweigh the benefits. Once a vaccine is mandated the vaccine manufacturer is no longer liable for adverse reactions.

Dr. W.B. Clarke's important observation that cancer was not found in unvaccinated individuals demands an explanation and one now appears forthcoming. All vaccines given over a short period of time to an immature immune system deplete the thymus gland (the primary gland involved in immune reactions) of irreplaceable immature immune cells. Each of these cells could have multiplied and developed into an army of valuable cells to combat infection and growth of abnormal cells. When these immune cells have been used up, permanent immunity may not appear. The Arthur Research Foundation in Tucson, Arizona estimates that up to 60 % of our immune system may be exhausted[19] by multiple mass vaccines (36 are now required for children). Only 10 % of immune cells are permanently lost when a child is permitted to develop natural immunity from disease. There needs to be grave concern about these immune system injuring vaccinations! Could the persons who approve these mass vaccinations know that they are impairing the health of these children, many of whom are being doomed to requiring much medical care in the future?

Compelling evidence is available that the development of the immune system after contracting the usual childhood diseases matures and renders it capable to fight infection and malignant cells in the future.

The use of multiple vaccines, which prevents natural immunity, promotes the development of allergies and asthma. A New Zealand study disclosed that 23 % of vaccinated children develop asthma , as compared to zero in unvaccinated children.

Cancer was a very rare illness in the 1890's. This evidence about immune system injury from vaccinating affords a plausible explanation for Dr. Clarke's finding that only vaccinated individuals got cancer. Some radical adverse change in health occurred in the early 1900s to permit cancer to explode and vaccinating appears to be the reason.

Vaccines are an unnatural phenomena. My guess is that if enough persons said no to immunizations there would be a striking improvement in general health with nature back in the immunizing business instead of man. Having a child vaccinated should be a choice not a requirement. Medical and religious exemptions are permitted by most states.

When governmental policies require vaccinations before children enter schools coercion has overruled the lack of evidence of vaccine efficacy and safety. There is no proof that vaccines work and they are never studied for safety before release. My opinion is that there is overwhelming evidence that vaccines are dangerous and the only reason for their existence is to increase profits of pharmaceutical firms.

If you are forced to immunize your children so they can enter school, obtain a notarized statement from the director of the facility that they will accept full financial responsibility for any adverse reaction from the vaccine. Since there is at least a 2 percent risk of a serious adverse reaction they may be smart enough to permit your child to escape a dangerous procedure. Recent legislation passed by Congress gives the government the power to imprison persons refusing to take vaccines (smallpox, anthrax, etc). This would be troublesome to enforce if large numbers of citizens declined to be vaccinated at the same time.

Footnotes:

1 Null Gary Vaccination: An Analysis of the Health Risks- Part Townsend Letter for Doctors & Patients Dec. 2003 pg 78
2 Mullins Eustace Murder by Injection pg 132 The National Council for Medical Research, P. O. Box 1105, Staunton, Virginia 24401
3 Gary Null Interview with Dr. Dean Black April 7, 1995
4 de Melker HE, et al Pertussis in the Netherlands: an outbreak despite high levels of immunization with whole-cell vaccine Emerging Infectious Diseases 1997; 3(2): 175-8 Centers for Disease Control
5 Gary Null Interview with Walene James, April 6, 1995
6 Torch WS Diptheria-pertussis-tetanus (DPT) immunizations: a potential cause of the sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) Neurology 1982; 32-4 A169 abstract.
7 Collin Jonathan The Townsend Letter for Doctors & Patients 1988 abstracted in Horowitz L. Emerging Viruses Aids & Ebola pg 1-5
8 Harris RJ et al Contaminant viruses in two live vaccines produced in chick cells.J Hyg (London) 1966 Mar:64(1) : 1-7
9 Horowitz Leonard G. Emerging Viruses AIDS & Ebola pg 484
10 Vilchez RA et al Association between simian virus 40 and non-Hodgekin lymphoma Lancet 2002 Mar 9;359(9309):817-823
11 Bu X A study of simian virus 40 infection and its origin in human brain tumors Zhonghu Liu Xing Bing Xue Zhi 2000 Feb;21 (1):19-21
12 Friedrich F. et al temporal association between the isolation of Sabin-related poliovirus vaccine strains and the Guillan-Barre syndrome Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo 1996 Jan-Feb; 38(1):55-8
13 Horowitz Leonard Emerging Viruses: Aids and Ebola pg 492
14 Horowitz Leonard G Emerging Viruses: Aids & Ebola pg 378-88 Tetrahedron Inc. Suite 147, 206 North 4th Ave. Sandpoint, Idaho 83864 1-888-508-4787 tetra@tetrahedron.org
15 Null, Gary Vaccination: An Anatysis of the health risks-Part 3 Townsend letter for doctors & patients Dec. 2003 pg 78
16 Classen, JB et al. Association between type 1 diabetes and Hib vaccine BMJ 1999; 319:1133
17 Brain 9/01
18 Incao, philip M.D. Letter to representative Dale Van Vyven, Ohio House of Representatives March 1, 1999 provided to www.garynull.com by The Natural Immunity Information Network
19 Rowen Robert Your first consultation with Dr. Rowen pg 20


  • 0

#14 Hansel

Hansel

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 5288 posts

Posted 05 July 2014 - 12:22 PM

Vaccines are big business and a excellent depopulation method


  • 0

#15 Mandrake

Mandrake

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 43805 posts

Posted 05 July 2014 - 12:26 PM

Your children can't participate in school sports programs or even attend public schools in Illinois unless they are vaccinated.
  • 0

#16 Mandrake

Mandrake

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 43805 posts

Posted 05 July 2014 - 12:29 PM

You can't get a job in the health industry or public service without being immunized.

Personally, I wouldn't want a PA trying to give me a shot while having a whooping cough fit and hacking mucous all over me.

Edited by Mandrake, 05 July 2014 - 12:31 PM.

  • 0

#17 Zharkov

Zharkov

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 32729 posts

Posted 05 July 2014 - 02:42 PM

Your children can't participate in school sports programs or even attend public schools in Illinois unless they are vaccinated.

 

No government has any right to mandate vaccinations.    They can make an administrative rule, and they can legislate their little hearts out, but they cannot make it stick in court.  

 

Americans have a fundamental right to care for their own bodies and that is well established since Roe vs. Wade, among other cases.

 

Legislators are usually 10 to 40 years behind science.    For example, there are no laws governing artificial intelligence, genetic research, etc.   There will be no laws on those subjects for at least another 10 years.

 

For most states, vaccinations remain legally optional and even where mandated, there are religious exceptions for people who are non-believers in the religion of medicine - for example, Christian Science followers are exempt, among others.   Many children are allergic to vaccine components, which may include Mercury, MSG, Squalene, etc.   So they are also exempt.   And if one really objects to vaccine, they can sue the school district.    There is no legal reason why any healthy American should be forced to be vaccinated.


Edited by Zharkov, 05 July 2014 - 02:43 PM.

  • 0

#18 Mandrake

Mandrake

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 43805 posts

Posted 05 July 2014 - 06:39 PM

http://www.nvic.org/...s/illinois.aspx

http://www.ilga.gov/...65sections.html




TITLE 77: PUBLIC HEALTH
CHAPTER I: DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH
SUBCHAPTER i: MATERNAL AND CHILD HEALTH
PART 665 CHILD HEALTH EXAMINATION CODE
SECTION 665.210 PROOF OF IMMUNIZATIONS






Section 665.210 Proof of Immunizations



a) At or about the same time that he/she receives a health examination, every child shall present proof to the local school authority of having received such immunizations against preventable communicable diseases as required by this Part and Section 695.10 of the Immunization Code (77 Ill. Adm. Code 695.10). "Proof" means that the individual administering the required immunizations has verified by recording on the Certificate of Child Health Examination form that the immunizations were administered in accordance with this Part.



:cool: Immunizations shall be administered in accordance with the Immunization Code and Section 665.240 of this Part.



(Source: Amended at 29 Ill. Reg. 18127, effective October 24, 2005)

Edited by Mandrake, 05 July 2014 - 06:42 PM.

  • 0

#19 Zharkov

Zharkov

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 32729 posts

Posted 06 July 2014 - 12:58 AM

America is different from other countries because natural law or fundamental rights prevail over legislation.    Unconstitutional state legislation may exist for a time, but eventually a court will strike it down because it violates the natural right to one's own body and the parent's right to protect the health of their children.   

The state cannot assume ownership of its residents merely by enacting legislation.


  • 0

#20 Hansel

Hansel

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 5288 posts

Posted 06 July 2014 - 09:24 AM

of sure the US has the most ill population one the cause is vaccination enforce medication (toxins)

 

Suzanne Humphries, MD
It may seem odd that a medical doctor with 19 years of experience has passionately turned away from the practice of vaccination. It may seem even stranger that, with a successful career as a nephrologist, she would pack her medical bags and leave the hospital without looking back. At the top of her game, she left a very lucrative practice and a shining reputation behind. Here’s what happened:
Like most doctors, I received a cursory summary of the childhood and adult vaccine schedules and was told that vaccines are safe and effective and to give them on schedule. I never questioned the vaccine schedule and was largely agnostic about it.
After nearly two decades of working in the conventional medical system, several things converged to launch me into a new way of thinking. I never would have predicted that the medical establishment would present itself to me as a blatant violator of life, or conflict with my moral and spiritual principles . . . but it did.
The most memorable event was during the winter of 2009 when the H1N1 flu vaccine was  given as a separate injection from the seasonal flu vaccine. Many doctors were skeptical of the practice of influenza vaccination, and many of my hospital colleagues signed the exemption form and dodged the vaccine for themselves. However, there were trusting patients who did not have the discernment to refuse, and I got to see the potential result of vaccination on their kidneys.
That winter, three patients in close succession were wheeled into the emergency room of my hospital with total kidney shutdown. When I arrived to talk to them, each one volunteered to me, “I was fine until I had that vaccine.” All three had normal kidney function at baseline, as per their outpatient records. All three required acute dialysis, two eventually recovered, and one died of complications several months later, supposedly from his other illnesses. After this series of events, I began to take vaccine histories on each of my patients and was startled at the connections that could be made just by asking, “When was your last vaccine?” In my opinion, many cases of supposedly idiopathic (a medical term for unknown) kidney disease are not idiopathic at all.
During the weeks of dialyzing the three kidney-failure patients, I passed the chief of internal medicine in the hallway. He was someone I had always had a good relationship with, and we were on excellent terms. He asked me the usual, “How are you doing? How is the nephrology practice going?” I decided to tell him what was happening and how I thought the flu vaccine was causing problems. After conveying a small bit of my observations, he became stiff, his face tightened, his body language changed, and he asked me why I was blaming the vaccine. “They just got the flu, and the vaccine didn’t have time to work,” was his curt response. I replied by pointing out the fact that I had never, in my career as a nephrologist and an internist, seen a case of the flu present with kidney failure unless the patient had become severely dehydrated and/or taken copious amounts of ibuprofen, neither of which these patients had done. Even more striking was that the patients under discussion did not have symptoms of influenza prior to developing kidney failure.
The conversation continued. We ended up discussing the meningitis problem in teenagers and college students. I suggested that the drugs, vaccines, lack of rest, and poor diets of these children may make them vulnerable to bacteria they would otherwise have defense against. After all, I knew that meningococcal bacteria were often found in completely healthy people. Something else must be contributing to the situation in those who get sick. He laughed at me and said, “So you think the diet is causing meningitis?” He went on to remind me that “smallpox was eradicated by vaccines, and polio was eradicated in the United States by vaccines.” At that time, I was ignorant of the history of smallpox and polio except that, six years prior, I was asked to be vaccinated for smallpox in order to be a first responder. These first responders would be ready in the case of a terrorist attack or if a person developed smallpox from the vaccine.
As for polio, the images of crippled children, iron lungs, and the terrible days of the vicious poliovirus attacks were branded into my consciousness like most other people’s. I thought Jonas Salk was a great American hero. Funny how the events of 1954 were programmed into me, since I was born in 1964. I wouldn’t have been able to even think about polio until 1969 at the earliest. So when this doctor made his final comments to me, I was speechless and unable to respond. I felt lambasted.
Later, several patients were admitted with normal kidneys and had their health decline within 24 hours of vaccination. Even these well-defined and documented cases were denied as vaccine-induced by most of my colleagues. There was the rare doctor who would concur with me in private or the nurse who would come and thank me and agree with me while nobody was listening.
Over the following months, I first made it my business to find out everything I could about safety trials for vaccines in kidney patients. I was shocked to find that there were no trials on these types of patients. I was told they could tolerate vaccines because they are “safe and effective.” On seeing that safety of vaccines in acutely ill (active heart failure, sepsis, cancer, autoimmune disease) and chronic nephrology patients was a myth, I decided to research the chief of internal medicine’s assumptions about the flu vaccine, smallpox, and polio history. What I encountered threw me into a tailspin that ultimately led me to become a full time researcher on the immune system and vaccination.
I came to realize that the guidelines, evidence, and opinions of the leaders were unsound and were NOT leading the herds to authentic health. What was most puzzling to me was how I was treated when I tried to protect my own kidney-failure patients from being vaccinated—especially when they were ill.
After an attempt to get the hospital to defer vaccinating for pneumonia and influenza until the day of hospital discharge instead of admission, I was told not to interfere with the vaccination protocol. Even more outrageously, I was continuously told that if I wanted credibility for my views I should conduct my own study to prove that the vaccines were causing kidney failure. The burden of proof was somehow placed upon me to obtain IRB (Institutional Review Board) approval and funding and conduct a statistically significant study that those who doubted my evidence of harm would believe. Shouldn’t the burden of proof rest upon vaccine manufacturers and those who tout their safety? After all, there was no data to support the belief that vaccines did not cause kidney failure and there was plenty of reason to believe they could. To me, it was obvious that nobody was looking, and thus the connections were not made.
This was the first time in my career that my opinion regarding kidney failure was not respected. Any other time I suggested that a drug was responsible for kidney damage, that drug was immediately discontinued—no questions asked. This happens routinely with certain blood pressure drugs, antibiotics, pain killers, etc. Sometimes kidneys can react to drugs in an allergic fashion—to any drug at any time—and that drug would have been stopped. Some drugs cause direct toxicity to the kidneys, and in the past if I suggested to stop or avoid them, they were always avoided. But now I was unable to protect my own kidney-failure patients from vaccinations given in the hospital.
Questioning the vaccines seemed to open an entire Pandora’s box that apparently had yellow tape over the lock, along with the message, “Do not cross.” I was met with doublespeak—permitted to write an order to stop a vaccine that was to be given if I got there in time, but I was also told that I was doing it too often and that I should not interfere with the hospital’s vaccination policy.
When I pointed out the connection between vaccines and worsening or new-onset kidney failure to a couple of open-minded colleagues, they understood, started taking vaccine histories, and saw what was happening. Yet they remained silent. Most doctors continue to practice with comfortable indifference. Some see the errors, damage, and limits of their practices but still walk lockstep with the herd and protect the brotherhood. I don’t know what it will take to get these doctors to resist the dictates who rule over them. I’ve had far more success reasoning with parents and intelligent people who are not attached to traditions that are damaging, unscientific, and not even supported by our own medical literature. This book is for those who want to read what I have discovered, after years of research, to be a much more accurate depiction of vaccination history.


  • 0




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Copyright © 2017 Pravda.Ru