Jump to content

Theme© by Fisana
 

Photo

Vaccination


  • Please log in to reply
702 replies to this topic

#41 ??!!??

??!!??

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 5289 posts

Posted 14 July 2014 - 10:38 AM

I am not religious

I don’t believe in crap


  • 0

#42 RobertD

RobertD

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 19886 posts

Posted 14 July 2014 - 01:08 PM

Good thread.... If Madrake denies it, it's true.

 

When charlatans invade the health industry, people suffer greatly. That's why when charlatans invade government, all associated ministries go down the tube. Be it health, or defense, it becomes the refuge of all criminals, who now benefit from government protection to ply their illicit activities under the umbrella of legitimacy... or if you prefer, under the color of law.

 

Dentists have been screwing my teeth for a long time, that's why I don't want to see them anymore, I prefer to have broken teeth than have these quacks destroy them more. Same goes with ophthalmologists, eye doctors, or ear doctors, or any kind of specialist.

 

When the head is corrupt, the whole body is corrupt.

 

There is a simple instant cure for shingles...!


Edited by RobertD, 14 July 2014 - 01:30 PM.

  • 0

#43 RobertD

RobertD

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 19886 posts

Posted 14 July 2014 - 01:44 PM

Junk Science Week: Vaccinating the ‘herd’
Getty Imagesmeasles outbreaks occur even when the vaccinated population exceeds 95%, leading some to say a 98% or 99% vaccination rate is needed to protect the remaining 1% or 2% of the herd.

Mass vaccination advocates rely on ‘herd immunity’ to make their case. But it doesn’t exist

“When vaccination rates are very high, as they still are in the nation as a whole, everyone is protected,” explained USA Today in a recent editorial entitled “Vaccine opt-outs put public health at risk.”

“This ‘herd immunity’ protects the most vulnerable, including those who can’t be vaccinated for medical reasons, infants too young to get vaccinated and people on whom the vaccine doesn’t work. But herd immunity works only when nearly the whole herd joins in. When some refuse vaccinations and seek a free ride, immunity breaks down and everyone is more vulnerable.”

The concept of “herd immunity” first materialized in the 1930s, when Johns Hopkins University’s Arthur Hedrich discovered that, after 55% of Baltimore’s population acquired measles (and thus immunity to measles), the rest of the population, or “herd,” became protected. This concept provides today’s rationale for insisting that everyone be vaccinated.

Measles outbreaks occur even when the vaccinated population exceeds 95%

“If you only risked your own health by not getting vaccinated, that would be your business,” mass vaccination advocates state. “But when your failure to get vaccinated endangers me or my child, that becomes my business.” It’s a powerful argument, except for one thing — herd immunity in vaccinated populations has been repeatedly disproven.

 

In November 1966, in announcing a mass vaccination program for measles that would exceed the 55% level reached in Baltimore, the U.S. Public Health Service confidently announced that “Effective use of these vaccines during the coming winter and spring should insure the eradication of measles from the United States in 1967.”

When measles failed to be eradicated, public health experts decided that a 70% or 75% vaccination rate would secure herd immunity. When that proved wrong, the magic number rose to 80%, 83%, 85%, and then it became 90%, according to a 2001 Health Services Research report. Later health experts commonly cited 95%.

But that too was insufficient — measles outbreaks occur even when the vaccinated population exceeds 95%, leading some to say a 98% or 99% vaccination rate is needed to protect the remaining 1% or 2% of the herd. But even that may fall short, since outbreaks occur in fully vaccinated populations.

 

“The target would be to have 100% of the population vaccinated,” Dr. Gregory Taylor of the Public Health Agency of Canada recently told CBC, voicing an increasingly common perspective among public health professionals. At that point, the balance of the herd that would be protected through mass vaccination would be precisely 0.

But even vaccinating 100% of the population wouldn’t be enough, say scientists at the Mayo Clinic’s Vaccine Research Group, because the measles vaccine is a dud with some people, offering no protection at all, and its effectiveness wanes with others, even if they get boosters. According to Tetyana Obukhanych of Stanford University’s School of Medicine, the measles vaccine works as planned with only 25% of the population, leaving the majority of adults who have been vaccinated as children with little or no protection. Up to half of today’s cases involve adults.

Unlike childhood measles, adult measles is dangerous: 25% of cases require hospitalization. Measles is especially dangerous when contracted by expectant mothers — studies of hospital outcomes in Los Angeles and Houston found that most suffered serious complications, some died, and their babies often died in the womb.

The dangers extend to infants who, as USA Today points out, are too young to be vaccinated. These entirely helpless members of “the herd” depend on antibodies inherited from their mothers. Yet previously vaccinated mothers have few antibodies to pass on, depriving their babies of protection. The only tried-and-true way for mothers to safeguard their infants — those most at risk of death from measles — remains nature’s way: by ensuring that the mother had previously contracted natural measles.

In fact, herd immunity — so elusive today — fully existed prior to the vaccine’s introduction. Virtually 100% of the population then contracted measles, typically as children, giving everyone lifelong immunity — and future mothers the means to protect their offspring. In mass vaccinating us, scientists of the 1960s didn’t realize that infecting us with the measles vaccine — a weak version of the natural measles virus — would give us a weak version of the defenses our bodies develop to the real thing.

Ironically, the Public Health Service considered measles generally benign in the pre-vaccine era. “Complications are infrequent and, with adequate medical care, fatality is rare…. Immunity following recovery is solid and lifelong in duration,” its chief of epidemiology, Alexander Langmuir, acknowledged in “Epidemiologic basis for eradication of measles in 1967.”

Why, then, did he decide to eradicate this generally harmless and beneficial disease? “To those who ask me, ‘Why do you wish to eradicate measles,’ I reply with the same answer that Hilary used when asked why he wished to climb Mt. Everest. He said, ‘Because it is there.’ To this may be added, ‘…and it can be done.’”

Herd immunity sounds fine in theory. But as Stanford’s Dr. Obukhanych concluded, “As with any garbage in-garbage out type of theory, the expectations of the herd-immunity theory are bound to fail in the real world.”

Lawrence Solomon is research director of Consumer Policy Institute. LawrenceSolomon@nextcity.com

To see the Public Health Service’s four-page prediction that measles would be eliminated in 1967, click here.

For  the untold story of measles, click here.

 

http://business.fina...ating-the-herd/


  • 0

#44 ??!!??

??!!??

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 5289 posts

Posted 14 July 2014 - 03:13 PM

fp0416_measle_rates_us_b_ab1.jpg?w=620

 

The vaccination hoax

Walter Last is spot on


  • 0

#45 ??!!??

??!!??

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 5289 posts

Posted 14 July 2014 - 03:27 PM

 

"At present, intelligent people do not have their children vaccinated, nor does the law now compel them to. The result is not, as the Jennerians prophesied, the extermination of the human race by smallpox; on the contrary more people are now killed by vaccination than by smallpox."
- George Bernard Shaw

Killer vaccines

 

http://www.bibliotec...lud_vacunas.htm


  • 0

#46 Zharkov

Zharkov

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 32734 posts

Posted 14 July 2014 - 04:05 PM

The problem with using charts to show vaccines have reduced disease is that nutrition was improving over the same time period, so that as people got more food, and better quality food, and refrigeration became common for food, disease of all kinds generally decreased but the vaccine advocates want everyone to believe that it was vaccines alone that caused the decrease.

 

The fact is that everyone in the US became healthier over time because of a multitude of factors, and vaccines may not have had a part of any of that.   People became healthier regardless of vaccinations.

 

The situation today is that vaccines present a risk of harm, more or less equal to the risk from disease, and in many cases, vaccines can kill.   So the decision to vaccinate or not should consider the risks from the disease balanced against the risks of the vaccine itself.

 

In the case of non-fatal diseases, vaccines can be worse that useless and become a real danger from the chemicals contained in them.   In view of the globalist design to reduce the world's population by vaccination, it would be wise to avoid vaccinations entirely.


  • 0

#47 ??!!??

??!!??

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 5289 posts

Posted 16 July 2014 - 06:04 AM

rimlandautism1.jpg


  • 0

#48 ??!!??

??!!??

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 5289 posts

Posted 16 July 2014 - 06:06 AM

483031_363819023702900_1136601463_n.jpg

 

13 deadliest corporations

These corporations, if they were individual human beings, would be locked up for life. Instead, they continue raking in the big bucks. Human rights abuses, murder, war, eco disasters, and animal exploitation keep these evil companies raking
in the green.

Prepare to be disgusted.

1. Monsanto

Big Agra makes the list with Monsanto, pushers of genetically modified foods, bovine growth hormones, and poison. Monsanto’s list of evils includes creating the “terminator” seed which creates plants which never fruit or flower so that farmers must purchase them anew yearly, lobbying to have “hormone-free” labels removed from the labels of milk and infant milk replacer (through bovine growth hormone is believed to be a cancer-accelerator) as well as a wide range of environmental and human health violations associated with use of Monsanto’s poisons — most notably “Agent Orange.” Between 1965 and 1972, Monsanto illegally dumped thousands of tons of highly toxic waste in UK landfills. According to the Environment Agency the chemicals were polluting groundwater and air 30 years after they were dumped. Alabama sued Monsanto for 40 years of dumping mercury and PCB into local creeks. Plus, Monsanto is infamous for sticking it to the very farmers it claims to be helping, such as when it sued and jailed a farmer for saving seed from one season’s crop to plant the next.

2. Chevron

Several big oil companies make this list, but Chevron deserves a special place in Hell. Between 1972 to 1993, Chevron (then Texaco) discharged 18 billion gallons of toxic water into the rain forests of Ecuador without any remediation, destroying the livelihoods of local farmers and sickening indigenous populations. Chevron has also done plenty of polluting right here in the U.S.: In 1998, Richmond, California sued Chevron for illegally bypassing waste water treatments and contaminating local water supplies, ditto in New Hampshire in 2003. Chevron was responsible for the death of several Nigerians who protested the company’s polluting, exploiting presence in the Nigerian Delta. Chevron paid the local militia, known for its human rights abuses, to squash the protests, and even supplied them with choppers and boats. The military opened fire on the protesters, then burned their villages to the ground.

3. DeBeers

Diamonds are a girl’s best friend — unless she lives in the Ivory Coast. “Blood” or “conflict” diamonds are the name given to minerals purchased from insurgencies in war-torn countries. Prior to 2000 when the U.N. finally took a stand against the practice, DeBeers was knowingly funding violent guerrilla movements in Angola, Sierra Nevada, and the Congo with its diamond purchases. In Botswana, DeBeers has been blamed for the “clearing” of land to be mined for diamonds — including the forcible removal of indigenous peoples who had lived there for thousands of years. The government allegedly cut off the tribe’s water supplies, threatened, tortured and even hanged resisters.

4. Tyson

Even if you don’t care about the horrendous animal abuse that has been documented in Tyson’s factory farms, you have to flinch at Tyson’s appalling environmental abuses and workers’ rights violations, as well as the fact that on several occasions, Tyson has allowed e coli tainted beef to enter the food supply. A recent study showed that Tyson’s chickens were the most salmonella-and-campylobactor filled poultry of all the major suppliers. As if that wasn’t gross enough, Tyson has been sued repeatedly for illegally dumping untreated wastewater into Tulsa’s water supply; after they were sued the first time, they simply paid the fine and continued the practice. Tyson has made people seriously ill with the ammonia from their factory farms. Tyson is infamous for knowingly hiring illegal immigrants and has even been accused of human trafficking to supply themselves with cheap labor.

5. Phillip Morris

Phillip Morris is the largest manufacturer of cigarettes in the U.S. Cigarettes are known to cause cancer in smokers, as well as birth defects in unborn children if the mother smokes while pregnant. Cigarette smoke contains 43 known carcinogens and over 4,000 chemicals, including carbon monoxide, formaldehyde, hydrogen cyanide, nicotine, ammonia and arsenic. Nicotine, the primary psychoactive chemical in tobacco, has been shown to be psychologically addictive. Smoking raises blood pressure, affects the central nervous system, and constricts the blood vessels. Discarded cigarette butts are a major pollutant as smokers routinely toss their slow-to-degrade filters on the ground. Many of these filters make their way into salt or fresh water bodies, where their chemicals leech out into the water. Then again, cigarettes make you look cool.

6. Halliburton

Any corporation that has Dick Cheney as a CEO has got to be evil. Haliburton, a huge “oilfield services” company, profited big time from the U.S.’s invasion of Iraq when Cheney called in his boys to quell burning oil wells — and to “help” the Iraq oil ministry pump and distribute oil. Haliburton has also been implicated in countless oil spills, including the BP disaster of 2010.

7. Coca Cola

Check out my other article “Coca Cola” Supporting The Regime of Swaziland Dictator King Mswati III

America’s favorite soft drink, deadly? Well, even if you choose to overlook the childhood obesity epidemic and how soft drinks market to children to get them to buy something really, really bad for them, Coca Cola corporation has wrought devastation in India, where its factories use up to one million liters of water per day, leaving tens of thousands of nearby residents dry during the drought months. Then the factories dispose of the wastewater improperly, contaminating whatever water is left. A lawsuit in 2001 accused Coca Cola of hiring paramilitaries in Columbia which suppressed unionization in the cola plant there through intimidation, torture and murder.

8. Pfizer

Big Pharma gets rich when you get sick. Pfizer, the largest pharmaceutical corporation in the U.S., pleaded guilty in 2009 to the largest health care fraud in U.S. history, receiving the largest criminal penalty ever for illegally marketing four of its drugs. It was Pfizer’s fourth such case. As if Pfizer’s massive use of animal experimentation wasn’t heart wrenching enough, Pfizer decided to use Nigerian children as guinea pigs. In 1996, Pfizer traveled to Kano, Nigeria to try out an experimental antibiotic on third-world diseases such as measles, cholera, and bacterial meningitis. They gave trovafloxacin to approximately 200 children. Dozens of them died in the experiment, while many others developed mental and physical deformities. According to the EPA, Pfizer can also proudly claim to be among the top ten companies in America causing the most air pollution.

9. ExxonMobil

Another oil company that makes the list, ExxonMobil is perhaps best known for the 1989 Exxon Valdez oil spill which resulted in 11 million gallons of oil contaminating Prince William Sound. But they have also been responsible for a huge oil spill in Brooklyn and for aiding in the decline of Russia’s critically endangered grey whale because of drilling in its habitat. The Political Economy Research Institute ranks ExxonMobil sixth among corporations emitting airborne pollutants in the United States. ExxonMobil counters not by cleaning up its act, but by funding scientific studies which refute global warming. ExxonMobil was targeted by human rights activists in 2001 when a lawsuit alleged that ExxonMobil hired Indonesian military who raped, tortured and murdered while serving as security at their plant in Aceh.

10. Caterpillar Company

Caterpillar sells all kind of tractors, trucks and machinery — including many of the vehicles, ships and submarines used by the U.S. military. Caterpillar also supplies the Israeli army with bulldozers which are used to demolish Palestinian homes — sometimes with the people still inside. In 2003 a Caterpillar bulldozer ran over and killed Rachel Corrie, an American protesting in Gaza who stood in front of the tractor to prevent the destruction of a Palestinian home.

11. Nestle

Sticky-sweet image aside, Nestle’s crimes against man and nature include massive deforestation in Borneo — the habitat of the critically endangered orangutan — to grow palm oil, and buying milk from farms illegally-seized by a despot in Zimbabwe. Nestle drew fire from environmentalists for its ridiculous claims that bottled water is “eco-friendly” when the exact opposite is true. Nestle attracted worldwide boycott efforts for urging mothers in third-world countries to use their infant milk replacer instead of breastfeeding, without warning them of the possible negative effects. Supposedly, Nestle hired women to dress as nurses to hand out free infant formula, which was frequently mixed with contaminated water, or the children starved when the formula ran out and their mothers could not afford more and their breast milk had already dried up from disuse. Nestle, of course, denies contributing to the death of thousands of infants.

12. British Petroleum

Who can forget 2010′s oil rig explosion in the Gulf Coast which killed 11 workers and thousands of birds, sea turtles, dolphins and other animals, effectively destroying the fishing and tourism industry in the region? This was not BP’s first crime against nature. In fact, between January 1997 and March 1998, BP was responsible for a whopping 104 oil spills. Thirteen rig workers will killed in 1965 during one explosion; 15 in a 2005 explosion. Also in 2005, a BP ferry carrying oil workers crashed, killing 16. In 1991, the EPA cited BP as the most polluting company in the U.S.. In 1999, BP was charged with illegal toxic dumping in Alaska, then in 2010 for leaking highly dangerous poisons into the air in Texas. In July 2006, Colombian farmers won a settlement from BP after they accused the company of benefiting from a regime of terror carried out by Colombian government paramilitaries protecting the Ocensa pipeline. Clearly, there is no way BP will ever “make it right.”

13. Dyncorp

This privatized military company is often hired by the U.S. government to protect American interests overseas — and so the government can claim no responsibility for Dyncorp’s actions. Dyncorp is best known for its brutality in impoverished countries, for trafficking in child sex slaves, for slaughtering civilians in Iraq and Afghanistan, and for training rebels in Haiti. Among some stiff competition, mercenary Dyncorp may be the deadliest and most evil corporation in the United States.


Edited by Hansel, 16 July 2014 - 06:08 AM.

  • 0

#49 ??!!??

??!!??

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 5289 posts

Posted 16 July 2014 - 06:12 AM

morris_b1.jpg

 

morris_b.jpg


  • 0

#50 ??!!??

??!!??

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 5289 posts

Posted 16 July 2014 - 06:32 AM

Scientific evidence shows that babies can have severe adverse reactions to vaccinations at critical intervals following their shots, and that vaccination is the more likely cause of cot death and shaken baby syndrome.

 

scheibnercotdeaths.jpg

 

http://www.whale.to/v/scheibner.html


  • 0

#51 ??!!??

??!!??

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 5289 posts

Posted 16 July 2014 - 10:40 AM

10441245_10203865418977625_2996481751106


  • 0

#52 ??!!??

??!!??

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 5289 posts

Posted 21 July 2014 - 10:29 AM

Whooping cough outbreak strikes county where 95 percent of children are vaccinated

Sunday, July 20, 2014 by: Ethan A. Huff,

(NaturalNews) One of the most vaccine-compliant counties in northern California is experiencing one of the worst whooping cough outbreaks in the entire state, according to a new reports. Yolo County, which sits directly east of Napa County near Sacramento, is reportedly seeing a larger spike in cases of pertussis than most other counties in California, despite the fact that roughly 95 percent of the children living there are up to date with their vaccines.

Officials are aghast at the latest figures, which already show a 900 percent increase in whooping cough cases compared to last year. And since only about half of the year has passed, this figure could increase even further as the seasons change.

"We are in the midst of a statewide epidemic of pertussis," stated Dr. Constance Caldwell, Yolo County Health Officer, to reporters. "It's most concerning because infants can become seriously ill and die from pertussis," she explained to CBS Sacramento.

Dr. Caldwell also admitted that Yolo County hasn't witnessed the decline in vaccine use that other counties throughout the state have. This suggests that the whooping cough vaccine is not providing the level of protection that we've all been led to believe it does, and that children who have already been vaccinated are still falling ill with the disease.

"Pertussis can be prevented by vaccine, but vaccine effectiveness does wane with time," she is quoted as saying by the Daily Democrat.

Whooping cough vaccines don't last very long, and destroy any chance at lifelong immunity
At best, the pertussis vaccine provides minimal protection against the disease, and only if children repeatedly get jabbed for it. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommends that young babies receive five whooping cough shots before entering kindergarten, and after this an additional booster shot in the seventh grade.

This is a whole lot of vaccines during a very short period of time, illustrating how quickly they lose their effectiveness. If a child has to get jabbed on five separate occasions before the age of five in order to have a chance of staving off whooping cough, it is no wonder that the disease is spreading most prominently in areas where most of the children have already been vaccinated.

After all, those who receive the shot can act as disease carriers, infecting others who are immune-compromised or who have lost the temporary immunity gained from previous shots. Only those children who have not been vaccinated, and who have instead developed lifelong immunity to whooping cough through natural exposure, obtain real protection.

The reason for this is that vaccines override the body's innate, also called mucosal or non-specific, immune system. This system is the body's primary line of defense against bacteria, viruses, toxins and other harmful invaders, as it deals with these threats first so the body's second line of defense, the adaptive immune system, doesn't have to.

However, when vaccines are brought into the equation, the innate immune system is artificially bypassed. The consequence of this is an unnatural immune response that not only fails to confer lifelong immunity but can also cause immune damage, leaving a person more susceptible to infection.

"Whereas natural recovery from many infectious diseases usually stimulates lifetime immunity, vaccines only provide temporary protection and most vaccines require 'booster' doses to extend vaccine-induced artificial immunity," said Barbara Loe Fisher, president and co-founder of the National Vaccine Information Center.


  • 0

#53 RobertD

RobertD

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 19886 posts

Posted 21 July 2014 - 09:16 PM

Until we start punishing the bastards, they will continue their malfeasance.


  • 0

#54 ??!!??

??!!??

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 5289 posts

Posted 30 July 2014 - 08:01 AM

Honouring Those Who Have Died From Vaccination

 

http://www.vaccineri...emember-My-Name


  • 0

#55 ??!!??

??!!??

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 5289 posts

Posted 14 August 2014 - 08:17 AM

Ebola vaccine to be manufactured by criminal drug company with felony record; rushed to market with near-zero safety testing
Monday, August 11, 2014
by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger

(NaturalNews) While the world of conventional medicine lines up to profit from the Ebola panic, there is no mention anywhere in the mainstream media of the criminal corporation behind the Ebola vaccine.

GlaxoSmithKline, now being celebrated by the pro-pharma press, is the same company that also has a proven criminal record of bribing physicians and knowingly distributing misleading information about the safety of their drug products.

Just two years ago, GSK plead guilty to felony crimes in the United States and was forced to pay an historical $3 billion fine for committing those crimes. After paying the fine, GSK was then exempted from normal rules regarding criminal enterprise, allowing it to continue conducting business with the federal government.

"Global health care giant GlaxoSmithKline LLC (GSK) agreed to plead guilty and to pay $3 billion to resolve its criminal and civil liability arising from the company's unlawful promotion of certain prescription drugs, its failure to report certain safety data, and its civil liability for alleged false price reporting practices, the Justice Department announced today," says a U.S. Department of Justice press release.

It goes on to explain, "GSK agreed to plead guilty to a three-count criminal information, including two counts of introducing misbranded drugs, Paxil and Wellbutrin, into interstate commerce and one count of failing to report safety data about the drug Avandia to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)."

As Natural News reported in 2012:

A roughly nine-year federal investigation has exposed GSK's rampant abuse of the law by illegally marketing drugs, forging drug safety data, bribing doctors to promote dangerous and expensive drugs, ripping off Medicare and Medicaid, and lying about the effectiveness and safety of drugs. And all this deception has generated tens of billions of dollars in profits for GSK over the years, while thousands of patients who used the drug products involved have suffered horrific side effects and even death.

Criminal drug company to spearhead Ebola vaccine with U.S. scientists
Now this same company that admitted committing multiple felony crimes is going to lead the development of the Ebola vaccine.

As CNBC reports: (1)

"A clinical trial of an experimental vaccine against the deadly Ebola virus is set to start shortly, according to British drugmaker GlaxoSmithKline, which is co-developing the product with U.S. scientists."

Vaccine to be "rushed through" with very little safety testing
We also know that the vaccine will not be tested for anything other than short-term side effects. This is all part of the "rush to market" for Big Pharma to profit from Ebola as quickly as possible.

As CNBC says:

A company spokeswoman said on Sunday that the trial should get underway "later this year", while GSK's partner the U.S. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) said in a statement on its website it would start "as early as fall 2014", implying a potential September launch of testing.

A headline in the Daily Mail declares "World Health Organisation says vaccine could be 'rushed through' for 2015." (2)

That same story goes on to report, "the WHO said a potential vaccine for the Ebola virus is being tested on humans and could be ready for widespread use by early 2015."

Doing the math here, if the Ebola vaccine clinical trials start in September of 2014 and the vaccine is manufactured and distributed to the public by "early 2015," this leaves virtually zero time for observing vaccine side effects.

Manufacturing the vaccine in large quantities, after all, takes many months. If this vaccine is to be available to the public in early 2015, they will have to start manufacturing it as early as October 2014, roughly just one month after the vaccine trials begin.

Zero liability; total immunity for faulty products
Keep in mind that in the United States, vaccine manufacturers have zero liability for the damage and death caused by their products. Due to a literal Act of Congress, all vaccine manufacturers are able to abandon all safety testing and knowingly sell faulty, deadly products with zero risk of liability.

This was all set up by design to make sure vaccine manufacturers could enjoy record profits while having zero liability for producing faulty products that harm children and adults. This is the reason why mercury is still used in flu vaccines which are injected into children -- a fact which I have scientifically proven in the Natural News Forensic Food Labs using ICP-MS instrumentation.

This total immunity means there is no incentive for adequate safety testing of an Ebola vaccine. The company has the same liability (zero) whether they test the vaccine or not. Their goal is to SELL the vaccine, not to make sure it's safe and effective. Time spent on conducting rigorous clinical trials with long-term observations simply isn't part of the "Sell! Sell! Sell!" business plan of today's vaccine manufacturers. Their current business slogan? "Every pandemic is an opportunity for profit." And with blanket immunity from all product liability, who needs safety testing?

Vaccine manufacturers routinely rely on scientific fraud
Here's additional information you need to know about vaccine fraud, originally published in this article on Natural News:

According to two Merck scientists who filed a False Claims Act complaint in 2010 -- a complaint which has just now been unsealed -- vaccine manufacturer Merck knowingly falsified its mumps vaccine test data, spiked blood samples with animal antibodies, sold a vaccine that actually promoted mumps and measles outbreaks, and ripped off governments and consumers who bought the vaccine thinking it was "95% effective."

See that False Claims Act document at:
http://www.naturalne...ry/documents...

According to Stephen Krahling and Joan Wlochowski, both former Merck virologists, the Merck company engaged in all the following behavior:

• Merck knowingly falsified its mumps vaccine test results to fabricate a "95% efficacy rate."

• In order to do this, Merck spiked the blood test with animal antibodies in order to artificially inflate the appearance of immune system antibodies. As reported in CourthouseNews.com:

Merck also added animal antibodies to blood samples to achieve more favorable test results, though it knew that the human immune system would never produce such antibodies, and that the antibodies created a laboratory testing scenario that "did not in any way correspond to, correlate with, or represent real life ... virus neutralization in vaccinated people," according to the complaint.

• Merck then used the falsified trial results to swindle the U.S. government out of "hundreds of millions of dollars for a vaccine that does not provide adequate immunization."

• Merck's vaccine fraud has actually contributed to the continuation of mumps across America, causing more children to become infected with mumps.

• Merck used its false claims of "95 percent effectiveness" to monopolize the vaccine market and eliminate possible competitors.

• The Merck vaccine fraud has been going on since the late 1990's, say the Merck virologists.

• Testing of Merck's vaccine was never done against "real-world" mumps viruses in the wild. Instead, test results were simply falsified to achieve the desired outcome.

• This entire fraud took place "with the knowledge, authority and approval of Merck's senior management."

• Merck scientists "witnessed firsthand the improper testing and data falsification in which Merck engaged to artificially inflate the vaccine's efficacy findings," according to court documents.


  • 0

#56 Ivan88

Ivan88

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 11623 posts

Posted 14 August 2014 - 08:28 AM

644092_399965236738628_425417960_n.jpg?w


  • 0

#57 ??!!??

??!!??

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 5289 posts

Posted 15 August 2014 - 05:11 PM

Deaths from vaccination quotes

 

http://www.whale.to/m/quotes16.html


  • 0

#58 ??!!??

??!!??

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 5289 posts

Posted 15 August 2014 - 05:30 PM

Dr Peter Glidden

 

1987: BS from University of Massachusetts, Amherst MA.
1991: ND from Bastyr University, Seattle WA.
1992: Licensed to practice Naturopathic medicine.
1987 -- Present: Member -- American Association of Naturopathic

 


Edited by Hansel, 15 August 2014 - 05:33 PM.

  • 0

#59 ??!!??

??!!??

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 5289 posts

Posted 22 August 2014 - 10:37 AM

Flu Shot Twice as Deadly for Seniors

 


  • 0

#60 ??!!??

??!!??

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 5289 posts

Posted 25 August 2014 - 09:36 PM

Is hepatitis-C a 'phantom virus?'
Sunday, August 24, 2014 by: Paul Fassa

(NaturalNews) In 2012, the CDC decided that they would preempt an anticipated Hepatitis-C epidemic by urging baby boomers to get tested for Hepatitis-C. Their logic was that during the 1960s through the 1980s, there was a rash of injected street drug use and shared needles among baby boomers as well as blood transfusions used before the Hepatitis-C test was used on donated blood.

The CDC's solution for anyone that is detected with Hep-C is to receive the Hep-A and B vaccinations, both dangerous vaccines, because there is no Hep-C vaccination. Could that be because there is no virus?

From award-winning Dr. Robert Scott Root-Bernstein: "A century ago, they let patients die by denying that germs had anything to do with diseases. Today they may be letting them die by insisting that the germ is everything."

Virus hunters create phantom viruses for fame and profit
Dr. Michael Tierra and web journalist Sepp Hasslberger report how Chiron, a diagnostic department of Novartis Vaccines, spent years struggling to find a Hep-C virus.

After lots of manipulation they came up with footprint of a shadow, or a phantom virus, that enabled them to create a blood screening test for Hep-C that has made them a lot of money, especially after blood banks began using it.

When high liver enzyme counts are discovered in a blood test, a Hep-C test is ordered. The unbiased experts who debunk the Hep-C test argue the phantom virus does not pass the full virology standard of an actual virus. That doesn't mean there is no liver disease. It only means it isn't from a virus.

If really viral, Hep-C is supposedly transmitted by blood, not saliva or sex fluids. Nobel Prize-winning winning virologist Peter Duesberg also thinks there is no Hep-C virus, as it doesn't pass the criteria of viral contamination. Injecting Hep-C blood into animals has not created Hep-C in the those animals.

Journalist Torsten Engelbrecht and Dr. Claus Koehnlein, who put out the book Virus Mania and others, agree with Duesberg (and others). Their book debunks virus claims for several diseases, including AIDS. But Big Pharma intends to profit highly from fear mongering and developing harmful bogus vaccines and "medicines".

It's obvious that there is money to be made by scaring almost everyone born between 1945 and 1965 into getting the test and the Hep-A and even more dangerous Hep-B vaccinations.

The Hepatitis Education Program (HEP) of Seattle, Washington claims over 15,000 people die of Hepatitus-C related disease annually. Notice it says die from Hep-C related illnesses. Part of that morbidity could be from the expensive and dangerous interferon drugs (chemo for Hep-C) or other pharmaceuticals prescribed for those diagnosed with Hep-C.

Several drugs and antibiotics carry warnings of liver damage. Even over-the-counter (OTC) Tylenol and others contain liver damaging acetaminophen, the number one cause of liver failure deaths.(naturalnews.com).

Detox and diet don't make money for Big Pharma, but putting out OTC and prescription liver-damaging drugs creates more repeat customers.

Naturopath Michael Tierra and others have handled Hep-C conditions with herbs, supplements, and good diet. Many who have been diagnosed with Hep-C lead normal lives with only slight changes in their lifestyles. (naturalnews.com).

Hep-C is a label for an overburdened and stress induced toxic liver. Hep means liver, and "itis" means inflammation, more likely a consequence of our increased exposure to toxins over the past several decades than a phantom virus.

Time for us old timers to take better care of our livers or be subjected to pharmaceuticals that kill (naturalnews.com).

Sources for this article include:

http://www.whale.to
http://www.activistpost.com
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
http://www.healtoronto.com

Virus Mania: How the Medical Industry Continually Invents Epidemics, Making Billion-Dollar Profits At Our Expense Paperback by Torsten Engelbrecht

About the author:
Paul Fassa is dedicated to warning others about the current corruption of food and medicine and guiding them towards direction for better health with no restrictions on health freedom.


Edited by Hansel, 25 August 2014 - 09:37 PM.

  • 0




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Copyright © 2017 Pravda.Ru