It Could Be The Bettest Fighter And The Bettest Bomber
Posted 15 March 2003 - 09:17 PM
It's naturally Stealth and it could be also VSTOL or STOVL.
Think about it. It's not the past it's the future.
It's not strange like it can appear.
They can make it also today.
Posted 16 March 2003 - 07:59 AM
This is a long way from being implemented.
I do expect to see UAV's in combat and bombing roles in the future, I have a question however with the electromagnetic pulse munitions how do you guarantee maintaining communications?
PS a lot of this stuff is a potential nightmare, like on Terminator movies.
Posted 16 March 2003 - 10:00 AM
A Pilot cost a lot more than the Modelling UCAV or UAV.
There is not the technology to put them in a war today.
The only UCAV or UAV ready for war are the Cruise Missiles and the Missiles AA, SAM, and so on.
None UCAV or UAV have a gun, a gatling inside.
Posted 13 June 2004 - 10:30 PM
The unmanned is a step to control if the projet/design can fly and how it perform in the air and in Take off and in landing.
I don't belive the unmanneds' a solution because i belive the unmanneds' vehicles a dangerous hazard for people, civilians or militaries. I call an unmanned object a mine, the mines are fully automatic when they are operative and the only way to disarm a mine is to blow up it.
To disarm a mine with human work is the last ratio when there's not other way.
Posted 13 June 2004 - 10:41 PM
It could be a very good fighter-bomber-recce like the old Typhoon or P-47 Thunderbolt (WW2) and P-38 Lightining.
I belive the project better than F-35.
I belive it better than unmanned copied on the B-2 flying wing drawning because i belive it much more agile and unite/concentrato. a better drawing.
Not all is in the drawning of the site above mentioned.
I don't belive the unmanneds a future. The missiles and the rockets are unmanned but they aren't a solution.
Posted 13 June 2004 - 11:32 PM
hey lets get some more chatters here.
THIS IS A REAL HOT THREAD
we could also have unmaned tanks.
we could also have unmaned truck bombs.
we could also have unmaned redoubts.
we could also have un maned booby traped foxholes.
we already have unmaned airplane bombers.
we already have unmaned airplane fighters.
we could also have unmaned heliocopter fighters.
we could also have unmaned anti-aircraft artillary.
we could also have unmaned cities.
we could also have unmaned governments.
but we may not have an un maned chat line.
Posted 14 June 2004 - 12:09 PM
The real unmanned must be fully automatic without external input.
I don't think there is only one man agree with this insanity idea.
The only full automatic objects are the mines and they are the most dangerous weapons of the world for ally and enemy when they are operative.
There is not mine operative that auto destroy itself when it's necessary.
The mines are mad/crazy objects they don't know Friends or Foes, we are all enemies for mines and the mines are all our enemies.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users