Jump to content

Theme© by Fisana
 

Photo

It Could Be The Bettest Fighter And The Bettest Bomber


  • Please log in to reply
13 replies to this topic

#1 pacific

pacific

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 6441 posts

Posted 15 March 2003 - 09:17 PM

IT COULD BE THE BETTEST FIGHTER, THE BETTEST STRIKE FIGHTER AND THE BETTEST BOMBER.

STORM SHADOW

http://www.aerospace...ucav/main.shtml

:cool:

It's naturally Stealth and it could be also VSTOL or STOVL.

Think about it. It's not the past it's the future.

It's not strange like it can appear.

They can make it also today.
  • 0

#2 pacific

pacific

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 6441 posts

Posted 16 March 2003 - 07:35 AM

Iraqis crisis is violence inside the world.
I love peace.


:rolleyes:
  • 0

#3 fabius

fabius

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 22 posts

Posted 16 March 2003 - 07:59 AM

Hey I did one of these too, undergraduate project I mean.

This is a long way from being implemented.

I do expect to see UAV's in combat and bombing roles in the future, I have a question however with the electromagnetic pulse munitions how do you guarantee maintaining communications?

PS a lot of this stuff is a potential nightmare, like on Terminator movies.
  • 0

#4 pacific

pacific

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 6441 posts

Posted 16 March 2003 - 09:52 AM

Do you prefer to be the pilot who test this planes (UCA or UAV)?
Do you love your skin or not?
:D
  • 0

#5 pacific

pacific

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 6441 posts

Posted 16 March 2003 - 10:00 AM

Today all what we call UCAV, UAV, and so on are radiocontrolled Models of a future plane nothing more than this.
A Pilot cost a lot more than the Modelling UCAV or UAV.
There is not the technology to put them in a war today.
The only UCAV or UAV ready for war are the Cruise Missiles and the Missiles AA, SAM, and so on.
None UCAV or UAV have a gun, a gatling inside.
  • 0

#6 pacific

pacific

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 6441 posts

Posted 19 March 2003 - 01:03 PM

World Tempest it's over.
:(
  • 0

#7 pacific

pacific

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 6441 posts

Posted 13 June 2004 - 06:09 PM

:cool:
  • 0

#8 vladzo

vladzo

    Registered User

  • Banned
  • PipPipPip
  • 16824 posts

Posted 13 June 2004 - 09:42 PM

to pacifica :::::::::::::::

maybe just maybe;
that is also the secret weapon in the next presidential term.
in north america.
the unmaned office.
a desk, achair, a comuter, a phone, a coffee cup;
B_U_T __ no man.


vlad
  • 0

#9 pacific

pacific

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 6441 posts

Posted 13 June 2004 - 10:30 PM

Do you belive safety to test a new plane with man inside or do you prefer to test the plane without to put in danger the life of a valiant man?

The unmanned is a step to control if the projet/design can fly and how it perform in the air and in Take off and in landing.

I don't belive the unmanneds' a solution because i belive the unmanneds' vehicles a dangerous hazard for people, civilians or militaries. I call an unmanned object a mine, the mines are fully automatic when they are operative and the only way to disarm a mine is to blow up it.

To disarm a mine with human work is the last ratio when there's not other way.

:D
  • 0

#10 pacific

pacific

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 6441 posts

Posted 13 June 2004 - 10:41 PM

It's a flying wing and i think it perform better than B-2 both on air and in the ground.
It could be a very good fighter-bomber-recce like the old Typhoon or P-47 Thunderbolt (WW2) and P-38 Lightining.

I belive the project better than F-35.

I belive it better than unmanned copied on the B-2 flying wing drawning because i belive it much more agile and unite/concentrato. a better drawing.

Not all is in the drawning of the site above mentioned.

I don't belive the unmanneds a future. The missiles and the rockets are unmanned but they aren't a solution.:cool:
  • 0

#11 opineaway

opineaway

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 6779 posts

Posted 13 June 2004 - 11:05 PM

I made one of those out of folded paper, when I was a kid.
"Wonderful future", we will bomb each other with full sized radio controlled planes.
  • 0

#12 vladzo

vladzo

    Registered User

  • Banned
  • PipPipPip
  • 16824 posts

Posted 13 June 2004 - 11:32 PM

to pacific and all ::::::::::::::

hey lets get some more chatters here.

THIS IS A REAL HOT THREAD

we could also have unmaned tanks.

we could also have unmaned truck bombs.

we could also have unmaned redoubts.

we could also have un maned booby traped foxholes.

we already have unmaned airplane bombers.

we already have unmaned airplane fighters.

we could also have unmaned heliocopter fighters.

we could also have unmaned anti-aircraft artillary.

we could also have unmaned cities.

we could also have unmaned governments.

but we may not have an un maned chat line.

vlad
  • 0

#13 pacific

pacific

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 6441 posts

Posted 14 June 2004 - 12:09 PM

BTW

The real unmanned must be fully automatic without external input.

I don't think there is only one man agree with this insanity idea.

The only full automatic objects are the mines and they are the most dangerous weapons of the world for ally and enemy when they are operative.

There is not mine operative that auto destroy itself when it's necessary.

The mines are mad/crazy objects they don't know Friends or Foes, we are all enemies for mines and the mines are all our enemies.

:D :rolleyes:
  • 0

#14 pacific

pacific

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 6441 posts

Posted 29 October 2005 - 12:29 AM

:tralala:
  • 0




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Copyright © 2016 Pravda.Ru