Jump to content

Theme© by Fisana
 

Photo
- - - - -

Simmetry

For the 5th force

  • Please log in to reply
37 replies to this topic

#1 math

math

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 97 posts

Posted 17 December 2015 - 04:20 PM

 I have some trouble with Mathematics because of the following ideas:
 
»0« (Symmetry recalls the mystery of the origins)
-eR= another world (in symmetric domains I expect to find symmetric functions)
*^0=?.0 (everything is equal to the exact question, if the zero is powered)
((( ))) Reality is dual, nothing is the door.
 
????
 
More simple:
I'm convinced that the natural law of symmetry should be applied to Mathematics, so:
-D^0= -1   ; -D (negative domain)
+D^0= +1  ; +D (positive domain)
0^0= -1 and +1.
 
???
 
 
 
 
 

Edited by math, 18 August 2016 - 06:46 AM.

  • 0

#2 math

math

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 97 posts

Posted 18 December 2015 - 01:42 PM

Beginning

In the gap of the essence
fission of the nothing,
tantalum of light
in the uncertainty
of the uncountable
and the reason for being
in the power of the fraction.
(in poetry.com)
 
-D/0= ((   negative infinite
+D/0= ))  positive infinite
  0/0= ()  a singularity 

 

???


 


Edited by math, 29 December 2015 - 01:31 PM.

  • 0

#3 math

math

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 97 posts

Posted 19 December 2015 - 08:40 AM

Moral and calm are the same:

 

-d X -d = ?

 

-d / -d = ?


Edited by math, 28 December 2015 - 01:41 PM.

  • 0

#4 math

math

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 97 posts

Posted 20 December 2015 - 12:06 AM

The future is our cause:

 

Could you analyse these issues in your Quantus (groups for sharing and discussion)?

 

Concilium

(in poetry.com)

 

They met 
on a day of freedom, 
in the domains 
where interrogation becomes 
exactness and sense. 
In the density 
of reason and conscience 
they drew the rainbow of faith 
over gestures of peace. 
And a new era began.


Edited by math, 29 December 2015 - 01:35 PM.

  • 0

#5 math

math

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 97 posts

Posted 23 December 2015 - 09:34 AM

Madness happens when kindness is low in the "terroir".

Let's start solving the problem,

because de Universe is a hologram of fraction and sharing with future.


  • 0

#6 math

math

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 97 posts

Posted 24 December 2015 - 06:39 PM

Freedom

(in poetry.com)

 

The eyes 
are our land; 
independence 
is golden; 
but summits 
are our destiny 
and children 
the wealth of the world. 
Because in their hands 
is the sense of the Earth 
and the Universe... 
Ever since and song 
for ever...


  • 0

#7 NO.*

NO.*

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 43 posts

Posted 26 December 2015 - 03:11 PM

See this:

 

http://engforum.prav...68312-mad-time/


  • 0

#8 math

math

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 97 posts

Posted 29 December 2015 - 10:40 AM

Yes. Time is windy and stems with asymmetries.

Debts and havings are symmetric by quality.


Edited by math, 29 December 2015 - 01:23 PM.

  • 0

#9 NO.*

NO.*

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 43 posts

Posted 08 January 2016 - 07:22 AM

Is natural what we are, is supernatural what we should be.


  • 0

#10 shaktiman

shaktiman

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 9698 posts

Posted 15 June 2016 - 08:05 PM

Greetings math,

 

Are you a mathematician?

 

1) Why do you think higher level mathematicians write so much of their research in symbolism very few other mathematicians, if any, can fully read?

 

Are you one of those? 

 

 ((( ))) Reality is dual, nothing is the door.

 

 

Are you referring to a Dual Space such as V* relative to R4 or a differential geometric construct.

 

Nothing is nothing to be bandied about.

 

symmetric domains - are they bounded?

 

Regards. 


  • 0

#11 math

math

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 97 posts

Posted 16 June 2016 - 08:43 AM

Hi shaktiman,

 

i'm not a mathematician, of course i like comprehension.

 

I see unity as any movement in the unutterable: Movement generates duality and duality moves the world.

 

Regards


  • 0

#12 shaktiman

shaktiman

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 9698 posts

Posted 16 June 2016 - 09:17 AM

I see unity as any movement in the unutterable: Movement generates duality and duality moves the world.

 

Seems like a very reasonable view, The non-canonical Archaeological find of the Gospel of Thomas uses a similar view on motion and rest and more so its relationship to light,

 

Best regards math.


  • 0

#13 math

math

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 97 posts

Posted 23 June 2016 - 07:15 AM

-Weighing-

1. A teorem:

The negative and positive domains of numbering are symmetrical and enjoy functional symmetry.

2. An axiom:

Symmetry recalls the mystery of the origins.

3. An hypothesis:

The Universe is a hologram of fraction and sharing with future.


  • 0

#14 math

math

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 97 posts

Posted 18 August 2016 - 06:48 AM

Because, because, because

 

-e^R= "alter mundus"


  • 0

#15 shaktiman

shaktiman

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 9698 posts

Posted 18 August 2016 - 11:33 AM

Weighing-

1. A teorem:

The negative and positive domains of numbering are symmetrical and enjoy functional symmetry.

2. An axiom:

Symmetry recalls the mystery of the origins.

3. An hypothesis:

The Universe is a hologram of fraction and sharing with future.

 

Nice work math.

 

I like the way you create a poetry of mathematics.

 

For numbers:

 

1) Nicely put.

2) It helps as does motion and rest.

3) The words themselves are problematic but I see your worldview. OK, but careful with such a Big Picture - fraction of what?

 

Best regards.


  • 0

#16 math

math

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 97 posts

Posted 18 August 2016 - 12:29 PM

 OK, but careful with such a Big Picture - fraction of what?

 

 

 

 

 

Fraction of identity?


Edited by math, 18 August 2016 - 12:30 PM.

  • 1

#17 shaktiman

shaktiman

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 9698 posts

Posted 18 August 2016 - 01:39 PM

Fraction of identity?

 

Beautifully said Mr. Math.

 

It is really the Big Question as well - this Identity.

 

If you don't know it, looking at the general definition of a "Topology" helps us all. Even the best of mathematicians sometimes gloss over it.

 

"The Universal Set T is the Universal Set T", regardless of Russell's Paradox that inherently produces a "measure".

 

It is also why physicists run into problems with "parallel universe" constructions.

 

More later.......

 

Best regards!!!


Edited by shaktiman, 18 August 2016 - 01:40 PM.

  • 0

#18 NO.*

NO.*

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 43 posts

Posted 19 August 2016 - 08:19 AM

What we want to be or where we want to be?

A response that mathematicians seek?


  • 1

#19 shaktiman

shaktiman

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 9698 posts

Posted 19 August 2016 - 11:44 AM

What we want to be or where we want to be?
A response that mathematicians seek?

 

 

 

Great point NO!

 

Sometimes mathematicians are not as bright as the public views them.

 

I doubt that many would understand your excellent question, but there are some.

 

Unfortunately, most mathematicians seek solutions to problems that are highly theoretical and often unbeknownst to them and vis a vis the more human existential questions pour out rather a process of symbolic manipulation and circuitous arguments - case in point was the claimed solution to Fermat's Theorem here in the US.

 

The use of mathematics in developing military weaponry is well established. Likewise for breaking codes and a plethora of issues dealing with the daily human condition, science and technolgy.

 

Those that have tried to address the more existential or even metaphysical aspects of science and humanity like Kantor and others went insane and even committed suicide.

 

Not too smart, eh?

 

Maybe the average Joe understands this better than the intelligentsia.

 

I did quite a bit of work and personal research in this "what or where we may or could be". Yes, there is a potential for good as well as evil. We all should know that.

 

Aristotle may be more valid yet in saying "The Supreme Good for a human being is happiness".

 

All the Best!


  • 0

#20 math

math

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 97 posts

Posted 19 August 2016 - 12:35 PM

shaktiman,

 

nice teachings...

 

Sincerely


  • 0




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Copyright © 2017 Pravda.Ru