Jump to content

Theme© by Fisana
 

Photo

MH17 Boeing 777, UN aid convoy: two hit hoaxes in perfect parallel scripts with a pint of reverse

MH17 UN aid convoy bombed hoax Ukraine Syria theater parallel script investigation

  • Please log in to reply
8 replies to this topic

#1 MattMarriott

MattMarriott

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 3063 posts

Posted 28 September 2016 - 03:23 PM

Original published Sep 19, two days after the "Syria UN aid convoy bombed" psy-op. Revised version:
 
MH17 Boeing 777, UN aid convoy: two hit hoaxes in perfect parallel scripts with a pint of reverse.
- "Boeing 777 MH17 hit by a missile in a war zone in east Ukraine" alias Novorussia, Jul 17 2014.
- "UN aid convoy bombed in Syria during truce", Sep 17 2016.
 
Basically parallel with a pint of reverse
Perfect parallelism obviously doesn't refer to both being of the same fake blood type as all "terrorist attacks" headlines since 2011.
As for the "investigation" timing, the first one "starting" days before the second one "concludes": only a detail and it stands for both parallel and reverse. 
 
Same general base script
Perfect parallelism includes a reverse detail: on which side the fake rebels are casted each time:
1. illuminati puppets playing the "blame each other game", each time the same base "oppositors" (US and Russia) with fake rebels on one of these sides: 
- US & Poroshenko v Russia & fake rebels in 2014; 
- US & fake rebels v Russia & Assad in 2016.
2. "investigation to conclude that the rebels did it". The freedom loving people that are targeted by the psy-op are the real rebels:  
- Novorussians fighting against the Kiev regime;
- syrians fighting Assad regime, Russia and "US led coalition".
 
CONTEXT
Exposed by the same Last Prophet who first exposed Jul 2014 MH17 as a fake blood act part of the BIG BANG script that starts with the "missing Boeing 777 resurfacing at Jerusalem":
Jul 2015 - The only page worldwide explaining in advance that "they" would not confirm the wing to be from the missing Boeing.
Exposed by Last Prophet's immediately after the "MH370 wing" episode was launched on 7/30:
Headlines will be: Reunion Island's Boeing 777 wing from downed MH17 NOT from missing MH370.
Human cattle mocked to the utter limits:
 
This page to prove that someone, albeit only one, predicted "the greatest U-turn in the History of mysteries", at the reunion of two previous "Malaysia Airlines Boeing 777" acts totally staged with actors, each one of them also exposed by Last Prophet within hours.
Two gangs of illuminazi suicide bombers in action:
- "Putin" and the fake rebels, used to stage MH17 in July 2014 and blame it on the real rebels while pretending to blame it on Ukraine government.
- "Netanyahu" and the rest of Israel's government, used to stage the resurrection of Obama Bin Laden with a 9/11 remake at Jerusalem, again with pixels used to simulate the "missing" Boeing 777 crashing on Temple Mount.
 
Sep 2016 Syria  UN convoy bombed - Agendas exposed immediately after by ... you guess:
 
All in Blog

Edited by MattMarriott, 28 September 2016 - 04:26 PM.

  • 0

#2 USC

USC

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 24540 posts

Posted 28 September 2016 - 07:50 PM

Buk missile producer: JIT probe lacks tech proof, experiments showed MH17 downed from Kiev-held area
  • 0

#3 USC

USC

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 24540 posts

Posted 28 September 2016 - 09:24 PM

presspict20140724203629.jpg


  • 0

#4 shaktiman

shaktiman

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 9711 posts

Posted 28 September 2016 - 10:03 PM

 

Buk missile producer: JIT probe lacks tech proof, experiments showed MH17 downed from Kiev-held area

 

 

 

The US has made up so many stories - but no convincing evidence.

 

One more thing - where's the motive for Russia to do this?

 

So far the only motives that go to culpability are for the US, NATO, Ukraine to discredit Russia.

 

Russia MUST protect it's borders - shooting down commercial aircraft is not a motive.

 

Regards.


  • 0

#5 Shura

Shura

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 25707 posts

Posted 29 September 2016 - 12:54 AM

 

 

The US has made up so many stories - but no convincing evidence.

 

One more thing - where's the motive for Russia to do this?

 

So far the only motives that go to culpability are for the US, NATO, Ukraine to discredit Russia.

 

Russia MUST protect it's borders - shooting down commercial aircraft is not a motive.

 

Regards.

ZIONAZIS DID IT IHOR KOLOMOISKI JEW BANKER ADMITTED SO MUCH


  • 0

#6 USC

USC

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 24540 posts

Posted 29 September 2016 - 06:45 PM

Troubling Gaps in the New MH-17 Report
September 28, 2016
 

Exclusive: The new accusation of Russian complicity in 2014 Malaysia Airlines shootdown was based on Ukrainian intelligence intercepts that were selectively interpreted while contrary information was ignored, writes Robert Parry.

By Robert Parry

The key conclusion of the Dutch-led criminal inquiry implicating Russia in the 2014 shootdown of Malaysia Airlines Flight 17 relied heavily on cryptic telephone intercepts that were supplied by the Ukrainian intelligence service and were given incriminating meaning not clearly supported by the words.

The investigators also seemed to ignore other intercepts that conflicted with their conclusions, including one conversation that appeared to be referring to a Ukrainian convoy, not one commanded by ethnic Russian rebels, that was closing in on the Luhansk airport, placing Ukrainian troops deep inside rebel territory.

malaysia-airways-boeing777-300x200.jpg

A Malaysia Airways’ Boeing 777 like the one that crashed in eastern Ukraine on July 17, 2014. (Photo credit: Aero Icarus from Zürich, Switzerland)

That conversation was among five that the Joint Investigation Team (JIT) released in seeking the public’s help in identifying persons of interest in the MH-17 shootdown. The callers seemed to be discussing information from Moscow regarding the movement of a convoy, but they describe it as a “Ukrops” or Ukrainian troop convoy.

“B: I am saying about the confirmation of the convoy that is going in the direction of the airport… Moscow/Moskva has confirmed… they see it. Is it err… whatsit… Ukrops convoy?

“A: The convoy that is going in the direction of the airport? Yes.

“B: And how did it go through?

“A: Most likely through Sabovka,” which the JIT interprets to be the town of Sabivka, about five miles west of Luhansk and about 92 miles northeast of Donetsk, the two rebel capitals. The Luhansk airport is about 20 miles south of the city center.

In other words, if this intercept from JIT is correct, the Ukrainian military was operating near the highway routes that the alleged Russian Buk missile battery would have been using. The conversation then picks up, referring to a possible battle for the airport:

“B: So, the convoy was confirmed. Where the convoy can be from?

“C: I don’t know where it is going from. It’s from west, isn’t it?

“B: It’s somehow going from west. From west. Fucking one and a half kilometres from the airdrome.

“C: From the airdrome?

“B: Yes.

“C: It can’t be one and a half kilometres from the airdrome because there is a populated locality there, there are positions there. Probably… I don’t know. Will now try to do something. … I think we will be receiving information soon… our groups have left.

“B: Uh-huh.

“C: Ok. Well, if they come in the airport, will fight at the airport. What else can we do?

“B: Ok. I got you.”

Although it’s difficult to know precisely what these callers are discussing, the conversation seems to refer to a potential battle for an airport, not the deployment of a Buk missile system.

Also, if Ukrainian forces had penetrated that deep into rebel territory, it is difficult to exclude that a Ukrainian Buk battery might have traveled along the southerly route H-21, which skirts Donetsk and then heads east toward the JIT’s claimed firing site in a field near the town of Pervomaiskyi. H-21 then bends north toward Luhansk airport and the city of Luhansk.

The Ukrainian Buks

The JIT video report on the MH-17 case, which was released on Wednesday, also didn’t address questions about the location of several Ukrainian Buk missile batteries that Dutch (i.e. NATO) intelligence placed in eastern Ukraine on July 17, 2014, the day that MH-17 was shot down. A finding from the Dutch intelligence service, MIVD, released last October, said the only high-powered anti-aircraft missile systems in eastern Ukraine at that time, capable of bringing down MH-17 at 33,000 feet and killing all 298 people onboard, belonged to the Ukrainian military, not the rebels.

CDQpviUVEAABdNc-300x174.jpg

A photograph of a Russian BUK missile system that U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine Geoffrey Pyatt published on Twitter in support of a claim about Russia placing BUK missiles in eastern Ukraine, except that the image appears to be an AP photo taken at an air show near Moscow two years earlier.

Although the location of the Ukrainian Buk systems would seem to be crucial to the investigation — at least in eliminating other suspects — JIT operates under an agreement with the Ukrainian government that lets it veto the release of information. Ukraine’s SBU intelligence service, which represented the Kiev government in the JIT, also has among its official responsibilities the protection of secret information that could be damaging to Ukraine.

Regarding JIT’s claim that the Buk missile system crossed over from Russian territory, the video report states: “All telecom data and intercepted telephone calls that have been examined by the investigation team demonstrates that the Buk/TELAR (the self-contained operating system) was brought into Ukraine from the Russian Federation.”

But as evidence the JIT cites one phone intercept, which – according to the JIT’s translation – does not use the word Buk though referencing a piece of equipment that can move on its own or be transported by truck. That could be a Buk system but could apply to many other weapons systems as well.

In the intercepted call, one speaker said, “it crossed, crossed the line.” The narrator of the JIT video report then adds, “The Buk/TELAR crossed the line, in other words, it passed the border.” But there are two assumptions here: that the unidentified weapon is a Buk and that the “line” means border. That could be the case but other interpretations are possible.

Another key point, the disputed location of the so-called “getaway” video of a Buk missile system missing one missile, is simply asserted as fact without an explanation as to how the JIT reached its conclusion placing the location near Luhansk.

While the Western mainstream media has given the JIT great credibility, the JIT itself has acknowledged a dependency on Ukraine’s SBU, which shaped the inquiry by supplying its selection of phone intercepts.

Yet, the SBU is far from a neutral party in the investigation, nor does it have clean hands regarding the Ukrainian civil war that followed a U.S.-backed putsch ousting elected President Viktor Yanukovych on Feb. 22, 2014, and sparking an uprising among ethnic Russian Ukrainians who represented Yanukovych’s political base in the east and south.

Since then, the SBU has been on the front lines of crushing the rebellion by using controversial tactics. In late June 2016, the United Nation’s Assistant Secretary-General for Human Rights Ivan Simonovic accused the SBU of frustrating U.N. investigations into its alleged role in torture and other war crimes.

Simonovic criticized the SBU for “not always providing access to all places where detainees may be kept. … OHCHR (the Office of the U.N. High Commissioner on Human Rights) also continues to receive accounts about torture and ill-treatment, arbitrary and incommunicado detention by the SBU, especially in the conflict zone.

“Torture and threats to members of the families, including sexual threats, are never justifiable, and perpetrators will be held to account sooner or later. … War crimes, crimes against humanity and grave breaches of human rights cannot be the subject of an amnesty.”

Yet, the SBU strongly influenced the direction of the JIT, which included Ukraine along with the Netherlands, Belgium, Australia and Malaysia. The JIT agreement gave Ukraine veto power over what would be released – even though Ukrainian military units were among the logical suspects in the MH-17 case,

Relying on Ukrainian Intelligence

Earlier this year, an internal report describing the JIT operation revealed how dependent the investigators had become on information provided by the SBU. According to the report, the SBU helped shape the MH-17 investigation by supplying a selection of phone intercepts and other material that would presumably not include sensitive secrets that would implicate the SBU’s political overseers in Ukraine. But the JIT seemed oblivious to this conflict of interest, saying:

28114287976_cc3a212b5f_k-300x200.jpg

Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko shakes hands with U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry as he arrives for a meeting in Kiev, Ukraine, on July 7, 2016. (State Department Photo)

“Since the first week of September 2014, investigating officers from The Netherlands and Australia have worked here [in Kiev]. They work in close cooperation here with the Security and Investigation Service of the Ukraine (SBU). Immediately after the crash, the SBU provided access to large numbers of tapped telephone conversations and other data. …

“At first rather formal, cooperation with the SBU became more and more flexible. ‘In particular because of the data analysis, we were able to prove our added value’, says [Dutch police official Gert] Van Doorn. ‘Since then, we notice in all kinds of ways that they deal with us in an open way. They share their questions with us and think along as much as they can.’”

The internal JIT report continued: “With the tapped telephone conversations from SBU, there are millions of printed lines with metadata, for example, about the cell tower used, the duration of the call and the corresponding telephone numbers. The investigating officers sort out this data and connect it to validate the reliability of the material. …

“By now, the investigators are certain about the reliability of the material. ‘After intensive investigation, the material seems to be very sound’, says Van Doorn, ‘that also contributed to the mutual trust.’”

Another concern about how the SBU could manipulate the JIT investigation is that the long assignments of investigators in Kiev over a period of more than two years could create compromising situations. Kiev has a reputation as a European hotbed for prostitution and sex tourism, and there’s the possibility of other human relationships developing between Australian and Dutch investigators and Ukrainian intelligence officers.

According to the JIT report, four investigating officers from Australia are stationed in Kiev on three-month rotations while Dutch police rotate in two teams of about five people each for a period of a “fortnight,” or two weeks.

The relative isolation of the Australian investigators further adds to their dependence on their Ukrainian hosts. According to the report, “The Australian investigators find themselves a 26 hour flight away from their home country and have to deal with a large time difference. ‘For us Australians, it is more difficult to get into contact with our home base, which is why our operation is quite isolated in Kiev’, says [Andrew] Donoghoe,” a senior investigating officer from the Australian Federal Police.

The SBU’s assistance, however, did not lead to a rapid resolution of the MH-17 mystery, now more than two years old. The Dutch Safety Board report last October placed the spot of the suspected missile launch within a 320-square-kilometer area, including both government and rebel positions.

According to the Dutch intelligence service finding also released last October, the only anti-aircraft missiles in eastern Ukraine on July 17, 2014, capable of hitting a plane flying at 33,000 feet belonged to the Ukrainian military.

There’s also the dog-not-barking mystery of the curious silence from the U.S. intelligence community. Although Secretary of State John Kerry claimed to know the firing location immediately after the shootdown, the U.S. government went silent after CIA analysts had time to evaluate U.S. satellite, electronic and other intelligence data.

A source who was briefed by U.S. intelligence analysts told me that they saw the attack as a rogue Ukrainian operation involving a hard-line oligarch with the possible motive of shooting down Russian President Vladimir Putin’s official plane returning from South America that day, with similar markings as MH-17. But I have been unable to determine if that assessment represented a dissident or consensus view inside the U.S. intelligence community.

For its part, the Russian government has denied supplying the eastern Ukrainian rebels with a Buk system although the rebels did possess shorter-range, shoulder-fired MANPADs.

Investigative reporter Robert Parry broke many of the Iran-Contra stories for The Associated Press and Newsweek in the 1980s. You can buy his latest book, America’s Stolen Narrative, either in print here or as an e-book (from Amazon and barnesandnoble.com).

 

https://consortiumne...w-mh-17-report/


  • 0

#7 MattMarriott

MattMarriott

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 3063 posts

Posted 03 November 2016 - 04:10 PM

Last Prophet's words from Apr 2016:
Introduction - Two fights for a title in Economy
The promoter of both fights: illuminati overtime. 
"Putin" wins both, the first as challenger and the second as defender. 
But it's the inclusion of the military context that leaves no doubts about the decision.
 
Economic treason: Russia's "Putin" beats Saudi King and Venezuela's Maduro in plain sight
"Putin" v "Saudi King": the title fight for "world champion for economic treason in plain sight".
At the end of the show "Putin" strips the Saudi King of his title. 
"Putin" became the first to "sell" oil and gas below production costs to the official IV Reich (NATO), this paradoxically as the gap in Saudi Arabia is drastically reduced by the day. 
In other words: as the Saudi oil reserves also rapidly come to an end.
 
"Putin"'s challenger: Venezuelas's Maduro
Shortly after "Putin" stripped the Saudi King of his title in the fight for world champion in economic treason in plain sight: "Putin" challenged by Maduro.
The gap between the humiliation of the population through staged "economy chaos" and real national wealth is pushed to new limits.
Last but not the least because the script unfolds as Venezuela conquers the "world's largest oil reserves" title.
 
Why "Putin" doesn't lose his title to Venezuelas's Maduro:
"Putin"'s answer to Maduro's script going as far as "Venezuelas has no money to pay the bill for printing money":
- russian navy and especially airforce massively used to support the the IV Reich, joining the "US led coalition" in Syria since Sep 30 2015, at the cost of $XX millions a day
- while the despair of russians, includes pensions reduced again and again, causing for example, military veterans becoming homeless every day, as they no longer afford to pay the rents.
 
Why you don't need to know the exact XX millions that Syria daily costs to Russia to let "Putin" keep the title
For the same reason that "Putin" would get his title in 2014 even if the price for "selling" oil and gas had not been pushed under the "below production costs" milestone.
Unlike Maduro, "Putin"'s transfer of oil and gas to the official IV Reich goes hand in hand with military treason in plain sight:
 
Fake Putin sets milestones for economic and military treason in parallel
1. Since March 2014 supplying the Ukraine while the Kiev regime was stating that it would attack Russia to regain Crimea.
This said you don't even need to also mention: while also carrying out the war by terror in Donetsk and Lugansk since Apr 2014, targeting ethnic russians who had previously voted to ultimately join Russia, same as Crimea.
2. Since Sep 2015 bombing together and for the first time ever in the same skies as a "US led coalition".
 
BASICS
Fake Putin's arsenal of bombs for his suicide mission.
The break-up of Russia started already, with Chechnya. Kaliningrad is next - new bombs added regularly
 
Quantitative and qualitative limits to human cattle not able to compute 1+1 sums.
Illustrated by "news" articles;
Apr 2016 - Bombs by a suicide bomber about to fully detonate at the end of the socialist show and beyond:
Venezuela: Maduro; Mockery of simulated reality: from no money to self-print to must have self-generators
 
Economic and military treason reduced to one word: Kaliningrad
...
Jul 2015 - see next post
 

  • 0

#8 Ivan88

Ivan88

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 11629 posts

Posted 03 November 2016 - 05:12 PM

radar strips at MH 17 crash site.jpg

RADAR STRIPS AT "CRASH" SITE:

 

 


  • 0

#9 MattMarriott

MattMarriott

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 3063 posts

Posted 05 November 2016 - 05:22 AM

Same as more than 99% of any replies to any threads by Last Prophet Matt:
No real replies. In other words:  what the post exposes is ignored and "replies" refer to the matrix, alias the simulated reality served by the iliuminati.
In this case the matrix offered to the human cattle is "who did it? pro-russians or Ukraine?".

Edited by MattMarriott, 05 November 2016 - 05:28 AM.

  • 0





Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: MH17, UN aid convoy, bombed, hoax, Ukraine, Syria, theater, parallel, script, investigation

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Copyright © 2017 Pravda.Ru