Jump to content

Theme© by Fisana
 

Photo

Russia launches massive cyber attack on US Oct. 21


  • Please log in to reply
16 replies to this topic

#1 Mandrake

Mandrake

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 43804 posts

Posted 22 October 2016 - 12:16 PM

Prove that they didn't.
  • 0

#2 Mandrake

Mandrake

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 43804 posts

Posted 22 October 2016 - 12:17 PM

I imagine that they will try to claim innocence, especially after the retaliatory strike.

Edited by Mandrake, 22 October 2016 - 12:19 PM.

  • 0

#3 Pete_V

Pete_V

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1957 posts

Posted 22 October 2016 - 01:15 PM

Bullshit. It was part US cyber military exercise (self inflicted attack), part warning-threat to Russia and China and part false-flag.

 

And i strongly suspect that they will not even try to directly blame Russia but will use the media to indirectly raise suspicious on Russia.


Edited by Pete_V, 22 October 2016 - 01:15 PM.

  • 0

#4 Hansel

Hansel

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 5218 posts

Posted 22 October 2016 - 02:00 PM

Mandrak has delusion as proof


  • 0

#5 Nemesis

Nemesis

    Administrator

  • Administrators
  • 18222 posts

Posted 22 October 2016 - 03:04 PM

Prove it wasn't the loser KKKlinton war machine that wanted no more WikiLeaks or email revelations.  They already shut off Assange's internet.


  • 0

#6 Mario Milano

Mario Milano

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 21017 posts

Posted 22 October 2016 - 03:07 PM

Mandy the rat still just posting Lame Stream Media proven crap...

 

TrumpInternetQUoteMeme.jpg


  • 0

#7 Mario Milano

Mario Milano

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 21017 posts

Posted 22 October 2016 - 03:18 PM

Prove that they didn't.

 What a wanker.....Russia did prove it, they said they haven't got a freakin clue what the wankers in washington are accusing Russia of, so the onus is on Washington seeing they are the accusers to prove their point wouldn't you say you dimwit..

 

They are not providing any proof because they don't have any, it is all made up shit as usual from the Jew infested lunatic Asylum called Washington..

 

And why are the Jew puppets in Washington making this shit up?

 

SyriaStopJewww3-1.jpg


  • 0

#8 Pete_V

Pete_V

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1957 posts

Posted 22 October 2016 - 03:28 PM

BTW...if it was Russia i would be totally OK with that. In fact it would be cool. As i stated in this forum before: "If you want to battle the demon-rats from hell you have to go down to the sewers" :Potstir:


  • 3

#9 Zharkov

Zharkov

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 32505 posts

Posted 22 October 2016 - 03:30 PM

Bullshit. It was part US cyber military exercise (self inflicted attack), part warning-threat to Russia and China and part false-flag.

 

And i strongly suspect that they will not even try to directly blame Russia but will use the media to indirectly raise suspicious on Russia.

 

Well thought out, and you could be right.    Russian intel would probably guess that interfering with US elections would hurt Trump, so Hillary Clinton would be the main beneficiary of hacker detection.   


  • 0

#10 Nemesis

Nemesis

    Administrator

  • Administrators
  • 18222 posts

Posted 22 October 2016 - 03:32 PM

CvOIbQnWgAAUTJd.jpg


  • 0

#11 Nemesis

Nemesis

    Administrator

  • Administrators
  • 18222 posts

Posted 22 October 2016 - 03:34 PM

CvVT13GW8AE_LRq.jpg


  • 0

#12 Nemesis

Nemesis

    Administrator

  • Administrators
  • 18222 posts

Posted 22 October 2016 - 03:37 PM

Bottom line are the questions:

 

Cui bono?

 

Who has something to hide?

 

Answer to both questions is the KKKlinton war machine.

 

Conversely, Russia has nothing to hide and in fact has a direct interest in getting the truth out, not stifling it.


  • 1

#13 Zharkov

Zharkov

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 32505 posts

Posted 22 October 2016 - 03:38 PM

Prove that they didn't.

 

They would get no benefit at all from hurting Trump, after Hillary had put Trump into the Russian camp by false accusation and innuendo.

 

More likely the Obama regime or the Clinton people did it to themselves.    That would be enough to get votes switched away from Trump just by saying "Trump's buddies, the Russians did it".   

 

Yet Mandrake seems unconcerned that the content of the e-mails themselves actually confirm numerous conspiracy theories and make them conspiracy fact?     Podesta admitting ISIS was US sponsored?     Hillary's instructions to the media?   Her threat to remove America's guns by executive order?    Other stuff that she denied but proves she lied, such as security classification of the messages?

 

Is the content of her character now meaningless?

 

Is the hacker witness to crime more evil than the criminal Clinton family?


  • 0

#14 Mario Milano

Mario Milano

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 21017 posts

Posted 22 October 2016 - 03:45 PM

Establishment now blaming Russians for nearly everything under the Sun; plans to illegally insert Hillary into the Presidency

 

Are Trump and Hillary really tied in the polls, or are pollsters and the corporate media lying again?

 

 
October 22, 2016
 

(INTELLIHUB) — If you are going by real numbers and not corporate media propaganda that is spewed forth to us via the T.V., Donald Trump will win the general election by a landslide.

 

And when I say real numbers, I mean real numbers. It’s that simple. Let me take a moment to explain.

 

You see, we can simplify everything just by casting away faked poll numbers, media lies and propaganda. It’s really that simple.

 

Let’s do this. Let’s judge the potential outcome of the election another way — in a simplified manner. Let’s go by rally attendance.

 

First off, we have to consider that physical participation at rallies will in fact reflect voters eagerness to make it to the polls on Election Day and should somewhat reflect on a per capita basis which candidate is actually more popular in the real world.

 

For example: If only 200 people attend the average Hillary Clinton rally vs. the 3000 to 20,000 people physically attending Donald Trump rallies, then in my opinion the verdict is in as these numbers should reflect participation of real people in a salable manner. You can see quite the contrast here.

 

Now let’s run the math. And hey, what the Hell, let’s even give Hillary the benefit of the doubt and average Trump rally attendees at an extremely low number of only 1000 on an average to Hillary’s 200, just to demonstrate a simple point.

 

Example:

  Trump 1000 Attendees vs. Hillary 200 Attendees Trump 80% Hillary 20%

 

 

So you see? Now imagine what the ratio would be if we factored in more accurate numbers into the equation, which would be more like and average of 4000 Trump attendees per rally vs. Hillary’s 200 or so. By using this logic we can apply it on a larger scale to demonstrate who will likely turnout to the polls and vote on Election Day. And by doing this the numbers show Donald J. Trump winning by a landslide. However, we all know that the

 

Establishment will not go down without a fight and plans to do everything in their power to insert Hillary as the next POTUS, because after all she is clearly the Establishment’s pick.

 

Media lies, trickery

 

Do we live in a fixed virtual reality?

 

Hillary supporter and media shill Abby D. Phillip of the Washington Post tweeted during a Hillary rally, back in August, that there was a “boisterous crowd” in attendance and even tweeted a picture which made the crowd look big.

 

CoziZWjUMAAfUuz.jpg

 

But, come to find out, not that many people actually attended the rally that day, which seems to be a norm for nearly all Clinton rallies.

 

capture10.png?w=670

 

https://www.intellih...insert-hillary/


Edited by Mario Milano, 22 October 2016 - 03:46 PM.

  • 0

#15 Zharkov

Zharkov

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 32505 posts

Posted 22 October 2016 - 03:45 PM

It's been admitted by Guccifer that he hacked public official emails, and he sits in prison for that, so why bring the Russians all the grief?

 

We already know the Chinese and Israeli intelligence services are hacking all communications constantly, and it could have been any of those who tossed in their catch of the day messages.    We already know that China doesn't want Trump causing it problems with trade, and we already know that Israel prefers Clinton because Trump might cut off foreign aid to richer countries that don't need any.

 

Mandrake doesn't like Russia, I think we all understand that much from his prior posts, but that doesn't make Russia guilty of anything.

 

The burden of proof is always on the accuser.    So far, no US intel agency has offered to prove anything.


  • 1

#16 Zharkov

Zharkov

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 32505 posts

Posted 22 October 2016 - 03:49 PM

The US media assumes all the e-mail leaks came from one source.

 

What if they came from multiple sources?

 

What if they came from private hackers, intel agencies, the Clinton campaign, even telecom companies who donated to Clinton, among many others?

 

What if a whole lot of people from across the world, in many countries, just got tired of US government lies?


  • 0

#17 Mario Milano

Mario Milano

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 21017 posts

Posted 22 October 2016 - 03:52 PM


What if a whole lot of people from across the world, in many countries, just got tired of US government lies?

 It is starting to happen, the Philippines just told the lunatics in Washington to F off and are making deals with China...

_________________________

 

Duterte Welcomed to China, Announces ‘Separation’ from US

Posted on October 20, 2016 by Richard Edmondson

 

It looks like Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte has had enough of America. The following is from the L.A. Times:

 

    Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte announced Thursday that he was “separating” from the United States and embracing China as the new best friend of the Philippines.

 

    The 71-year-old president, famous for blunt, often profane rhetoric, announced his country’s realignment in a state visit to Beijing, where he was hailed as China’s new “brother.’’

 

https://uprootedpale...ration-from-us/


Edited by Mario Milano, 22 October 2016 - 04:05 PM.

  • 0




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Copyright © 2017 Pravda.Ru