Jump to content

Theme© by Fisana
 

Photo

Bush


  • Please log in to reply
216 replies to this topic

Poll: right or not? (0 member(s) have cast votes)

right or not?

  1. yes (23 votes [28.40%])

    Percentage of vote: 28.40%

  2. no (58 votes [71.60%])

    Percentage of vote: 71.60%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#181 Rich

Rich

    Banned

  • Banned
  • PipPipPip
  • 317 posts

Posted 05 June 2003 - 04:09 PM

Is Bush right or not about what? The war?
  • 0

#182 platykitten

platykitten

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 352 posts

Posted 05 June 2003 - 11:44 PM

No, about whether he should have sugar in his coffee!

(quel thicko, what?)




InsideB, you should have seen Blair getting all flustered. I'm assuming it was a Question time in the UK parliament. He was jumping up and down, just like his friend, Pinocchio! LOL

Then there was Rumsfeld's puppet, Shrubya! STILL desperately waiting for "irrefutable" evidence! roflmao!!!

Ya gotta laugh!!!
  • 0

#183 platykitten

platykitten

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 352 posts

Posted 05 June 2003 - 11:54 PM

Wolfowitz: Iraq war was about oilGeorge Wright
Wednesday June 4, 2003
The Guardian

Oil was the main reason for military action against Iraq, a leading White House hawk has claimed, confirming the worst fears of those opposed to the US-led war.

The US deputy defence secretary, Paul Wolfowitz - who has already undermined Tony Blair's position over weapons of mass destruction (WMD) by describing them as a "bureaucratic" excuse for war - has now gone further by claiming the real motive was that Iraq is "swimming" in oil.

The latest comments were made by Mr Wolfowitz in an address to delegates at an Asian security summit in Singapore at the weekend, and reported today by German newspapers Der Tagesspiegel and Die Welt.

Asked why a nuclear power such as North Korea was being treated differently from Iraq, where hardly any weapons of mass destruction had been found, the deputy defence minister said: "Let's look at it simply. The most important difference between North Korea and Iraq is that economically, we just had no choice in Iraq. The country swims on a sea of oil."

Mr Wolfowitz went on to tell journalists at the conference that the US was set on a path of negotiation to help defuse tensions between North Korea and its neighbours - in contrast to the more belligerent attitude the Bush administration displayed in its dealings with Iraq.

His latest comments follow his widely reported statement from an interview in Vanity Fair last month, in which he said that "for reasons that have a lot to do with the US government bureaucracy, we settled on the one issue that everyone could agree on: weapons of mass destruction."

Prior to that, his boss, defence secretary Donald Rumsfeld, had already undermined the British government's position by saying Saddam Hussein may have destroyed his banned weapons before the war.

Mr Wolfowitz's frank assessment of the importance of oil could not come at a worse time for the US and UK governments, which are both facing fierce criticism at home and abroad over allegations that they exaggerated the threat posed by Saddam Hussein in order to justify the war.

Amid growing calls from all parties for a public inquiry, the foreign affairs select committee announced last night it would investigate claims that the UK government misled the country over its evidence of Iraq's WMD.

The move is a major setback for Tony Blair, who had hoped to contain any inquiry within the intelligence and security committee, which meets in secret and reports to the prime minister.

In the US, the failure to find solid proof of chemical, biological and nuclear arms in Iraq has raised similar concerns over Mr Bush's justification for the war and prompted calls for congressional investigations.

Mr Wolfowitz is viewed as one of the most hawkish members of the Bush administration. The 57-year old expert in international relations was a strong advocate of military action against Afghanistan and Iraq.

Following the September 11 terror attacks on the World Trade Centre and Pentagon, Mr Wolfowitz pledged that the US would pursue terrorists and "end" states' harbouring or sponsoring of militants.

Prior to his appointment to the Bush cabinet in February 2001, Mr Wolfowitz was dean and professor of international relations at the Paul H Nitze School of Advanced International Studies (SAIS), of the Johns Hopkins University.

Guardian Unlimited
  • 0

#184 platykitten

platykitten

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 352 posts

Posted 06 June 2003 - 12:00 AM

Our Minister for Foreign Affairs said the same thing on TV the other night. Bureaucratic reasons!!!

So that little boy in Iraq lost his arms so some yank could still buy cheap petrol!! Yes, it is emotive language, but, ya know, I bloody feel emotional about it all!!!!
  • 0

#185 inside bush

inside bush

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 212 posts

Posted 06 June 2003 - 05:18 AM

Ceterum censeo Bushum esse delendam!
  • 0

#186 inside bush

inside bush

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 212 posts

Posted 06 June 2003 - 05:28 AM

he was trying to get ridd of me. Hey he wasn't that successful.

Got problems in the bathroom.
  • 0

#187 platykitten

platykitten

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 352 posts

Posted 06 June 2003 - 05:35 AM

InsideB....who has problems in the bathroom?

Are these problems which can be discussed in mixed company? <g>
  • 0

#188 inside bush

inside bush

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 212 posts

Posted 06 June 2003 - 05:53 AM

What shall I say - we are so schoarf - wait and see those buggers will sooner or later have their parasites. Under colleagues, I know it. Colic thats what we call it.
To the bathroom with Shrubya down the douche down and away.

Ya gotta laugh!!!

roflmao!!! ohno buffers way to say hallo to ib.

Bush us Tony up Tony down us Rumsfeld us Wolfowitz us, if comenced Pravda Forum would be us-ed too. I'll better stop.
  • 0

#189 inside bush

inside bush

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 212 posts

Posted 06 June 2003 - 05:54 AM

I dought so.
  • 0

#190 inside bush

inside bush

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 212 posts

Posted 06 June 2003 - 03:39 PM

Hit the Guardian - Join Fox News
Well, I am a meber of FoxFan Club. LOL
http://usmilitarysingles.com/ roflmao

WASHINGTON
  • 0

#191 platykitten

platykitten

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 352 posts

Posted 07 June 2003 - 03:05 AM

Oh! nooooo! Fox News!! LOL

It sounds like an interview with Home Beautiful magazine...."he said facing a wide screen TV"

What depth! What integrity! What a load of......

On the other hand, InsideB, it shows again what a shallow and stupid person he is. Powell did all the work, and he plays the part of hostess! I have been saying from the start that he makes the coffee and sets out the biscuits!! roflmao!! Helping people to relax!!! My aching sides!

The man proves every day that he is nothing less than a puppet...is it a glove puppet? If so, *I* wouldn't be putting MY hand up there!!
  • 0

#192 inside bush

inside bush

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 212 posts

Posted 07 June 2003 - 06:57 AM

K?tzchen

You realy should try the member area to see how they manipulate people.
Propaganda in the Third Reich they had "Voelkischer Beobachter" a paper and "Die Deutsche Wochenschau"/ Cinema. The Nazis had to pay for propaganda.
Shrubya is even better. Murdoch et al. make the Propaganda and they pay for his campagne.

Kaetzchen - imagine, we have our examination to pass tomorrow. The commission is headed by D. Rumsfeld, Co Chairman P. Wolfowitz.
Members of Comission R. Barnett, A. Bernstein, S. Cambone, E. Cohen, Devon Gaffney Cross, T. Donnelly, D. Epstein, D. Fautua, D. Goure, D. Kagan, F. Kagan, R. Kagan, R. Killebrew, W. Kristol, M. Lagon, J. Lasswell, I. Lewis Libby, R. Martinage, P. Meilinger, M. Owens, S. Rosen, G. Schmitt, A. Shulsky, M. Vickers, B. Watts, D. Zakheim.

Nothing to worry about. They are all our friends and our task was made as easy as possible.
TELL US SOMETHING NICE ABOUT OUR PRESIDENT; GEORGE W. BUSH.
Nosy I am. Bonne chance K?etzchen. :D
  • 0

#193 inside bush

inside bush

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 212 posts

Posted 07 June 2003 - 06:59 AM

Ceterum censeo Bushum esse delendam!
  • 0

#194 inside bush

inside bush

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 212 posts

Posted 07 June 2003 - 10:59 PM

Cras legam
  • 0

#195 inside bush

inside bush

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 212 posts

Posted 07 June 2003 - 11:15 PM

Means: Tomorow I will read it. The content of the letter, G..J. Caesar never read was a warning. At least Sueton (Vita divi Julii 81,4) told so in a more than ambiguous way. Caesar couldn't read the letter the next day because he was already assassinated by Brutus.


Rumsfeld was pleased, Wolfowitz was pleased. I got the feeling it could be their task. I don't care, I passed.
  • 0

#196 platykitten

platykitten

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 352 posts

Posted 08 June 2003 - 01:46 AM

Oh! no! InsideB. What an easy topic! Hmmmm! something nice about Bush.

One moment, I'll go back and read the question.

<Half an hour later>

Errr! How much longer have I got to answer the question?

<an hour later>

Do I only have to find ONE thing?

(an hour and a half later>

Ummmm! He doesn't dye his hair like some past President's did?

<three hours later>

Is it time to go?
  • 0

#197 inside bush

inside bush

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 212 posts

Posted 08 June 2003 - 07:42 AM

Hey Kitten this is Dony: Ditto JFK, could be liberal . Have another try. Come on.
  • 0

#198 platykitten

platykitten

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 352 posts

Posted 08 June 2003 - 07:59 AM

Ok, Dony, thank you for the second chance!

<think, think think>

I've got it!~

Even though he signed up for the Naval Reserve, he really, really didn't want to learn how to kill people, so he never turned up for training - even though it was in a time of "conflict/police action"!


yay!~ I expect a High Distinction on this one!

By the way, Dony exactly how tall are you? I would say about 5'2" but it's hard to tell on TV when you're standing behind that podium!
  • 0

#199 inside bush

inside bush

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 212 posts

Posted 08 June 2003 - 08:36 AM

Ha Ha you are joking Kitten. For your joke you passed. Are we sharp? Cons you are now. Ha Ha Ha!
  • 0

#200 platykitten

platykitten

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 352 posts

Posted 08 June 2003 - 12:04 PM

Oh! no! A con! I'll have to throw away my flowing skirts and tops and start wearing a twinset, pearls and a pleated skirt!!! LOL I am a little bit there, because I wear "sensible shoes". One must be suitably attired, doncha know!
  • 0




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Copyright © 2016 Pravda.Ru