Jump to content

Theme© by Fisana
 

Photo

Quotes - Jewish and American.


  • Please log in to reply
431 replies to this topic

#301 Saddam

Saddam

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 4071 posts

Posted 15 May 2003 - 06:12 AM

Thanks all for replies. BlackCloudSky thanks again for USS Liberty links.
Now I wanna post some quotes about you know whom.



"Thanks to the terrible power of our International Banks, we have forced the Christians into wars without number. Wars have a special value for Jews, since Christians massacre each other and make more room for us Jews. Wars are the Jews' Harvest: The Jew banks grow fat on Christian wars. Over 100-million Christians have been swept off the face of the earth by wars, and the end is not yet." (Rabbi Reichorn, speaking at the funeral of Grand Rabbi Simeon Ben-Iudah, 1869, Henry Ford also noted that: 'It was a Jew who said, 'Wars are the Jews' harvest'; but no harvest is so rich as civil wars.' The International Jew: The World's Foremost Problem, Vol. III, p. 180).

"I fear the Jewish banks with their craftiness and tortuous tricks will entirely control the exuberant riches of America. And use it to systematically corrupt modern civilization. The Jews will not hesitate to plunge the whole of Christendom into wars and chaos that the earth should become their inheritance." (Bismarck)

"The Christians are always singing about the blood. Let us give them enough of it! Let us cut their throats and drag them over the altar! And let them drown in their own blood! I dream of the day when the last priest is strangled on the guts of the last preacher." (Jewish Chairman of the American Communist Party, Gus Hall).

"Wars are the Jews harvest, for with them we wipe out the Christians and get control of their gold. We have already killed 100-million of them, and the end is not yet." (Chief Rabbi in France, in 1859, Rabbi Reichorn).
  • 0

#302 Saddam

Saddam

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 4071 posts

Posted 15 May 2003 - 06:18 AM

Two more quotes :


"Israel won the war [WW I]; we made it; we thrived on it; we profited from it. It was our supreme revenge on Christianity." (The Jewish Ambassador from Austria to London, Count Mensdorf, 1918).

"We shall drive the Christians into war by exploiting their national vanity and stupidity. They will then massacre each other, thus giving room for our own people." (Rabbi Reichorn, in Le Contemporain, July 1st, 1880)
  • 0

#303 HAZ

HAZ

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 6377 posts

Posted 15 May 2003 - 11:13 PM

Saddam and PRAVDA friends; be reminded, "The motor force of PROGRESS is truth and not lies." Trotsky......HAZman:D
  • 0

#304 Houlin

Houlin

    Banned

  • Banned
  • PipPipPip
  • 47 posts

Posted 16 May 2003 - 02:31 AM

You quoted Trotsky. He was Jewish? Did he try to overthrow Stalin and introduce capitalism back into Russian Society? Did you read the Military Tribunal of the Trotskyites? Was that a Jewish thing?
  • 0

#305 HAZ

HAZ

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 6377 posts

Posted 16 May 2003 - 03:46 AM

Houlin; actualy the only one of his books I've read was: "The Revolution Betrayed "(verrry good read) (1937).....I believe Lenin's NEP was a combo of capitalism, socialism and cabalism :P , please correct me about this....think Trotsky would've been a stronger choice than Stalin! His comrade Bukarin, (editor of PRAVDA and Inveztia) was probably a mental giant compared to Stalin....however was eliminated!, an enemy of the people, you understand. Yes, Leon's real named sounded Jewish......however not sure about your questions, sorry. In my study of Russian History, guys like Trotsky and Bukarin were skimmed over pretty quickly!.....HAZman
  • 0

#306 Houlin

Houlin

    Banned

  • Banned
  • PipPipPip
  • 47 posts

Posted 16 May 2003 - 02:13 PM

Trotsky also wrote the History of the Russian Revolution plus numerous other sundried books after his exile but still, the point is that he betrayed the Revolution and the tribunal of the Trotskyites including Bukarin exposes all the harm the Trotskyites did to the Russian people. Bucharin admits openly that he did commit many crimes as well as all of his other associates. It seems they were bent on taking the Ukraine and Poland and that they were getting their help from Germany and Churchill. These trials that everyone brushes off as "political" or as "Show" or as "Purge" trials were none of the above. The assassination of Kirov and of Lenin and others were a sort of preparation or condition for a coup orchestrated by Trotsky and seemingly and underhandedly by the Jews? Why ? I don't know. I suspect they wanted to created a Jewish State in this region like Israel. Stalin gave them another state near Japan. They orchestrated the famines and killed millions of Russians. They orchestrated private enterprise and asked growers to hide their products from the government. They admitted the reasons for this. They blame Stalin but the Trotskyites one and all admit they did this dastardly deed. You can not believe that people would commit such crimes but then look at what the jews do to the Palestinians and look at what America has done in Africa and in the Middle East.

All of the ambassadors of the time of the very public trials were shocked by the admissions when the trials were going on. The American Ambassador had many discussions with others about the trial and later put his remarks in writing. The newspapers all over the world had a field day. None of them seemed to indicate that these trials were a joke. Ambassador Joseph Davies was later discounted as a retard but many of the prevailing minds of the time were absolutely convinced that the Trotskyites were guilty of massive crimes against the Russian people. Yet, today, it is far away and a blur and everyone is convinced that Communism had failed, Stalin was a mass murderer, and the trials were but a political tool to rid Stalin of his enemies. The trotsky brand of communism still pretends to be a social alternative to communism. I doubt it is.
  • 0

#307 BlackCloudSky

BlackCloudSky

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 40 posts

Posted 16 May 2003 - 06:56 PM

Just checking, Thanks Houlin & Saddam for interestine info.
  • 0

#308 HAZ

HAZ

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 6377 posts

Posted 16 May 2003 - 08:47 PM

Thanks Houlin, great information! One thing I agree with Trotsky about is the 100% valued monetary system, backed by precious metals! Think about it, if every country were held to this benchmark......a dominate country like the U.S., could'nt bull chit and bully, the rest of the world with its nukes and valueless, cyber kited, yankee dollar!
Think this U.S. monetary system was orchestrated in hell!, look at the poorer countries playing catch up, yea, like they realy will :P lol......
Always felt Bukharin would'nt been on board with this 100% valued monetary system, as I've read, he wrote something about economics.
Whats interesting is ,why the issue about Israel totaly leaving and abandoning their territory for 400 years, fleeing to Eygpt for free food! It would stand to reason, that the people who stayed and toughed it out, would have legal claim, kind of like the salvage right law! The U.N. should enforce the 1948 boundry disputes and tell King Sharoon to go back to the 1967 plan at least! ......HAZman
  • 0

#309 HAZ

HAZ

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 6377 posts

Posted 16 May 2003 - 08:50 PM

excused typo; Bukarin WOULD'VE been on board!
  • 0

#310 Saddam

Saddam

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 4071 posts

Posted 16 May 2003 - 11:22 PM

SEN. McCARTHY & THE KHAZARS' CURSE
WHY THE JEWS HATE JOE

By: Henry Makow

If the late Sen. Joseph McCarthy had been wrong about Communist infiltration in the 1950's, wouldn't he have been refuted and forgotten? Instead, 50 years later, media connected to Khazar (Jewish) bankers and their allies continue to vilify him, indicating that he struck a nerve.

Last week, new transcripts provoked a gratuitous attack in The Washington Post. A Reuters story said McCarthy's "scorched earth investigation into supposed communist infiltration of America's most sensitive institutions...add another layer of tarnish to his place in history."

"The 5,000 pages from his closed-door hearings show no smoking guns, no uncovered spies, no verification of conspiracy theories on which he built his political career...But his probes ruined lives and careers with unproven hints of communist taint."

The story also appeared on NBC Nightly News May 5. Tom Brokaw labelled the "scowling" Senator "a demagogue" and "publicity seeker" whose irresponsible witch-hunt imperilled freedom.

How do Reuters and NBC reconcile their propaganda with the fact that McCarthy has been vindicated by history? Books like "The Soviet World of American Communism" based on newly opened Kremlin archives confirm that Moscow controlled the US Communist Party and subverted thousands of top-level Americans, including a disproportionate number of Jews.

McCarthy did not understand the true nature and dimensions of the subversion. He didn't realize that Communism was a hoax, funded by Khazar bankers and their non-Jewish allies like the Rockefellers, as part of their plan for world domination. According to Prof. Carroll Quigley, "the substantive financial powers of the world were in the hands of these investment bankers...who remained largely behind the scenes..." (Tragedy and Hope, 327. They controlled every President since Woodrow Wilson, and probably masterminded the JFK assassination and 9-11 using the CIA and Mossad. See Victor Thorn, The New World Order Exposed, 2003.

News stories like the one cited above convince Americans to reflexively reject "conspiracy theories." But it's the plotters themselves who own these news outlets.

Samuel Levi Josephat, (baptized Julius Reuter) was the son of a rabbi and the son-in-law of a banker. A revolutionary who fled Germany in 1848, he started the Reuters News Service in 1851. His first major client was the Rothschilds. In 1984, Reuters became a public company but control remains with the "Reuters Founders Ltd."

Eugene Meyer's family came to the US after the failure of the Communist Paris Commune in 1871. He purchased the Washington Post in 1933. One of his first acts was to fire the editor for refusing to editorially support FDR's recognition of the Soviet Union.

Mayer had worked for international bankers Lezard Freres, and for Bernard Baruch as head of the War Industries Board. In Chuck Morse's words, " this board held almost dictatorial power over American industry during the war and, as head, Meyer placed billions of dollars worth of contracts with friends and associates."

Mayer later became the first president of the World Bank. According to Morse, Meyer's daughter Katherine Graham, and presently his grandson Donald E. Graham "has consistently promoted establishment left ideas, suppressed conservative influence [and smeared] investigations into Communist subversion..."

A DIFFERENT PARADIGM

In a book entitled "Iron Curtain Over America" (1951), Lieut. Col. John Beaty, a veteran of US Military Intelligence, suggests that Communism is nothing but a front for Khazar imperial ambitions. (This book is available second-hand at www.abe.com and www.bookfinder.com)

As you will recall, the Khazars were a Turkic-Mongolian people who had an empire in Southern Russia. In 741 AD they converted to Judaism for political reasons, to distinguish themselves from rival Christian and Muslim empires. In 1016 AD the Russians conquered the Khazars but could not assimilate them because of their adherence to the primitive Babylonian Talmud, which creates "a world of its own," characterized by "magic, incantations, miraculous cures and interpretations of dreams." (Graetz's History of the Jews (1893) Vol. II, p.631)

The Judaized Khazars scorned Russian civilization and refused to enter the fold of Christianity. The Romanovs tried unsuccessfully to assimilate or contain them incurring taunts of "anti Semitism." Many Khazars sought change by embracing communism as their religion.

Beaty writes: "Since the Talmud contained more than 12,000 controls, the regimentation of Marxism was acceptable, provided the Khazar politician, like the Talmudic rabbi exercised the power of dictatorship." (27)

From their outposts in the financial centres of the world, the Khazars financed the 1917 Bolshevik Revolution. "Israel, in Russia, suddenly found itself lifted out of its oppression," one Jewish historian wrote. In 1918, 457 out of 556 Communist Commissars were Jewish. Trotsky was Jewish. Lenin's grandfather and Stalin's wife were also Jewish. Anti Semitism was made punishable by death.

Turning history on its head, Beaty traces Second World War partly to Nazi resistance to the Khazar /Communist threat. While only 1% of the population, Jews had a major position in German culture, politics and economy. When Hitler began to "Aryanize" in 1933, the World Jewish Economic Federation declared a "holy war" against Germany and initiated an "economic boycott." Yielding to the clamor, "to which the propaganda-dazed public became gradually accustomed," the US government placed prohibitive tariffs on German imports. (Beaty 63)

Like the Communists, the Nazis also had a diabolical plan for world domination. Beaty's book is a reminder that history is written by the victors.

A statement by Jewish-born British Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli raises the dimension of race in history.

"No man will treat with indifference the principle of race. It is the key to history, and why history is often so confused is that it was written by men who are ignorant of this principle and all of the knowledge that it involves... Language and religion do not make a race--there is one thing that makes a race, and that is blood." (Endymion, pp. 249-50)

WHAT TO THINK?

Beaty suggests that the new world order is a veiled scheme for Jewish racial supremacy. Jews have certainly played a dominant role in revolutionary movements like communism, liberalism, Zionism, neo-conservatism, feminism and modernism. But I don't think a Jewish racial agenda is the explanation. The same gang sacrificed millions of Jews in World War II. Competing elites wouldn't tolerate Jewish domination. Rather, I think the new world order is based on the desire of the superrich, Jewish and non-Jewish, to protect and increase their wealth using a command economy and an authoritarian political system.

From an early age Jewish children are taught that Jews were unjustly persecuted throughout history. They become Communists, Liberals and Zionists hoping to create a better world. But these movements have resulted in brutal persecution of other people by Jews. Communists killed millions of Christians, Kulaks and Germans. Jews need to stop being manipulated by Jewish powerbrokers.

As we have seen, Americans (like Jews) are kept in a mental straitjacket. Joseph McCarthy (and his predecessor Martin Dies) are true American heroes yet they are demonized. Chuck Morse sent me this statement, which gives Sen. Joseph McCarthy his due. It is from Arthur Herman's Joseph McCarthy: Re examining the Life and Legacy of America's Most Hated Senator (2000).

Joe McCarthy's great achievement was that he helped popularize a deep public animosity toward Communism and its agents. McCarthy attacked liberalism itself, exposing its fraud by proving the liberal's willingness to side with Communist infiltration and treason, to glamorize the brutality of Communist governments... Liberalism and Communism are both infected with the same materialistic secular virus...Their identical world-view creates a "strong affinity between the Communists and New Dealers; between the progressive and totalitarian visions of the maximalist state."
  • 0

#311 Saddam

Saddam

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 4071 posts

Posted 16 May 2003 - 11:33 PM

This prophecy, by Benjamin Franklin, was made in a "CHIT CHAT AROUND THE TABLE DURING INTERMISSION," at the Philadelphia Constitutional Convention of 1787. This statement was recorded in the dairy of Charles Cotesworth Pinckney, a delegate from South Carolina: "I fully agree with General Washington, that we must protect this young nation from an insidious influence and impenetration. The menace, gentlemen, is the Jews. "In whatever country Jews have settled in any great numbers, they have lowered its moral tone; depreciated its commercial integrity; have segregated themselves and have not been assimilated; have sneered at and tried to undermine the Christian Religion upon which that nation is founded by objecting to its restrictions; have built up a state within a state; and when opposed have tried to strangle that country to death financially, as in the case of Spain and Portugal.

For over 1700 years the Jews have been bewailing their sad fate in that they have been exiled from their homeland, they call Palestine. But, Gentlemen, should the world today give it to them in fee simple, they would at once find some cogent reason for not returning. Why? Because they are Vampires, and Vampires do not live on Vampires. They cannot live only among themselves. They must subsist on Christians and other people not of their race.

If you do not exclude them from these United States, in this Constitution in less than 200 years they will have swarmed in such great numbers that they will dominate and devour the land, and change our form of government [which they have done -- they have changed it from a Republic to a Democracy], for which we Americans have shed our blood, given our lives, our substance and jeopardized our liberty.

If you do not exclude them, in less than 200 years our descendants will be working in the fields to furnish them sustenance, while they will be in the counting houses rubbing their hands. I warn you, Gentlemen, if you do not exclude the Jews for all time, your children will curse you in your graves. Jews, Gentlemen, are Asiatics; let them be born where they will, or how many generations they are away from Asia, they will never be otherwise. Their ideas do not conform to an American's, and will not even though they live among us ten generations. A Leopard cannot change its spots.

Jews are asiatics, they are a menace to this country if permitted entrance and should be excluded by this Constitution." (by Benjamin Franklin, who was one of the six founding fathers designated to draw up The Declaration of Independence. He spoke before the Constitutional Congress in May 1787, and asked that Jews be barred from immigrating to America. The above are his exact words as quoted from the diary of General Charles Pickney of Charleston, S.C.).
  • 0

#312 Saddam

Saddam

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 4071 posts

Posted 17 May 2003 - 12:46 AM

DONDAN , as a matter I have. Here's one more story. Tell me how you like it.



"A Jew remains a Jew even though he changes his religion; a Christian which would adopt the Jewish religion would not become a Jew, because the quality of a Jew is not in the religion but in the race. A Free thinker and Atheist always remains a Jew." (Jewish World, London December 14, 1922)

DO YOU KNOW WHO REALLY BROUGHT THE BLACK SLAVES TO AMERICA?

The following information is documented in 4 volumes by Elizabeth Donnan, with Documents illustrative of the slave trade in America. They can be found in the National Library Washington, D.C. and in the Carnegie Institute of Technology Library, Pittsburgh, PA.

Name of Ship Owners
Abigail.......... Aaron Lopez, Moses Levy and Jacob Franks
Crown............ Isaac Levy and Natham Simpson
Nassau........... Moses Levy
Four Sisters..... Moses Levy
Anne and Eliza... Justus Bosch and John Adams
Prudent Betty.... Henry Cruger and Jacob Phoenix
Hester........... Mordecai and Davdi Gomez
Elizabeth........ Mordecai and Davdi Gomez
Antigua.......... Natham Marston and Abram Lyell
Betsy............ Wm. De Woolf
Polly............ James De Woolf
White Horse...... Jan de Sweevts
Expedition....... John and Jacob Roosevelt
Charlotte........ Moses and Sam Levy; Jacob Franks
Caracoa.......... Moses and Sam Levy
  • 0

#313 Houlin

Houlin

    Banned

  • Banned
  • PipPipPip
  • 47 posts

Posted 17 May 2003 - 12:47 AM

Some of this stuff leaves me speachless. Anyway, about history, you quoted "Like the Communists, the Nazis also had a diabolical plan for world domination. Beaty's book is a reminder that history is written by the victors." Just to note something simple. When Beaty writes, it is only his story and no one elses. When the Nazis write, it is only there story of events. When the victor writes his account, it is only his story. Get it? His story? History. You can not place too much emphasis on Beaty's account like you can not place too much emphasis on the concept of History. History is a misnomer. There is no such thing as History. It is an abstract concept that can not be defined. We would like to believe that it is a repository of the events as they occurred, but it can never be. More importantly there can be no one version of events. We would like to believe that we can see ourselves by our history but this can never be either. It is all illusion. The only way to the truth is to see this persons point of view, that person's point of view and so forth. Of course, we must never put the cart before the horse and we should never condemn until we know what we are talking about.

I used to ask myself what this McCarthy was all about...What turned him on? Well, I suspect I know what got him all riled up about Communism. Joseph Stalin. Back in the 1940's, the US started developing the Atomic Bomb. A lot of people knew how important this was albeit how secret it was also. A lot of people in America fealt like chumps working for slavemasters like the state. A lot of people in America thought Communism and Lenin and Stalin were the greatest thing since apple pie. These same people hated America for what it was. America was a bigoted racist monsterous society. One just had to look at what Roosevelt did to the Mexicans in the 30's, the Japanese in the 40's and the blacks in the south and all around them. America was and is a rotten to the core republic. It is run by barbarians and jews. Well here is my take on this.

When Roosevelt and Churchill sicked Hitler on Stalin, they thought Stalin would buckle. They thought Hitler would swamp Stalin. Stalin on the other hand did not cave in. Instead, he mobilized. The American Ambassador to Russia, Averil Harriman said to Roosevelt that he did not think that Stalin would throw in the towel. Roosevelt promised him verbally that if he fought Hitler, he would help him defeat him and set up a second front. He also claimed he would aid his cause with Lend Lease. They sent military men to the Kremlin to ascertain what was needed and to control the flow of american goods. These military men also tried to get the upper hand on Stalin and spied on him and his military. However, Stalin was on to them and he was a man fit to be tied. He despised Harriman and Roosevelt and I think he would have assasinated Churchill if he could. In any event, his daughter told me that he turned the tables on Roosevelt. Svetlana said that an opportunity arose where Russians needed to oversee certain aspects of Lend Lease; that they really could not be handled by the canadians or the americans in Seatle and Canada. It was akin to the same reason that Roosevelt had sent in hundreds of military attache's into the Kremlin and throughout Russia. They had a twofold purpose which was to help as little as possible and to spy as much as possible. Stalin did the same.

The interesting thing is that many americans covertly liked the Russians and in the 40's began passing the secrets of the Atom bomb onto Russia. When Stalin discovered this, he orchestrated the entire siezure of all the phases of technology necessary to get the Atom bomb so that by 1949, he shocked America out of its complacency when he exploded his bomb. The Americans were thoroughly taken aback by this event. They could not believe in any stretch of the imagination that the USSR had the necessary technology. They went on a witch hunt to discover how they got this technology. In the following years, slowly but surely they discovered that practically everyone was Russia's friends and these people openly admitted to just giving the Russians this technology or that technology. Many did it for nothing. Stalin had the last laugh. They sent agents in to kill him when they finally found out.

McCarthy and his Red Scare and commies in every woodpile and in the State Department made a fool out of himself but I suspect that this was really what the Commie Scare was all about. It is just my version of what happened and my read on what the McCarthy Era was really all about.

As for the Khazars, according to one author, they died out when the Mongols swept west and took out many people. How they can now show up in the 20th century out of space and time is possibly a mystery ....but then the jews are a mysterious lot.

As for Benjamen Franklin, is this really a true account of his words? I have several letters by Washington to jews and he seems very deferential and subservient to them. This, the so called leader of America?

cheers Saddam
  • 0

#314 Saddam

Saddam

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 4071 posts

Posted 17 May 2003 - 07:42 PM

"We Jews regard our race as superior to all humanity, and look forward, not to its ultimate union with other races, but to its triumph over them." (Goldwin Smith, Jewish Professor of Modern History at Oxford University, October, 1981)

"We Jews, we are the destroyers and will remain the destroyers. Nothing you can do will meet our demands and needs. We will forever destroy because we want a world of our own." (You Gentiles, by Jewish Author Maurice Samuels, p. 155)

"We will have a world government whether you like it or not. The only question is whether that government will be achieved by conquest or consent." (Jewish Banker Paul Warburg, February 17, 1950, as he testified before the U.S. Senate).
  • 0

#315 Saddam

Saddam

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 4071 posts

Posted 17 May 2003 - 07:50 PM

"Cunning, no doubt came to Churchill in the Jewish genes transmitted by his mother, Lady Randolph Churchill, nee Jenny Jacobson/Jerome." (Jerusalem Post, January 18, 1993).

"I am not an American citizen of Jewish faith. I am a Jew. I have been an American for sixty-three years, but I have been a Jew for 4000 years." (Rabbi Stephen S. Wise)

"Slavery is likely to be abolished by the war power and chattel slavery destroyed. This, I and my [Jewish] European friends are glad of, for slavery is but the owning of labor and carries with it the care of the laborers, while the European plan, led by England, is that capital shall control labor by controlling wages. This can be done by controlling the money. The great debt that capitalists will see to it is made out of the war, must be used as a means to control the volume of money. To accomplish this, the bonds must be used as a banking basis. We are now awaiting for the Secretary of the Treasury to make his recommendation to Congress. It will not do to allow the greenback, as it is called, to circulate as money any length of time, as we cannot control that." (Hazard Circular, issued by the Rothschild controlled Bank of England, 1862)
  • 0

#316 Saddam

Saddam

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 4071 posts

Posted 17 May 2003 - 08:11 PM

CONFRONTING SEMITISM
IT'S CALLED BRAINWASHING

By: Alan Stang

Whatever "anti-Semitism" used to be in the United States, today it is employed almost without exception as a tool of conquest. Consider that it doesn't really mean anything. I looked up the word "Semite" in a couple of dictionaries. The consensus seems to be that a Semite can be both a Jew and an Arab. The term "anti-Semitism" has become more of a label than a word that conveys meaning, a button akin to "Enter" designed by programmers to elicit a specific response rather than invoke thought.

Some years ago, while on a speaking tour, I was brought to a high school in Ohio to address a senior class. Needless to say, I discussed Communism and Hitler, but because I did so in a way they had never heard, they had no idea what to make of it. Names like McCarthy and Roosevelt, or words like left and right wing were mere audio-labels they either jeered or applauded, but when I left I could see that they were wondering which side I was on, whether I was a good guy or not. Later, of course, the teacher would tell them.

Consider the so-called "N" word. It started out as an appellation that offended people of color. So we were told, and because we were Christian gentlemen we didn't use it to avoid giving those people offense. Case closed. Instead, the word has been used to foment a literal reign of terror, in which someone suspected of breathing it even in private can be ruined for life. Incredibly, this is not an exaggeration.

In my novel, Perestroika Sunset, about a Soviet scheme to seize power in the united States, there is a scene in which the heroine, a professor of English in a university outside Washington, D.C., is accused of "racism" against blacks but can't find out why. At last she learns accidentally that the accusation stems from her use of the word "niggardly" in a report.

When I reread that scene, it seemed too preposterous to be real. I considered removing it. Happily, I did not. A couple of weeks later, a story out of Washington said that a top city official there had been fired for racism because he used the word "niggardly" in a report. Compounding the preposterous nature of all this is the fact that "niggardly" and "niggard" are not even English words; they derive from the Swedish language, which is spoken too far north to suffer this problem.

But former funny man Dick Gregory can entitle his autobiography Nigger and survive. That's okay. The music industry can extrude noise in which blacks routinely are called "niggers" and that's apparently fine. It must be because that noise is allowed to make millions. So, everything depends on who is using the word. If the right people use it, it's a term of endearment.

The point of all this is that the anxiety you may feel when you see the word "nigger" in print has been instilled in your mind deliberately by the world's foremost experts in the art. The process is called "brainwashing" and its purpose is to paralyze and emasculate you, to cripple you with guilt while totalitarian connivers dismantle your country and your culture.

And so it is with "anti-Semitism," another brainwashing tool the totalitarians use with similar effect. "Anti-Semitism" is pretty near the worst thing you can be accused of today, worse than sodomy or embezzlement, certainly far worse than dropping your pants and asking for sex in the Oval Office. In fact, the billionaire totalitarian Socialist conspirators who rule us have found "anti-Semitism" so helpful in their scheme for world government that they will take pains to protect it.

Today, "anti-Semitism" is an even more important tool in their arsenal, because of the recent war in Iraq and the terror in Israel. They have invested considerable time, trouble and money to maintain it. They certainly will not give it up without a fight.

Many years ago, a couple of men in New York formed something called the Jewish Society of Americanists. The purpose of the new group was to be just what the name implied and the organizers scheduled a press conference to announce it. At the last moment, however, one of them caved, leaving the other, Samuel L. Blumenfeld, alone.

Sam and I were graduates of the same college. It was Sam who had introduced me to what we then called the Communist Conspiracy. I had heard of Communism and knew it was something they did in Russia, but that was all I knew. At the time, Sam was still Jewish; today, he is a Christian with a strong affinity for Calvin and has come to church with us. This of course is the same Dr. Samuel L. Blumenfeld who has written all those books about the horrors of government (mis)education, the totalitarian crimes of the National Education Association and the benefits of home schooling.

Sam was understandably reluctant to face the New York press alone. And who could blame him. We are talking about a bunch of bottom-feeding, atheist bastards (pardon my language, ladies), world government traitors like Walter Cronkite, **** bags and accomplished liars who show up however much they detest you, if you give them drinks and a free meal. Sam asked me to fill in for the young man who had caved and I did so with the understanding that Sam would do the talking.

I was new in the literary racket at the time, having written just one book. In the course of the press conference, one of the feasting reporters asked me between gorgings why we had formed this organization, and I made the mistake of saying that I had never seen anti-Semitism in New York. In my na?ve ignorance, I assumed this was a remarkably unremarkable remark, meant to inspire good will. I was sure it would make them happy.

I didn't say there was no such thing as anti-Semitism. All I had said was I had never seen it there. New York was then, and maybe still is, the world's biggest Jewish city. If memory serves, about half the population then was Jewish. There were more Jews in New York City than there were in the nation of Israel.

In view of the fact that half the people you pass in the street there are Jews, would it really be so surprising and impossible for someone born and raised in New York never to see anti-Semitism? Wouldn't this be something like the discovery that no one in Stockholm or Oslo is anti-Caucasian?

You are already smiling, because you are as sophisticated as I was na?ve. To my amazement and consternation, the assemblage of vicious predators erupted with savage disdain. They refused to believe I had never seen anti-Semitism. They hated the very idea. Presumably, they wanted me to talk about the deprivation I had suffered. They "knew" I was lying.

It became quite obvious, at least to me, at that press conference, that anti-Semitism was a favorite tool they would not give up. Guess which hopelessly stupid author was skewered for the next couple of days by the press for daring to make such an idiotic remark. During those years, the Cronkite evening news people taped a couple or three segments with us. They were all a waste of time. Not one of those segments ever got on the air.

What lesson should we derive from all this? The "N" word and anti-Semitism are not just a bad word we shouldn't say and a bad thing we shouldn't do; they are ideological weapons deliberately calculated to emasculate us, brainwashing tools designed for the purpose. Again, you need to read a couple of books by Ed Hunter, the man who coined the term "brainwashing."

One of those books is entitled simply, Brainwashing. The other is Brainwashing in Red China. Reading those books, you will experience a shock of recognition, because the same thing is happening here. Indeed, some of the victims were our POWS in Korea. Of course, in Red China the words they used-the labels-were different because the cultures are. But the process was the same. In Red China, the victims were forced to inculpate themselves in "self-criticism" sessions.

Victims here are required to do the same thing. The procedure includes a public mea culpa and "sensitivity training," a laundered term for brainwashing. Remember what happened to Braves pitcher John Rocker? By now, the list of victims is endless. Who will mumble something in his sleep and be next?

Once we are aware this is a process-once we realize it doesn't happen by itself-once we understand that true haters are doing this to cripple us, the anxiety will dissipate and desensitization can begin. That doesn't mean we need to be shouting the title of Dick Gregory's book into the telephone when we call talk shows, or publicly expressing hostility to Jews.

It does mean that wherever the people who hate America try to use these techniques we need to tell them that their scam is over and that they won't get away with it any more. We need to go nose-to-nose with them and no longer back up.
  • 0

#317 HAZ

HAZ

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 6377 posts

Posted 17 May 2003 - 08:18 PM

Saddam and PRAVDA friends; think this is verrry interesting!
"After the Revolution of 1905, the Czar had prudently transferred some $400 million in cash to the New York banks, Chase, National City, Guaranty Trust, J.P. Morgan Co., and Hanover Trust. In 1914, these same banks bought the controlling number of shares in the newly organized Federal Reserve Bank of New York, paying for the stock with the Czar's sequestered funds. Thus the Romanoff fasmily actually owns the controlling interest in the Federal Reserve Banks today!
Since 1917, a cloud has hung over the financial structure of the Western democracies, threatening their jerrybuilt financial structure, the fear that some court somewhere, might eventually rule that the Czar's funds must be turned over to the rightful heirs. This would affect not only the ownership of the Federal Reserve Bank stock, but, with payment of interest, would mean the end of our ten largest financial institutions."
Kind of make you wonder, why did Germany, realy declare war on Russia in 1914!.......:confused: .......HAZman
  • 0

#318 Saddam

Saddam

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 4071 posts

Posted 17 May 2003 - 09:06 PM

i ibn Shaprut, who was foreign minister to Abd-al-Rahman, Sultan of Cordova, in his letter to King Joseph of the Chazars (about 960 A.D.)...speaks of the tradition according to which the Chazars once dwelt near the Seir Mountains [The 'Seir Mountains' are none other than the original land of Esau-Edom - 'Thus dwelt Esau in mount Seir: Esau is Edom.' {Genesis 36:8}. Seir was a mountain range sought of the Dead Sea and was also known as the 'land of Edom' {Genesis 36:21}. The Seir mountains were the home of the Edomites for nearly a millennium {The Edomites arrived in Edom or Seir at the end of the 14th and beginning of the 13th century B.C. Encyclopedia Judaica, Vol. 6, p. 372} Thus we have it from Jewish sources that the Khazars originally 'dwell near the Seir Mountains' so are racially of Edomite stock. But how and when did Edomites get to Khazaria? There is evidence that in the 6th century B.C., some of the Edomites fled their homeland of Seir and migrated north, 'After the fall of Jerusalem, in 586 B.C., the Edomites began to press northward {Ezekiel 36:5} {The New Westminster Dictionary of the Bible, ed. by Henry S. Gehman, The Westminster Press, Philadelphia, 1970, p. 418}]." (The Jewish Encyclopedia, Vol. IV, (1905), p. 3).

"...the large majority of surviving Jews in the world of Eastern European, and thus perhaps mainly of Khazar origin. If so, this would mean that their ancestors came not from the Jordan but from the Volga, not from Canaan, but from the Caucasus...and that genetically they are more closely related to the Hun, Uigur and Magyar tribes than to the seed of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob." (Arthur Koestler, The Thirteenth Tribe, Random House, 1967, p. 17).
  • 0

#319 Guest__*

Guest__*
  • Guests

Posted 17 May 2003 - 09:23 PM

HAZ do you have any links for your last post .I need as much info as possible on the looted Russian gold
  • 0

#320 HAZ

HAZ

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 6377 posts

Posted 17 May 2003 - 10:47 PM

No I don't bro....this came from a book written by a guy who was once high in the offices here, when he became vocal about the hooliganism of the Federal Reserve, it's said his days were numbered!.....however, was so high profile in certain circles they dared not!...no publisher, would touch his material, (for obvious fear) so, published himself ! .....guess you already realize, in 1914, the Czar was absolutly the richest man on the planet!..let me know and I'll send book title, and how to order direct....not here to sell books, however it's a very good read, in regard, HAZman
  • 0




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Copyright © 2016 Pravda.Ru