Jump to content

Theme© by Fisana
 

Photo

What would it take for Russia to be #1?


  • Please log in to reply
7545 replies to this topic

#7361 Pliny

Pliny

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 3587 posts

Posted 28 December 2007 - 05:58 PM

Best of the season to you, Bader! Have a good year.
  • 0

#7362 Bader

Bader

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1757 posts

Posted 28 December 2007 - 06:32 PM

Originally posted by Pliny
Best of the season to you, Bader! Have a good year.



Thanks Pliny. Complements of the season to you as well.
  • 0

#7363 woj1@cyberonic.

woj1@cyberonic.

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 10667 posts

Posted 30 December 2007 - 06:01 PM

Happy New Year to all
  • 0

#7364 woj1@cyberonic.

woj1@cyberonic.

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 10667 posts

Posted 30 December 2007 - 06:06 PM

"The first anniversary of the remembrance of the crime of Saddam's assassination committed by the Americans and the Iranian agents they have collaborated with to carry out a fake trial."
year after the execution, Iraq remains to a great degree divided :scrollhah :kowt: :Party:
  • 0

#7365 Bader

Bader

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1757 posts

Posted 31 December 2007 - 07:32 PM

Happy new year, Woj, Pacific and Raggz and others.
  • 0

#7366 Bader

Bader

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1757 posts

Posted 31 December 2007 - 07:54 PM

Originally posted by woj1@cyberonic.
"The first anniversary of the remembrance of the crime of Saddam's assassination committed by the Americans and the Iranian agents they have collaborated with to carry out a fake trial."
year after the execution, Iraq remains to a great degree divided :scrollhah :kowt: :Party:




Cant see how the US gained any advantage to force through the trial and hanging in particular from the Iranians.

The Iranians will have reason to hate Hussein but they also have as much the US, so I cant see any grounds for them to collude on such a extraneous issue expecially when it gave credit to the US and nothing what so-ever to Iran!

There are three other issues that have to be covered to be able to make that claim. One is the fact that the invading US, (seudo-)christian led, nation has hung a muslim man.
The second is the particulars regards the religious details associated that are important to the cultural revolutionary Iran.
Thirdly there is a occultic aspect to this hanging that doesnt sit with Iranians at all in my view. That links to Israel much better than Iran. Hussein fired his junk missiles into Israel, it is expedient he die publically for it. There can be no question the cell-phone photos were deliberately made avilable world wide for a purpose which offended Muslims and Iranians are not psychopathicly inclined.
It was a disgrace to justice and it had the same putrid smell as sept 11 cover-up and the war and all the lies and the death of Melosovich and his mock trial.
Next step is to say Iran did Sept 11 to get back at Hussein.
  • 0

#7367 woj1@cyberonic.

woj1@cyberonic.

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 10667 posts

Posted 01 January 2008 - 06:24 PM

Sorry for my errors in understanding some past events.
As a Slav, I want Iraq, Iran and maybe Turkey as well, to be the Slavs friends, only I don
  • 0

#7368 Bader

Bader

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1757 posts

Posted 01 January 2008 - 06:37 PM

[QUOTE]Originally posted by woj1@cyberonic.
[B]Sorry for my errors in understanding some past events.
As a Slav, I want Iraq, Iran and maybe Turkey as well, to be the Slavs friends, only I don
  • 0

#7369 woj1@cyberonic.

woj1@cyberonic.

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 10667 posts

Posted 01 January 2008 - 06:40 PM

Originally posted by Bader
B]Cant see how the US gained any advantage to force through the trial and hanging in particular from the Iranians.

The Iranians will have reason to hate Hussein but they also have as much the US, so I cant see any grounds for them to collude on such a extraneous issue expecially when it gave credit to the US and nothing what so-ever to Iran!
One is the fact that the invading US, (seudo-)christian led, nation has hung a muslim man.
The second is the particulars regards the religious details associated that are important to the cultural revolutionary Iran.
That links to Israel much better than Iran. Hussein fired his junk missiles into Israel, it is expedient he die publically for it.
It was a disgrace to justice and it had the same putrid smell as ept 11 cover-up and the war and all the lies and the death of Melosovich and his mock trial.
Next step is to say Iran did Sept 11 to get back at Hussein. B]

Hussein is executed and Milosevic is dead but victory for invader is further with every day. :scrollhah
  • 0

#7370 woj1@cyberonic.

woj1@cyberonic.

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 10667 posts

Posted 01 January 2008 - 07:09 PM

Originally posted by Bader
B]The NWO has made that very difficult in the short term because
the al qaeda after Russia withdrew from Afghanistan were moved into Kosovo and Bosnia to destablise and break up Jugoslavia.You know the rest but Serbia is trying to avoid becoming a colony of Brussels and so there will be grounds for those Islamic nations, now the UE has rejected Turkey as a member, through economic and trade first to become friends. But it will be effected by how the Kosovo question is resolved.
If Iraq can get those US banking/finaciers off their backs, Iran is free of them and Turkey will need to also be incontrol of its financial policy for them to relatively free. Naturally they will inevitably have to have increasing trade links to Russia as well
otherwise the US and UE will undermine them. Thats how I see it. /B]

We can have hopes but: Turkey doesn
  • 0

#7371 woj1@cyberonic.

woj1@cyberonic.

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 10667 posts

Posted 03 January 2008 - 04:31 PM

British Indian Ocean terrytory BIOT(Africa to Indonesia,)
British Virgin Islands, Cayman Island, Bermuda, Barbados,, Burma, Bangladesh, Bahrain....
  • 0

#7372 woj1@cyberonic.

woj1@cyberonic.

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 10667 posts

Posted 03 January 2008 - 04:34 PM

Ashmore and Cartier Islands
(territory of Australia)
:scrollhah
  • 0

#7373 woj1@cyberonic.

woj1@cyberonic.

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 10667 posts

Posted 03 January 2008 - 09:29 PM

Originally posted by woj1@cyberonic.
B]British Indian Ocean terrytory BIOT(Africa to Indonesia,)
British Virgin Islands, Cayman Island, Bermuda, Barbados,, Burma, Bangladesh, Bahrain.... B]

Sudan Kenya, in Pakistan
  • 0

#7374 woj1@cyberonic.

woj1@cyberonic.

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 10667 posts

Posted 04 January 2008 - 07:44 PM

BRITAIN DETERMINED TO KEEP BRITISH COUNCIL OFFICES OPEN IN RUSSIA
A spokesman for the British Embassy in Moscow was quoted by the BBC on January 3 as saying that the British Council offices in St. Petersburg and Yekaterinburg will stay open despite a Russian order to close them. The spokesman said that the British Council's legal position in Russia is "rock-solid." The council plans to resume work on 14 January after the Russian New Year break. It's perplexing that the Russian government is pursuing this vendetta against the British Council, which does only good things for Russia and Russians." The dispute over the British Council is widely seen as part of the continuing row stemming from the 2006 London poisoning of former Russian security agent Aleksandr Litvinenko (see "RFE/RL Newsline," December 17 and 21, 2007, and January 2 and 3, 2008). On January 3, Russian news agencies quoted Foreign Ministry spokesman Mikhail Kamynin as saying that "we have not raised the question of the British Council's office in Moscow thus far, and this is an act of goodwill." This was the first time that a Russian official made mention of the council's Moscow office in the course of the dispute. Kamynin also accused Britain of "politicizing" the issue. On January 4, the "International Herald Tribune" quoted an unnamed British Embassy official as calling Kamynin's remarks "hypocritical in the extreme." The daily also quoted Kathryn Board, who heads the council's overseas network, as saying that "if there is a law that we don't comply with, the Russian government has yet to point it out."
  • 0

#7375 woj1@cyberonic.

woj1@cyberonic.

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 10667 posts

Posted 04 January 2008 - 07:49 PM

NATO
  • 0

#7376 lolomarsei

lolomarsei

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 9226 posts

Posted 04 January 2008 - 09:57 PM

[QUOTE]Originally posted by woj1@cyberonic.
[B]NATO
  • 0

#7377 Bader

Bader

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1757 posts

Posted 06 January 2008 - 07:57 AM

Originally posted by woj1@cyberonic.
BRITAIN DETERMINED TO KEEP BRITISH COUNCIL OFFICES OPEN IN RUSSIA
A spokesman for the British Embassy in Moscow was quoted by the BBC on January 3 as saying that the British Council offices in St. Petersburg and Yekaterinburg will stay open despite a Russian order to close them. The spokesman said that the British Council's legal position in Russia is "rock-solid." The council plans to resume work on 14 January after the Russian New Year break. It's perplexing that the Russian government is pursuing this vendetta against the British Council, which does only good things for Russia and Russians." The dispute over the British Council is widely seen as part of the continuing row stemming from the 2006 London poisoning of former Russian security agent Aleksandr Litvinenko (see "RFE/RL Newsline," December 17 and 21, 2007, and January 2 and 3, 2008). On January 3, Russian news agencies quoted Foreign Ministry spokesman Mikhail Kamynin as saying that "we have not raised the question of the British Council's office in Moscow thus far, and this is an act of goodwill." This was the first time that a Russian official made mention of the council's Moscow office in the course of the dispute. Kamynin also accused Britain of "politicizing" the issue. On January 4, the "International Herald Tribune" quoted an unnamed British Embassy official as calling Kamynin's remarks "hypocritical in the extreme." The daily also quoted Kathryn Board, who heads the council's overseas network, as saying that "if there is a law that we don't comply with, the Russian government has yet to point it out."



They can cut off their power and water.

The 'law' is 'do unto others as you would be done by'. If Britain wants to be treated better then they should have behaved correctly in the first place.
  • 0

#7378 woj1@cyberonic.

woj1@cyberonic.

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 10667 posts

Posted 06 January 2008 - 04:29 PM

Iran says Bush's Middle East trip aimed at "interfering" Bush will travel to Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Bahrain, the United Arab Emirates and Egypt.
Bush told mass media in Washington that part of the reason for his trip to the Middle East is to warn countries in the region that nuclear armed Iran will be a danger to the Mideast region.
  • 0

#7379 woj1@cyberonic.

woj1@cyberonic.

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 10667 posts

Posted 06 January 2008 - 04:38 PM

Iran has no plan to normalize ties with U.S.
Ali Khamenei said that he was willing to restore diplomatic relations with the United States but doing so now would endanger Iran's security.
"We have never said the ties between the two countries will be cut forever... but under the current conditions of the U.S. government, it's harmful to resume the relations and we should not do it," Tehran and Washington broke up diplomatic ties since Iran's 1979 Islamic Revolution and the succedent hostage incident of U.S. embassy which was taken over by the Islamic students in 1980.
  • 0

#7380 woj1@cyberonic.

woj1@cyberonic.

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 10667 posts

Posted 06 January 2008 - 04:43 PM

Islamic Hamas movement on Saturday rejected U.S. President George W. Bush's visit to the region which will start on January 10.

"Bush's visit widens the internal Palestinian splitting by supporting one Palestinian side (Fatah) to fight another side (Hamas) and to incite against ending the internal political differences,".
  • 0




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Copyright © 2016 Pravda.Ru