That is correct !
Well Adrian, let's first consider this: There's NO evidence that you acted without anyone asking for it. Correct?
So, the game is that you acuse me for something, and if I can not prove you are wrong, then I'm guilty?
If I say "Odd did bla bla bla bla" then it is the truth, if there is no evidence that I am wrong in my acusations?
That is indeed very Odd. Then everyone of this planet could be acused for being murderes and thiefs.
What's up, Adrian you sure are aggressive and unpleasant.
Just answer the question. The point is: You didn't act without anyone asking you to act?
YES, unless you're on a powertrip. I am !!!!
Do you then admit, that everything else you wrote was wrong? It is the only natural consequence.
I did it by myself, because I am on a powertrip, and the rest of what you acuse me, or your imaginary lobbygroup for, is WRONG
Now, please stop that childish behaviour, can't you answer a few simple questions without going loco?
Who were the posters asking for the banning of Sergio1, formerly chaseheston? Now, I'm at a big disadvantage here since there's no free access to the information you refuse to share. Pretty much the same case as if I said "Odd stole my bike" and in next sentence sayinbg "But I cant proove it, because he wont let me search his flat and his bla bla. This is completely absurd odd!
OK, you refuse to give a coherent answer.
Still, judging by the sentiments of some posters on this it's not hard to point out a number of them. Why many don't have the guts to openly admit their inclination to exclude nonconformist fellow posters is rather pathetic. You migth believe me, or think I lie. Your own business, but...IF someone have complained about Sergio, I would have judged it neutrally (Ok, you dont believe that, so not much of an argument). I honestly don't remember if anyone complained about him.
Are you seriously stating that you banned Sergio1 without any input whatsoever from posters? If so, you are dangerously close to earn a new title.
Let me get this straight, no matter how much I loath Sergio1's idiotic posts, I see no reason for banning him. I believe in freedom, no matter what the holier-than-thou posters say. Then go after the moderating function, and not for me personally as you did it moderator thread. My languamistakes or lack of mental capabillities have nothing to do with moderation of a forum as a neutral topic. You go after me as a person, not after moderation functions itself.
Please don't go paranoid on me. Adrian wake up, YOU are moderator, YOU are responsible for your competence and actions.
So, if you take the time to make a list of the complainers, you'll probably find that the distribution don't match the average poster.
Paradoxically, the main argument for getting rid of Sergio1 has been that 'legitimate' posters' threads aren't exposed long enough. Could it be that these 'legitimates' are among the complainers? It would be very hard to believe that anyone hasn't been able to post because of the three abominable culprits. Noone ever wote "Hasn't been able to post" as you put up as something you dont belive. Again, you make up something all by yourself, and argument against your own words. This is really silly.
Sure, I'll dig up the phrase.
?s I've stated elsewhere, covertly lobbying the moderator is a sure sign of cowardice. That's what my book says. You don't have to feel singled out unless you think that this sort of behaviour is compliant with common decency. There is a complain button, and they use that. If this is rigth or not is not up to me to judge, but its a function implemented here.
By saying that "lobbying the moderator" I also feel that you imply, that I just do what people complain about, and it couldn't be more wrong. It is taking me as a fool, and that is another stupidity from your side now.
Well, wasn't libdeth banned after you were lobbyed by Firecat?
Or are you still maintaining that you act solely out if your own wims? Please quote me correctly:' covertly
Adrian, this thread could very well turn into great length, can you really afford to get bogged down into a myriad of questions? You can try me.
I'm only trying to give you some time off.
There's no hard feelings over here, it's just that this Lilliputian will never bend to injustice and arse-licking. Same with this lilliputian. Your absolutely biggest mistake is that you by strange and mysterious reasons thinks, that just because I try to behave nice, then I feel for arse-licking. You really couldnt be more wrong Odd.
This your idea of being nice? I really wish you could show some coherence and logic to your arguments.
Frankly, this sordid business has nothing whatsoever with me personally to do. It all falls back on if we should accept this ubersturmbannfuhrer behaviour. No questions allowed, Mr besserwisser knows what's best for the poor posters etc.
OK, shall I cut 'n paste all of the outstanding issues from the 'sticky' thread? Or are you continuing on your unfinished previou post in this thread?
Hvorfor blir du sa elak?