France vs. US elections for dummies: Sarkozy 2007 compared to Bush 2004 and Bush 2000

[MattMarriott]

Sarkozy / Royal 2007 compared to Bush / Kerry 2004 and Bush / Gore 2000

How difficult was it to fulfill the agenda for these three key elections? Comparing how Sarkozy was elected President of France in the french presidential elections 2007 with each of the Bush victories, gives the answer...

Same as Bush vs. Kerry 2004 - acceptance of voting machines
The introduction of voting machines in the French Presidential elections 2007, served one of two main purposes of its introduction in the US elections 2004:
- have the candidate who was supposed to lose, acknowledge that the elections were fair, i.e.pave the way to have next time votes counted exclusively by machines.

Difference to Bush 2004 - president not decided by the software
But in France 2007, even if in the first round the machines served to count less votes for the anti-EU platform, unlike in the US 2004 elections, the machines were not necessary to elect the candidate who had to win.
That's why its introduction was limited to count only 5 pct of the votes in France.

Same as Bush 2000 - packaged as "nationalist", no need to fraud
The illuminati didn't need voting machines to elect the right candidate because they knew they could use in France 2007 the same trick used with Bush in the 2000 elections: selling the only "alternative" to face the most important problem, the loss of national identity with the "natives" facing the prospect of becoming the minority of the active population in the near future, due to the "open borders" policies.
A couple of sentences was all the packaging the illuminati needed to sell Sarkozy as the man who would solve the problem of the french "banlieue", or in other words, the fact that in 2011 the muslims will be the majority of the population under 30 years age.
An example of a sheep's reaction to this illuminati theater:

Nicolas Sarkozy in quotes
"'I want an integrated Europe, in other words, a Europe that has borders ... Turkey is in Asia Minor."
Turkey will never join the EU....

Like Bush 2004, Sarkozy was the candidate who had to win
Bush was the candidate who had to win in 2004, since Kerry was not the right actor for the role required by the tasks ahead: continuing the war in Iraq, completing the transition to the terror state and continue to reduce the population to "working poor".

If the muslim population in France would be already large enough to prevent Sarkozy from winning, then the software would do the job for him, like it did for Bush in 2004.
In fact for Sarkozy's first task, Segolene Royal would fit more the profile: completing the destruction of what is left from national independence in France (not much...). But since this task is nearly done, it's not decisive for the profile of the right candidate.

His profile fits much better than Royal the second task, the KEY task he has ahead, the reason why Sarkozy was the candidate who had to win 2007 like Bush was 2004: to complete the destruction of the social benefits and of the salaries of the french, by brutally increasing the pace.
A subject for which he was not even forced to play completely theater, like in the "open borders" issue...

[Mr Teapot]

Now if Sarkozy has the balls that Thatcher of Britain had then he might save France from becoming a 3rd world basket case.

[Zen]

Originally posted by Mr Teapot
Now if Sarkozy has the balls that Thatcher of Britain had then he might save France from becoming a 3rd world basket case.

You're an idiot!

[vietnambob]

100 personal vehicles are torched. This has nothing to do with fun-filled riots. We're just talking a run-of-the-mill average night here. You get three guesses but the first two don't count..who are the main ones torching them? Aren't they the by-products of many years in France of the Ultra-Liberal (never mind the basics) line of thinking? Free to argue Marriot if you want but that's all that's been there since I've been here...and I just bet I've been here a lot longer than you.

Any problems today France has and it simply cannot be rationally denied..the franc stops with the Liberals.

Being a US cry-baby liberal yourself where's the surprise when you flip to page two and go with the diebold drill but I know what really bugs you here. Voter fraud is so much easier when done in person.

Hey any of you guys need a carton of smokes. You don't want Bush for business do you..you want Kerry of the Heinz ketchup fortune don't you because he da man fo you!

Hel (hic) yeah! Well jump in boys!

Wow 85% of the people voted in France and now we see how they feel..around 53% of those. But for it to work Parliament must be in line with the new President.

Should happen shouldn't it Parliament represents the people doesn't it? And the people just said..didn't they?

I wonder if we will see that the Liberals are nearly as much so when things are not working directly for them.

I think Matt the French people are just tired of the BS that their governments of the past half century promised them was a great idea and now obviously...was not.

Maybe that's all this is.

[vietnambob]

This constant barrage of sheer brilliance such as is your typical forte here..deep thoughts just like this...
__

You're an idiot!

__

Hey guy do you ever wonder what your life would have been like if you didn't view the world as a gigantic welfare line in which you've finally elbowed your way into the forefront? I mean if you'd actually ever done or at least tried to do something in this existance?

Here's my guess Zen..no you haven't..

Benito

[sb11]

Sarkozy
Berlusconi (gone)
Harper Canada
Howard Australia
Merkel Germany
Bush in the US
(as well as Sununu,
Coleman, Allard and
2 Georgia senators)

Thank You God that You
are now breaking
up evil networks.. which
cannot withstand the
infinite frequencies of Your Light

[Zen]

Sarkozy Election Victory Confirmed


News Brief – Sunday May 6, 2007

Nicolas Sarkozy's victory in the French presidential election has been confirmed after a string of exit polls showed him securing a clear win over Ségolène Royal in Sunday's second round run-off vote.

Early Sunday evening Sarkozy supporters gathered at a Paris concert hall celebrating victory after a Belgium website posted polls showing that Sarkozy was on course to capture around 54 per cent of votes cast.

Meanwhile at Socialist headquarters Ms Royal’s advisers were reportedly avoiding contact with journalists.

Voters turned out in near-record numbers – the highest second-round figure since Charles de Gaulle was elected president in 1965.

The likelihood of a Sarkozy victory had already put police on riot alert in anticipation that young immigrants in Paris’s rundown suburbs would take to the streets in protest

Two years ago Sarkozy pledged to jetwash "the ****" when immigrants started rioting in Paris.

Thousands of police are now on standby in case Sarkozy's victory triggers more rioting and reports coming in indicate this may have already begun, although how widespread and extensive these protests are remains to be seen.

It should be noted however that this website considers Sarkozy's victory to be ominious in the extreme.

What we have just witnessed in France is a classic Illuminati ploy. First a problem is created or allowed to develop; then a solution is proffered, one that would have been unacceptable without the pressing need to solve that problem.

It’s diabolically clever, quite literally.

Thus decades of unregulated immigration have seen the creation of a violent sub culture in France. which is now a virtual no-go zone for law abiding French citizens. Contrary to what the mainstream media may say however, this has been deliberatly created and while formerly his policies might have been deemed unacceptable, Nicolas Sarkozy is now seen as a solution to this problem.

So not only can we expect to see tougher policing in France and the passage of draconian legislation but perhaps, more ominously still, Sarkozy may well throw his weight behind Neocon plans. And that could mean anything from diplomatic support to French troops supporting their Anglo-American counterparts in their next endeavour.

In an victory speech Sunday evening Sarkozy said that "France would be at America's side" if needed. Which effectively confirms that Washington’s Neocons have a new ally in Europe.

The son of a Hungarian immigrant father of aristocratic pedigree and a mother of French and Sephardic Jewish descent, Nicolas Sarkozy can be expected to throw his weight behind any Neocon plans, whatever they may be.

[sb11]

Sarkozy.. Jan 28, 55
does not have the
astrological chart of
someone who won power
legitimately

[kaksteen]

Sarkozy.. Jan 28, 55
does not have the
astrological chart of
someone who won power
legitimately:mad:

[sb11]

may the fraud be exposed
in France..

God now require all
'illuminati' who follow
the nonillumined path
to kneel to universal
nonviolence, peace, love
and equity

[Zen]

Vote Fraud and “Little French Hitler"

Wayne Madsen – WMR May 7, 2007

Nicolas Sarkozy (whom are French intelligence sources have referred to a the "little French Hitler") will govern France with the help of two Silvio Berlusconi- and Rupert Murdoch-like billionaire neo-con French media moguls, Martin Bouygues and Arnaud Lagardere. Bouygues owns the TF1 television channel, which can be expected to act as Sarkozy's own version of the U.S. Republican Party's Fox News Channel. Lagardere's media group owns the Europe 1 radio network, Paris Match, several French regional newspapers, and is a major stakeholder in the French television network Canal+. Sarkozy is known to censor any news reports that are unfavorable to him and pressure publishers and editors to fire wayward journalists. With much of the French media in his pocket, expect the Franco-Hungarian Sarkozy to institute a new era of Janos Kadarist-style censorship in his nation.

The French election, from the start, has been plagued by election fraud – bogus polling data, false exit polls, and electronic voting machine and machine counting irregularities were hallmarks of the first presidential election round. ES&S's I-Votronic machines were used in both elections across France. Only Sarkozy's party was supportive of the machines, with all the other political parties calling for a moratorium on their use. Turnout in the French election was over 75 percent. With large turnouts historically favoring the left in France, the exit polling and actual polling were at odds with the turnout – an indication of massive election fraud.

Similar polling irregularities were experienced in recent elections in Scotland, Wales, and England. In Scotland, 100,000 ballots, thought to mostly be cast for the pro-independence Scottish National Party, were declared "spoiled" in Scotland's election. That "glitch" cost the Scottish Nationalists a larger majority in the Scottish Parliament. Irregularities in Wales and England similarly affected larger margins for Welsh and Cornish nationalists. As the Bretons and Corsicans will soon discover with Sarkozy, regional nationalism is anathema to the globalist neo-con agenda, particularly the international bankers who want strong centralized control and minimal devolution of power to local and regional governments.

The electoral malfeasance of neo-cons in manipulating elections in France, Britain, Canada, the United States, Italy, Australia, Peru, Costa Rica, Mexico, and other countries will remain a problem until the people, acting through the power of progressive, anti-globalist, and anti-capitalist governments, seize control, via whatever means necessary, of the media, the voting and vote counting process, and the opinion polling mechanisms.

http://www.waynemadsenreport.com/