Queen Elizabeth II abdication rumours grow in England
Posted 21 October 2011 - 05:41 PM
The Knights Templar ended as the Templ?rios in the Convent of Tomar, Convento de Cristo, in Portugal, where it is thought the Holy Grail is buried.
THAT is their only legacy. Sorry but when I lived in Portugal I researched it for my University.
Somebody wrote and filmed a documentary about that for The History Channel. It was interesting.
Posted 21 October 2011 - 07:01 PM
3 days and counting until the satanic beast goes away!
Posted 29 December 2011 - 09:34 PM
More previously suppressed news seems to be emerging about the deep entanglement of the US/German Nazi-continuum within the British Royal family.
On Tuesday 27th December 2011, writing from Japan, a White Dragon Society spokesman confirmed that the German Chancellor, Angela Merkel, is the daughter of Adolf Hitler.
Hitler himself was the son of King George V of England (George Frederick Ernest Albert; Royal Houses of Windsor, and Saxe-Coburg and Gotha; 1865-1936). George V was the grandson of Queen Victoria, and the grandfather of Elizabeth Windsor (the current Queen Elizabeth II of England).
Russian intelligence sources report that just prior to the fall of Berlin in 1945, Adolf Hitler left Europe via Norway in a submarine, and ended up in Argentina. He lived in that country until he was aged ninety.
Not only was Adolf Hitler's suicide in his Berlin bunker in 1945 a faked cover story, but so also was the much-publicised 1944 plot to assassinate Hitler organised by several German High Command Officers, led by Wehrmacht Colonel, Count von Staufenberg. The prepared narrative ran that this group managed to plant a bomb in Hitler's battlefield headquarters but, by sheer luck, Hitler survived the blast and the SS quickly arrested and executed all those involved in the affair.
In fact, this assassination canard was designed to enable the five thousand or so Nazi officers who were "executed" to be fitted out with new identities by the Odessa Group (Organization Der Ehemahlige SS Angehorige), so that at the end of the war they would not be hunted out, and could be seamlessly introduced into the American covert military-industrial and intelligence cadres.
These machinations led to the establishment of an ?lite-led Nazi-continuum at the heart of what became the Washington DC private corporation. Its most visible apparatchiks have included Heinz ("Henry") Kissinger, George Bush Snr, George Bush Jnr, and most male American establishment figures who, since World War II, have taken out joint Israeli-American citizenship.
More background here, here and here.
Posted 27 February 2012 - 06:36 PM
European bloodlines face end-time vortex of exposure.
Europe's royal élites are fragmenting over their Nazi-continuum connections with the Committee of 300.
Picture: Harry Spencer-Hewitt; Henry Charles Albert David Windsor; Prince Harry of Wales.
Picture: Diana Spencer, James Hewitt and Harry Spencer-Hewitt
Picture: Elizabeth Windsor; Queen Elizabeth II of England; British Royal Family; Chairman of the Committee of 300.
Picture: Elizabeth Windsor's lead signature on a Committee of 300 financial document.
On Monday 20th February 2012, confirmatory intelligence emerged from Japan (here) that, below the surface, a widening rift in geopolitical loyalties is developing between the older and younger members of the British Royal Family bloodlines. This rift is understood to be developing and extending through most of the European Illuminati hereditary control-structures, not just in the UK, but also in countries such as The Netherlands, Spain and Sweden.
What is being referred to as the Gnostic Illuminati powergroup has issued a 31st March 2012 deadline to the Western banking cartel's Committee of 300, to cease and desist in its Nazi-continuum (Odessa Group) agenda of financial theft and international exploitation.
The Committee of 300 agenda is being implemented through artificially constructed financial instruments and money laundries, and through wars, invasions and state-sponsored terrorist atrocities such as the post-WW2 conflicts in Korea, Vietnam, Cambodia, Bosnia, Iraq, Afghanistan and Libya, and the false-flag attacks of 911 (pre-planned demolition of Twin Towers in New York - more here) and 311 (the pre-planned nuclear tsunami in Japan - more here).
This Nazi-continuum agenda is still driving the financial nexus and the foreign policies of the G5 nations (UK, US, Germany, France and Italy).
The Gnostic Illuminati powergroup is of ancient lineage, and through its spokesman, Alexander Romanov (Romanoff), claims to have initiated the American Revolution (1775–83), the French Revolution (1787–1799) and the Russian Revolution (1917). More here (07.01.12) - YouTube video (7 mins).
Romanov has also said that Prince Harry of Wales (British Royal Family; third in line of succession to the British Throne) has been keeping in touch with the Gnostic Illuminati group and has agreed to take over control of the British Royal family from Queen Elizabeth II when she is obliged to abdicate in connection with her covert Chairmanship of the Committee of 300 and other geopolitical machinations. More here (19.10.09).
One of the reasons that the Gnostic Illuminati are working with Prince Harry, is that this particular member of the British Royal Family is not a scion (or issue) of the Nazi-continuum, German-English, reptilian bloodline Houses of Windsor and Saxe-Coburg & Gotha. In this, Harry is unlike his brother, William (Duke of Cambridge), or his father, Charles (Prince of Wales). Charles is the heir apparent (first in line of succession) and William is second in line of succession to the British Throne.
This difference in Prince Harry's bloodline is due to the (now) widely-known fact that he is not Prince Charles' son. Prince Harry is the son of Diana Spencer (Princess Diana) and James Hewitt, a young army officer, horse trainer and polo player. More here (31.05.09). And a picture of Diana Spencer and James Hewitt together can be seen here.
Prince Harry of Wales is not, therefore, the biological son of Prince Charles, or the biological grandson of Queen Elizabeth II of England. However, for reasons of public relations expediency, he was given a full royal name and rank at his christening in St George’s Chapel, Windsor, on Friday 21st December 1984. Prince Harry of Wales' full name is Henry Charles Albert David Windsor. In long-established English usage, Henry = Harry.
The absence of Prince Philip, Queen Elizabeth's husband, from Prince Harry's official christening photograph, is considered to be highly significant. Among the English aristocracy it is normative for the grandfather of the child being christened to feature in the official photograph. Philip had been present two years earlier for the family christening photographs of Harry's older brother, Prince William. That service was held on Wednesday 4th August 1982 in the Music Room at Buckingham Palace. The official christening photographs associated with the event can be seen here and here.
A longtime employee of Harry's mother, Princess Diana, has revealed that the British Royal Family has been involved for many years in a media and intelligence cover-up of Harry's origins. Diana knew that Harry's father was James Hewitt, and talked about it frequently in private. This was one reason why she was murdered in 1997, following a manufactured Paris car crash, by Tavistock-linked agents of the British Crown Temple. More about the Tavistock Institute can be found here.
Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh (Queen Elizabeth's husband), is reported to have issued explicit death threats to James Hewitt if he refused to go along with the royal cover-up. In particular, Philip made Hewitt lie about the timeline of his relationship with Diana, Princess of Wales.
James Hewitt was in an active sexual relationship with Diana two years before Prince Harry was born. Diana had stopped having sex with Prince Charles about eighteen months before Harry was born because of her disgust at the active relationship her husband was continuing with Camilla Parker-Bowles. Parker-Bowles has now been officially re-branded as the Duchess of Cornwall, but there have recently been indications that Charles and Camilla are living essentially separate lives, spending much of their time in separate houses in Gloucestershire and Wiltshire. More here (27.02.12) and here (26.02.12).
Prince Harry looks very similar to James Hewitt. He has ginger hair like Hewitt and a similar physiognomy. Harry looks nothing like Prince Charles (younger picture here) or like his brother, Prince William (side-by-side pictures here and here).
Harry is also considerably less intelligent (academically) than his brother, William, (ask anyone who taught the boys at Eton College) and unlike William, he did not go to university. Harry's father, James Hewitt, is also considerably less intelligent than Prince Charles. And, it might be noted, Harry has inherited playboy character-traits from Hewitt which are largely absent from William and Charles. But mutual friends say that Harry is more street-wise, in terms of modern popular culture and mores, than William.
The idea that Prince Harry of Wales might supplant his grandmother, Queen Elizabeth II of England, upon her forced abdication has been around for a while. But the rumours were given new life at the end of 2011. Speaking on the record to a television interviewer, Harry expressed the view that he did not believe the Queen could carry out her public duties without the presence of her husband Phillip, Duke of Edinburgh.
A few days after the interview was recorded, Prince Philip suffered a "heart scare" and spent four days over Christmas at Addenbrookes Hospital (Cambridge) "having a blocked coronary artery cleared and a stent fitted." Observers noted that when he returned to the family houseparty on the Sandringham estate in Norfolk, the Duke was unusually vigorous, physically. Seasoned conspiracy-watchers began to wonder whether the four days "in hospital" were, in fact four days for the Tavistock-nexus to get a new Prince Philip clone up-and-running, the previous one having been terminated unexpectedly. More about the use of human clones in élite political management can be found here (17.01.12).
It should be noticed that although Harry Spencer-Hewitt (Prince Harry of Wales) is not a scion of the Nazi-continuum Windsor/Saxe-Coburg & Gotha bloodline, he is still, through his mother's ancestry, an issue of an old, non-reptilian, English bloodline referred to as the Spencers. The Spencer dynasty began to develop in pre-Tudor times and became visible to official exoteric histories around the year 1486 with the rise of Sir John Spencer. More about the Spencer bloodline can be found here.
Source here (27.02.12).
Edited by BioSphere, 02 August 2015 - 10:52 AM.
Posted 02 August 2015 - 11:30 AM
Since 2012, there has been a fools' procession of royal developments, disclosures and false alarms in Europe:
In April 2013, (Queen) Beatrix Armgard (Royal Dutch Shell), of the Netherlands royal bloodline, abdicated in good health at the age of 75. More here (30.04.13).
In June 2014, (King) Juan Carlos Bourbon, of the Spanish royal bloodline, abdicated in good health at the age of 76. More here (18.06.14).
On Monday 8th December 2014, the UK's 33-year-old (Prince) William Wales was in Washington DC for "a meeting" at the World Bank HQ. It is said that he signed a document there which authorised the disbursement of $48 trillion to a series of established global power centres. More here (30.12.14).
The World Bank sum of $48 trillion was very close to the $47 trillion sum involved in the Lien executed against the US Treasury and the US Federal Reserve on Sunday 6th December 2009, by China.
This World Court Writ of Execution and Lien was issued following the diversion of a $6.2 trillion loan from the UK Crown (London Crown Temple) to the US government to finance the (on-the-books) US Dollar Refunding Project. China had been involved, with London, in assembling these monies.
The $6.2T was wired to the US during the 2008 financial crisis on 10th-12th September 2008. The money was then stolen, mirrored, and traded for other purposes. More here (14.12.09).
(Prince) William Wales' reported signing of the $48T World Bank document on the 8th December 2014, caused a flurry of speculation. If it was a Nazi-continuum Committee of 300 document (like this one, cited above), why did William sign it, rather than his grandmother, (Queen) Elizabeth Windsor?
Did this change in lead signatory mean that Elizabeth had resigned her position as Chairman of the Committee of 300, and had passed that post on to her grandson William (second in line of succession to the British Throne), rather than to her son, Charles (heir apparent and first in line of succession)?
If this, indeed, was the case, why had the official royal prerogative in this matter jumped a generation, leaving Charles and Camilla apparently impotent and discarded in the dustbin of English history? And, perhaps more significant, why was no official announcement of this royal promotion/demotion forthcoming from Buckingham Palace? Because it was not true? Or because it was nothing to do with the little people: the democratic electorate of UK citizens; subjects, still, of the Queen?
A week or two later in December 2014, the UK bookmaker Coral suspended betting on 89-year-old (Queen) Elizabeth Windsor announcing her abdication during her annual Christmas Day broadcast to the nation. An unusual rush of bets had been received. Buckingham Palace denied the rumour. More here (17.12.14).
In January 2015, UK royal Andrew Windsor (Duke of York) was accused in US court papers of consorting with 'Jane Doe 3' (Virginia Roberts) at an orgy where she was used as a sex slave. More here (04.01.15).
Also in January 2015, Spain's Supreme Court agreed to examine a paternity suit against (former king) Juan Carlos Bourbon by a Belgian woman, Ingrid Jeanne Sartiau, who claimed to be his daughter. More here (14.01.15).
In March 2015, the UK Supreme Court ordered the publication of 27 secret letters sent by Charles Windsor (Prince of Wales) to UK government figures, including the Prime Minister Tony Blair, in 2004 and 2005. In these, Wales, an unelected aristocrat with no official constitutional rôle, sought to place improper pressure on government ministers. The letters revealed that Wales' much-vaunted 'political neutrality' was a cynical establishment sham. More here (13.05.15).
In April 2015, an opinion poll published in the UK mainstream media indicated that 55% of respondents did not want Camilla Parker-Bowles (Charles Windsor's partner) to become Queen (ever). More here (11.04.15).
In June 2015, the new Spanish King, Felipe Bourbon, issued a decree stripping his sister, (Princess) Cristina, of her title as Duchess of Palma. She was about to stand trial on two counts of being an accessory to tax fraud. More here (11.06.15).
Also in June 2015, a BBC reporter stated on an official Twitter feed that the UK's (Queen) Elizabeth Windsor had died. She hadn't. Shortly afterwards, a BBC spokesman explained that the mistake happened during a “technical rehearsal for an obituary” of the Queen. More here (03.06.15).
In July 2015, pictures from the UK royal archives were leaked to the mainstream media showing (Queen) Elizabeth Windsor, when six or seven years old, practising Nazi salutes with her family, at Balmoral in Scotland. More here (18.07.15).
A little later in July 2015, a Facebook page entitled: R.I.P. Prince Philip appeared. It stated: "At about 11am ET on Monday (July 27, 2015), our beloved prince Prince Philip passed away. Prince Philip was born on June 10, 1921 in Mon Repos. He will be missed but not forgotten. Please show your sympathy and condolences by commenting on and liking this page.” The page attracted nearly one million 'likes'. On the following day, a royal spokesman stated that 94-year-old Philip Battenburg (Mountbatten), Elizabeth Windsor's husband, was still alive. More here (30.07.15). Picture: Elizabeth Windsor (British Queen). Chairman of the Committee of 300.
Picture: Queen + Obama + Kenyan birth certificate. Barry, you've done well.
Source here (02.08.15).
Edited by BioSphere, 03 August 2015 - 11:43 AM.
Posted 02 August 2015 - 02:37 PM
Real History Of Satanism
By Lyndon LaRouche
The best-organized Satanist forces operating presently inside the United States include the following prominent organizations:
THE LUCIS TRUST
This is the leading, putatively respectable Britain-based Satan cult (it worships Lucifer). The Lucis Trust, which runs the only religious chapel at the New York United Nations headquarters, The Temple of Understanding, was originaly founded as the Lucifer Trust, in London, in 1923. The Lucis Trust associated with the UNO is the New York affiliate of the British organization. The name was changed from Lucifer Trust, to Lucis Trust, to make the nature of the organization less conspicuous.
The Lucis Trust's leading sponsors include the following prominent figures:
Henry Clausen, Supreme Grand Commander of the Supreme Council, 33rd Degree, Southern District Scottish Rite Freemasons Norman Cousins John D. Rockefeller IV The Rockefeller Foundation The Marshall Field family Robert McNamara Thomas Watson (IBM, former US Ambassador to Moscow) The United Lodge of Theosophists of New York City U. Alexis Johnson, former Undersecretary of State Rabbi Marc Tannenbaum, American Jewish Committee
Prominent front-organizations sponsored by the Lucis Trust, include the following:
The Theosophical Order of Service (founded by Annie Besant in1908) The Theosophical Society (founded by Helena P. Blavatsky in 1875) The United Nations Association The World Wildlife Fund UK The Findhorn Foundation Greenpeace International Greenpeace USA Amnesty International The Nicholas Roerich Society (chief connection to Russian mysticism, spirituality) The Anthroposophs of Rudolf Steiner The Rudolf Steiner School [these could not be genuine followers of Steiner] UNESCO UNICEF The American Friends Service Committee
THE ORDO TEMPLI ORIENTIS (OTO)
This is today's best-known of the hard-core, British-based Satanist cults. Like the Lucis Trust, the OTO is a direct off-shoot of the work of Britain's leading twentieth-century Satanist, Theosophy leader Aliester Crowley. OTO enthusiasts claim this organization is an offshoot of Templar freemasonry, and hint at very influential protection from among Templars very high in British freemasonry.
THE WICCA CULT
The WICCA cult came to the surface early during the post-war period, as a legalized association for the promotion of witchcraft. It is the leading publicly known international association of witches in the world today.
In the United States, WICCA's outstanding sponsor is the New York Anglican (Episcopal) diocese, under Bishop Paul Moore. Officially, New York's Anglican Cathedral of St. John the Divine has promoted the spread of WICCA witchery through its Lindisfarne center. The late Gregory Bateson conducted such an operation out of the Lindisfarne center during the 1970s.
No later than the 1970s, and perhaps still today, the crypt of the Cathedral of St. John the Divine, is the headquarters for solemn ceremonies of the British (Venerable) Order of Malta. Key figures, such as Gregory Bateson's former spouse, Dame Margaret Mead, associated with that British order, have been associated with projects in support of the Satanist "Age of Aquarius" cause.
For obvious reasons, U.S. witches have chosen Salem, Massachusetts, as their national center. One of the most important operations of these witches is their coordination of the hardcore of U.S. astrology rackets.
THE AGE OF AQUARIUS
The "Age of Aquarius," or "New Age," is the generic name adopted by the modern Satanist movement. The best-publicized among the founders of the Age of Aquarius movement include Fyodor Dostoevsky, Friedrich Nietzsche, Alex Muenthe (of Capri notoriety), and Aleister Crowley. Most Aquarians trace the origins of modern Satanism to Nietzsche and Crowley.
Anti-Christ cultist Nietzsche announced that the twentieth century would see the end of the Age of Pisces, which Aquarians associate with the figures of Socrates and Christ; Nietzsche prophesied that the New Age would be the Age of Aquarius, which he identified with the Satanic figure Dionysos. Crowley announced himself publicly a devotee of Nietzsche's New Age cult in his Vienna Theosophy magazine, near the beginning of this century, and indicated as his preferred choice of name for Satan.
Among hard-core insiders, the New Age models its dogma on the Magis' cult of Mithra, as Nietzsche did. The cult has notable affinities to the Bulgarian-Cathar Bogomil cult(from which the slang term "buggery" is derived). The New Age's most celebrated historical figure, its choice for the original "incarnation" of the Anti-Christ, is the Roman Emperor Tiberius who ordered the execution of Christ. [Some Roman emperors, most notably Caligula, became possessed by being initiated without being suitably prepared.] Adolf Hitler and Hermann Goering were among the notable figures who followed this cult.
The best-known coordinating-center for the Age of Aquarius project in the U.S.A. today is Palo Alto, California's Stanford Ressearch Institute, whose Willis Harman is the relevant leading personality. See Harman disciple Marilyn Feruguson's 1980 Aquarian Conspiracy for a popular exposition of Harman's views and program for subversion of the United States. Ferguson is accurate when she reports that the Fabian Society's H.G. Wells (World War I boss of British intelligence) is a key figure of the Aquarian Conspiracy. Also key are Wells' ally, Bertrand Russell, and such Russell cronies as Robert M. Hutchins (Chicago University, Ford Foundation, Fund for the Republic, Aspen Institute, and the project).
Both Margaret Mead and her husband Gregory Bateson were close collaborators of Russell and Hutchins from no later than 1938. The brothers, Aldous (Hollywood) and Julian (UNO) Huxley were collaborators of H. G. Wells, and were recruited to Crowley's Satanist cult during the late 1920s.
Since the launching of the Beatles as an international project via TV in 1963, "rock" has been the most influential recruiter to Satanism. Rock was created, and is still coordinated by Crowley's followers and by the OTO network, in cooperation with WICCA. It is, not so incidentally, also the Satanist's biggest money-maker, and believed to provide the chief logistical support for deployments and other activities of the OTO-WICCA efforts world-wide.
There is nothing spontaneous or accidental about "rock." It is a product of classical studies of the ancient Phrygian terrorist cult of Satan-Dionysos, the model for the Roman Bacchic cults of similar characteristics. Crowley's control of the "rock industry" has been documented by a team of [private] investigators, who have also noted, that in addition to the Satanist lyrics, Satanist messages embedded sublimally in rock recordings are a key feature of this subversive operation.
The "rock rythm" itself is copied from the old Dionysian-Bacchic cults. Even without the drugs and sexual orgies which are characteristic features of hard-core rock affairs, repeated,frequent, hours-long exposure to constant repetition of "rock rythms" produces lasting, drug-like effects on the mind of the victim. Reducing sexual practices to the level of bestiality,is a crucial feature of Satanism in all historical periods studied, from Phrygian Cybele-Dionysos cult-period onward.
From western continental Europe, among the threats to the U.S. from this quarter, the two leading open centers for hard-core Satanism today, are Turin, Italy (where actress ElizabethTaylor's "Live AIDS" project attempted to sponsor an aborted Satan-rock festival), and Lausanne, Switzerland.
The Satanist Mind
Satanists already have numerous victims. Most of the sexual and related atrocities perpetrated upon "disappeared" infants and other children, are done as part of the rituals outlined in manuals of Satanist organizations. A leading police association has received expert estimate, that of all known murders, one in five is a ritual murder, like the ritual London assassination of Italy's Roberto Calvi, perpetrated by members of Satanist cults. The "Son of Sam" murders in New York, and the Cobb County-based cult operations in the so-called "Atlanta child-murders," fit into this pattern.
Satanism is not "just another nutty occult fad." The mind of the Satanist is pure evil; the Satanist is a former person who has been transformed into something no longer human. It begins like drug-addiction; the prospective recruit to Satanism "gets into something" on a playful impulse, but then finds himself or herself gripped by compulsions which he or she can no longer control. Drugs and other special circumstances may be significant collateral features of the initiation, but not necesarily. The key is "letting oneself go," into the depths of acting-out impulses which combine sexual impulses and rage as a unity, and expressing this form of "pleasure" in the form of an act which violates an important precept of one's own conscience.
Nietzsche's writings, especially toward the last period of life preceding his mental breakdown, address these special sorts of emotions, and refer implicitly to terrible obscene acts as the prospective fulfilment of such impulses. Nietzsche recognized these impulses as Satanic --dionysiac-- in quality. [Dionysiac activity, or wild abandon, by itself leads to non-demonic possession. Becoming demonically possessed requires killing, torturing, or tormenting someone with a neutral or positive attitude.]
Ordinarily we think of the criminal mind as representing a person whose goals are based on "normal human impulses," but whose choice of means is immoral. Doing something illegal is not necessarily immoral; the useful definition of the criminal mind, is the person inclined to prefer immoral means as short-cuts to some goal usually not inconsistent with normal human impulses. In the case of the Satanist, we touch upon something way beyond such a mere criminal mind.
Imagine a criminal mind which has undergone a curious transformation. Perhaps, formerly, this fellow was an habitual thief, even of that sort of twisted mind which delighted in occasions he might have imagined he had pretext to exert the power of life or death over some chance victim on the scene of his crime. Yet, up to that point, robbery or kindred results were always the prompting of his criminal activity.
Now, he has changed. Crime is no longer motivated by the impulse to employ cruel means for personal gain. Instead, the pleasure of the sense of power realized in employing viciously cruel means, becomes an end in itself. This form of criminal pleasure becomes a blend of rage and sexuality. Jaded appetites create the mental state in that man, that he must do something more monstrous than he has done before, to realize the desired level of orgiastic pleasure from the evil deed. Evil for the purpose of doing evil, has become for him, a goal in and of itself. This man has become a beast, a virtual Satanist.
That is the state of mind which Satanism seeks to develop inits initiates. It might begin with an ordinary sexual act performed under the influence of an ugly state of mind. Soon, something much more degraded becomes a need for the prospective initiate's rapidly jaded appetites. In contrast to the healthy mind, which seeks always to become better in what is being mastered, for the initiate to Satanism, a sense of need develops, to seek to muster oneself to do something much worse than one has ever done before. Satanic cults organize that degraded process of self-degeneration. The potential for endemic incidence of individual bestiality within society, is transformed into an organized,institutionalized form of social behavior.
The tradition of the "Black Mass," points to the mechanisms of Satanism as such. Nietzsche's instruction is much to the point. Perform some really monstrous act of blasphemy, and associate that blasphemous doing with some sort of degraded,orgiastic pleasure.
Go back to ancient Mesopotamia, whence Satanism was transmitted to western Europe. The relevant figure of Satanism is not a male, but a female figure. The male figure --Satan, Baal, Lucifer, and so on--is a subordinate figure; the female principle of evil is pre-dominant. Hence, Satan's mother, the "Whore of Babylon,"known otherwise as the Chaldean Ishtar, the Caananite Astarte,Isis, Venus, or the Phrygian Cybele. The ritual of the priestesses of Ishtar was an obscene "religious service" which concluded with the priestesses' fornicating with the congregation. Hence, "Whore of Babylon," and the associated position of Ishtar, Athtar, Astarte, Isis, and Venus as the patron goddess of prostitution.
This satanic cult-practice was introduced to Mesopotamia from pre-Aryan India [which was Inanna/Ishtar's assigned domain - see Sitchin's Wars of Gods and Men]. The so-called "Harrappan" culture, featuring the Earth-Mother and fertility goddess Shakti and her satanic male figure Siva, established a set of colonies in the Middle East. The Sumer established as a colony by what the local semites named "the black-headed people" (Dravidians), was a Harrapan colony. There, among the semites, Shakti became known as Ishtar. In the Harrapan colony of Sheba-Ethiopia, Shakti became known as Athtar. In the Caananite ("Phoenician") offshoot of Harrapan colonizing, she became known as Astarte. The Hellenic cults of Isis and Osiris, were offshoots of the Harrapan cult of Shakti-Siva, by this route. When the same cult spread to an Indo-european people, the Phrygians, Shakti-Siva assumed the Indo-european forms of Cybele and Dionysos (day-night). Apollo and Lucifer are variants of the name for Satan-Osiris-Dionysos. [Ishtar was ambitious.]
Among the Caananites, for example, Satanism expressed itself in such forms as the worship of Moloch, with the included custom of making a human sacrifice of the first-born of each marriage. Notably, that Caananite tradition is featured in the modern Satanists' ritual sexual and homicidal rituals upon infants and children used as human sacrifices.
By combining the means by which men and women are degraded into potentially satanic forms of beasts, as rituals associated with Satanism practised as an "anti-religion," large-scale Satanic movements are developed through systematic proselytzing.
The result of this initiation, as we have already stressed,is no human being, but a former human being transformed into something which is not human.
Modern liberals and others frown on reports of savage witch-hunts from earlier centuries. Usually, the special British COINTELPRO operation, run in Salem Massachusetts as a covert operation against the independence of the Massachusetts Bay Colony, is commonly referenced. A better comparison is the proliferating of Satanist movements during the fourteenth century; these witches were actually sub-human, Satanist beasts, who represented that sort of mass threat to the population of that period. So, the population, as its only defense against a genuine Satanic force of that sort, hunted them down and sought to wipe them out. Not for nothing, does the Old Testament warn, "Thou shalt not suffer a witch to live." The witches of the old Middle East and fourteenth-century Europe were very real, very evil witches, no longer human, but murderous beasts.
The modern spread of witchcraft in English-speaking nations, began during the sixteenth century, in the setting of imported cabalist and rosicrucan cults built up around Oxford and Cambridge. Francis Bacon and his secretary Thomas Hobbes were part of this movement. The endemic inculcation in Satanism which this prompted in seventeenth-century England, exploded after the accession of King George I, in the form of the Hell-fire Clubs which proliferated among degenerate English nobility during the long Liberal prime ministry of Hugh Walpole.
During the Stuart Restoration period, the pro-satanic rosicrucean and cabalist cultism around the Stuart court siezed upon the case of Robert Bruce to reorganize the cult in a newform.
Robert Bruce had been the leader of a group of Satan-worshipping (Baphomet) Templars, who had fled to Scotland, away from the angered justice of the Papacy and the King of France. What they brought with them, was the Templars' exploitation of the Cathar (Bogomil) tradition in the region of Toulouse and Albi, to build up the syncretic sort of Satanic worship the Templars had acquired in the Middle East. The Papacy had enough of this, and the King of France acted to shut down Templars by the means customary in those times. A group of Templars under Bruce fled to Scotland, and after some initial difficulties, made themselves the lords of the place.
The character of the Stuart court is illustrated by the characterization of one Stuart government of that period as the "Cabal." In his history, Macauley offers an amiable description of the affair. During this century, when the chest of Isaac Newton's laboratory papers was opened and examined, the content of Newton's acutal "scientific work" turned out to be a selection of lurid and rather insane experimetns in "black magic." The circles around Francis Bacon and Hobbes were, as we say today, "a prize collection of real kooks."
So, the Templar mish-mash of Bogomil Gnosticism blended into Hashishin Satanism, caused Bruce's Templar credentials to be viewed as suitable myth-building material for the taste of the Stuart kooks of the period. The Liberal aristocracy of Britain became a principal concentration of this filthy stuff. When the Liberals came to full power, under Walpole, this Liberal stuff came out in such form as the proliferating Hell-Fire Clubs. That tradition was cultivated under the Second Earl of Shelbourne's puppet prime minister, William Pitt the Younger, with Satanic figures such as the powerful Jeremy Bentham in the fore.
Satanism gained new ground under the protection of Liberalism and Romanticism during the nineteenth century. In England,the more virulent new forms surfaced around Oxford University'sJohn Ruksin and the Pre-Raphaelite Brotherhood. Out of this came theosophy, British "guild" socialism, the Fabian Society, Bertrand Russell, H. G. Wells, and Aleister Crowley -- Satanists all.
This spilled over into the United States, notably in the circles of putative "Great Awakening" evangelist Johnathan Edwards, and his protege, Princeton Hell-Fire Club activist Aaron Burr. During the late nineteenth century, the sort of spoon-bending kookery associated with such figures as Oliver Lodge and A. Conan Doyle spilled generously among the wealthy anglophile liberals of the United States.
In short, this sort of witchery has been endemic over the centuries. The difference is, that what was endemic has become epidemic.
To Journalism on Satanism page: http://www.whale.to/b/rouche.html
The Real History of Satanism is not a real history at all. It is Christian Fundamentalist propaganda written for the purpose of demonizing perceived enemies of fundamentalist beliefs. I would like to encourage your readers to read The Origin of Satan by historian Elaine Pagels (Author of The Gnostic Gospels) for the actual history of Satanism. What interests Elaine Pagels is the social implications of the figure of Satan. She invites readers to consider Satan as a reflection of how we perceive ourselves and those we call "others."
The article "The Real History of Satanism" appears to be just this, propaganda in which the "others", in this case pagans, are cast as disciples of Satan as a way of demonizing those with opposing beliefs. If this tendency in the Christian movement over the ages resulted in nothing more than a tool for Christians defining themselves against opposing values, there would be no problem. Instead, we see an excuse for intolerance. What's true is that those perceived as enemies of Christianity have often been violently persecuted.
Jeff, I'm stunned. Did you post this article as a satire? I laughed out loud when I came to "the 'Bloods' and the 'Crypts'" (sic) choosing Satanic names. However, when the article rambled on and on casting a wide net of paranoia and misinformation over every group the writer disagrees with, I began to wonder about why you would post this.
LaRouche obviously knows little about New Age or (Neo)Pagan beliefs if he believes they have anything whatsoever to do with Satanism. While some "New Agers" do incorporate some degree of Christian beliefs into their spiritual paths (and therefore believe in Satan), not all do. And as an ordained New Age minister, I have yet to meet anyone following a New Age path who could possibly be considered a Satanist.
His labelling of (Neo)Pagans as Satanists is ludicrous. Pagans follow pre-Christian or non-Christian spiritual paths. Satan belongs almost wholly to Christians. He is the dark god of the dualist Christian faith. It's but the flipside of the Christian coin: Good & Evil, Light & Darkness, God & Satan. Has he not considered that Satanists are simply those who follow the dark side of his own faith? Most Pagans do not even believe in Satan, much less "worship" him!
As a lifelong spiritual seeker I endeavor to maintain a joyous, empowering, and life-affirming connection to the divine. I take offense at anyone's hateful, arrogant, & very misinformed attempt to equate people of my (or similar) beliefs with pedophiles and their like.
Peace & blessings.
After 40 years of research into the subject of satanism, I can only say that the article was...right on.
Those who are a part of the New Age Movement simply have no concept of the roots of their various religions. Every occult religion which I have studied over the years (no matter how innocent it seems) appears to have roots in Occult Satanic Babylon.
If I could find fault in the article, it would be that in order to truly report on the subject, one would need about 4,000 pages of text.
Edited by Hansel, 02 August 2015 - 02:50 PM.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users