Jump to content

Theme© by Fisana
 

Photo

Atom Bomb Hoax revisited

atom bomb hoax conspiracy to defraud

  • Please log in to reply
229 replies to this topic

#41 Ghostwriter

Ghostwriter

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 2080 posts

Posted 04 February 2014 - 07:43 AM

It also forecast the entire strategy of the Cold War, which lasted forty-three years, cost American taxpayers five trillion dollars

 

Both the firebombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki combined probably cost about 2 million dollars in fuel and bombs and serviceman pay. I will take a wild guess how much the censorship of Japan cost for 6000 employees over a few years and estimate a few million. 

 

For less than 4 or 5 million dollars they created an illusion that brought in 5 trillion dollars just in America. Hows that for a return on the investment? Dead people did not touch a penny of that. Just excruciating pain and death.


Edited by Ghostwriter, 04 February 2014 - 07:44 AM.

  • 0

#42 Ghostwriter

Ghostwriter

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 2080 posts

Posted 04 February 2014 - 08:30 AM

The scientists who had built the atomic bomb were gleeful when they received the news of its success at Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

 

And this in spite of a lack of understanding the legitimacy or not of the threat these cities were said to represent in war terms.

 

Both Hiroshima and Nagasaki were and still are very important merchant seaport cities. A thinking person might suspect that the destruction of those cities had more to do with expediting the expansion plans of the developers than any necessity of war.

 

 

 

In the book, Robert Oppenheimer, Dark Prince, by Jack Rummel, 1992, we find, p.96, "Back in the United States the news of the bombing of Hiroshima was greeted with a mixture of relief, pride, joy, shock and sadness. Otto Frisch remembers the shouts of joy, 'Hiroshima has been destroyed!' 'Many of my friends were rushing to the telephone to book tables at the La Fonda Hotel in Santa Fe in order to celebrate. Oppenheimer walked around "like a prizefighter, clasping his hands together above his head as he came to the podium".'"

 

The key to trillions of dollars had just been turned in the lock that kept the treasury safe. I suppose that is reason to celebrate. It never ceases to amaze me how happy people can be at the suffering and agony of of the people that were burned alive on their behalf as long a a fairly believable demonization of those peoples has preceded the carnage.

 

I'm sure many were furious at the Japs for attacking Pearl Harbour. They feel justified in their homicidal distains. They rarely feel they should make excuses for their lack of a thorough understanding of the circumstances surrounding that incident. Never once thinking it was a tool designed to make you look the other way while the Japanese are tortured and killed in the worst imaginable ways.

 

We are talking here about people that are bright enough to know that little people have very little say in the decisions their masters make but they are the ones getting the ignited gasoline showers.

 

The M-69 was clearly a war crime and crime against humanity when they used it against the predominantly wooden architecture of the Far East. Nothing to celebrate.


Edited by Ghostwriter, 04 February 2014 - 09:23 AM.

  • 0

#43 Ghostwriter

Ghostwriter

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 2080 posts

Posted 04 February 2014 - 08:40 AM

Bernard Baruch: New York agent of the Rothschilds who at the turn of the century set up the tobacco trust, the copper trust and other trusts for the Rothschilds. He became the grey eminence of the United States atomic bomb program when his lackey, J. Robert Oppenheimner, became director of the Los Alamos bomb development, and when his Washington lackey, James F. Byrnes, advised Truman to drop the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

 

They had the motives, the means and the opportunities. The whole circus rests on the word of pathological liars, murderers and cheats.


  • 0

#44 Ghostwriter

Ghostwriter

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 2080 posts

Posted 04 February 2014 - 08:51 AM

Believe it or not, the deserts on a number of continents today are the result of (prehistoric) nuclear warfare.

 

Freedom of speech, gotta love it.


  • 0

#45 Ghostwriter

Ghostwriter

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 2080 posts

Posted 04 February 2014 - 09:02 AM

Historian Kisari Mohan Ganguli says that Indian sacred writings are full of such descriptions, which sound like an atomic blast as experienced in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. He says references mention fighting sky chariots and final weapons. An ancient battle is described in the Drona Parva, a section of the Mahabharata. “The passage tells of combat where explosions of final weapons decimate entire armies, causing crowds of warriors with steeds and elephants and weapons to be carried away as if they were dry leaves of trees,” says Ganguli.

 

They would have us believe this means our atomic evolution was somehow preordained. That this scripture somehow validates the claim.

 

If anything, I think writings like these "inspired" the fakery of atomic bombs.

 

6 months before 911 TV networks broadcast an episode of the Lone Gunnman where the storyline involved airliners impacting the twin towers in New York.

 

Many decades before the Titanic a book was published with a story almost identical to the Titanic story.

 

Are these guys reading books and watching TV to decide what will be the next hoax-du-jour?


Edited by Ghostwriter, 04 February 2014 - 09:27 AM.

  • 0

#46 Ghostwriter

Ghostwriter

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 2080 posts

Posted 04 February 2014 - 09:45 AM

KGB knew the US atomic bomb was a fake as KGB had spies everywhere in the USA fooling FBI for years. So USSR produced their own communist atomic bomb! It didn't cost them a kopek. It was just proletarian propaganda. It was never built.

 

Its always the working masses that end up paying for the props that serve to legitimize these hoaxes.


  • 0

#47 Ghostwriter

Ghostwriter

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 2080 posts

Posted 04 February 2014 - 09:58 AM


Anonymous said...

Bombs where real alright. But they where atomic bombs stolen from Germany at the end of the war. Manhattan project was infact unsuccessful, first atomic test occured in german island Rügen November, 1944, second in Thüringen 1945. SS also developed rocket systems A9-A10 to deliver two atomic bombs to enemy cities (Operation Elster).

In march 1945, a bomber Junkers 390 (six-motor) bombed ship convoy L-143, wich was destoyed completely in atomic blast. Ships didnt sunk, but where burned off in hellfire. When american navy arrived, they found only smoking ship wrecks and they where ordered to torpedo down these remains and whole incident was classified at top level.

Germans made overall three more bombs (meant to drop on London, Moscow and New York). Super planes Messerschmidt 265 (4-motor, flight range 15 000 km) was destined to carry this operation. Hitler ordered to cancel this operation (sic!) and bombs where given to americans to use against Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

 

I have archived documentation revealing what appeared to be a Luftwaff plan to bomb Manhatten with an atomic bomb. The story spoke of a huge bomber plane as carrier and the yield very close to that of Hiroshima and detonation a few thousand feet above ground.

 

The other odd thing that both the Luftwaffe plan and Hiroshima have in common are the detonation very high up to cushion the impact, both are delivered by the riskiest carrier vehicle.

 

Its as if the hoaxsters took the NAZI script and moved it to Japan to stage it there. Unless the NAZIS script was created after Hiroshima to validate that claim.


  • 0

#48 Ghostwriter

Ghostwriter

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 2080 posts

Posted 08 February 2014 - 06:13 AM

Many years ago someone told me something that I flatly refused to accept. And I still don't accept it now, despite all the times I've seen it proved right.
"The common good and the individual good rarely coincide..."
Sure, I know, it's true.

 

But some truths are probably worse than lies.”

 

― Sergei Lukyanenko, Night Watch

 

Is the truth about the atom bomb worst than the lie?

 

Is it worst than the lie to discover the declared national sovereignty of the political partitions of this world are nothing more than a facade hiding the fact that behind the scenes a very old one world government exerts it's influence to the detriment, suffering and deaths of the non-affiliated masses.

 

Is a return to a potential series of global wars based on conventional weapons worst than believing a mirage that conventional global wars have been deterred by non-existant atom bombs and the illusion of mutually-assured-destruction?

 

Is it what we see in the magnitude of the dishonesty of the governing elites and close conspiracy to lie that makes the truth harder to swallow than the lies?

 

If one believes the atom bomb to be a lie he must also come to realize that war is genocide masquerading as failed diplomacy. If you see the truth you must see the facade of diplomacy rigged to fail deliberately to cull the herd more efficiently.


Edited by Ghostwriter, 08 February 2014 - 10:29 PM.

  • 0

#49 Ghostwriter

Ghostwriter

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 2080 posts

Posted 08 February 2014 - 06:20 AM

Is the U.S. getting ready to wage the Cold War again? If one believes the critics that’s the aim behind a planned $10 billion modernization of the B61 nuclear bomb, the backbone of the Pentagon’s tactical nuclear arsenal.

 

Barack Obama, the US president, has said that he is pushing for "a world without nuclear weapons" and is committed to deterring nuclear proliferation, while on a visit to Seoul for a two-day 53-nation nuclear summit that is under way.

 

Contradiction is the hallmark of a hoax. Readers can clearly see that the right hand of that hoax has no idea what the left hand is up to.


  • 0

#50 Ghostwriter

Ghostwriter

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 2080 posts

Posted 08 February 2014 - 06:36 AM

It's tough to think of a goal more widely espoused than the dream of an H-bomb-free planet.

 

Why is that?

 

 


The truth is that industrial killing was practiced by many nations in the old world without nuclear weapons. Soldiers were gassed and machine-gunned by the hundreds of thousands in the trenches of World War I, when Hitler was just another corporal in the Kaiser's army. By World War II, countries on both sides of the war used airplanes and artillery to rain death on battlefields as well as cities, until the number killed around the world was so huge that the best estimates of the total number lost diverge by some 16 million souls. The dead numbered 62 million or 78 million — somewhere in there.

 

So when last we saw a world without nuclear weapons, human beings were killing one another with such feverish efficiency that they couldn't keep track of the victims to the nearest 15 million. Over three decades of industrialized war, the planet averaged about 3 million dead per year.

 

Wasn't the posession of an atomic arsenal supposed to deter world war? Obama gets the Nobel Prize for Peace because of his efforts to bring the world back to that sorry state of affairs? Orson Wells rolls in his grave.

 


 

Edited by Ghostwriter, 08 February 2014 - 06:46 AM.

  • 0

#51 Ghostwriter

Ghostwriter

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 2080 posts

Posted 08 February 2014 - 06:45 AM

Hundreds if not thousands of wars, small and large, have been fought since Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Is it because nations and tribes found a conscience regarding mass death? Clearly not — the slaughter in China during the Cultural Revolution, in Cambodia under the Khmer Rouge and in Rwanda between Hutu and Tutsi all offer bloody proof.

 

Was the US ever concerned they might step on Chinese toes and start a nuclear war while slaughtering millions in Vietnam? Was the US ever worried they might escalate with the Soviets while in Afghanistan and start a nuclear holocaust and wipe out all life on earth?

 

Where does one get the assurance that they can go murder countless millions and never arouse the passions of major bomb holding nations? This is the kind of confidence you get knowing atom bombs do not exist.


 

Edited by Ghostwriter, 08 February 2014 - 10:25 PM.

  • 0

#52 Ghostwriter

Ghostwriter

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 2080 posts

Posted 08 February 2014 - 06:53 AM

A world with nuclear weapons in it is a scary, scary place to think about. The industrialized world without nuclear weapons was a scary, scary place for real. But there is no way to un-ring the nuclear bell. The science and technology of nuclear weapons is widespread, and if nukes are outlawed someday, only outlaws will have nukes.

 

The "nuclear bell" never rang to start with. They lied from the get-go. Outlaws would be fully nuke-capable by now if the claim was not a shameless lie. Governments would have crumbled and the governing elites would have fried along side their human cattle if the atom bomb claim was true.

 

 


 

  • 0

#53 Ghostwriter

Ghostwriter

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 2080 posts

Posted 08 February 2014 - 07:02 AM

The demand for a world without nuclear weapons represents an unshakable international development.

 

The demand for a thorough laundering of the atom bomb hoax and a swift return to conventional carnage on a global scale represents an unshakable committment on the part of those that grow rich and powerful from that suffering and death.

 

Who else would see a world without nukes in a positive light?

 

They are the ones with lies to launder and global scale genocides to operate. They are boxed into their mutually-assured-destruction" bs. A doctrine they created in the late 40s when they were satiated with the blood of millions and could hardly imagine another time when it might get in the way of another global massacre.


Edited by Ghostwriter, 08 February 2014 - 07:03 AM.

  • 0

#54 Ghostwriter

Ghostwriter

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 2080 posts

Posted 08 February 2014 - 07:07 AM

On the governmental level, a movement to seek to outlaw nuclear weapons by focusing on their atrocious, inhuman nature is rapidly gathering momentum.

 

The "atrocity" of atom bombs? Compared with a death by conventional means a death by atom bomb was supposed to be mercifully swift, vaporized into thin air.

 

Meaning, the atom bomb, had it been real, was the "humaine" death. Fast and painless, over in a split second flash.


Edited by Ghostwriter, 08 February 2014 - 07:31 AM.

  • 0

#55 Ghostwriter

Ghostwriter

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 2080 posts

Posted 08 February 2014 - 07:12 AM

The policy of “nuclear deterrence”, aimed to threaten adversaries with nuclear weapons, contravenes the basic principle of the U.N. Charter, which stands for the solution of international conflicts by peaceful and diplomatic means as opposed to the use of force.

 

Deterrence is a warning not a threat. A sign on the door that says you will meet the guard dog if you beligerantly transgress.

 

A position of mutually-assured-destruction is the best platform to build diplomatic bridges and explore peaceful options to prevent the use of conventional warfare globally.

 

The reason the diplomacy at present is rotten to the core is because there exists no potential for mutually-assured-destruction. The bomb is bogus.


Edited by Ghostwriter, 08 February 2014 - 07:29 AM.

  • 0

#56 Ghostwriter

Ghostwriter

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 2080 posts

Posted 08 February 2014 - 07:40 AM

In this age, lies were the universal lubricant of the culture. A love of Truth and commitment to it were seldom rewarded and were often punished.”
― Dean Koontz

 

You always hear people describe politicians and the governing elites a pack of liars that rarely deliver on their promises where they can speak informally. They lie in their courts, they lie about the safety of processed foods, they lie about the safety of prescription drugs, or insurance claims. The lie rules our era. This is the Age of Industrial-Size BS.

 

Everything is a damned lie except when you talk about 911, the holocaust, the deep space claims, atom bombs and nuclear reactors.  Those unrepenting recidivist liars told the truth that time, swear too god, eh?


Edited by Ghostwriter, 08 February 2014 - 07:41 AM.

  • 0

#57 Ghostwriter

Ghostwriter

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 2080 posts

Posted 08 February 2014 - 07:53 AM

International conflicts can only be resolved by diplomatic and peaceful means.

 

When the global warmongering beligerants that pit us against each other in homicidal hatreds own the diplomatic apparatus and control the peace movements, armies only they can determine when enough blood of the common man has been shed. That is how genocides operate.

 

All leadership elites in every fighting country decide which human cattle will be culled. Lots of property confiscations under the shroud of war. People they would have a hell of a time driving out otherwise.


Edited by Ghostwriter, 08 February 2014 - 07:54 AM.

  • 0

#58 Ghostwriter

Ghostwriter

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 2080 posts

Posted 08 February 2014 - 07:59 AM

A lie's true power cannot be accurately measured by the number of people who believe its deception when it is told, it must be measured by the number of people who will go out after hearing it trying to convince others of its truth.

 

― Dennis Sharpe

 

Public school teachers are among the worst offenders in this regard. Indoctrinating young minds without having reasoned the material adequately to insure they are not duped into spreading lies. Reckless disregard for authenticity and continuity in the stories taught about so--called NAZIS holocausts, deep space exploits, atom bombs, nuclear reactors and lots more. For a salary, for money, they will brainwash kids that will become compliant subjects.


  • 0

#59 Ghostwriter

Ghostwriter

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 2080 posts

Posted 08 February 2014 - 08:03 AM

It is only prudent never to place complete confidence in that by which we have even once been deceived.
― René Descartes

 

Good advice. People have been deceived so many times it is hard to keep track. Yet, after the first deception we should have ceased trusting them.


  • 0

#60 Ghostwriter

Ghostwriter

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 2080 posts

Posted 08 February 2014 - 08:08 AM

The hardest thing to explain is the glaringly evident which everybody has decided not to see.

 

― Ayn Rand

 

A planet swarming with conflicts of interest, a global epidemic of selective myopia.


  • 0




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Copyright © 2020 Pravda.Ru