Jump to content

Theme© by Fisana
 

Photo

Obama Is A Soviet Agent


  • Please log in to reply
43 replies to this topic

#1 Zharkov

Zharkov

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 36861 posts

Posted 15 November 2014 - 01:21 AM

The good news is that a war with Russia is very unlikely - the bad news is that Putin is now a target for assassination, because this time, communist globalists want to rule the world, not only Russia.

 

The First Time I Heard Of Barack
By Tom Fife
11-20-8

  During the period of roughly February 1992 to mid 1994, I was making frequent trips to Moscow, Russia, in the process of starting a software development joint-venture company with some people from the Russian scientific community. One of the men in charge on the Russian side was named V. M.; he had a wife named T.M.   V. was a level-headed scientist while his wife was rather deeply committed to the losing Communist cause - a cause she obviously was not abandoning.  

 

One evening, during a trip early in 1992, the American half of our venture were invited to V. & T.'s Moscow flat as we were about to return to the States. The party went well and we had the normal dinner discussions.   As the evening wore on, T. developed a decidedly rough anti-American edge - one her husband tried to quietly rein in.   The bottom line of the tirade she started against the United States went something like this:   "You Americans always like to think that you have the perfect government and your people are always so perfect. Well then, why haven't you had a woman president by now? You had a chance to vote for a woman vice-president and you didn't do it."   The general response went something along the lines that you don't vote for someone just because of their sex. Besides, you don't vote for vice-president, but the president and vice-president as a ticket.   "Well, I think you are going to be surprised when you get a black president very soon."   The consensus we expressed was that we didn't think there was anything innately barring that. The right person at the right time and sure, America would try to vote for the right person, be he or she black or not.   "What if I told you that you will have a black president very soon and he will be a Communist?"   The out-of-the-blue remark was met by our stares. She continued, "Well, you will; and he will be a Communist."   It was then that the husband unsuccessfully tried to change the subject; but she was on a roll and would have nothing of it. One of us asked, "It sounds like you know something we don't know."   "Yes, it is true. This is not some idle talk. He is already born and he is educated and being groomed to be president right now. You will be impressed to know that he has gone to the best schools of Presidents. He is what you call "Ivy League". You don't believe me, but he is real and I even know his name. His name is Barack. His mother is white and American and his father is black from Africa. That's right, a chocolate baby! And he's going to be your President."  

 

She became more and more smug as she presented her stream of detailed knowledge and predictions so matter-of-factly - as though all were foregone conclusions. "It's all been thought out. His father is not an American black so he won't have that social slave stigma. He is intelligent and he is half white and has been raised from the cradle to be an atheist and a Communist. He's gone to the finest schools. He is being guided every step of the way and he will be irresistible to America."   We sat there not knowing what to say.

 

She was obviously very happy that the Communists were doing this and that it would somehow be a thumbing of their collective noses at America: they would give us a black president and he'd be a Communist to boot. She made it quite obvious that she thought that this was going to breathe new life into world Communism. From this and other conversations with her, she always asserted that Communism was far from dead.  

 

She was full of little details about him that she was eager to relate. I thought that maybe she was trying to show off that this truly was a real person and not just hot air.   She rattled off a complete litany. He was from Hawaii. He went to school in California. He lived in Chicago. He was soon to be elected to the legislature. "Have no doubt: he is one of us, a Soviet."   At one point, she related some sort of San Francisco connection, but I didn't understand what the point was and don't recall much about that. I was just left with the notion that she considered the city to be some sort of a center for their activity here.   Since I had dabbled in languages, I knew a smattering of Arabic. I made a comment: "If I remember correctly, 'Barack' comes from the Arabic word for 'Blessing.' That seems to be an odd name for an American." She replied quickly, "Yes. It is 'African'", she insisted, "and he will be a blessing for world Communism. We will regain our strength and become the number one power in the world."  

 

She continued with something to the effect that America was at the same time the great hope and the great obstacle for Communism. America would have to be converted to Communism and Barack was going to pave the way.   So, what does this conversation from 1992 prove?   Well, it's definitely anecdotal. It doesn't prove that Obama has had Soviet Communist training nor that he was groomed to be the first black American president, but it does show one thing that I think is very important. It shows that Soviet Russian Communists knew of Barack from a very early date. It also shows that they truly believed among themselves that he was raised and groomed Communist to pave the way for their future. This report on Barack came personally to me from one of them long before America knew he existed.   Although I had never before heard of him, at the time of this conversation Obama was 30+ years old and was obviously tested enough that he was their anticipated rising star.   http://www.rense.com...eral84/brck.htm   ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++  

 

Obama’s Mysterious Rise to the Presidency

 

How does a man get elected President after serving less than one full term as a U.S. Senator? Does being a community activist/antagonist qualify one for the highest office in the land? Were the Soviet defectors correct in that Obama is the manifestation of a multi-generational plot to bring America to her knees? It is easy to comprehend how and why Putin would want to destroy America. But is Obama is his accomplice in this mission which could imperil all of us?

 

obama-impostor.jpg

Who is he?

 

Former FBI Weatherman Task Force supervisor, Max Noel, noted that the FBI utilized a CARL test when it conducted background checks on various suspects. The acronym CARL stands for Character, Associates, Reputation, and Loyalty is used to assess candidates fitness to hold the highest office in the country. On each of these four points of power, Obama fails and fails miserably. Like many FBI law enforcement agents and officials, Noel was alarmed by the fact that someone like Barack Obama could capture the presidency. For some unexplained reason, Obama was never vetted before he became a candidate for the presidency by the FBI. This is an unacceptable result of our national security system and is wholly suggestive of internal plot to allow the installation of a blatantly communist advocate into the highest political position in America.

 

Soviet Defectors Warn of Deception and the Emergence of a Manchurian Candidate

Through the testimony of high-ranking Soviet defectors, it can clearly be established that the Russians have been engaged in a multi-generational plot to destroy the United States from within and from without. Domestically, the Russian communists are in the midst of completing a coup d’état, with the help their communist stooge, Barack Obama. In the following paragraphs, the verbatim statements of high ranking Soviet defectors are offered as proof of these claims. The first three defectors tell how the Soviets are setting the table for America’s demise. Stunningly, the fourth defector warns our country of a Manchurian candidate type of leadership whose job it will be to hand over a weakened America to the Russians (see Part Two).

 

 

Did you really think Alger Hiss would be the last communist traitor to serve in a high level US governmental position?

 

Today, many people have been in a position to now vet the President after Obama’s first six years in office and observed his fundamental transformation of America“. This particular series will continue to connect the dots of the secretive and nefarious communist background of Barack Hussein Obama.

Obama Moves To Obscure His Background

With the general warning by Russian defectors that a traitor was waiting in the wings, it is time to reveal the true nature of the Manchurian candidate who sits in the Oval office through a brief examination of his family members with CIA affiliations along with their exposure to the MKULTRA mind control experiments being conducted at the University of Hawaii.

 

With the stroke of his executive order pen, President Obama quickly moved to seal off his records from public view after his election. However, he was too late to completely hide his background as researchers, such as Wayne Madsen, have found significant  information to demonstrate that what Obama has omitted, is that his rare rise to power can only be explained by his family’s CIA roots.

 

The election of Barack Hussein Obama is the culmination of what the Soviet defectors have been warning America about for decades in that Obama’s ascendency to the Presidency was part of a documented long-term strategic plan to recruit selected candidates into intelligence, while guiding these individuals and their families into high-ranking intelligence community positions before executing the meteoric rise to power by one of their own. For example, George H. W. Bush was a former CIA director, and CIA member going back to the 1950’s and thanks to Wayne Madsen, we now know that Obama’s family was CIA and not just CIA, but a CIA mind controlled family.

Obama is the Soviet messiah as he will eventually become known as the Second Coming of Stalin. He has been prophesied by Soviet defectors Lunev, Golitsyn, Suvorov and Bezmenov, and now he is here to fulfill his mission.

 

Phase I of Obama’s Grooming for Treason: The Obama Family’s CIA Background

Question: What does  Barack Obama and the “Unabomber” Ted Kaczynski have in common?

Answer: Both Kaczynski and Obama had significant exposure to the MK-ULTRA experiments; Kaczynski at Harvard and Obama at the University of Hawaii and the Ford Foundation much earlier. Outrageous?

The following paragraph represents quoted excerpts from Wayne Madsen’s exceptional investigation into the Obama family CIA background:

“President Obama’s own work in 1983 for Business International Corporation, a CIA front that conducted seminars with the world’s most powerful leaders and used journalists as agents abroad, dovetails with CIA espionage activities conducted by his mother, Stanley Ann Dunham in 1960’s post-coup Indonesia on behalf of a number of CIA front operations, including the East-West Center at the University of Hawaii, the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), and the Ford Foundation.

 

Dunham met and married Lolo Soetoro, Obama’s stepfather, at the East-West Center in 1965. Soetoro was recalled to Indonesia in 1965 to serve as a senior army officer and assist General Suharto and the CIA in the bloody overthrow of President Sukarno….  

 

Soetoro worked for the elitist Ford Foundation, World Bank, Asian Development Bank, Bank Rakyat (the majority government-owned People’s Bank of Indonesia), and the CIA-linked USAID while she lived in Indonesia and later, Pakistan…..

 

Barack Obama, on the other hand, cleverly masked his own CIA connections as well as those of his mother, father, step-father, and grandmother (there is very little known about Obama’s grandfather, Stanley Armour Dunham.“

 

Madsen painstakingly and conclusively demonstrated that virtually all of Obama’s relatives were CIA operatives. Madsen has found even more CIA connections to Obama’s first employer. Madsen further went on to describe how Obama’s family was clearly exposed and was intimately connected to MK-ULTRA’s mind control program at the University of Hawaii. Info Wars also carried Madsen’s expose and it is available here.

 

It’s a Small World, After All

President Obama’s family and former Ex-Goldman Sachs executive, Ex-Treasury Secretary and World Bank leader,Tim Geithner and his family  have been joined together at the hip for decades. Tim Geithner’s father worked for the CIA in the Rockefeller funded Ford Foundation in Asia. Geitner’s father was in charge of micro-finance for the Ford Foundation for all of Asia. From Wayne Madsen’s work, we know that President Obama’s mother was in charge of micro-finance in Indonesia. The Hollywood producers could not make this plot up. Geithner’s father was Obama’s mother’s boss. It is likely that Geithner’s father tagged Obama as a potential presidential CIA Ford Foundation, well-groomed Manchurian candidate.

Additional information comes from the discovery that the two universities that Obama attended, Harvard and Columbia, were prime CIA recruiting grounds. The Ford and Rockefeller Foundations continued to fund Columbia’s Soviet studies programs through the early 1980s, where Obama was a student. And would anyone care to guess what Obama was studying?

 

Trilateral Commission co-founder, former National Security Adviser to Carter and Obama’s former professor and now political handler.

 

Obama was enrolled in a Soviet studies program taught by Zbigniew Brzezinski. And to those who are new to NWO conspiracies, one might wonder who is Brzezinski?  Brzezinski was the former National Security Adviser under President Carter. But more importantly, he was also the co-founder of one of the most influential globalist organizations in all of history, the Trilateral Commission. If you know your New World Order history, you have chills going up and down your spine as you read these words. We should be mindful that Brzezinski, in his book, Between Two Ages: America’s Role in the Technetronic Era (1970), that he laid out the NWO conspiracy to control all nation states and usher in a totalitarian world government.

 

There are two chilling quotes by Brzezinski in his aforementioned book that come directly to bear on Obama and his meteoric rise to power:

 

Zbigniew Brzezinski, Between Two Ages: America’s Role in the Technetronic Era

“In the technetronic society the trend would seem to be towards the aggregation of the individual support of millions of uncoordinated citizens, easily within the reach of magnetic and attractive personalities exploiting the latest communications techniques to manipulate emotions and control reason.”

 

Zbigniew Brzezinski, Between Two Ages: America’s Role in the Technetronic Era

In the second quote, Brzezinski is clearly calling for the installation of CIA/MKULTRA mind control leaders. Today, Brzezinski would his former understudy, Obama, a President with an undeniable “magnetic and attractive personality exploiting the latest communications techniques designed to manipulate emotions and control reason.”

Comrade Obama’s ascension to the presidency has been a long time in the making. Interestingly, Barack Obama’s past associates especially the communist terrorists which funded his Harvard legal education and ultimately launched his political career as an Illinois state senator, namely, Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dohrn, have been in lockstep with Obama his entire adult life. However, Dohrn and Ayers were not the first to indoctrinate Obama with the Marxist communist philosophy. For that information, we have to begin with Frank Marshall Davis.

 

Obama’s real father, Frank Marshall Davis, was a member of the Communist Party and a former Soviet Agent who was under FBI investigation for a total of 19 years. In 1948, Davis moved from Chicago to Hawaii leaving behind a colleague named Vernon Jarrett, father-in-law of Senior White House adviser, Valerie Jarrett. Yes, the Jarrett’s are communists as well. Both Jarrett and Davis wrote for a left wing newspaper called the Chicago Defender in which they espoused a communist  takeover of the United States Government. In 1971, Davis, according to Joel Gilbert, reunited with his then nine-year-old son, Barack Obama, and schooled him in the ways of being a good communist for the next nine years.

The Final Stages of Training the Manchurian Candidate

Adding more fuel to this communist fire, it is interesting to note that both Senior White House Advisers, David Axelrod and Valerie Jarrett were both also “Red Diaper Babies, in which they were the sons and daughters of well-to-do parents who desired communism and lived out their dreams through their children’s revolutionary activities. Other notable red-diaper babies also include such notables as Rahm Emanuel and Eric Holder. Jarrett’s situation is particularly interesting in that her family and the Ayers family have been multi-generational friends which also included a marriage between the two families. Much of the Obama administration is a nest of well-established communists and this should serve to gravely concern every American citizen.

 

Following the nine years of mentoring and parenting by Frank Davis, Obama made some very important communist connections which ultimately led to him obtaining an impressive college education financed by some very familiar communist activists, namely, Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn. You remember Bill and Bernardine, don’t you?

 

The Prairie Fire book was co-authored by Dohrn and Ayers, and, quite unbelievably, it was dedicated to Sirhan Sirhan, Robert Kennedy’s assassin. A former FBI informant, while appearing on The Common Sense Show, Larry Grathwohl, revealed that he testified in a court of law that Ayers and Dohrn had direct involvement in a terrorist plot which killed San Francisco police sergeant, Brian V. McDonnell, by a bomb made and planted by these Weathermen Underground terrorists. How are Bernadine Dohrn and husband Bill Ayers not in prison? The only logical explanation is that Ayers and Dohrn are and were CIA assets whose mission it was consisted of guiding the young communist, Barack Obama, and his legal education and later, launching his political career. If Dohrn was not a CIA asset, then how can anyone explain how she teaches at a prominent university with her felony background, conviction and the time she briefly served in prison?

 

Grathwohl also revealed on The Common Sense Show that he asked Ayers, in a meeting of about 25 well-to do Weatherman, most with advanced degrees from Ivy League Universities, what the Weathermen planned to do when they achieved their goal of a communist take over the government. Grathwohl stated that Ayers paused for a moment and then said that it was likely that about 50 million Americans will have to be re-educated in concentration camps located in the American Southwest and that about 25 million would have to be eliminated, meaning that they would have to be murdered. Bill and Bernardine’s Weather Underground had the support of Cuba, East German intelligence and the North Vietnamese. I believe that Obama could end up being the fulfillment of the Ayers “re-education prediction, and with the power granted to Obama by the NDAA, that he will fulfill Ayers’ promise to Grathwohl to murder 25 million Americans who cannot be “re-educated”.

 

During the Vietnam war era, Ayers championed black civil rights and he and Dohrn further chastised white society for their treatment of blacks. Grathwohl also revealed that Ayers wanted to support the beginning of a race war by killing whites, from supposed black villains, and then blaming whites in order to begin a race war. How eerily similar does this sound to the Charles Manson Family and their Helter Skelter plans to execute that very same objective? While Grathwohl was infiltrating the Weathermen, Ayers ordered FBI infiltrator, Grathwohl, to blow up a Detroit police substation to which Grathwohl said that a nearby restaurant, where many blacks ate would suffer many casualties. Ayers replied that some have to die for a revolution to proceed.

 

Ayers and Dohrn raised a foster son, Chesa Boudin, who worked for the late Hugo Chavez, communist dictator in charge of Venezuela. Chesa Boudin was the child of Kathy Boudin and David Gilbert, members of a Weather Underground spin-off group who went to prison for an armored car robbery that resulted in the murders of two police officers and a security guard. Dohrn served seven months for her role in the robbery and this is the reason that she is ineligible to become bar certified as an attorney. Is anyone else uncomfortable with the fact that obama-and-ayers.png

 

Ayers and Dohrn were the ones primarily responsible for educating Obama with the communist funds and then subsequently launched his political career from their living room? Well, it is true, please read on.

 

Allen Hulton, a 39 year veteran of the postal service, provided a sworn affidavit to Maricopa County, AZ. Sheriff investigators, led by Sheriff Joe Arpaio, in an effort toward determining whether or not former FOREIGN college student, Barack Obama, was eligible to be placed on Arizona’s 2012 election ballot. After reviewing Hulton’s affidavit, it is apparent that Ayers and Dohrn were in fact the de facto adoptive parents to this foreign student destined to become the first illegitimate President of the United States. As a result, Obama was treated to the finest Ivy League education that communist backed money could buy as Hulton maintains that the Ayers’ repeatedly told him that they were financing the education of a promising young black FOREIGN student at Harvard. Hulton also testified that he met Obama while at the Ayer’s home and he asked Obama what he was going to do with all his education, to which Obama politely answered:

barry-soetoro.jpg

“I am going to become the President”. Readers should take note that this is an affidavit, and as such, is formally considered to be evidence, not conjecture or hearsay. There can be no other conclusion that the communist terrorist, Bill Ayers, and his father, the former head of Con Edison, Tom Ayers, began grooming Obama to become America’s first communist President. Bill Ayers and President Obama’s relationship continues into the present time as it is on record that Ayers visited the White House in August of 2009.

I think it is likely that the Weatherman Underground was a CIA created false flag operation simply designed to assist the communist inspired group with the ability to undermine the country and that Obama represents the Weatherman’s finest achievement. The Weathermen were nothing more than mere Soviet collaborators that Soviet defectors had previously us warned about.

We also know that Obama’s communist affiliations continued well into his adulthood because of the good work of Joel Gilbert who discovered that Obama was active with a Weathermen Underground support group known as The May 19th Communist Organization, in New York. Perhaps, this is why Ayers was visiting the White House in 2009.

 

The Communists Openly Declare Victory Upon Obama’s Election

Frank Chapman, a communist activist and a member of the communist front group known as the World Peace Council. Chapman clearly used the term “mole” to describe Obama. He said Obama’s political climb and subsequent success in the 2008 Democratic presidential primaries was “a dialectical leap ushering in a qualitatively new era of struggle.” Chapman further stated that, “Marx once compared revolutionary struggle with the work of the mole, who sometimes burrows so far beneath the ground that he leaves no trace of his movement on the surface. This is the old revolutionary ‘mole,’ not only showing his traces on the surface but also breaking through. The Communist Party USA backs Obama to the hilt.” It is clear that Obama is their man!

Conclusion

Because of the psychological principal, cognitive dissonance, no amount of direct or circumstantial proof would convince some people that the highest political position in the country has been compromised by a communist plot spanning several decades. The term cognitive dissonance refers to a person who received information so shocking, so upsetting, that they cannot adequately process that information and then instead deny the validity of the proof that anyone else could see. If you are one of the cognitive dissonance types, please allow me to ask you a few questions.

obama-and-kellog.jpg

Who was Obama’s basketball coach in high school? The President has some degree of basketball skills as he defeated former NBA player and sports broadcaster, Clark Kellogg, in a game of pig (how appropriate) in front of a national TV audience.

 

Who was Obama’s history teacher in high school? Why don’t we see interviews with his former professors, teachers, coaches, childhood friends and his first girl friend? Who in the hell is he?

 

There are no visible answers to these questions are there? But still the cognitive dissonance crowd still persists with their abject denials. To them, I say let’s judge a man by his actions, not his words. Has Obama’s actions served to help or hurt America? Do his Presidential actions match up with his communist background? It is an easy, perhaps, groundless accusation that Obama is truly the manifestation of what Soviet defectors warned us about when these stated that America’s leadership would become compromised and lead America down the path of destruction.

 

Ask yourself America, how could we collective allow a person with Obama’s very limited political background into the White House? More importantly, how could Obama’s questionable background escape public scrutiny? And the most important question lies in understanding the the answer to this question, “Can anyone clearly demonstrate his intention to bring America down by his own actions?”  The answer to this question is unquestionably YES, and this will be covered in Part Four of this series! When we put Obama’s misdeeds side-by-side, it will become easy to see how Obama is deliberately trying to dismantle America prior to entering martial law followed by World War III.

 

http://www.thecommon...the-presidency/


Edited by Zharkov, 15 November 2014 - 01:25 AM.

  • 0

#2 Cosssack

Cosssack

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 59509 posts

Posted 15 November 2014 - 11:09 AM

holly shit....

 

:)


  • 0

#3 Nemesis

Nemesis

    Administrator

  • Administrators
  • 20207 posts

Posted 15 November 2014 - 01:12 PM

What an utterly bullshit story.  No Communist would attack Russian people and Russian interests if he were "Soviet" or "Communist."


  • 0

#4 Mario Milano

Mario Milano

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 40679 posts

Posted 15 November 2014 - 02:43 PM

What an utterly bullshit story.  No Communist would attack Russian people and Russian interests if he were "Soviet" or "Communist."

That isn't quiet right Nem, Communism is a Jew invention to enslave the population, The Jew bankers were behind the Bolshevik revolution in Russia to oust the Tzar and install Jew Puppets Like Trotsky and Lenin to rule Russia.....exactly like they are doing in Ukraine....hence after that the Gulags in Russia were born where millions of Russians were murdered by the Jew created Communists.

____

 

The Gulag is the system of slave labor camps initially established in 1919 by the Cheka--the secret police established by the Bolsheviks after they seized power from the Russian Provisional Government. It was a crime against humanity without parallel in European history


  • 0

#5 Zharkov

Zharkov

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 36861 posts

Posted 15 November 2014 - 03:29 PM

That isn't quiet right Nem, Communism is a Jew invention to enslave the population, The Jew bankers were behind the Bolshevik revolution in Russia to oust the Tzar and install Jew Puppets Like Trotsky and Lenin to rule Russia.....exactly like they are doing in Ukraine....hence after that the Gulags in Russia were born where millions of Russians were murdered by the Jew created Communists.

____

 

The Gulag is the system of slave labor camps initially established in 1919 by the Cheka--the secret police established by the Bolsheviks after they seized power from the Russian Provisional Government. It was a crime against humanity without parallel in European history

Exactly!   

 

I suspect that most Russians think their 1917 revolution originated from INSIDE Russia, not from OUTSIDE Russia, or more precisely, in New York, London, and Berlin, where the money and planning had been acquired.    Russia was attacked by outside forces who manipulated the Russian people, or some of them, who disliked the Tsar and thought others would do better.    They were wrong and paid for that mistake with their lives.    Communism is not unique to Russia.    It exists in the West, in Israel, the USA, Germany, and many other places, so that "going global" would be less difficult than one might expect, particularly if an organization such as the UN is allowed the power to govern the globe.    But first, national sovereignty must be destroyed, and that is why Putin has become a target, because he is a nationalist.   Putin accepts a certain amount of globalism as necessary but resists handing Russia over to them.

 

The shootdown of a plane similar to Putin's aircraft was not a coincidence, it was a targetting mistake.   It could happen again.


  • 1

#6 vladzo

vladzo

    Registered User

  • Banned
  • PipPipPip
  • 16824 posts

Posted 15 November 2014 - 08:36 PM

this is an absurdity.

 

find the obama speech in berlin.


  • 0

#7 Cosssack

Cosssack

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 59509 posts

Posted 16 November 2014 - 12:00 AM

this is an absurdity.

 

find the obama speech in berlin.

 

 

do you think obama should be killed?

 

vladzo?


  • 0

#8 Nemesis

Nemesis

    Administrator

  • Administrators
  • 20207 posts

Posted 16 November 2014 - 01:09 AM

Don't try to bait a poster.   Doing so could get this site shut down and we are also bound by the laws and Constitution of the Russian Federation, Cosssack.


  • 0

#9 RobertD

RobertD

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 24171 posts

Posted 16 November 2014 - 01:10 AM

Obola is a mobster.


  • 0

#10 Zharkov

Zharkov

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 36861 posts

Posted 16 November 2014 - 02:33 AM

this is an absurdity.

 

find the obama speech in berlin.

Obama always tells people what they want to hear, so it is surprising that anyone as smart as vlad would still believe any speech Obama makes.     Isn't ruining America enough?   Does he have to confess too?   His speech writers won't allow that.

What more could Obama do to prove he is a global communist agent?

Obama is a spy who doesn't confess his crimes.


  • 0

#11 Zharkov

Zharkov

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 36861 posts

Posted 16 November 2014 - 03:02 AM

In a wide-ranging foreign-policy speech in Berlin, President Barack Obama called for launching negotiations with Russia aimed at ending the two nations’ Cold War military posture and a reduction of nuclear arms by up to one third. Here is the text of the speech, as provided by the White House.

http://blogs.wsj.com...eech-in-berlin/

 

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

 

How well did that work out, vladzo?    Were there any "negotiations"?

Are those Russian bombers flying over the Gulf of Mexico, or is Obama friendly with Russia again?

Why do you think Putin brought warships with him to the conference in Australia?

 

Communists want Putin gone, and Obama is a charter member of that group according to researchers who looked into his background a bit more deeply than the mainstream news media.


  • 0

#12 Zharkov

Zharkov

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 36861 posts

Posted 16 November 2014 - 03:29 AM

Marcel-Lehel Lazar, the Romanian top hacker known as Guccifer who accessed private email accounts of numerous top government & military officials as well as the Bush & Rockefeller family, is quoted in the New York Times as predicting a nuclear attack on Chicago sometime in 2015.


  • 0

#13 bishadi

bishadi

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 9522 posts

Posted 17 November 2014 - 09:40 PM

What an utterly bullshit story.  No Communist would attack Russian people and Russian interests if he were "Soviet" or "Communist."



Well no wonder the Ukraine is breaking up, the people are not soviet, communist?!?!?

ah .....

makes sense now
  • 0

#14 Zharkov

Zharkov

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 36861 posts

Posted 20 November 2014 - 06:12 PM

Russia Prepares To Join The Globalist-Soviet Gulag

 

Grand Theft Kremlin

I laugh at those who think that Putin is somehow independent of the Banksters. Putin is as controlled by the banksters as is President Obama and his intended theft of Russian retirement accounts is living proof of this statement.

Late last year, Russian Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev told his finance ministers that the Russian government was  “temporarily” seizing $7.6 billion in savings from non-state pension funds while it carries out inspections to insure that the money Russians channel to private pension funds, is safe. To do this, it seized 244 billion rubles (i.e. $7.6 billion) from private, non-governmental pension funds and forcibly, but only “temporarily” place them into the Russian government state pension fund.

Russian authorities claim that they will only hold the retirement money for awhile (i.e. a year) while they check to see that banking institutions are sound. We have passed the previously set year deadline and the Putin still has the Russian retirement money. To you journalists who work such outlets as “Voice of Russia”, Putin just stole your retirements. Aren’t you going to report it? It is hard not believe that this retirement money will not be applied to invading and occupying Ukraine as well as continuing to buy gold in order to purchase Iranian oil.

The Russian government explanation of why they need to seize retirement funds does not even constitute a good cover story. Many analysts state that the “temporary” borrowing of Russian pension funds by the government looks more like a case of government“ confiscation” of these private funds.

Former Russian finance minister, Alexei Kudrin, has stated that if the government is not intent on spending these retirement funds, then why are they banking the retirement money?

Government controlled companies have expressed a negative reaction to the “borrowing” of Russian retirement funds. Most experts agree that the Russian government is making Russia a very unattractive place to invest given this new development. This apparent reckless action by the Russian government makes no sense unless the Russians, like the American bankers, are  attempting to acquire as many hard assets as possible before the coming collapse of the banks.

Loving Your Enslavement

When the globalists are done stealing all of your hard assets, then they are coming after last remaining asset, namely, your personal labor.

 

According to Obama’s Executive Order 13603, the President, or the head of any federal agency that he shall designate, can conscript “persons of outstanding experience and ability without compensation,” in both “peacetime and times of national emergency.”  I can hear the Obama supporters now as they will write to me and say, “Obama would never do that, you are drinking from the Kool-Aid”.  Well, here it is, you can read it for yourself.

    Sec. 502.  Consultants.  The head of each agency otherwise delegated functions under this order is delegated the authority of the President under sections 710(B) and © of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2160(B), ©, to employ persons of outstanding experience and ability without compensation and to employ experts, consultants, or organizations.  The authority delegated by this section may not be redelegated.

 

This means that Obama, and his fellow communists, can seize any resource, property, or person at any time for any reason, including being able to force that person to perform assigned labor without being paid.

There is only ONE word for forced, “uncompensated employment”. That word would be “slavery”. Congratulations President Obama, you have effectively repealed the 13th Amendment to the Constitution.

Section 601 of the act specifies, in part, how far the government can go in terms of making you their slave.

    Sec. 601. Secretary of Labor. (a) The Secretary of Labor, in coordination with the Secretary of Defense and the heads of other agencies, as deemed appropriate by the Secretary of Labor, shall:

(1) collect and maintain data necessary to make a continuing appraisal

of the Nation’s workforce needs for purposes of national defense;

(2) upon request by the Director of Selective Service, and in coordination

with the Secretary of Defense, assist the Director of Selective Service

in development of policies regulating the induction and deferment of

persons for duty in the armed services;

(3) upon request from the head of an agency with authority under this

order, consult with that agency with respect to: (i) the effect of contemplated

actions on labor demand and utilization; (ii) the relation of

labor demand to materials and facilities requirements; and (iii) such other

matters as will assist in making the exercise of priority and allocations

functions consistent with effective utilization and distribution of labor;

(4) upon request from the head of an agency with authority under this

order: (i) formulate plans, programs, and policies for meeting the labor

requirements of actions to be taken for national defense purposes; and

    ii) estimate training needs to help address national defense requirements

    and promote necessary and appropriate training programs

    “to employ persons of outstanding experience and ability without compensation and to employ experts, consultants, or organizations”.

If the above section was merely going to be a military draft, then the Secretary of Labor would not have to be involved. However, as you will note the “Secretary of Labor, in coordination with the Secretary of Defense and heads of other agencies, as deemed appropriate by the Secretary of Labor, shall:

    “…assist in the development of policies regulating the induction and deferment of persons for duty in the armed services;… formulate plans, programs, and policies for meeting the labor requirements of actions to be taken for national defense purposes; and (ii) estimate training needs to help address national defense requirements and promote necessary and appropriate training programs…”.  Refer back to section 502 of sections 710(B) and © of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2160(B), ©;  these are the people that the Secretary of the Labor will conscript in order “to employ persons of outstanding experience and ability without compensation and to employ experts, consultants, or organizations”.

    This, my fellow Americans, is a civilian conscription (i.e. slavery) and this is why the Secretary of Labor is in charge instead of the head of the Selective Service! Under these provisions, the government believes that they can send you anywhere, to work on anything of their choosing.


http://www.thecommon...hey-steal-next/

 

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

 

What more would Obama have to do to prove he is a globalist-soviet communist agent?

 

Is the state seizure of your personal labor sufficient to show his intent to establish a communist state?

 

 


  • 0

#15 Zharkov

Zharkov

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 36861 posts

Posted 18 January 2015 - 06:27 PM

Can a Communist be also a Fascist at the same time?   Yes.   Some call it "Obamunism".

 

The difference between National Socialism and International Socialism are relatively slight.   

They are both compatible in many respects.   Both types of socialism have in common that the ordinary worker becomes a slave to the state.   The state is all-powerful and important, the lives of individuals not so important, and the leader creates a cult of personality along with a dictatorship.   


Edited by Zharkov, 18 January 2015 - 06:39 PM.

  • 0

#16 Mandrake

Mandrake

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 43860 posts

Posted 18 January 2015 - 08:09 PM

Can a Communist be also a Fascist at the same time?   Yes.   Some call it "Obamunism".
 
The difference between National Socialism and International Socialism are relatively slight.   
They are both compatible in many respects.   Both types of socialism have in common that the ordinary worker becomes a slave to the state.   The state is all-powerful and important, the lives of individuals not so important, and the leader creates a cult of personality along with a dictatorship.


Most call it Stalinism.
  • 0

#17 Mandrake

Mandrake

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 43860 posts

Posted 18 January 2015 - 08:12 PM

Definition of Stalinism taken from the Encyclopedia of Marxism
http://www.marxists....ssary/index.htm

Stalinism

In contemporary parlance, the word “Stalinism” has come to embody a range of ideologies, specific political positions, forms of societal organization, and political tendencies. That makes getting at the core definition of “Stalinism” difficult, but not impossible.

First and foremost, Stalinism must be understood as the politics of a political stratum. Specifically, Stalinism is the politics of the bureaucracy that hovers over a workers' state. Its first manifestation was in the Soviet Union, where Stalinism arose when sections of the bureaucracy began to express their own interests against those of the working class, which had created the workers' state through revolution to serve its class interests.

Soviet Russia was an isolated workers' state, and its developmental problems were profound. The socialist movement–including the Bolshevik leaders in Russia–had never confronted such problems. Chief among these was that Russia was a backward, peasant-dominated country, the “weakest link in the capitalist chain,” and had to fight for its survival within an imperialist world. This challenge was compounded by the defeat of the revolution in Europe, particularly in Germany, and the isolation of the Soviet workers' state from the material aid that could have been provided by a stronger workers' state. But the pressures of imperialism were too great.

From a social point of view, then, Stalinism is the expression of these pressures of imperialism within the workers' state. The politics of Stalinism flow from these pressures.

The political tenets of Stalinism revolve around the theory of socialism in one country–developed by Stalin to counter the Bolshevik theory that the survival of the Russian Revolution depended on proletarian revolutions in Europe. In contradistinction, the Stalinist theory stipulates that a socialist society can be achieved within a single country.

In April 1924, in the first edition of his book Foundations of Leninism, Stalin had explicitly rejected the idea that socialism could be constructed in one country. He wrote: “Is it possible to attain the final victory of socialism in one country, without the combined efforts of the proletarians of several advanced countries? No, it is not. The efforts of one country are enough for the overthrow of the bourgeoisie. This is what the history of our revolution tells us. For the final victory of socialism, for the organization of socialist production, the efforts of one country, especially a peasant country like ours, are not enough. For this we must have the efforts of the proletariat of several advanced countries. Such, on the whole, are the characteristic features of the Leninist theory of the proletarian revolution.”

In August 1924, as Stalin was consolidating his power in the Soviet Union, a second edition of the same book was published. The text just quoted had been replaced with, in part, the following: “Having consolidated its power, and taking the lead of the peasantry, the proletariat of the victorious country can and must build a socialist society.” And by November 1926, Stalin had completely revised history, stating: “The party always took as its starting point the idea that the victory of socialism ... can be accomplished with the forces of a single country.”

Leon Trotsky, in The Third International After Lenin, called the Stalinist concept of “socialism one country” a “reactionary theory” and characterized its “basis” as one that“sums up to sophistic interpretations of several lines from Lenin on the one hand, and to a scholastic interpretation of the 'law of uneven development' on the other. By giving a correct interpretation of the historic law as well as of the quotations [from Lenin] in question,” Trotsky continued, “we arrive at a directly opposite conclusion, that is, the conclusion that was reached by Marx, Engels, Lenin, and all of us, including Stalin and Bukharin, up to 1925."

Stalinism had uprooted the very foundations of Marxism and Leninism.

From “socialism in one country” flow the two other main tenets of Stalinist politics. First is that the workers' movement–given the focus on building socialism in one country (i.e., the Soviet Union)–must adapt itself to whatever is in the best interests of that focus at any given moment. Hence we find the Stalinists engaged in “a series of contradictory zigzags” (Trotsky, The Revolution Betrayed), from confrontation with imperialism to détente and from seeming support for the working-class struggle to outright betrayal of the workers. In other words, Russia's own economic development comes first, above an international policy of revolution–which was the Bolshevik perspective. The second is the idea of revolution in “stages” –that the “national-democratic revolution” must be completed before the socialist revolution takes place. This, too, runs contrary to Marxism. But because of this theory and as the expression of imperialism within the workers' state–and, by extension, within the world workers' movement–we find the Stalinists assigning to the national bourgeoisie a revolutionary role.

The case of Indonesia in 1965 affords an ideal illustration of the bankruptcy and treachery of the “two-stage theory.” As class tensions mounted among the workers and the peasantry, and the masses began to rise up against the shaky regime of President Sukarno, the Stalinist leadership in Beijing told the Indonesian masses and their mass organization the Indonesian Communist Party (PKI) to tie their fate to the national bourgeoisie. In October, as many as 1 million workers and peasants were slaughtered in a CIA-organized coup led by General Suharto, which swept aside the Sukarno, crushed the rising mass movements, and installed a brutal military dictatorship.

The “two-stage theory” has also propelled the Stalinists into “popular fronts” with so-called“progressive”elements of the bourgeois class to “advance” the first revolutionary stage. Examples include Stalinist support (through the Communist Party, USA) to President Roosevelt 1930s. And, taking this orientation to its logical conclusion, the Communist Party in the United States consistently supports Democratic Party candidates for office, including the presidency.

The theory of “socialism in one country” and the policies that flowed from it propelled a transformation of Soviet foreign policy under Stalin. The Bolshevik revolutionary strategy, based on support for the working classes of all countries and an effort through the Communist International to construct Communist Parties as revolutionary leaderships throughout the world, gave way to deal-making and maneuvers with bourgeois governments, colonial “democrats” like Chiang Kai-shek in China, and the trade union bureaucracies.

In his 1937 essay “Stalinism and Bolshevism,” Trotsky wrote: “The experience of Stalinism does not refute the teaching of Marxism but confirms it by inversion. The revolutionary doctrine which teaches the proletariat to orient itself correctly in situations and to profit actively by them, contains of course no automatic guarantee of victory. But victory is possible only through the application of this doctrine.” At best, one can say that the Stalinist orientation has not been one of orienting “correctly."

In terms of the organization of a state, Stalinist policies are quite clear: democratic rights threaten the position of the bureaucracy, and hence democracy is incompatible with Stalinism. In basic terms on a world scale, the forces of Stalinism have done everything in their power to prevent socialist revolution.
  • 0

#18 Zharkov

Zharkov

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 36861 posts

Posted 19 January 2015 - 12:46 AM

Stalinist references are about as relevant as dinosaurs and cave men.    America doesn't need to worry about losing democracy because we have none to begin with and the power structure has been designed to maintain that situation indefinitely.  

 

Operations Research Technical Manual TM-SW7905.1, (Silent weapons for quiet wars) reveals a plan far more dangerous than Stalin could have imagined.     It's an ongoing program of war against the domestic US population, containing a description of the war, its strategies, and its weaponry.

Technitronic engineering of human society offers no opportunity for agonizing over religious, moral, or cultural values.   It looks at human society with cold objectivity to create an automated, totally controlled human society.  

 

Silent weapons were developed to prevent the public from overturning the centers of power.    The end is control.   The goal is to shift the wealth from the general public to the elite few.    Lower class individuals have little hope in extricating themselves from the class structure developed for them.    There is no questioning of obviously flawed elections, bogus candidates, sham legislation and corrupt lawmaking.

Instead of a gun, instead of bullets, it uses situations to destroy - biological, chemical, legislative, and judicial warfare, and microwave radiation, to pulverize the public will into obedient compliance.
 


Edited by Zharkov, 19 January 2015 - 02:47 PM.

  • 0

#19 Ivan88

Ivan88

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 17064 posts

Posted 19 January 2015 - 06:22 AM

White House Forms Task Force to Address Police Brutality, Appoints Brutal & Abusive Cop to Lead It

 

03Dec, 2014by Dave Hodges

 

 

Washington D.C. – This week, President Obama gave a speech about police militarization, in light of the recent unrest in Ferguson, Missouri, and formed a committee that will supposedly be working to address police corruption and police brutality. However, one of his lead figures in this committee is Philadelphia Police Chief Charles Ramsey, a crooked cop who is notorious for using excessive force and making false arrests.

“If the president’s idea of reforming policing practices includes mass false arrests, brutality, and the eviscerating of civil rights, then Ramsey’s his man. That’s Charles Ramsey’s legacy in D.C. Obama should immediately rescind his appointment of Commissioner Ramsey, who is a mass violator of civil rights and civil liberties,” Mara Verheyden-Hilliard, Executive Director of the Partnership for Civil Justice Fund(PCJF), said in a recent statement.

Before his stay in Philadelphia, Ramsey was the Police Chief in D.C. for a number of years, where he oversaw many violent arrests and mass detainments during the regularly occurring protests that take place in the city.

Instead of taking money and equipment away from these agencies, the government is now seeking to grant them larger budgets, as a so-called solution to the problem of police brutality.

Press Secretary Josh Earnest said this week that the programs have been useful for the government, especially last year in the Boston lock-down, which followed the marathon bombing.

http://www.thecommon...cop-to-lead-it/


  • 0

#20 Zharkov

Zharkov

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 36861 posts

Posted 19 January 2015 - 02:52 PM

WHAT MOST AMERICANS SAY ABOUT OBAMA:

'What planet you from?'
'If they're not Islamic fanatics, what are they, Martians?

WASHINGTON – Jeanine Pirro, host of the Fox News show “Justice with Judge Jeanine,” says Americans are beset with a president won’t tell them the truth.

“We have a commander in chief who is so incorrect that he says ISIS is not about Islam. Look, this is a religion of peace, Obama tells us. ‘What planet are you from?’” she asked “‘If they’re not Islamic fanatics, what are they, Martians?’”

Pirro, who previously has blasted Obama for not adequately preparing America for the attacks she believes are coming from jihadists, and even said his handling of various crises constitutes impeachable offenses, spoke Thursday night at the annual conference for the nonprofit activist group Act for America.

She hit Obama over the Sept. 11, 2012, attack on the U.S. special mission in Benghazi that killed U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens.

“I think about Benghazi. I wonder if the people in our government really want to protect us. When I went to law school, I went to learn about justice and equal rights,” she said. “In the law, you have people whose lives have changed because some dirtbag decided to do something to them. We should call it the criminal injustice system. The victim didn’t choose to be a victim.”

In Benghazi two years ago, there were four Americans who died who “didn’t choose to be victims of that attack. Then our president and secretary of state blamed the Benghazi attack on a video. Are you kidding me?”

She said the administration “took Islam out of the talking points on Benghazi because we didn’t want to offend Muslims!”

“We didn’t want to offend them. Really? Do we really think we’re going to make them hate us more?” Pirro asked.

“What do they gain by lying to us? They gain their political office by lying to us. This administration has to say it was about a video because they didn’t want to admit that they didn’t have Libya under control,” she said.

“He is lying to us. He knew it was terrorists. He knew it was Ansar al-Shariah. He knew who did it. Then he complains when the people in this country criticize the administration over Benghazi,” said Pirro.

“Then they’re apologizing for the man who made the video. The reason they had to fantasize about the video being the cause [was] because they claimed that Libya was normalized. They’re lying! We heard Leon Panetta and Martin Dempsey say we couldn’t get there in time,” she said.

“Oh, they tell us we should be happy they arrested the guy who masterminded Benghazi. He spoke to the London Times, Fox, CNN and the media. Then they say it took us a year to find the mastermind of Benghazi,” she said, unleashing on the Democrat in the White House.

“It took them two years after his speaking to the media. They couldn’t get him before that because he would say they were stupid for believing that a video caused it. The mastermind would say that we are stupid. It doesn’t take a video to make them hate us!” Pirro said.

Fox News reported last week three American security operatives claim they repeatedly were told to wait, rather than rush to the aid of colleagues under attack at the facility in Benghazi.

Get all of the answers about Benghazi, in “The REAL Benghazi Story: What the White House and Hillary Don’t Want You to Know,” from the WND Superstore.

They said it was a CIA operative, identified so far only as Bob, who ordered their delay, drawing a stunned reaction from Pat Smith, the mother of security agent Sean Smith, who died along with Ambassador Chris Stevens and two others.

“Who’s the stupid idiot that we have in our government that would order something like that?” she demanded.

And she wants to know what role the White House played.

Pirro also focused on ISIS, the Muslim terror army now estimated to include more than 30,000 fighters in Iraq and Syria.

“Mark my words, this administration will try to say if you insult the Prophet Muhammad we’re going to punish you,” she said. “Says who? That’s not in the Constitution. Who is the president of the United States to say that the future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam?

“We’re in the middle of a serious mess. Our commander in chief announces the beheading of James Foley, then goes to play golf and high-five his buddies. Now he says we’re going to get the guy who got James Foley and Steve Sotloff. Really?”

“The president says ISIS is not Islamic. Really? What is it, German? Have you read the Quran. Read the d–n thing and you’ll figure it out,” Pirro said.

Pirro also took aim at Obama’s domestic policy.

“They’ve removed all references to Islam and jihad from the training manuals and [they] label the shooter at Fort Hood as committing an act of workplace violence,” she said. “They are so breathtakingly stupid that [we] say [that] even after the Fort Hood shooter talked to Anwar al-Awlaki, a guy who was so dangerous that we had to kill him.”

She cited the administration’s statements about al-Qaida and Osama bin Laden being on the run.

“He wasn’t on the run. He was holed up in a house in Pakistan watching porno movies. We took him out and he wasn’t running. The administration continues with a fantasy. Our president said we’re going to give justice to these people – people who he says were offended by the video,” Pirro said.

Obama’s true allegiance was revealed in his dealings with Egypt, she said.

“We take out Mubarak who was actually an ally. We take out Gadhafi. We supported the Arab Spring, and it wasn’t democratic. But, Morsi gets elected. Obama’s first speech he gave in Cairo was about apologizing for who we are.”

She continued: “We support Morsi because he was democratically elected. So was Hitler. They kick out Morsi and elect al-Sisi and the administration is still holding back. The administration is angry that the Muslim Brotherhood is out in Egypt. The Egyptians had the strength to throw out the Muslim Brotherhood! Shame on us because we don’t have the strength to throw them out of the U.S.,” Pirro said.

“We don’t need to be politically correct,” she said. “We need to be morally right. The people who started this country are turning over in their graves asking what in the world they did all of that for.”

The Act for America convention took place on the 13th anniversary of the Sept. 11 Muslim terror attacks on the U.S.

She earlier warned the Islamic jihadists killing and threatening Christians and other religious minorities in the Middle East are gunning for the U.S.

“They are coming for us,” she said on her program. “They as much as told us in 2009.”

She noted the message was delivered by the leader of the Islamic State, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, who was held as a civilian internee by the U.S. in Iraq for most of 2004 and then released. In his parting message to his captors, he vowed: “We’ll see you in New York.”

Further, she said some of Obama’s actions have constituted offenses for which he could be impeached.

http://www.wnd.com/2...lanet-you-from/


  • 0




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Copyright © 2020 Pravda.Ru