Jump to content

Theme© by Fisana
 

Photo

Obama Is A Soviet Agent


  • Please log in to reply
43 replies to this topic

#21 Zharkov

Zharkov

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 36861 posts

Posted 19 January 2015 - 02:57 PM

“It is my duty and our duty as Muslims to replace the U.S. Constitution with the Quran.”

 

GARLAND, Texas – Hundreds of protesters were out in force Saturday at a Muslim gathering blacked out to the media called “Stand with the Prophet” whose keynote speaker, an imam from Brooklyn, has been linked as an unindicted co-conspirator with the deadly 1993 World Trade Center bombing.

The imam, Siraj Wahhaj, once remarked, “It is my duty and our duty as Muslims to replace the U.S. Constitution with the Quran.”

President Obama formally invited Wahhaj to give a “juma,” or invocation, at the Democratic National Convention in 2012, but his invitation was withdrawn after public criticism of the decision became widespread.

http://www.wnd.com/2...?cat_orig=faith


  • 0

#22 Zharkov

Zharkov

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 36861 posts

Posted 20 January 2015 - 05:29 AM

Generals conclude Obama backed al-Qaida
Probe of military experts finds U.S. 'switched sides' in terror war

NEW YORK – The Obama White House and the State Department under the management of Secretary of State Hillary Clinton “changed sides in the war on terror” in 2011 by implementing a policy of facilitating the delivery of weapons to the al-Qaida-dominated rebel militias in Libya attempting to oust Moammar Gadhafi from power, the Citizens Commission on Benghazi concluded in its interim report.

In WND interviews, several members of the commission have disclosed their finding that the mission of Christopher Stevens, prior to the fall of Gadhafi and during Stevens’ time as U.S. ambassador, was the management of a secret gun-running program operated out of the Benghazi compound.

The Obama administration’s gun-running project in Libya, much like the “fast and furious” program under Eric Holder’s Justice Department, operated without seeking or obtaining authorization by Congress.

The Citizen’s Commission on Benghazi’s interim report, in a paragraph titled “Changing sides in the War on Terror,” alleges “the U.S. was fully aware of and facilitating the delivery of weapons to the Al Qaeda-dominated rebel militias (ISIS) throughout the 2011 rebellion.”

The report asserted the jihadist agenda of AQIM, the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group and other Islamic terror groups represented among the rebel forces was well known to U.S. officials responsible for Libya policy.

“The rebels made no secret of their Al Qaeda - ISIS affiliation, openly flying and speaking in front of the black flag of Islamic jihad, according to author John Rosenthal and multiple media reports,” the interim report said. “And yet, the White House and senior Congressional members deliberately and knowingly pursued a policy that provided material support to terrorist organizations in order to topple a ruler who had been working closely with the West actively to suppress Al Qaeda.”

The report concluded: “The result in Libya, across much of North Africa, and beyond has been utter chaos, disruption of Libya’s oil industry, the spread of dangerous weapons (including surface-to-air missiles), and the empowerment of jihadist organizations like Al Qaeda and the Muslim Brotherhood.”

Christopher Stevens: ’1st U.S. envoy to al-Qaida’

In the WND interviews, several members of the citizens’ commission, speaking for themselves, not for the commission, added important background to the interim report’s conclusion.

“In early 2011, before Gadhafi was deposed, Christopher Stevens came to Benghazi in a cargo ship, and his title at the time was envoy to the Libyan rebels,’ which basically means Christopher Stevens was America’s very first envoy to al-Qaida,” explained Clare Lopez, a member of the commission who served as a career operations officer with the CIA and current is vice president for research at the Washington-based Center for Security Policy.

“At that time, Stevens was facilitating the delivery of weapons to the al-Qaida-related militia (ISIS) in Libya,” Lopez continued. “The weapons were produced at factories in Eastern Europe and shipped to a logistics hub in Qatar. The weapons were financed by the UAE and delivered via Qatar mostly on ships, with some possibly on airplanes, for delivery to Benghazi. The weapons were small arms, including Kalashnikovs, rocket-propelled grenades and lots of ammunition.”

Lopez further explained that during the period of time when Stevens was facilitating the delivery of weapons to the al-Qaida-affiliated militia in Libya, he was living in the facility that was later designated the Special Mission Compound in Benghazi.

“This was about weapons going into Libya, and Stevens is coordinating with Abdelhakim Belhadj, the leader of the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group, other al-Qaida-affiliated militia leaders and leaders of the Libyan Muslim Brotherhood that directed the rebellion against Qadhafi as an offshoot of the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood,” Lopez said. “Many of the individual members of the al-Qaida-related militias, including the LIFG, and the groups that would later become Ansar Al-Sharia, were Muslim Brotherhood members first.”

According to the interim report, as detailed by Lopez, a delegation from the UAE traveled to Libya after the fall of Gadhafi to collect payment for the weapons the UAE had financed and that Qatar had delivered to the TNC during the war.

“The UAE delegation was seeking $1 billion it claimed was owed,” the interim report noted. “During their visit to Tripoli, the UAE officials discovered that half of the $1 billion worth of weapons it had financed for the rebels had, in fact, been diverted by Mustafa Abdul Jalil, the Muslim Brotherhood head of the Libyan TNC, and sold to Qaddafi.”

According to information discovered during the UAE visit to Tripoli, when Jalil learned that Maj. Gen. Abdel Fatah Younis, Gadhafi’s former minister of the interior before his late February 2011 defection to the rebel forces, had found out about the weapons diversion and the $500 million payment from Gadhafi, Jalil ordered Abu Salim Abu Khattala, leader of the Abu Obeida Bin al-Jarrah brigade to kill Younis.

“Abu Khattala, later identified as a Ansar al- Shariah commander who participated in the 11 September 2012 attack on the U.S. mission in Benghazi, accepted the orders and directed the killing of Gen. Younis in July 2011,” the interim report noted.

Abu Khattala is currently in custody in New York awaiting trial under a Department of Justice-sealed indictment, after U.S. Delta Force special operations personnel captured him over the weekend of June 14-15, 2014, in a covert mission in Libya. Abu Khattala’s brigade merged into Ansar al-Shariah in 2012, and he was positively identified to the FBI in a cell phone photo from the scene of the attack on the U.S. mission in Benghazi.

The language of the interim report made clear why the sequence of events is important.

“The key significance of this episode is the demonstration of a military chain-of-command relationship between the Libyan Muslim Brotherhood leadership of the TNC and the Al Qaeda-affiliated militia (Ansar al-Shariah) that has been named responsible for the attack on the U.S. mission in Benghazi,” the interim Rreport concluded.

“What we have here is the Muslim Brotherhood leadership of the revolution giving a kill order to a Muslim militia affiliated with al-Qaida, which then carried it out,” Lopez summarized. “This chain-of-command link is important even though it has not yet received enough attention in the media.

A big ‘oh no’ moment

“After Gadhafi is deposed and Stevens was appointed U.S. ambassador to Libya, the flow of weapons reverses,” Lopez noted. “Now Stevens has the job of overseeing the shipment of arms from Libya to Syria to arm the rebels fighting Assad, some of whom ultimately become al-Nusra in Syria and some become ISIS.”

Lopez distinguished that “al-Nusra in Syria still claims allegiance to al-Qaida, while ISIS has broken away from al-Qaida, not because ISIS is too violent, but out of insubordination, after Abu Bakr Al-Baghdadi, the leader of ISIS, wanted to run his own show inside Syria as well as Iraq, thereby disobeying orders from al-Qaida leader Ayman Al-Zawahiri.”

She noted that in this period of time, after the fall of Gadhafi and before the Sept. 11, 2012, attack on the Benghazi compound, Stevens was working with Turkey to ship weapons out of Libya into Syria for the use of the rebels fighting Assad.

According to the authors of the bestselling book “13 Hours,” on Sept. 11, 2012, before the attack on the Benghazi compound started, Stevens had dinner with Turkish Consul General Ali Sait Akin. Stevens reportedly escorted the Turkish diplomat outside the main gate of the Benghazi compound to say good-bye to Akin at approximately 7:40 p.m. local time, before he returned to Villa C to retire for the evening.

Kevin Shipp, a former CIA counterintelligence expert who worked on the seventh floor at Langley as protective staff to then-CIA Director William Casey, again speaking for himself in his interview with WND, agreed with Lopez that the gun-running operation Stevens managed is a secret the Obama White House and Clinton State Department have sought to suppress from the public.

“The shocking part, maybe even a violation of international law that the Obama administration has been terrified to have fully revealed, is that Stevens as part of his duties as a State Department employee was assisting in the shipment of arms first into Libya for the al-Qaida-affiliated militia, with the weapons shipped subsequently out of Libya into Syria for use by the al-Qaida-affiliated rebels fighting Assad,” Shipp told WND.

“Very possibly, these gun-running activities could be looked at even as treasonable offenses,” he said.

Shipp further noted that in gun-running operations in which the CIA wants deniability, the CIA generally involves a third party.

“The way the CIA works is through a ‘cut-out,’ in that you get Qatar to transport the weapons and you facilitate the transport. So now the third party is to blame,” he explained.

“Qatar probably would have been able to pull this off without any attribution to the CIA if the Benghazi attack had not happened. The attack basically shed the light on this operation the White House, the State Department and the CIA were trying to keep quiet,” he said.

“The attack on Benghazi was a big ‘oh no’ moment.”

   http://www.wnd.com/2...acked-al-qaida/
 


  • 0

#23 Shura

Shura

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 25707 posts

Posted 21 January 2015 - 05:14 AM

Definition of Stalinism taken from the Encyclopedia of Marxism
http://www.marxists....ssary/index.htm

Stalinism

In contemporary parlance, the word “Stalinism” has come to embody a range of ideologies, specific political positions, forms of societal organization, and political tendencies. That makes getting at the core definition of “Stalinism” difficult, but not impossible.

First and foremost, Stalinism must be understood as the politics of a political stratum. Specifically, Stalinism is the politics of the bureaucracy that hovers over a workers' state. Its first manifestation was in the Soviet Union, where Stalinism arose when sections of the bureaucracy began to express their own interests against those of the working class, which had created the workers' state through revolution to serve its class interests.

Soviet Russia was an isolated workers' state, and its developmental problems were profound. The socialist movement–including the Bolshevik leaders in Russia–had never confronted such problems. Chief among these was that Russia was a backward, peasant-dominated country, the “weakest link in the capitalist chain,” and had to fight for its survival within an imperialist world. This challenge was compounded by the defeat of the revolution in Europe, particularly in Germany, and the isolation of the Soviet workers' state from the material aid that could have been provided by a stronger workers' state. But the pressures of imperialism were too great.

From a social point of view, then, Stalinism is the expression of these pressures of imperialism within the workers' state. The politics of Stalinism flow from these pressures.

The political tenets of Stalinism revolve around the theory of socialism in one country–developed by Stalin to counter the Bolshevik theory that the survival of the Russian Revolution depended on proletarian revolutions in Europe. In contradistinction, the Stalinist theory stipulates that a socialist society can be achieved within a single country.

In April 1924, in the first edition of his book Foundations of Leninism, Stalin had explicitly rejected the idea that socialism could be constructed in one country. He wrote: “Is it possible to attain the final victory of socialism in one country, without the combined efforts of the proletarians of several advanced countries? No, it is not. The efforts of one country are enough for the overthrow of the bourgeoisie. This is what the history of our revolution tells us. For the final victory of socialism, for the organization of socialist production, the efforts of one country, especially a peasant country like ours, are not enough. For this we must have the efforts of the proletariat of several advanced countries. Such, on the whole, are the characteristic features of the Leninist theory of the proletarian revolution.”

In August 1924, as Stalin was consolidating his power in the Soviet Union, a second edition of the same book was published. The text just quoted had been replaced with, in part, the following: “Having consolidated its power, and taking the lead of the peasantry, the proletariat of the victorious country can and must build a socialist society.” And by November 1926, Stalin had completely revised history, stating: “The party always took as its starting point the idea that the victory of socialism ... can be accomplished with the forces of a single country.”

Leon Trotsky, in The Third International After Lenin, called the Stalinist concept of “socialism one country” a “reactionary theory” and characterized its “basis” as one that“sums up to sophistic interpretations of several lines from Lenin on the one hand, and to a scholastic interpretation of the 'law of uneven development' on the other. By giving a correct interpretation of the historic law as well as of the quotations [from Lenin] in question,” Trotsky continued, “we arrive at a directly opposite conclusion, that is, the conclusion that was reached by Marx, Engels, Lenin, and all of us, including Stalin and Bukharin, up to 1925."

Stalinism had uprooted the very foundations of Marxism and Leninism.

From “socialism in one country” flow the two other main tenets of Stalinist politics. First is that the workers' movement–given the focus on building socialism in one country (i.e., the Soviet Union)–must adapt itself to whatever is in the best interests of that focus at any given moment. Hence we find the Stalinists engaged in “a series of contradictory zigzags” (Trotsky, The Revolution Betrayed), from confrontation with imperialism to détente and from seeming support for the working-class struggle to outright betrayal of the workers. In other words, Russia's own economic development comes first, above an international policy of revolution–which was the Bolshevik perspective. The second is the idea of revolution in “stages” –that the “national-democratic revolution” must be completed before the socialist revolution takes place. This, too, runs contrary to Marxism. But because of this theory and as the expression of imperialism within the workers' state–and, by extension, within the world workers' movement–we find the Stalinists assigning to the national bourgeoisie a revolutionary role.

The case of Indonesia in 1965 affords an ideal illustration of the bankruptcy and treachery of the “two-stage theory.” As class tensions mounted among the workers and the peasantry, and the masses began to rise up against the shaky regime of President Sukarno, the Stalinist leadership in Beijing told the Indonesian masses and their mass organization the Indonesian Communist Party (PKI) to tie their fate to the national bourgeoisie. In October, as many as 1 million workers and peasants were slaughtered in a CIA-organized coup led by General Suharto, which swept aside the Sukarno, crushed the rising mass movements, and installed a brutal military dictatorship.

The “two-stage theory” has also propelled the Stalinists into “popular fronts” with so-called“progressive”elements of the bourgeois class to “advance” the first revolutionary stage. Examples include Stalinist support (through the Communist Party, USA) to President Roosevelt 1930s. And, taking this orientation to its logical conclusion, the Communist Party in the United States consistently supports Democratic Party candidates for office, including the presidency.

The theory of “socialism in one country” and the policies that flowed from it propelled a transformation of Soviet foreign policy under Stalin. The Bolshevik revolutionary strategy, based on support for the working classes of all countries and an effort through the Communist International to construct Communist Parties as revolutionary leaderships throughout the world, gave way to deal-making and maneuvers with bourgeois governments, colonial “democrats” like Chiang Kai-shek in China, and the trade union bureaucracies.

In his 1937 essay “Stalinism and Bolshevism,” Trotsky wrote: “The experience of Stalinism does not refute the teaching of Marxism but confirms it by inversion. The revolutionary doctrine which teaches the proletariat to orient itself correctly in situations and to profit actively by them, contains of course no automatic guarantee of victory. But victory is possible only through the application of this doctrine.” At best, one can say that the Stalinist orientation has not been one of orienting “correctly."

In terms of the organization of a state, Stalinist policies are quite clear: democratic rights threaten the position of the bureaucracy, and hence democracy is incompatible with Stalinism. In basic terms on a world scale, the forces of Stalinism have done everything in their power to prevent socialist revolution.

Stalin's birth name is DJUGASHVILI, which translates from Gruzin into "SON OF A JEW"


  • 0

#24 Zharkov

Zharkov

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 36861 posts

Posted 27 March 2015 - 03:53 PM

Others reached the same conclusion, Obama is a Soviet Agent...

 

RUSSIAN TROLLS ARE HARASSING AMERICAN MEDIA FIGURES

It is not a secret that the Federal government hires trolls to monitor the Internet and engages in harassing actions against people like you and me who dare to speak out mind on the Internet. The surprising factor is how brazen they are about the practice.

These trolls exist in Canada as well as the United States. “Shills exist,” writes an anonymous ex-shill following a lengthy explanation of how he was hand-selected to pose as a normal commenter and basically lie on forums and in comment sections. “They are real. They walk among you … You should be aware of this.”

Beginning in late February 2015, I was exposing how aggressive and warlike the Russian government had become with regard to military snap exercises which threatened to go live at any minute. Then there was “now you see me, now you don’t” disappearance of Putin, from March 5-March 15, which coincided with the increase in the much more aggressive stance of the Russian military. I began suggesting that the signs pointed to the fact that Putin had been deposed and was reduced to being a figurehead. I even went so far as to say that the only reason that Putin was not killed was because he was so popular with the Russian people and that could lead to civil war. This is when the trouble started for me as the Russian trolls began to attack me in earnest.

    1. March 8, 2015- My radio show for that evening was canceled that evening because both the satellite and the backup satellite were taken down at the same time.

    2. March 9, 2015- My Facebook page was no longer viewable to many who knew me including my own staff at The Common Sense Show.

    3. March 10-12, 2015- My website was hacked a total of 31 times. The mobile phone access to my site was vandalized. My associates are still finding back doors into my website that were established during the hacking sessions. In all likelihood, I will have to change my hosting provider.

    4. March 13, 2015-  An IPAD that I use, which associated with another organization, had an unauthorized security screen placed upon it. Both the technical support people and the IT people said they did not do this and they had never seen this before. The IPAD had to be crashed and rebuilt in order to get rid of the security screen which used a password that nobody in an official capacity could crack.

    5. March 13-14, 2015- My email, contacts and logged calendar events were wiped clean.

    6. March 6-Present- I am being spammed on ALL my emails accounts with messages in Russian, most of which generally threaten to do harm to people that I am close with.

    7. March 15-Present- I am receiving harassing and threatening phone calls from people with Russian accents and their caller ID’s show up as four zeros (0000).

     
    My Ongoing Battle with the American-Based Russian Media
    
    This is not the first time that I have had trouble with the Russians. Back in 2013, I was writing how the Russians were training to be a part of a martial law occupation force (EDITOR’S NOTE: This is a highly recommended read as to why the Russians are so defensive about linking their troops to any domestic martial law scenario) inside of the United States. Additionally, I exposed the fact that the Russians,who had twice threatened to nuke the U.S., were allowed to participate in the highly secure Grid EX II simulated drill in which the American power grid is destroyed by an EMP. Subsequent to my stories on these topics, The Voice of Russia invited me on their show with only a 24 hour notice. In the show promo, the Russians doctored my biography. In particular, they left out all references that I have taught undergraduate and graduate research courses which obviously serves to enhance my credibility as a researcher. In the subsequent interview, the host attempted to marginalize my work and I was compelled to adopt the practice of speaking over the host, repeatedly, in order to get my points across about the dangers posed by Russian troops on American soil.

Following my appearance on The Voice of Russia, the subsequent Voice of Russia archives and show description branded me as an extremist and proceeded to defame me. Ask yourself, when was the last time you ever saw a guest attacked in print by an organization which had just interviewed them?

I have a website and I exposed the Russians and their unprofessional tactics. Amazingly, one of the Russian employees from this Russian media outlet, contacted me and said “Although it is true that we are state-sponsored media, we do not always engage in propaganda”. I was grateful for the gift offered by this inane statement which led to my next article about the Russian media.
A Common Phenomenon

In the last two weeks, I have spoken to a number of talk show hosts and Independent Media writers who are having very similar issues to what I am presently suffering through. I am choosing to not identify these people and I will leave to them to determine their own level of disclosure. Many are hoping this will blow over. I can tell everyone that this will not go away on its own. I have over 18 months of harassment at the hands of the Russians. Make no mistake about it, we in the Independent Media are under attack from not only U.S. government trolls, but from the Russians as well. I would encourage my colleagues to speak out on this matter because the harassment will not stop.
Shocking Revelations

I have very good reason to believe that these trolls, both domestic and Russian, are sanctioned by Obama. He has permitted this environment of intimidation to grow. It is a mystery as to why Obama would support these same Russians. I  am preparing a set of revealing articles, with previously established data, which will demonstrate that Obama and the Russians are actually in bed together and that both sides answer to the same forces.

The accusation that Obama is a traitor is an outrageous accusation. However, it is a provable allegation. In the interim, ask yourself one question, America, “Can you name even one thing that Obama has done to strengthen this country and the middle class?”

http://www.thecommon...-media-figures/


  • 0

#25 Zharkov

Zharkov

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 36861 posts

Posted 27 March 2015 - 03:57 PM

What if American-Russian foreign relations are scripted like a ballet, with Obama wearing the dress and Putin his dance partner in an elaborate choreographed dance routine involving the Ukraine, the Middle East, Iran, and other places?  

 

Remember his comment to Medvedev, "I'll have more flexibility AFTER the election"?  


  • 0

#26 Nemesis

Nemesis

    Administrator

  • Administrators
  • 20207 posts

Posted 27 March 2015 - 04:16 PM

What a paranoid wacko.  What makes him think he's so important to Russians???  LMAO.  As though there aren't limitless garbage like him in the west.


  • 0

#27 vladzo

vladzo

    Registered User

  • Banned
  • PipPipPip
  • 16824 posts

Posted 27 March 2015 - 04:52 PM

hey everyone ::::

 

! ! ! LET"S WAKE UP ! ! !

 

-1- first there is no nation called the "soviet union";

therefore we may not have any "soviet agents".

-2- second; obama is trying to destroy the great russian federation with his foreign policy;

therefore obama is not a friend of russia in any way.

-3- third in his infamous berlin speech mr. obama pretended that it was still possible to chase ulbricht out of germany;

therefore he actually proved that he has never had any communist party education.

 

there is so much happening in the way of current events; we do not need such silly fantasies about "soviet agents".

 

vlad


  • 1

#28 Mario Milano

Mario Milano

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 40690 posts

Posted 27 March 2015 - 05:01 PM

Others reached the same conclusion, Obama is a Soviet Agent...

 If by meaning "Soviet" you mean Zionist Jews then I agree with you....Obongo is a puppet of the Jew bankers hence why he is bombing so many countries on behalf of Israel, funding arming and training Rothschilds ISIS....the Soviet Union was a Jew bolshevik take over of Russia just like they recently did to Libya and trying with Syria and murdering scores of people! Just like they murdered millions of Russian Christians with their Bullshit Bolshevik take over of the country they are trying the same shit to everyone now, Muslims (Syria, Libya. Lebanon, Iran, Yemen,) Christians, (Ukraine, Russians, Americans, British, Australians to go and die in Jew created wars) It;s only a matter of time once these parasite Jews have wiped out Christians and Muslims then they will start on the Buddhists

 

original.jpg


Edited by Mario Milano, 27 March 2015 - 05:13 PM.

  • 0

#29 Zharkov

Zharkov

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 36861 posts

Posted 27 March 2015 - 07:46 PM

 If by meaning "Soviet" you mean Zionist Jews then I agree with you

 

Exactly.   That is what "Soviet" was all about - a communist jew-led revolution against the Russian population.

If the Russian population had 300 million guns back then, the bolsheviks would have lost the war.

Obama hopes to pull off a similar scheme, only more slowly because we have guns and the political class is not bullet resistant.

 

Solzhenitsyn wrote a bold truth.   No American public school or university dares to reveal that truth.


  • 1

#30 vladzo

vladzo

    Registered User

  • Banned
  • PipPipPip
  • 16824 posts

Posted 27 March 2015 - 08:06 PM

hey zharkov :::::

 

WAKE - UP

 

once upon a time, there was a nation called the SOVIET UNION and we all knew that for a fact.

yes there were many opinions; both positive and negative, about it.

but everyone knew that there was a large and powerful nation called the "SOVIET UNION".

 

and further more; today we all know that the soviet union no longer exists.

yes; there are a few opinions as to exactly when was the end of the soviet union.

however we all know for a certain fact, today it does not exist.

there are many opinions about the value of this fact;

some of us agree that the end was a good thing and some of us disagree.

 

but everyone knows that there is no longer a nation called the SOVIET UNION.

 

any one who disagrees with the above words is a total fool. and an ace hole.

 

vlad


  • 0

#31 Zharkov

Zharkov

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 36861 posts

Posted 28 March 2015 - 12:17 AM

hey zharkov :::::

 

WAKE - UP

 

once upon a time, there was a nation called the SOVIET UNION and we all knew that for a fact.

yes there were many opinions; both positive and negative, about it.

but everyone knew that there was a large and powerful nation called the "SOVIET UNION".

 

and further more; today we all know that the soviet union no longer exists.

yes; there are a few opinions as to exactly when was the end of the soviet union.

however we all know for a certain fact, today it does not exist.

there are many opinions about the value of this fact;

some of us agree that the end was a good thing and some of us disagree.

 

but everyone knows that there is no longer a nation called the SOVIET UNION.

 

any one who disagrees with the above words is a total fool. and an ace hole.

 

vlad

 

Just because there is no Soviet Union does not mean there are no Soviet agents still around.

 

Obama associated with communists, he was trained to be a communist, and everything he does is to establish a Soviet system in America.   Obama is a Soviet agent.   Obama has an agenda for a Soviet America.   He works for a one-world Soviet government, except that they call it "globalist" now, but it remains a Soviet system.   The UN is the Supreme Soviet - none of its representatives are elected, they are appointed.   The UN dictates to member nations much as the Soviet Union dictated to Baltic nations, and if the UN wants regime change, they send in the tanks and troops, just as the Soviet Union once did.    Obama is a Soviet agent.   Get used to it.

 

 


 


  • 0

#32 Zharkov

Zharkov

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 36861 posts

Posted 28 March 2015 - 12:30 AM

What if American-Russian foreign relations are scripted like a ballet, with Obama wearing the dress and Putin his dance partner in an elaborate choreographed dance routine involving the Ukraine, the Middle East, Iran, and other places?  

 

Remember his comment to Medvedev, "I'll have more flexibility AFTER the election"?  

Dancing with the Stars:

 

An American astronaut and Russian cosmonaut launched into space Friday to attempt something their two countries have never done together before: a one-year mission on the International Space Station that could help one day send humans to Mars.

 

The epic one-year space mission launched NASA's Scott Kelly and cosmonaut Mikhail Kornienko into orbit aboard a Russian Soyuz space capsule at 3:42 p.m. EDT (1942 GMT) today (March 27) from the Baikonur Cosmodrome in Kazakhstan, where it was early Saturday morning local time. Also flying on the Soyuz is cosmonaut Gennady Padalka, a crewmember who will live and work aboard the orbiting outpost for about six months, the usual length of time people spend on the station.

 

http://www.space.com...w-launches.html

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

 

This cooperation is not something one would expect from adversaries who are engaged in economic war against each other, so what is going on?   

 

Could it be that the so-called dispute between the US and Russian governments is an illusion created for a purpose?


  • 0

#33 Zharkov

Zharkov

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 36861 posts

Posted 30 March 2015 - 03:44 PM

The Soviet Union was created by wealthy jew bankers, and once they got that snowball rolling, it only got bigger, but while the Soviet Union is gone, the snowball keeps rolling across America.    The KGB did excellent work.   Their legacy lives on...

 

Obama funds left-wing hit squad with your tax dollars  
 

subversion.jpg
[Editor's note: If it sounds convoluted, it's on purpose. This is the first in a series of stories exposing a massive shell game with taxpayer funds that, while not new, is being perfected by the Obama administration as a means to deploy and reward non-profit co-laborers in an effort to fulfill the president's stated aim of radically transforming America. It's a system in which complexity serves as a useful tool to avoid drawing scrutiny. The series will offer a tour of the landscape and ultimately address the implications for every citizen.

By Matthew Vadum

 

WASHINGTON – The Obama administration is using your tax dollars to back a super-wealthy, left-wing charity that cuts checks to a myriad of avowedly "progressive" causes, including the notorious Media Matters for America, founded by Hillary Clinton ally and Fox News nemesis David Brock.

It's just one of many examples of how in the Obama era, government is handing out money to nonprofits that share the ideology and political inclinations of a president who looks back warmly on his time as a community organizer in Chicago.

obama-community-organizer.jpg

Barack Obama was a community organizer in Chicago from 1985 to 1988.

“Barack is not a politician first and foremost,” first lady Michelle Obama has said. “He’s a community activist exploring the viability of politics to make change.”

 

In this case, the charity receiving federal funding is called Silicon Valley Community Foundation, a favorite philanthropy of Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg. Based in Mountain View, California, it is already awash in private funds.

On its website, the foundation acknowledges having $4.7 billion in assets under its management.

Zuckerberg pledged in December 2013 to give Facebook shares to the Silicon Valley Community Foundation shares worth $1 billion. He previously gave $500 million worth of Facebook shares to the foundation and another $100 million to the foundation earmarked for public schools in Newark, New Jersey.

Matthew Vadum’s “Subversion Inc.: How Obama’s ACORN Red Shirts Are Still Terrorizing and Ripping Off American Taxpayers” is available now at the WND Superstore!

Blurring the lines

The federal government has been funding left-wing groups like the Silicon Valley Community Foundation for at least a half-century, ever since the so-called “War on Poverty” was launched by President Lyndon Johnson.

But President Obama is aggressively using taxpayer funds in a way that blurs the line between government functions and political activism, while at the same time stealthily fostering a steady increase in the overall size and scope of government.

Another example of the Obama administration’s funding and deployment of left-wing groups in governmental functions to carry out its ideological agenda, reported exclusively by WND last year, was the IRS hiring of the avowedly progressive Urban Institute, supported by far-left billionaire activist George Soros, to process the Form 990s of non-profit groups.

At the time, revelations of the IRS targeting of conservative groups that oppose Obama’s agenda were continuing to emerge.

Together, the two stories present a picture of an administration that rewards its friends, punishes its enemies and, in the process, fundamentally changes the character of government.

Similarly, President Obama’s nomination of Loretta Lynch to succeed Eric Holder as attorney general has put a spotlight on the administration’s decision to “defer prosecution” against banking giant HSBC despite laundering billions of dollars in funds for Middle Eastern terrorists and Mexican drug cartels. It was Lynch, in her role as a U.S. attorney, who handled the HSBC charges, which were brought to light in a series of stories reported exclusively by WND beginning in 2012, based on charges by John Cruz, a former vice president and relationship manager for the bank. Lynch’s nomination has been delayed as, among other issues, the Senate Judiciary Committee investigates Cruz’s allegations that Lynch engaged in a Department of Justice cover-up.

irshq.jpgMeanwhile, the Daily Caller reported the Obama administration has quietly killed an IRS tax-preparation program designed to help low-income and disadvantaged citizens, choosing instead to give millions of dollars to liberal groups for the same purpose.

Also, WND was first to report a State Department-financed non-profit based in Israel was engaged in a major effort to get young Arab citizens to the voting booths in the recent Israeli elections.

In its rewarding of friends, a pattern emerges of nonprofit groups creating a program, pitching it to the White House, the White House accepting it and then handing it over to the very nonprofit that conceived of the idea.

Asked by WND to comment, Rep. Louie Gohmert, R-Texas, called the Obama administration’s pattern of behavior “yet another profound example of how extreme leftists have conspired to use American taxpayers’ funds for their far-left destructive agenda.”

“Once again, that means that most Americans who are privately paying to preserve and pass on their love for our American heritage to our children are also having money forcibly taken by the federal government to fund those who want to become Castro-led-Cuba, Chavez-led-Venezuela or an anti-Judeo-Christian, Stalin-led-Soviet state,” said Gohmert.

See how taxpayer dollars end up in the hands of left-wing activists:

non-profit-funding.jpg“This president has done an amazing job of ‘fundamentally transforming’ America using the dollars of those who did not want it to become a socialist state,” he said.

The congressman also made a reference to the recent disclosure by former top aide David Axelrod that Obama falsely insisted he opposed same-sex marriage for religious reasons in a presidential debate with his Republican opponent, Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz.

“If a senator will knowingly lie in a presidential debate to get elected on a fundamental issue like marriage,” Gohmert asked, “is it conceivable that he would lie about plenty of other things, even deceiving us about how our money is being spent?”

See Matthew Vadum’s recent interview with Bill O’Reilly on the Fox News Channel:

‘Social investment’

Despite its fabulous wealth, the Silicon Valley Community Foundation was recently awarded $7.5 million in federal funding from the Social Innovation Fund, which is administered by the taxpayer-supported Corporation for National and Community Service, or CNCS.

CNCS was established by Republican President George H.W. Bush in 1993 to oversee three grant programs promoting community service: AmeriCorps, Senior Corps and Learn and Serve America.

obama-teaches-alinsky-method.jpg

Barack Obama taught principles of wealth redistribution espoused by leftist-activist Saul Alinsky, regarded as the “father of community organizing.”

In 2009, President Obama signed the Edward M. Kennedy Serve America Act, which reauthorized CNCS and its $1.1 billion budget and created the Social Innovation Fund.

The SIF was established the year after the Democratic Party’s campaign platform advocated the formation of a “Social Investment Fund Network” to provide government funding for “social entrepreneurs and leading nonprofit organizations (that) are assisting schools, lifting families out of poverty, filling health care gaps and inspiring others to lead change in their own communities.”

The three-year, $7.5 million grant for the Silicon Valley Community Foundation is earmarked for a local program in California called “The Big Lift Social Innovation Fund.”

The new program, according to the foundation, “seeks to address the troubling reality that in San Mateo County, 42 percent of third graders are not reading at grade level.”

The foundation said the figure “rises to a shocking 60 percent of Latino, African-American and Pacific Islander third graders. Education experts agree that third-grade reading proficiency is one of the best predictors of academic achievement in subsequent years. If a child is behind in reading by the end of third grade, it is likely that he or she will never catch up.”

SVCF notes that it may qualify for an extra $9 million for a fourth and fifth year, assuming Congress finds the program successful.

“Along with our lead partners, the County of San Mateo and the San Mateo County Office of Education, we at SVCF are proud of the trust the federal government has placed in us to put the county’s children on the road to success,” said Erica Wood, chief community impact officer for the foundation.

The Silicon Valley Community Foundation, which typically gives grants to nonprofit organizations working in the fields of health, education and the environment, also funds controversial causes.

And even though it is performing work for the government, the foundation is far from ideologically neutral.

‘Building community’ through Media Matters

Since 2008, the foundation has given $931,000 to Media Matters, a Washington, D.C., nonprofit headed by former conservative journalist David Brock, who is now leading the charge for Hillary Clinton’s yet unannounced presidential campaign.

BROCK.png

Media Matters founder David Brock

The declared purpose of the nine grants was for “building community,” according to SVCF’s IRS filings.

It is unclear which community the Silicon Valley Community Foundation is hoping its grants to the divisive Media Matters group will help to build.

Media Matters, according to critics, is about tearing down conservatives, not about “building community.” The self-described media watchdog ferrets out what it calls “conservative misinformation.” In the process, it slavishly defends figures on the political left such as Obamacare architect Jonathan Gruber and former top IRS official Lois Lerner, who led the division responsible for obstructing the applications for non-profit tax status of conservative groups.

Media Matters even has its critics on the left.

The New York Times describes Media Matters as a “highly partisan research organization” in a Nov. 1, 2008, article.

David Folkenflik of National Public Radio says Media Matters is staffed by hairsplitters.

“They’re looking at every dangling participle, every dependent clause, every semicolon, every quotation to see if there’s some way it unfairly frames a cause, a party, a candidates that they may have some feelings for.”

Republican polling expert Frank Luntz calls Media Matters “one of the most destructive organizations associated with American politics today.

“They are vicious. They only understand one thing: attack, attack, attack.”

Other left-wing organizations funded by the Silicon Valley Community Foundation include: Tides Center and Tides Foundation ($2,546,888 since 2005), Planned Parenthood and affiliates ($2,007,950 since 2005), (Jimmy) Carter Center ($1,346,500 since 2007), Center for American Progress ($1,696,000 since 2007), Center for Responsible Lending ($275,000 since 2009), ACLU ($204,075 since 2005), Center for Constitutional Rights ($106,500 since 2007), People for the American Way Foundation ($90,000 since 2010), Clinton Global Initiative ($59,000 since 2011), New Organizing Institute ($20,000 in 2012), National Immigration Forum ($15,000 in 2012) and Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence ($6,950 in 2012).

Bureaucrats decide

So how did the Silicon Valley Community Foundation, which doesn’t represent the political proclivities of most Americans, get its hands on federal money?

cecilia_munoz.jpg

Cecilia Munoz

Federal bureaucrats get to decide which groups and proposals are funded by the Social Innovation Fund. SIF creates a kind of artificial civil society, one designed from above by elites. It focuses on three areas that are hard to define with precision: “economic opportunity, youth development, and healthy futures.”

In practice, it means that bureaucrats and grant recipients propose more government spending and bigger government as solutions to more or less all problems.

It also means SIF uses taxpayer money to help groups hostile to the interests of taxpayers. Even worse, many of these groups want to remake society along radical left-wing lines.

It is possible that the Corporation for National and Community Service and its Social Innovation Fund could play a role in President Obama’s recent proposal to allow students of any age to receive two years of free instruction at a community college.

Students would qualify provided that they maintain an average of at least “C+” and go to school at least half-time and are making “steady progress” toward a degree.

“What I’d like to do is to see the first two years of community college free for everybody who’s willing to work for it,” Obama said in a video posted Jan. 8 by the White House. “It’s something we can accomplish, and it’s something that will train our workforce so that we can compete with anybody in the world.”

Obama’s proposal has been dubbed “America’s College Promise.” It is unclear how the program would be paid for.

 

http://www.wnd.com/


  • 0

#34 Shura

Shura

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 25707 posts

Posted 30 March 2015 - 08:12 PM

Most call it Stalinism.

Stalinism without the Jewish aristocracy? Do not believe a word of it


  • 0

#35 Zharkov

Zharkov

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 36861 posts

Posted 01 June 2020 - 08:49 PM

NSA/CIA prove me wrong.

 

Tell us what you know about Obama.

 

Tells us everything!

 

Show it to Trump and DOJ.


  • 0

#36 Zharkov

Zharkov

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 36861 posts

Posted 01 June 2020 - 08:58 PM

If I posted this today, I would say Obama is a COMMUNIST AGENT.  

Soviet era is over.   I went with what the article said, but Obama is now obviously a comrade.

He loves ANTIFA.


  • 0

#37 Traveler

Traveler

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 4108 posts

Posted 02 June 2020 - 12:57 AM

Obama is a Muslim, You can see this from his name change at his conversion and from the decision and actions he took while in office. The man is a total snake in the grass.

 

Communism is the tool that the globalists use to motivate the masses to embrace their new world order.

 

Remember when Trump was first elected he wanted to make friends with Putin. It was the Obama administration that made all the accusations against Russia to push Trump in the other direction. If Trump is able to defeat the deep state and entrenched globalists then he will return to try and mend relations with Russia. But for now it is all about optics for his local consumption.


  • 0

#38 RobertD

RobertD

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 24178 posts

Posted 03 June 2020 - 04:59 PM

Obama is a Muslim, You can see this from his name change at his conversion and from the decision and actions he took while in office. The man is a total snake in the grass.
 
Communism is the tool that the globalists use to motivate the masses to embrace their new world order.
 
Remember when Trump was first elected he wanted to make friends with Putin. It was the Obama administration that made all the accusations against Russia to push Trump in the other direction. If Trump is able to defeat the deep state and entrenched globalists then he will return to try and mend relations with Russia. But for now it is all about optics for his local consumption.


Now Trudeau is a Muslim too.
And I'm sure Trump is being zapped in the direction deep state wants him to go.

Edited by RobertD, 03 June 2020 - 05:00 PM.

  • 0

#39 Traveler

Traveler

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 4108 posts

Posted 03 June 2020 - 09:32 PM

Now Trudeau is a Muslim too.
And I'm sure Trump is being zapped in the direction deep state wants him to go.

I don't think this guy has any idea what he is. He plays at Muslim but then goes all gay which is anti Muslim. Only things for sure is he is anti Christian and pro globalist and politically correct to the point of insanity.


  • 0

#40 USC

USC

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 25891 posts

Posted 03 June 2020 - 09:41 PM

They say this is not fake :)  Operational nickname "White".

 

415224_original.jpg


Edited by USC, 03 June 2020 - 09:42 PM.

  • 0




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Copyright © 2020 Pravda.Ru