Jump to content

Theme© by Fisana
 

Photo

Iran: Nuclear or not

Iran nuke Al aqsa Temple mount Israel

  • Please log in to reply
7 replies to this topic

#1 bishadi

bishadi

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 9522 posts

Posted 24 November 2014 - 04:18 PM



Well Hagel just left the orifice. Kerry is perhaps heading home for Thanksgiving and Iran has a deferment.


http://in.reuters.co...eedName=topNews


Reuters) - Iran and six powers failed for a second time this year on Monday to resolve their 12-year dispute over Tehran's nuclear ambitions and gave themselves seven more months to overcome the deadlock that has prevented them from clinching an historic deal.

Western officials said they were aiming to secure an agreement on the substance of a final accord by March but that more time would be needed to reach a consensus on the all-important technical details.

"We have had to conclude it is not possible to get to an agreement by the deadline that was set for today and therefore we will extend the JPOA to June 30, 2015," British Foreign Secretary Philip Hammond told reporters at the end of the talks.

He was referring to the so-called Joint Plan of Action, an interim deal agreed between the six and Iran a year ago in Geneva, under which Tehran halted higher level uranium enrichment in exchange for a limited easing of sanctions, including access to some frozen oil revenues abroad.

.
.


The cost of failure could be high, and Iran's regional foes Israel and Saudi Arabia are watching nervously. Both fear a weak deal that fails to curtail Tehran's nuclear ambitions, while a collapse of the negotiations would encourage Iran to become a threshold nuclear weapon state, something Israel has said it would never allow





.
What does Israel have to do with it, right?

Saudi's are the ISIL folk

How many saw the headlines that the Sunni have just been armed? That is what ISIS/ISIL is.............
.
  • 0

#2 Zharkov

Zharkov

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 35836 posts

Posted 24 November 2014 - 04:59 PM

OK, assume Iran already had nuclear weapons, now what?

 

Will Iran use them against Israel in an unprovoked attack?   No.   Why?   Because Iran has no national interests at stake in Israel.

 

Iran doesn't like the idea of the "international community" taking land away from one group and giving to another group, but it's not worth going to nuclear war over, and Iran doesn't care that much about jews as long as they don't try to annex Iran.

 

Jews are to Iran what "terrorists" are to America - a reason to rally support for the government, despite the fact that fewer people are killed by terrorists in America than are killed by slipping and falling in their bathtubs.    We spent trillions to control terrorists and almost nothing on bathtubs.   The  cost-benefit analysis in the Obama regime is really out of wack.    Iran needs an enemy to keep the public support of their government, just as the Bushobama regime needs terrorists to keep the public under their thumb.

 

Israel hasn't nuked anyone yet, despite having the bomb for decades, and Iran won't nuke anyone either because they would rather have peace than war.    Iranians are not crazy.    Their government only talks crazy sometimes.   But it's all just talk.   Iran hasn't attacked anyone in centuries.   There is no reason for that to change as long as the globalists leave Iran alone and stop trying to regime-change them.


  • 0

#3 Mario Milano

Mario Milano

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 34473 posts

Posted 24 November 2014 - 05:11 PM

Heh heh Bishadi using Reuters that is owned by the Rothschilds that are trying to start WW3 to get their Central Bank in Iran just like Libya!

 

Freakin hell Bishitto, can you please start using more credible sources for your future articles!

 

Reuters (Rothschilds) that is trying so hard to do a Libya to Iran.....Get Real Bishitto and your idiot articles

 

Heh heh Rothschilds using WMD's again....yeh we freakin sick of that shit...

 

But WMD's would be awesome if they kill the Rothschilds...the whole lot of that stinking parasitic family because it will mean the rest of us live in peace if they are eliminated!


Edited by Mario Milano, 24 November 2014 - 05:19 PM.

  • 0

#4 Mario Milano

Mario Milano

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 34473 posts

Posted 24 November 2014 - 05:26 PM





.
What does Israel have to do with it, right?

Saudi's are the ISIL folk

How many saw the headlines that the Sunni have just been armed? That is what ISIS/ISIL is.............
.

Freakin Jew crap divide and conquer.....

 

ISIL are CIA/Mossad........your crap of trying to blame someone else is just like Fox news that said a caveman on the other side of the world was able to stand down NORAD

--

 

ISIS Leader Abu Bakr Al Baghdadi Trained by Israeli Mossad, NSA Documents Reveal

http://www.globalres...-reveal/5391593


  • 0

#5 bishadi

bishadi

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 9522 posts

Posted 24 November 2014 - 05:33 PM

OK, assume Iran already had nuclear weapons, now what?
 
Will Iran use them against Israel in an unprovoked attack?   No.



great reasoning. That is the kind of reasoning, that hagel and Kerry should be telling the nutlessyahoo. Then lift the sanctions.

Why?   Because Iran has no national interests at stake in Israel.

correct. The only interests that I can see, are that the muslims don't like what Israel is doing to the Palestinians.

Like wise, the wingnuts may have forgotten this by now:

"February 24, 2007. Hamas representative Ahmad Hamdan, attending a conference in Teheran titled "Art of Resistance," talked about the excavations: "Israel intends to destroy Al Aksa and build Solomon's temple on the ruins of this sacred place. Al Aksa is being disrespected by the Zionist regime, but it seems that none of the Islamic countries have the courage to stop Israel and throw it out, so to prove that Al Aksa is the red line for Muslims.""


That gold domed spot in Israel, is a vesting of sorts.


Iran doesn't like the idea of the "international community" taking land away from one group and giving to another group, but it's not worth going to nuclear war over, and Iran doesn't care that much about jews as long as they don't try to annex Iran.

I agree.

Jews are not the problem, it's the rabbid in curls wanting the al aqsa; gold domed spot.

Jews are boycotting Israel for the oppression to Palestinians. See the BDS and JFJFP, just to name a few.

Jews are to Iran what "terrorists" are to America - a reason to rally support for the government, despite the fact that fewer people are killed by terrorists in America than are killed by slipping and falling in their bathtubs.    We spent trillions to control terrorists and almost nothing on bathtubs.   The  cost-benefit analysis in the Obama regime is really out of wack.    Iran needs an enemy to keep the public support of their government, just as the Bushobama regime needs terrorists to keep the public under their thumb.


business likes the war machine.
 

Israel hasn't nuked anyone yet, despite having the bomb for decades, and Iran won't nuke anyone either because they would rather have peace than war.    Iranians are not crazy.

Israel just bombed both Iraqi and Syrian nuke installations, unilaterally, numerous times.  

iran is not as small and has far more patience.

Their government only talks crazy sometimes.   But it's all just talk.   Iran hasn't attacked anyone in centuries.   There is no reason for that to change as long as the globalists leave Iran alone and stop trying to regime-change them.


The only reason iran is a target is because Israel and SA are nervous.
  • 0

#6 bishadi

bishadi

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 9522 posts

Posted 24 November 2014 - 05:39 PM

Freakin Jew crap divide and conquer.....
 
ISIL are CIA/Mossad........your crap of trying to blame someone else is just like Fox news that said a caveman on the other side of the world was able to stand down NORAD
--
 
ISIS Leader Abu Bakr Al Baghdadi Trained by Israeli Mossad, NSA Documents Reveal
http://www.globalres...-reveal/5391593

so NSA docs claim CIA is running ISIL?

Is global research Snowdens website or do you have the inside scope, that the Female Body Inspectors, don't know about either?


Jews adhere to the commandments. The goofs you are unhappy with are zionist puke. The sad part is that there are more christian zionists, than any other zionist supporters on the earth
  • 0

#7 Zharkov

Zharkov

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 35836 posts

Posted 24 November 2014 - 09:10 PM

I've seen Iran and the people who live there, and they don't want war with anyone.

 

Israel will just have to accept the fact that Israeli leaders cannot forever be the only ones with a nuclear self-defense.

 

Saudi Arabia has been secretly working on nuclear weapons (they have threatened to do what they are already doing), so any nuclear inspection program should include them as well.

 

If there is ever to be a nuclear-free Middle East, they will all have to de-escalate their nuclear programs and along with Israel, abandon their nuke stockpiles.   Obviously that is not going to happen.   So the parties will have to get used to the idea of MAD.


  • 0

#8 bishadi

bishadi

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 9522 posts

Posted 24 November 2014 - 09:48 PM

And what stupid hill will most likely be the flash point for nuts to do the stupid?

come on! You know the answer.
  • 0





Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: Iran nuke, Al aqsa, Temple mount, Israel

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Copyright © 2019 Pravda.Ru