Blowback In Paris Armed Terrorists Kill 12 People By Tony Cartalucci January 07, 2015 "ICH" <posted by macaense>Je suis Charlie Mockery Jesus human cattle CHARLIE Chaplin KEYSTONE COPS Paris Shooting Hoax
Posted 12 January 2015 - 11:43 PM
Reminder of Last Prophet's words before the "manhunt" for the "Tsarnaev brothers" began: expect an exact remake of the same act in episode "LAPD Dorner",
There are as many "differences" between the "manhunt" act in Boston Marathon bombings 2013 and Charlie Hebdo attack 2015 as between the search for the first and the second missing malaysian planes, 2014.
Reminder of Last Prophet's words one hour after the Paris "attack" [added text is signaled as update]:
All it takes to get "Paris Charlie Hebdo hoax": Basic Questions that you'll never hear
For a start:
1. Why would they now strike a satirical newspaper instead of the government or the military?
Reminder: unlike 2011 there are now thousands of french mercenaries fighting and air bombing the population in former french colonies.
Mauritania, Burkina Faso, Mali, Chad, Niger: an area larger than ALL of Europe, "ruled" by illuminazi puppets dressed as islamists (sharia law).
2, Why does this happen one day after "France says ready to strike extremists on Libya border"?
Reminder: Dec 2014: Libya's patriotic government launches an offensive against the ISIS terrorists that NATO covertly finances and sends to Libya.
All staged with actors, same as EVERY false flag since Germany school shooting 2009
The "dead" will now be given new identities
For people aware of who the illuminati are, facts that immediately prove it. For a start:
1. If Charlie Hebdo wasn't an illuminati tool it would have been finished long ago.
Main Agenda: supervised race war
Preliminaries for the internment and extermination of non-whites, part of the BIG BANG, about to be launched.
Just one day before the Charlie Hebdo hoax illuminati terminated another psy-op setting the stage for the supervised race war:
"Mayor denies burial to gypsy baby", an episode of the same Gypsy series as "blonde Gypsy girl kidnapped in Greece", 2013.
Web of Disinfo
As always since the 1975 coup: Israel's treasonous government (all nazi agents) plays its to convince the questioning audience that "it was indeed real and the evil jews did it".
For a start:
1. "this same week Israel vents their fury with France after parliament votes to recognise Palestine as a state".
Illuminati jokes - Update
Jan 8: Young mother let terrorists into Charlie Hebdo building after threat against daughter
This act is an illuminati joke about a REAL act: the fake marriage of Onassis and Jackie Kennedy.
As exposed worldwide first by Last Prophet in July 2009, Jacqueline Kennedy agreed to participate in this theater days after the illuminati murdered Robert F. Kennedy.
For a good reason: otherwise it meant the death sentence for her son, JFK Jr.
AP - France has now launched a military operation against Islamic extremists in five of its former colonies in the Sahel region, with 3,000 troops, 200 armored vehicles and six fighter jets in Mauritania, Burkina Faso, Niger, Chad and Mali.
AP - The [patriotic] Tobruk government says [NATO member] Turkey backs Islamist militias.
Jan 5, 2015 - "France says ready to strike extremists on Libya border"
Jan 5, 2015 - France: episode "Gypsy baby denied burial" "finally" ends.
Half a million french law abinding gypsies are put in the same bowl as the romanian gypsies deliberately brought to France during the last decade, mostly thieves.
Update Jan 8: example of two members of the illuminati web of disinfo hammering for more than one hour that "it's all very strange, the Jews sure did it".
Update Jan 8: Young mother let terrorists into Charlie Hebdo building after threat against daughter
For what is now going on in Libya, start here and see BASICS in that page:
Jan 5, 2014 - Patriotic government bombs [covert NATO] greek vessel transporting terrorists dressed as jihadists
Posted 13 January 2015 - 12:06 AM
This forum is somehow a magnet for the insane.
hey D and M ::::::::::::::::
i have volunteered to be the janitor on this chat line;
i could sweep out the trash; such as this.
just because he thinks that "je suis" looks like it may mean "jesus" ;;;;
he also wants to believe that everyone thinks that "je suis" means "jesus".
and then he goes on and on.
it takes too much time for all of us to check each posting and then to find that some of the postings are trash.
the trash postings obstruct our search for that thread which we saw the other day;
and the trash obstructs our searc for our own threads which we may want to continue.
Posted 13 January 2015 - 12:07 AM
By Takis Fotopoulos
Yesterday, Paris saw the 'biggest' rally in France's history, as the French Interior Ministry described it. This was of course hardly surprising, as the entire political part of the Transnational Elite (TE-i.e. the elites which run the New World Order of neoliberal globalization, based mainly in the G7 countries), attended it. On top of this, it was a prominent country-member of the same elite that organized it. The main aim of the rally was ostensibly to condemn terrorism. Yet, as I will try to show, it was the same TE, which also created the phenomenon of Islamic terrorism, particularly during the period of the thirty years or so since the emergence of the NWO, which is defined by two parallel systemic events. First, the rise and mass expansion of the transnational corporations that today rule the world economy and the consequent phasing out of economic and national sovereignty that is replaced by a new form of transnational sovereignty shared mainly be the members of the TE. Second, the parallel collapse of 'actually existing socialism' in the form of the Soviet bloc.
The concept of modern terrorism derives from the French revolution, where terrorism was only state terrorism, although this concept had been distorted in the NWO to fit its own needs, so that it is not defined anymore on the basis of who carries it out and why, as in the past, but almost exclusively on the basis of the methods and tactics used and particularly the targeting of civilians. This means that if a conquering army occupies your country, kills women and children in their thousands and then, in desperation, you kill women and children of the occupying country wherever you find them, the crimes of the occupying army will be as a rule pardoned, as a kind of collateral damage or 'error', whereas your action will be characterized as crime and either you are going to be killed instantly in action, or you are going to rot in prison for the rest of your life. Needless to add that on the basis of this convenient (for the TE) definition of terrorism most liberation or anticolonial movements would have been characterized as terrorist, including the ANC and the Algerian FLN. This is why Hamas, for instance, has been defined today as terrorist because it killed a few hundred Israeli civilians in its history, while the thousands of Palestinian civilians and many children among them killed by the Israeli security services, settlers and others were just characterized as 'collateral damage', if not 'human shields' used by their parents! No wonder that in yesterday's mass rally the Israeli PM was a prominent guest and he did not even have any qualms about comparing the Paris attack at Charlie Hebdo with the "rocket" attacks on Israeli cities (which had perhaps fewer victims than the former!) characterizing Palestinian resistance as 'terrorist'!
The new 'ideology' used to justify the present war on terrorism is expressed in terms of the 'barbaric' methods used by the ISIS jihadists-despite the fact that the elites were fully aware of the fact that the same (mostly) jihadists, with the elites' connivance, used exactly the same methods against the Libyan and Syrian peoples in the past few years to achieve 'regime change' in the corresponding cases. It is therefore clear that the elites simply adopted a convenient definition of terrorism, which, however, had nothing to do with the historical origin of the term and its traditional meaning.
On the basis of this distorted definition of terrorism, in retrospect, it is relatively easy to see who and how has created the phenomenon of modern terrorism, or what I would better call transnational terrorism. In fact, transnational terrorism is a new phenomenon, characterizing the New World Order of neoliberal globalization, namely, terrorism that is controlled by the TE and its client states. As I argued elsewhere, transnational terrorism is, in effect, the form that state terrorism takes today against the victims of neoliberal globalization and its main weapons are either economic violence (e.g. Greece, Portugal, Spain e.tc), or physical violence (Iraq, Libya, Syria, Ukraine e.tc.).
Thus, it can easily be shown that a lot of today's butchers of ISIS, Al Nusra e.tc. had carried out similar (if not worse) massacres in the recent past. First, in Libya, in 2011 when they were playing the role of NATO infantry. Next, after finishing their "work" there, many of these jihadists moved to Syria, where they continued the same project. This time, the aim was the destruction of the Assad regime, which was based on the Ba'athist national liberation movement, and its replacement by a theocratic caliphate. At least this is what the gullible followers of these organizations believed, not being usually conscious of the actual role played by them as instruments of the TE and its client criminal regimes in the region, e.g. Saudi Arabia and Qatar, which excelled in organizing crimes against the peoples of Libya and Syria. Finally, when these organizations began attacking the direct instruments of the TE in the area (e.g. the 'Free Syrian Army'), which were earmarked to succeed Assad and transform the country into an informal protectorate of the NWO (something like Greece), then the TE decided that their time was up. In other words, ISIS simply functions at present as the pretext for the continuation of the 'long war', this time against Syria. That is, the main objective has always been to crush the national liberation movement in Syria today and Iran tomorrow, whether this is achieved by a coup 'from above' (the traditional military coup), or 'from below,' (the "Maidan" model), or whether it is done by external intervention combined with a 'coup from below' (the Libyan model).
So, as in the case of traditional state terrorism in the pre-globalization era of nation-states the victims of it were mainly individuals or organizations resisting the concentration of power in the hands of national elites, in today's transnational terrorism, the victims of it are mainly states that have not been fully integrated into the NWO, either because they are based on national liberation movements (e.g. the Ba'athist regimes in Iraq and Syria, or Jamahiriya in Libya) or because they are based on peoples who have a vivid memory of self-determination and are struggling to maintain their national and economic sovereignty in the globalization era (Russia).
However, to understand the nature of political Islamism, from which Islamic terrorism emerged, we have to go back to the former's historical development, particularly in the post-1948 period. The earliest main expression of political Islamism, which was supported by the Western elites, was the Muslim Brotherhood (MB) but in the last few years, following its failure in Egypt, the TE shifted its sympathies from the MB to the Salafists and the jihadis supported by the Gulf regimes and particularly Saudi Arabia. Both the Muslim Brotherhood and the Salafists have used violence in their clashes with Arab secularism and particularly the Arab regimes based on national liberation movements. No wonder that both the MB and Salafists were supported at times by the Western elites and the TE today. This is how political Islam gave rise to Islamic terrorism. But let us see in some more detail this process.
The Muslim Brotherhood, which initially expressed the Islamist movement, was formed with the active support of the British colonialists and expressed "the most reactionary, antidemocratic and against social progress version of the newborn 'political Islam.'" Their main aim has always been the Islamization of Egypt's political and cultural institutions and the promotion of sharia as the basis for legislation. This is summed up by its main slogan used worldwide: "Islam is the solution". So, the old Islamic movement, i.e. the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, which later expanded all over the Middle East, was a traditionally conservative movement mainly concerned with the cultural aspects of colonization and later of globalization. The Brotherhood has always made pragmatic alliances with regimes - those of King Farouk from 1936; the Free Officers under Nasser, (who ousted Farouk in 1952); and Sadat from 1970 (who used the Brothers against the Nasserites and the left). The tactical alliance with the Free Officers however was inevitably short lived as they had divergent political goals: the Officers believed in a secularist national liberation movement whereas the "Brothers" in an Islamist regime. No wonder that a failed attempted assassination of Nasser in 1954 led to the brutal suppression of the Muslim Brotherhood and the imprisonment and sentencing to death of Sayyid Qutb, one of its leading ideologues, which led to the jihadist movement. In fact, a year after Qutb's death in 1966, Ayman al-Zawahiri, aged 16 at the time, set up a jihadist cell at his school and invited a few friends to join.In May 2011, Zawahiri became the leader of Al-Qaida, following the murder of Osama bin Laden by US Special Services. As Fawaz A Gerges pointed out, "the birth of the jihadist movement cannot be understood without reference to this great clash between the Muslim Brotherhood and Nasser's forces". This early clash developed later on into a clash between the Muslim Brotherhood and Ba'athists in Iraq and Syria and in the last couple of years into a clash between Salafists and the MB, which in 2014 was declared a terrorist organization by Saudi Arabia.
The Brotherhood's relation to Western powers had started early on, and even during the Second World War, the British viewed the Brotherhood as a possible counterweight against the secular nationalist party, the Wafd, and the communists. But it was in the post-Second World War period, and particularly since 1946-1948, when two crucial events took place, almost at the same time, which marked the post-war period in the Middle East and the entire world, i.e. the beginning of the Cold War in 1946 and the establishment of the Zionist Israeli state in 1948 on occupied Palestinian land. In the immediate post-war period, i.e. during the Cold War, the main division was between pro-Soviet and pro-Western Arab countries. Then, with the rise of Arab nationalism and Arab socialism, on the one hand, a kind of front developed between the supporters of national liberation (Nasser's Egypt, the Ba'athist regimes in Iraq and Syria, Libya's Jamahiriya) and, on the other, the front of Western stooges emerged (i.e. the reactionary Gulf regimes, Jordan, Morocco etc.).
However, the NWO that was imposed on the Middle East, first through economic means and corruption in Egypt, and then through brutal military violence by the TE in Iraq and Libya, completely changed the balance of power within the Arab World. Particularly when the client Muslim Brotherhood regimes that emerged in Tunisia and Egypt during the Arab "Spring", under the cover of "revolutionary movements", played a leading (and dirty) role in the destruction both of Libya and of Syria. It was of course hardly surprising that the TE backed the MB when one takes into account its real nature, as Samir Amin stressed:
"The Muslim Brotherhood is committed to a market-based economic system of complete external dependence. They are in reality a component of the comprador bourgeoisie. They have taken their stand against large strikes by the working class and against the struggles of poor peasants to hold on to their lands. So the Muslim Brotherhood are 'moderate' only in the double sense that they refuse to present any sort of economic and social program, thus in fact accepting without question reactionary neoliberal policies, and that they are submissive de facto to the enforcement of U.S, control over the region and the world. They thus are useful allies for Washington (and does the US have a better ally than their patron, the Saudis?), which now vouches for their 'democratic credentials."
On the other hand, Ba'athism was a synthesis of nationalism (initially in the form of pan-Arabism) and Arab socialism, in so far as it adopted socialist principles like the public ownership over the strategic sectors of the economy, the belief that socialism is the only way to develop an Arab society that is truly free and united, and secularism. In other words, Ba'athism was mainly a left-wing Arab-centric ideology, a kind of "socialism with Arab characteristics". In fact, the most important characteristic of Ba'athism was its anti-imperialist nature. The Western hostility against it, in fact, began in the mid seventies, as it did also in the Syrian case, when the Iraqi Ba'athists embarked on a program of Arab socialism that culminated in the nationalization of oil, seeking to achieve a form of economic independence to complement political independence. Then, they soon realized that they had to de-integrate Iraq's economy from the capitalist market economy and minimize free enterprise on the means of production, with the ultimate objective to establish an Arab socialist society in which all citizens would enjoy the benefits of development. Clearly, therefore, the main economic aim of the campaign on Iraq was to return oil exploitation to the western powers and reintegrate the Iraqi economy into the world capitalist market. This aim was confirmed by later reports according to which State Department blueprints, sent to Congress before the invasion began, laid out a vision for Iraq's reconstruction that would move the country aggressively toward "self-managed economic prosperity, with a market-based economy and privately owned enterprises that operate in an environment governed by the rule of law."
This is why the Ba'athist regime in Syria as well as the Iraqi Ba'athist regime in Iraq had to be destroyed. Their secular, multi-ethnic and multi-faith societies, and, even more important, their historical foundation on national liberation movements, which by definition were enemies to the NWO, were obviously anathema not only to the TEs but also to the reactionary regimes belonging to the Cooperation Council for the Arab States of the Gulf (GCC) and Turkey--the main client regimes (together with Jordan) in the area. The campaign to destroy Iraq began early on with the Gulf war, followed by heavy sanctions and frequent bombings, which culminated with the invasion and occupation of the country for a ten year period leading to hundreds of thousands of Iraqi lives being destroyed in the process. This was followed by similar processes in Libya and finally in Syria. Yet, although such huge crimes never led to any demonstrations in the West comparable to yesterday's demonstration, the resentment created among the Arab populations was growing all the time and in the absence of any strong secular national liberation movements (which have been effectively destroyed by the TE) their only way to express their anger against the West was to join the various Islamic terrorist movements, mostly supported by the Gulf states and particularly Saudi Arabia and Qatar.
It is of course not surprising that Saudi Arabia and its ideology was enthusiastically embraced in the West, both in the pre-globalization era and at present. In fact, Saudi Arabian Salafis seem to be even more reactionary than Muslim Brothers. As Benjamin Schett wrote in a significant recent article on Salafism/Wahhabism:
Wahhabi ideology serves U.S. interests for several reasons. Its followers' archaic perception of society makes them reject any kind of progressive social change. Therefore they are well equipped to push back socialist, secular or nationalist movements, whose independence-oriented policies are a threat to America's geopolitical agenda. Although Wahhabism certainly is not representative of the majority of Sunni Muslims, Wahhabi Muslims are Sunni extremists, which causes them to maintain an extremely hostile stance towards Shi'te Islam.
So, Saudi Salafis were useful to the TE both in the pre-globalization era, because it was a useful tool in the hands of Western elites to fight Soviet influence and pan-Arabic socialism, as well as in the NWO because they were a valuable tool in the hands of the Transnational Elite to fight any nations resisting the abolition of their sovereignty within the New World Order (NWO) of neoliberal globalization. This was clearly shown, for instance, when Saudi Arabia supported in every possible way the Salafi jihadis, who butchered the peoples of Libya and Syria. In fact, it was only very recently that they stopped supporting their offspring, ISIS, when they had become targeted by the Transnational Elite for attempting to follow their own line in building an Islamic State. Unsurprisingly, the methods used by ISIS, like beheading, which were repeated ad nauseam by the TE media in order to terrorize Western middle classes and justify its 'war on terrorism', have in fact been practiced for years by its client Saudi regime, with nobody in the 'civilized' West bothering much about it, as long as they were able to keep expanding their highly profitable business of arms selling to the regime.
In conclusion, it is the TE itself, which today pretends it suffers because of the activities of Islamic terrorists, that, in fact, bears the main responsibility for Islamic terrorism. Not just in the simple sense that it funded and supported jihadists fighting national liberation regimes in Iraq, Libya or Syria, as the degenerate Western Left argues but, even more important, because, historically, it did everything possible to assist the flourishing of Islamic terrorism. In other words, the massive support the TE provided over time to political Islamism and Islamic terrorism, in its campaign to destroy Arab national liberation movements, had led to the flourishing of an 'army' of jihadists, lacking of any political ideology for national liberation and against globalization and relying instead on religious irrationalism. This was of course the desired by the TE aim, in order to prevent them from understanding who their real enemy is, so that they could organize accordingly to fight it. Yet, even if the aim of many (but by no means all) of these jihadists is irrational, i.e. to create a caliphate, this does not prevent them from understanding that, even achieving this aim, they have to fight against the TE, which, all these years, has destroyed their countries and/or their fellow believers.
Takis Fotopoulos is a political philosopher, editor of Society & Nature/ Democracy and Nature/The International Journal of Inclusive Democracy. He has also been a columnist for the Athens Daily Eleftherotypia since 1990. Between 1969 and 1989 he was Senior Lecturer in Economics at the University of North London (formerly Polytechnic of North London). He is the author of over 25 books and over 1,000 articles, many of which have been translated into various languages.
 See e.g. Seumas Milne, "Terror and tyranny," The Guardian, 25/10/2001
 "Hezbollah leader on Charlie Hebdo: 'Extremists more offensive to Islam than cartoons'", RT, 10/1/2015 http://rt.com/news/2...harlie-offends/
 see Takis Fotopoulos, The New World Order in Action: Integrating Eastern Europe and the Middle East (Published shortly by Progressive Press) ch 9
 Samir Amin, "2011: An Arab Springtime? Reflections from Egypt", Europe solidaire sans frontiers, 15/5/2011 http://www.europe-so...rticle21911#top
 Fawaz A Gerges: "This Brotherhood has a real sense of purpose", Independent, 7/2/2011
 Jack Shenker & Brian Whitaker, "A rare glimpse into the world of the Muslim Brotherhood", The Guardian, 9/2/2011
 Samir Amin, "2011: An Arab Springtime? Reflections from Egypt",
 Jonathan Weisman and Mike Allen "Officials Argue for Fast U.S. Exit From Iraq", Washington Post , April 21, 2003
 Benjamin Schett, "US Sponsored "Islamic Fundamentalism": The Roots of the US-Wahhabi Alliance", Global Research, 7/9/2012 http://www.globalres...hhabi-alliance/
 See Takis Fotopoulos, The New World Order in Action: Integrating Eastern Europe and the Middle East.
Posted 13 January 2015 - 01:11 AM
Two years ago, an obscure film that hardly anyone had ever heard of and even fewer people had seen became the reported reason for riots throughout the Middle East.
How do these things happen?
Who funds the production and promotion of these things? Where do the crowds come from who riot for the television cameras?
Shortly after this story aired, the US Ambassador to Libya was dragged from his compound and beaten to death. The reported reason for this attack was local people's outrage about the movie "The Innocence of Muslims."
This turned out to be total bullshit.
Why the US government sat back and allowed this man to be killed (eliminated) has yet to be answered though it's since been reported that he was helping aid and arm anti-government terrorists in Syria, quite possibly including the group that became known recently as ISIS, the new instant "just add water" terrorist threat.
2380 California St.
San Francisco, CA 94115
Edited by macaense, 13 January 2015 - 01:15 AM.
Posted 13 January 2015 - 01:36 AM
Script: Osama Bin Laden's death is yet another treasonous act of the Obama Bi-nla-den's presidency.
Osama is not only alive and well but now leading ISIS he manages to capture airliners, exploiting software flaws to escape radars, flying to Afghanistan's caves for conversion into weapons of mass destruction.
The second missing plane, originally scripted for early April 2014, was exposed also one hour later, Dec 28 2014:
Remake of Shanksville, part of the remake of 911 2001 at Jerusalem, that started with the missing Boeing 777, March 2014.
Jan 5 reads ISIS in date format so it's a possible date to drop the Shanksville bomb, that in the remake is detonated not the sane day but days BEFORE the WTC bombs.
But the act "Missing Malaysian plane #2: Black boxes found" came only after the Paris Jesus Charlie Chaplin hoax, alias "Je suis Charlie".
So the Shanlksville bomb will be dropped Jan 15 2015, that reads "I, ISIS" in date format.
These will be the breaking news:
Malaysia airbus crashed because brave passengers resisted terrorsts hijacking the plane.
Jan 12: Divers Find AirAsia Jet’s Black Box in Plane Wreckage
ISIS created by the illuminati to fight and discredit the real rebels in Syria and Iraq.
ISIS also plays a role in the start of the BIG BANG, the remake of 911 2001 at Jerusalem:
- missing Boeing 777 crashes with a mini-nuke at the Parliament (Knesset).
- hours or days later Osama Bin Laden resurrects to reveal himself as the real leader of ISIS and the same day Obama is arrested on live TV.
"Obama" stripped of titles, same as "Pope Francis", also arrested, same as "Evil Jews" of the Federal Reserve Bank.
They confess the most sophisticated conspiracy in the History of Politics, Religion, Finance.
Hillary Clinton declared successor of GW Bush since 2008, Ratzinger alias Benedict the only pope since 2005.
Human cattle stripped of savings and pension funds, supervised race war, compulsory vacinassination (ebola), extermination camps.
https://www.google.c...o a Boeing 777"
Parallelism is used to fulfill the "in plain sight" commandment of the illuminati religion.
And never forget: all this is possible because on 911 it was also possible for aluminium planes to cut through steel
Edited by MattMarriott, 13 January 2015 - 01:57 AM.
Posted 13 January 2015 - 01:42 PM
Likewise, Al Qaeda and its various franchises including its most recent and notorious, ISIS, is being used simultaneously as a domestic menace and a foreign expeditionary mercenary force.
Indeed, out of one side of President Hollande's mouth he would condemn the attacks in Paris, and out of the other, continue calling for the arming and backing of the very networks this attack originated from in order to continue the campaign of violence and terror in Syria.
Regardless of whatever investigation yields whatever conclusion, the fact that NATO has engineered such attacks in the past against the very people it claims to exist to protect, makes NATO and the various political leaders at the head of its respective member states prime suspects - both incapable of conducting an impartial investigation of the recent attack, and incapable of preventing another attack, likely engineered not from enemies beyond Europe's borders, but exceptionally dangerous enemies within them.
Land Destroyer.blogspot.com (CC) 2009-2014
Posted 13 January 2015 - 07:32 PM
WHO ORDERED THE ATTACK AGAINST CHARLIE HEBDO ?
You like this.
Posted 14 January 2015 - 12:11 AM
Fredou was the 2nd highest ranking official in the department and was involved in the early investigations into the Charlie Hebdo massacre. French media claims that he interviewed one of the families of the victims and had yet to finish his report. A union representative has stated that Fredou was battling depression and experiencing burn out. He was 45.
We learned this morning, a Limoges SRPJ Commissioner has committed suicide last night in his office with his service weapon. Information confirmed by his superiors. It is unknown at this time the reasons for his actions.
He would have killed himself that night to 1 hour.
Commissioner Helric Fredou aged 45 was from Limoges began his career in 1997 as a police officer at the regional office of the judicial police of Versailles, before returning to Limoges. He was deputy director of the regional police service since 2012.
According to the police union commissioner was depressed and experiencing burn out.
In November 2013, the Commissioner Fredou had discovered the lifeless body of his colleague, number 3 of SRPJ Limoges who had also committed suicide with his service weapon in his office.
The Fredou Commissioner, like all agents SRPJ worked yesterday on the case of the massacre at the headquarters of Charlie Hebdo. In particular, he surveyed the family of one of the victims. He killed himself before completing its report…
Apparently Fredou was following the example of a colleague who committed suicide just over a year prior.
Several foreign outlets have reported this story, though once again it is not seen as worthy to make it to mainstream american media.
My opinion is that the suicide of one of the lead CHARLIE HEBDO investigators should warrant a media mention, even in America.
Read more at http://freedomoutpos...r0vsRfqTQWwH.99
Edited by vladzo, 14 January 2015 - 12:14 AM.
Posted 14 January 2015 - 12:16 AM
William Andrew Pitsker · Top Commenter · Petaluma, California
Everett S Scofield · Top Commenter · School of Hard Knocks
Posted 14 January 2015 - 12:18 AM
Posted 14 January 2015 - 12:19 AM
Kenneth Hall · Top Commenter · NDSUWhen will the world learn that they can not let terrorists go for training in Yemen or some such place and come back to join a peaceful society? We have made the same mistake over and over. We still allow people who go over and fight with ISIS to come back here. For what? To plan more Jihad against us!
J Neil Schulman · Top Commenter · Pahrump, Nevada
Posted 14 January 2015 - 12:20 AM
David Burks · Works at ManufacturingDon't even finish your report..... No note mentioned for family or loved ones.... in the middle of a HUGE case, would keep most any dedicated professional going for a little while.....
I doubt there is a snowballs chance in.... heck this story was truly a suicide.
France has a Serious problem, and most likely.....so does the US.
Connie Parks · Norvel Hayes Bible College, Cleveland TennesseeBurn out from frustrations of being forbidden by all the superiors to tell the truth, and not having any honest media outlets to tell it to anyway. What the Jihadists cant buy, they can always bomb.and they know where you live. they're teachers know your kids. It's gettin bad, huh.
Boris M. Garsky · Top Commenter · UMDNJ – School of NursingNo doubt that he was murdered. He knew more about the initial terrorist act than anyone else and was in a position to refute, contradict the official version which is filled with contradictions, impossibilities, and lies. This attack was a false flag and I have commented much on the contradictory evidence and the incredulous events that followed. Hollandes approval rating is lower than zero as was sarkozys. This event was a means to prop up his ratings in his battle for survival which is still nil, and well deserved.
Posted 14 January 2015 - 12:21 AM
Connie Parks · Norvel Hayes Bible College, Cleveland TennesseeI'm wondering if the EU is waiting for the terrorists to finish Israel off, before they suit up and wipe out all those terrorists & their Imams. That time's coming, that war between Europe and terrorism. It's coming, and they're going to get their #$$ finally whipped to cream once it starts .No Charlie Wilson 's gonna stop it this time. Those 3 trouble makers, they're fixing to get it. You know who you are.
Greg Gibbs · Top Commenter · Works at Young Living Essential oils with my wife.
Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: Je suis Charlie, Mockery, Jesus, human cattle, CHARLIE Chaplin, KEYSTONE COPS, Paris Shooting Hoax
Main Forum →
Main Forum →
Coral Springs FL School shooting hoax & illuminati icon Ronaldo 6 weeks from Obama Bin Laden's resurrection
Main Forum →
Main Forum →
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users