EU SOU TODOS OS CHARLIES
Jump to content
Posted 14 January 2015 - 09:19 PM
Eu sou todos os Charlies
Eu sou Charlie;
Eu sou todos os Charlies;
Eu sou cada um dos 360 jornalistas e outros trabalhadores que a Controlinveste e o Belmiro despediram no Diário de Notícias, no Jornal de Notícias, na TSF, na Notícias Magazine, no 24 Horas e no Público;
Eu sou a senhora Ana que, aos 84 anos, é um dos mil sem-abrigo que vivem nas ruas de Lisboa;
Eu sou o tradutor checo, que passa os dias na biblioteca e a quem pela calada da noite roubam os livros na casa que habita numa das artérias da Capital [NR] ;
Eu sou todas as operárias e operários que viram as suas vidas desfeitas por capitalistas sem coração e sem pátria;
Eu sou a puta que, para alimentar os filhos, se vende na berma da estrada;
Eu sou cada um dos milhares de desempregados que faz fila nos chamados Centros de Emprego;
Eu sou cada um dos pensionistas e reformados a quem pagam 200 euros depois de uma vida inteira de trabalho;
Eu sou cada um dos emigrantes, brancos e pretos, a quem obrigam a trabalhar de sol a sol por um salário de merda;
Eu sou cada um dos milhares de jovens licenciados a quem um imbecil, travestido de governante, mandou emigrar;
Eu sou cada um dos pescadores a quem a União Europeia proíbe de pescar sardinha, condenando-os à fome;
Eu sou cada um dos pequenos e médios agricultores a quem a grande distribuição condena a dar aquilo que produzem;
Eu sou cada um dos pequenos e médios produtores de leite a quem os hipermerceeiros esmagam;
Eu sou cada uma das mulheres e homens vítimas de violência doméstica;
Eu sou cada um daquelas velhas e velhos que abandonamos;
Eu sou a criança que morre nos braços, leves, ressequidos, famintos. da mãe;
Eu sou cada um daqueles que nos últimos dias morreram por falta de assistência médica nos ... hospitais;
Eu sou um dos milhares de trabalhadores a quem o Estado penhorou o salário por uma dívida de 1 euro;
Eu sou cada uma das milhares de crianças refugiadas e que a essa condição foram condenadas pelos poderosos do mundo;
Eu sou cada um dos palestinianos que atira pedras contra o muro que há na Faixa de Gaza;
Eu sou cada um dos negros que a polícia norte-americana mata nas ruas;
Eu sou cada um dos milhares de sem-terra que no Brasil lutam por uma vida digna;
Eu sou cada um dos milhares de africanos mortos pelos vírus de ébola e a quem virámos as costas por isso ser doença de pretos;
Eu sou cada um dos milhões de pessoas a quem violência de Estado, tão má e criminosa quanto a violência religiosa, quer enterrar vivos.
Eu sou Charlie.
Eu sou todos os Charlies.
[NR] Referência a reportagem passada na TVI 24. O dito tradutor é apoiado pela equipa de rua da Junta de Freguesia de Arroios. Segundo ele, com "o fim do comunismo" deixou de ter emprego como professor e tradutor e arribou a Lisboa – onde não encontrou melhor sorte. Passa os dias na Biblioteca Nacional e dorme na rua. Ali, segundo disse, roubam-lhe os livros e a comida que lhe dão.
[*] Jornalista e escritor, email@example.com
Este artigo encontra-se em http://resistir.info/ .
Edited by macaense, 15 January 2015 - 12:41 AM.
Posted 16 January 2015 - 11:23 AM
Posted 16 January 2015 - 11:30 AM
Posted 16 January 2015 - 01:10 PM
I am Charlie Chaplin !
“To read the Koran is a revolting experience. After Islam is born, it distinguishes itself by its will to subjugate the world. Its nature – it is subjugation.”
— Michel Houellebecq, reported 31 August 2001.
Nothing justifies an assassination, all the more a mass murder committed in cold blood. What has happened in Paris, the beginning of January, constitutes an absolutely inexcusable crime.
To say that involves nothing original: millions of people think and feel likewise on this account. However, in the light of this appalling tragedy, one of the first questions that occurrs to me is the following: in spite of the profound disgust experienced by the murders, is it obligatory to identify oneself with the victims’ actions? Must I be Charlie because the victims were the supreme incarnation of the ‘liberty of expression’, as the President of the Republic has declared? Am I Charlie, not only because I am a secular atheist, but also because of my fundamental antipathy towards the oppressive roots of the three principal Western monotheistic religions?
Certain caricatures published in Charlie Hebdo, that I’ve seen ages ago, appeared to me to be in bad taste; only a minority amongst them made me laugh. But isn’t the problem to be found there! In the majority of the caricatures on Islam published by the weekly, in the course of the last decade, I have discerned a manipulative aggro intended to further seduce the readership, obviously non-Muslim.
The reproduction by Charlie of the caricatures published in the Danish magazine seemed to me appalling. Already, in 2006, I had perceived as pure provocation the drawing of Mohammed decked in a turban in the form of a bomb. This is not so much a caricature against Islamists as a stupid conflation of Islam with Terror; it’s on a par with identifying Judaism with money!
It has been affirmed that Charlie, impartially, lays into all religions, but this is a lie. Certainly, it mocks Christians, and, sometimes, Jews. However, neither the Danish magazine, nor Charlie would permit themselves (fortunately) to publish a caricature presenting the prophet Moses, with kippah and ritual fringes, in the guise of a wily money-lender, hovering on a street corner. It is good that in the society these days called ‘Judeo-Christian’ (sic), it should no longer be possible to publically disseminate anti-Jewish hatred, as was the case in the not-too-distant past. I am for the liberty of expression while being at the same time opposed to racist incitement.
I admit to, gladly, tolerating the restrictions imposed on Dieudonné from expressing too far and wide his ‘criticism’ and his ‘jokes’ against Jews. On the other hand, I am positively opposed to attempts to restrain him physically. And if, by chance, some idiot attacks him, I will not be very shocked … albeit I will not go so far as to brandish a placard with the inscription: ‘je suis Dieudonné’.
In 1886, there was published in Paris La France juive of Edouard Drumont. And in 2014, the day of the assassinations committed by the three idiot criminals, there appears, under the title: Soumission [Submission], effectively Muslim France, of Michel Houellebecq. The pamphlet La France juive was a genuine bestseller by the end of the 19th Century. Even before its appearance in the bookstores, Soumission was already a bestseller!
These two books, each in its own time, have benefited from sizeable and heated media coverage. There are, certainly, differences between them. Amongst other things, Houellebecq knows that, at the beginning of the 21st Century, it is no longer acceptable to generate fear-mongering of a Jewish threat, but that it remains readily acceptable to sell books implying a Muslim threat. Alain Soral, less adept, has not understood the ‘rules’ and, for this fact, he is marginalized in the media – and so much the better! Houellebecq, on the other hand, has been invited, with much fanfare, to appear on the coveted 8 o’clock program (journal de 20 heures) of French public television, while his book is simultaneously responsible for the dissemination of the fear of Islam.
A bad wind, a fetid wind of dangerous racism, hovers over Europe: there exists a fundamental difference between challenging a religion or a dominant belief in a society, and that of attacking or inciting against the religion of a dominated minority. If, in the breast of ‘Judeo-Muslim’ [no less ridiculous than the Judeo-Christian label] society – in Saudi Arabia, in the Gulf Emirates – there is a groundswell of protests and warnings against the dominant religion that oppresses workers in their thousands, and millions of women, we have the responsibility to support the persecuted protestors. Now, as one well knows, Western leaders, far from encouraging the would-be disciples of Voltaire and Rousseau in the Middle East, maintain their total support to the religious regimes the most repressive.
On the other hand, in France or in Denmark, in Germany or in Spain populated by millions of Muslim workers, more often forced into the worst jobs, at the bottom of the social scale, it is necessary to show the greatest prudence before criticizing Islam, and above all to not crudely ridicule it.
At the moment, and particularly after this terrible massacre, my sympathy goes to the Muslims who reside in ghettos adjacent to the metropolises, who are at considerable risk of becoming the second victims of the murders perpetrated at Charlie Hebdo and at the Hyper Casher supermarket. I continue to take as a reference point the ‘original Charlie’: the great Charlie Chaplin who never mocked the poor and the little-educated.
Moreover, and knowing that one’s writings always occur in context, how to not raise the fact that, for more than a year, so many French troops are present in Africa to ‘combat the jihadists’, when no serious debate has taken place in France on the usefulness or the damage of these military interventions? The colonial gendarme of yesteryear, who carries an incontestable responsibility in the chaotic heritage of [arbitrary] borders and regimes, is today ‘recalled’ to reinstall ‘law and order’ by means of its latterday neo-colonial gendarmerie.
France joins the military coalition in Iraq, beside the US military, firefighting pyromaniac, responsible for the chaos created in the region, and notably in the rise to power of the frightful ‘Daesh’. Allied with the ‘enlightened’ Saudi leadership, and other ardent partisans of the ‘liberty of expression’ in the Middle East, [France] shores up the illogical border carve-up that it had imposed a century ago according to its imperialist interests. It is summoned to bombard those who threaten the precious oil reserves whose product it consumes, without understanding that, in doing so, it invites the risk of terror attacks in the heart of the metropolis.
But, in fact, it is possible that this process is well understood. The enlightened West can’t possibly be the naive and innocent victim as it loves to present itself. Of course, for an assassin to kill in cold blood innocent and unarmed people it is necessary to be cruel and perverse. But it is necessary to be hypocritical or stupid to close one’s eyes on the particulars that have provided the foundations of this tragedy.
This is also proof of a blindness that we had better understand: this conflict will further escalate if we don’t all work together, atheists and believers, to open true ways of living together without hating each other.
Shlomo Sand is the author of How I Stopped Being a Jew, Verso, 2014.
In November 2014 Sand was denied the opportunity to talk at a University in France (seat of the liberty of expression). The UJFP summarises the affair here.
An earlier version of this article was published on the site of the Union Juive Française pour la Paix, and reproduced on Mediapart. Translated from the Hebrew by Michel Bilis; translated from Bilis’ French by Evan Jones.
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users