Jump to content

Theme© by Fisana

- - - - -

Napoleon the Philosemite & The House of Rothschild, by Bassiano

  • Please log in to reply
5 replies to this topic

#1 Mr Walker

Mr Walker

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 816 posts

Posted 12 March 2015 - 10:58 AM


In addition to taking the lives of one million Frenchmen, bankrupting France and indebting it to Jewish bankers, Napoleon brought philosemitism with him wherever he went:



The ascendancy of Napoleon Bonaparte proved to be an important event in European Jewish emancipation from old laws restricting them to Jewish ghettos, as well as the many laws that limited Jews' rights to property, worship, and careers.

Though Ben Weider argued that Napoleon had to be extremely careful in defending oppressed minorities such as Jews, he clearly saw political benefit to his Empire in the long term in supporting them.

He hoped to use equality as a way of gaining advantage from discriminated groups, like Jews or Protestants and Catholics. Both aspects of his thinking can be seen in a response to physician Barry O'Meara, who asked why he pressed for the emancipation of the Jews, after his exile in 1816:

My primary desire was to liberate the Jews and make them full citizens, I wanted to confer upon them all the legal rights of equality, liberty and fraternity as was enjoyed by the Catholics and Protestants.

It is my wish that the Jews be treated like brothers as if we were all part of Judaism. As an added benefit, I thought that this would bring to France many riches because the Jews are numerous and they would come in large numbers to our country where they would enjoy more privileges than in any other nation.

Without the events of 1814, most of the Jews of Europe would have come to France where equality, fraternity and liberty awaited them and where they can serve the country like everyone else.

All the states under French authority applied Napoleon's reforms. In Portugal, the State allowed Jews the same rights as other citizens and authorized them to open the synagogues for the first time in over 300 years. In Italy, in the Netherlands and in the German states, the Jews were able to take their place as free men for the first time in the society of their respective countries.



By a long succession of these ruinous loans, and the various rights granted to guarantee them, the whole finances of France appear to have fallen in total confusion, and presented an inextricable chaos to those who endeavored to bring them into order.. sounds like our $150 trillion Judeo derivatives market."

louis_xvi.jpgLouis XVI
https://books.google...uis XVI&f=false
Sir Walter Scott: Louis XVI and the French Revolution, 1789-1792


Scott goes on to explain how Louis XVI, contrary to the agitprop preached by France's Judenpresse at the time, tried to accommodate the situation:

Louis XVI, fully sensible of the disastrous state of the public revenue, did all he could to contrive a remedy. He limited his personal expenses, and those of his household, with a rigor which approached to parsimony, and dimmed the necessary splendor of the throne, he abolished many pensions.

Lastly, he dismissed a very large proportion of his household troops and bodyguards, destroying with his own hand a force devotedly attached to the royal person, and which, in the hour of popular revolutionary fury, would have been a barrier of inappreciable value.

Thus, it was the misfortune of this well meaning prince, only to weaken his own cause and endanger his safety, by those sacrifices, intended to relieve the burdens of the people, and supply the wants of the state.



The Judenpresse was smearing the King 24/7, the Jews had a monopoly on grain so they were starving the French people, King Louis had to go, like Charles I before him, like Nicholas II after!

d56c4980dd52.jpg Necker


This brings us back to Jacques Necker, Louis XVI's chief finance minister who was responsible for France's huge debts, he was supposedly a Protestant born in Switzerland, in 1747, he was sent to Paris to work in the bank of Isaac Vernet, a friend of his father.

By 1765 he had become incredibly wealthy through suspiciously successful speculations, he then became a partner of another banker, Peter Isaac Thellusson. He "cooked the books" and completely ruined France financially.

R McNair Wilson writes ..Necker, as has been said, had forced his way into the King's Treasury as a representative of the debt system, owing allegiance only to that system. It had been his business, before he became a minister, to prevent the King from getting out of debt.

To that end he had founded in Paris a number of newspapers in which side by side, were presented accounts of the profligacy of the Court at Versailles, and of the poverty and wretchedness of France.

Necker evidently had the full support of the Judenpresse because the French rabble loved him. They loved him so much, in fact, that they spared his life even though he had ruined France financially.


Louis XVI's other finance minister, the noble Malesherbes, was not spared. He was guillotined at the age of 72, but not before his entire family had been guillotined before his very eyes.


Now that I've covered the Judeo financial angle, demonstrating how France was completely crippled financially and indebted to jew bankers in London in the century leading up to the French Revolution, I'll go on to talk about the Judeo intellectual/propagandist angle.

In 1798, John Robison, famous Scottish physicist, wrote in his book "Proofs of a Conspiracy Against All the Religions and Governemnts of Europe":

Nothing can more convincingly demonstrate the early intentions of a party, and this a great party, in France to overturn the constitution completely, and plant a democracy or oligarchy on its ruins. The Illuminati had no other object.

They accounted all Princes usurpers and tyrants, and all privileged orders as their abettors. They intended to establish a government of Morality, as they called it Sittenregiment, where talents and character, to be estimated by their own scale.

And by themselves, should alone lead to preferment. They meant to abolish the laws which protected property accumulated by long continued and successful industry, and to prevent for the future any such accumulation.

They intended to establish universal Liberty and Equality, the imprescriptible Rights of Man, at least they pretended all this to those who were neither Magi nor Regentes. And, as necessary preparations for all this.

They intended to root out all religion and ordinary morality, and even to break the bonds of domestic life, by destroying the veneration for marriage vows, and by taking the education of children out of the hands of the parents.


This was all that the Illuminati could teach, and this was precisely what France has done Page .. was Adam Weishaupt, founder of the Illuminati, a Jew? For some reason, well connected and powerful Jew, on his mother's side, as exposed by Moshe Kohn in the Jerusalem Post.

Edited by Mr Walker, 12 March 2015 - 11:03 AM.

  • 0

#2 Mr Walker

Mr Walker

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 816 posts

Posted 12 March 2015 - 11:01 AM


200px-Churchill_1904_Q_42037.jpg Churchill

Winston Churchill had reason to think so.. this movement amongst the Jews, the Russian Revolution is not new, from the days of Spartacus Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx, and down to Trotsky in Russia..

Bela Kuhn in Hungary, Rosa Luxembourg in Germany, and Emma Goldman in the United States, this world wide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilization and the reconstruction of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality, has been steadily growing.

It played, as a modern writer, Mrs. Nesta Webster, has so ably shown, a definitely recognizable part in the tragedy of the French Revolution. It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the Nineteenth Century;

And now at last this band of extraordinary personalities has gripped the Russian people by the hair of their heads and have become practically the undisputed masters of that enormous empire.

There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creation of Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution by these international and for the most part atheistic Jews. Moreover, the principal inspiration and driving power comes from Jewish leaders.



http://www.white-his...com/hwr61ii.htm Were there Jews surrounding Weishaupt? Bernard Lazare, Jew writer, confirms that there were in his "Antisemitism, Its History and Causes" published in 1894:


It is true, of course, that there were Jews connected with Free Masonry from its birth, students of the Kabbala, as is shown by certain rites which survive.

It is very probable, too, that in the years preceding the outbreak of the French Revolution, they entered in greater numbers than ever, into the councils of the secret societies, becoming, indeed, themselves the founders of secret associations.

There were Jews in the circle around Weishaupt, and a Jew of Portuguese origin, Martinez de Pasquales, established numerous groups of illuminati in France and gathered a large number of disciples...

http://www.fordham.e...azare-anti.htmlWhat about the genuine Frenchmen revolutionaries.. the top players were all killed after they had served their purpose:

Louis Phillipe II, brother of Louis XVI, Freemason, vehemently supported the revolution, financed copious amounts of propaganda, and even voted in favor of murdering his brother! His Palais Royal became a hotbed for revolutionaries, when he had served his purpose he was Guillotined!



And the list goes on and on. Basically all of the lead goyim who posed a threat to Jewish hegemony in France were guillotined.


The above history details what happened before and during the French Revolution. My earlier expose on the Rothschilds details what happened during the 19th century.

What were the results of the French Revolution, the Revolutionary Wars and the Napoleonic wars? The British people went from being 244 million pounds in debt in 1790 to being 838 million pounds in debt in 1821.. Popular Contention in Great Britain, 1758-1834" Page #131.

The debt got so out of control, in fact, that the first ever income tax in British history had to be "temporarily" introduced, but it never did go away, much like America's "temporary" WWI income tax.

Furthermore, the "petit" Jews attained equal rights, the Bank of France was established, the Bourbon hegemony was destroyed, European nations were financially crippled, there was terrible bloodshed, constitutional monarchies were put in place.

Judeo socialist democratic ideas came to the fore, and last but not least, the Jew bankers of Europe became the wealthiest in all the world .. since we have the benefit of hindsight, it should be our duty to always ask ourselves: Cui bono?

Edited by Mr Walker, 12 March 2015 - 11:02 AM.

  • 0

#3 Mr Walker

Mr Walker

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 816 posts

Posted 12 March 2015 - 11:13 AM

To understand the French Revolution, we must first understand 1688's Glorious Revolution in England.. "Glorious" in the eyes of the Jews, just like the French Revolution was known as the "Great French Revolution" because it had established Jewish hegemony.


Antonio Lopez Suasso, the enormously wealthy Jew banker living in The Hague who had already been made a baron by King Charles II of Spain in 1676, advanced 2,000,000 gulden without interest to William III, in order for him to invade England.

Establish a constitutional monarchy, set up a central bank Bank of England AKA Bank of Jew, and enslave the British people. In 1714 Antonio Lopez Suasso's son married a daughter of another enormously wealthy Jew banker and Governor of the Bank of England.

Whatever the truth may be, the point is that Jew bankers owned England by the end of the 17th century. Because they had successfully established a constitutional monarchy and a central bank.

In a constitutional monarchy the King is subservient to the bankers. Jacques Necker, Louis XVI's chief finance minister on whom I will speak later, said.. "the English system was a dictatorship of finance cleverly disguised as a crowned republic."

This oligarchy ... controlled money; it controlled the Press; it controlled the funds of both the great political parties. Thus it was in command of the whole patronage of the Crown on the one hand, and of the whole body of political patronage on the other.

The Mind of Napoleon, R. McNair Wilson. The London banker oligarchy was comprised of the Jew families Suasso, Mocatta, Goldsmid, da Costa and Montifiore.

Alvarez Lopez Suasso, for example, is described as: Resident of London; one of the wealthiest men of his time, in 1725 he was a member of the board of directors of the Spanish Portuguese community of London, seven years later he received permission from the English government to send settlers to the colony of Georgia.


The Jewish Encyclopedia states. "Nathan Mayer Rothschild born at Frankfort Sept. 16, 1777, went to London in 1805 and married a sister in law of Moses Montefiore one of the heads of the Sephardic community, then ruling the financial world of London through their connection with Amsterdam.

England was already clearly in the hands of Jews before the Rothschilds ever set foot there. Anyone who thinks that the Rothschilds came out of nowhere to rule the world is simply misinformed, they didn't come out of nowhere, they were not a "front."

They were clever, emerging Jew bankers aided by other very powerful Jew bankers in the quest for world domination. Having established a central bank and national, people's debt system there was nothing the Jews now wanted more than wars.

Because wars naturally equal dead goyim, skyrocketing national debt and conquest, of course, now that they had ensnared England, they also wanted to ensnare the world's second great power, France.

So they set to bankrupting France first by way of The Seven Years' War, which had Prussia and Britain fighting Austria, France, Russia, Sweden and Saxony.


The war was instigated by Frederick the Great of Prussia when he invaded Saxony. Daniel Itzig and Veitel Ephraim, both Jew bankers, funded Frederick the Great of Prussia.

Daniel Itzig: German banker; head of the Jewish communities of Prussia (1764-99); born 1722; died at Berlin May 21, 1799. Itzig was a member of the wealthy banking firm of Itzig, Ephraim & Son, whose financial operations greatly assisted Frederick the Great in his wars.

He was also the owner of the large lead factories at Sorge as well as of the oil mill at Berlin. Being one of the few Jews permitted to engage in such enterprises.

In 1756 Itzig was appointed Münzjude, mint-master, by Frederick the Great, and again in 1758, together with his partner Ephraim. Veitel-Heine Ephraim: German financier; died at Berlin in 1775. The name means "Veitel, the son of Heine, German for "Ḥayyim", the son of Ephraim.

Friedrich_Wilhelm_I_1713.jpg Frederick William I

He was jeweler to the Prussian court and mint-master under Frederick William I, and Frederick the Great, by whom he was held in high esteem. By his financial operations he assisted this king in his wars,

And when afterward charges of defalcation were brought against him, the king would not permit an investigation. The Seven Years' War was followed by the American Revolutionary War, which completely bankrupted France.


R McNair Wilson in his "Napoleon: The Portrait of a King" explains: The country was experiencing bitter poverty, especially in the towns where there were large numbers of unemployed workmen.

He saw many of these unhappy men hanging about the approaches to towns and villages, and was told, by Judeo agitpropists, that their evil plight was due to the trade treaty with England which the King had been compelled to sign at the close of the American War of Independence.

This treaty opened French markets to English manufactured goods which were being offered at prices below those of the home produced goods. [WTO and NAFTA in the 18th century] In consequence the townspeople had lost their jobs, become destitute, and ceased to buy the farmers' products, thus spreading the ruin into the country districts also.

...he concluded that the treaty with England had been a betrayal of French interests, seeing that, as a country predominantly agricultural, France was self sufficient. The suspicion entered his mind that the rulers at Versailles had done very well out of the bargain.

It was an unjust suspicion. What had actually happened was that the growing power of London as the world's financial centre had broken down French resistance at a moment when French power, whether financial, political, or military, was at a low ebb.

France was a borrower from London, even though the presence of many intermediaries obscured the fact. The creditor was in position to dictate to the debtor. Indeed, London possessed so large a part of the world's stock of gold and silver that the whole Continent of Europe was falling under the necessity of borrowing from her."


He goes on to explain, this is important, as it clearly demonstrates how the Jew had changed finance in Europe to cripple and destroy the Bourbons and eventually enslave all of European folk..


Had Rousseau possessed any understanding alas, Rousseau was either a shabbas goy or a naive goy--we'll never know now, of this fact he might have revised his view about the wickedness of human nature.

For what he had in mind, clearly, was the wickedness of the guides and rulers of men, the priests and the kings. In fact, authority was bankrupt, literally; and possessed as its chief concern the need of obtaining the means whereby industry and agriculture might be carried on.


Nor was this state of affairs the fault of authority, not the fault of the Bourbon monarchy! A change of a fundamental kind had taken place in the economic structure of Europe, whereby the basis of that economic structure had ceased to be wealth and become debt.

In the old Europe wealth had been measured in land and in the products of land, crops and herds and minerals; but a new standard had now been introduced, namely, a form of money which the title "credit" had been given.

Sir Walter Scott in his "Life of Napoleon Bonaparte" writes ..Louis XVI, with the plain well-meaning honesty which marked his character, restored the parliaments to their constitutional powers immediately on his accession to the throne...

In the meanwhile, the revenue of the kingdom had fallen into a most disastrous condition. The continued and renewed expense of unsuccessful wars... had occasioned large deficits upon the public income of each successive year. The ministers... put off the evil day.. of inevitable collapse, by borrowing money at heavy interest.

On their part, these financiers used the government as bankrupt prodigals are treated by usurious money-brokers, who, feeding their extravagance with the one hand, with the other wring out of their ruined fortunes the most unreasonable recompense for their advances.

  • 0

#4 Mr Walker

Mr Walker

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 816 posts

Posted 12 March 2015 - 11:18 AM


The first Rothschild of any prominence was one Amschel Moses Rothschild, a small merchant and money changer at Frankfort on Main, however the founder of the house was his son Mayer Amschel Rothschild, born in that city about 1743.

When a boy Mayer used to be sent to exchange money for use in his father's banking business, he thereby developed an interest in coins which was both practical and scientific. He was at one time destined for the rabbinate, and studied for that purpose in Fürth. He soon changed his career, however, and took a post in the Oppenheim banking house in Hanover.

About 1760 he started in business for himself in his native city, in the house of his father, who was then dead. He married, Aug. 29, 1770, Güttele Schnapper, who lived to see her sons at the head of European finance. Mayer was a general agent and banker, and traded also in works of art and curios.


In the latter connection he became an agent of William IX., Landgrave of Hesse-Cassel, who on his father's death in 1785 had inherited the largest private fortune in Europe. Mayer Amschel Rothschild had become acquainted with the crown prince in 1775.

He does not seem to have done much business with him till toward the end of the next decade. He changed some English gold for him in 1789, and in 1794 took as much as £150,000 worth, but not alone, having associated with him no less than six other bullion-brokers of Frankfort.

It was only toward the end of 1798 that he had sufficient credit with the prince to undertake single handed any large quantity of gold brokerage. From 1800 to 1806 the landgrave placed with Rothschild 1,750,000 thaler, mostly at 4 per cent, of it to be invested in Frankfort town loans, part in Danish loans, in 1801 he became the landgrave's court agent.


Meanwhile his third son, Nathan Mayer Roths-child, born at Frankfort Sept. 16, 1777, had settled in England under somewhat remarkable circumstances, as related by himself to Sir Thomas Buxton.

The firm dealt in Manchester goods, and, having been treated somewhat cavalierly by a commercial traveler, Nathan at a moment's notice settled in Manchester (1798) with a credit of £20,000.

Upon which he earned no less than £40,000 during the following seven years by buying raw material and dyes, having the goods made up to his own order, and selling them abroad, thus making a triple profit.

He became naturalized as a British subject June 12, 1804, and in 1805 went to London, establishing himself at first in St. Helen's place and afterward in New Court, St. Swithin's lane, still the office of the firm.

He married shortly afterward a sister-in-law of Moses Montefiore, thus coming into association with the heads of the Sephardic community, then ruling the financial world of London through their connection with Amsterdam.

London was already in Jew banker hands before the Rothschilds even set foot there, nor ha the Rothschilds "come out of nowhere," they were simply another Jew banking family aided by already wealthy Jews all in the name of dominating the Goyim.

Owing to Napoleon's seizure of Holland in 1803, the leaders of the anti Napoleonic league chose Frankfort as a financial center where from to obtain the sinews of war.


After the Battle of Jena in 1806 the Land grave of Hesse-Cassel fled to Denmark, where he had already deposited much of his wealth through the agency of Mayer Amschel Rothschild.

Leaving in the hands of the latter specie and works of art of the value of £600,000, about £500 million today. According to legend, these were hidden away in wine-casks, and, escaping the search of Napoleon's soldiers.

When they entered Frankfort, were restored intact in the same casks in 1814, when the elector returned to his electorate ..see Marbot, "Memoirs," 1891, i. 310-311.

image015.jpgPrince Dalberg

The facts are far more prosaic, William never did recover his £600,000 from the Rothschilds. Rothschild, so far from being in danger, was on such good terms with Napoleon's nominee, Prince Dalberg, that he had been made in 1810 a member of the Electoral College of Darmstadt.

The elector's money had been sent to Nathan in London, who in 1808 utilized it to purchase £800,000 worth of gold from the East India Company, knowing that it would be needed for Wellington's Peninsular campaign. The Rothschilds were funding both sides.

He made no less than four profits on this:

(1) on the sale of Wellington's paper.

(2) on the sale of the gold to Wellington.

(3) on its repurchase.

on forwarding it to Portugal.

This was the beginning of the great fortunes of the house, and its early transactions may be divided into three stages, in each of which Nathan was the guiding spirit..

(1) from 1808 to 1815, mainly the transmission of bullion from England to the Continent for the use of the British armies and for subventions to the allies;

(2) from 1816 to 1818, "bearing" operations on the stock exchange on the loans needed for the reconstruction of Europe after Napoleon's downfall.

(3) from 1818 to 1848, the undertaking of loans and of refunding operations, which were henceforth to be the chief enterprises of the house.


The Rothschilds were taking over Europe! As regards the first stage, the deaths in 1810 of both Sir Francis Baring and Abraham Goldsmid left Nathan Mayer Rothschild without a formidable competitor in the London bullion market.

It has been calculated that England forwarded to the Continent through him in the three years 1813 to 1815, no less than £15,000,000 sterling, while in the latter year up to the battle of Waterloo he forwarded in a similar manner £1,000,000 per month.

The great sums needed by France and the allies after the Waterloo period were at first not supplied by the Rothschilds at all, though undoubtedly the large movements of bullion which were required for these loans were negotiated through them.

As it is reckoned that from 1814 to 1822 no less than £18,000,000 sterling was transferred by them to the Continent. By financing both sides and it was for this reason that the brothers were raised to the Austrian nobility.

Sept. 29, 1822; Nathan never assumed the title, though he acted as Austrian consul-general. The loans themselves were made by the banking-house of Baring, which was connected with the firm of Hope in Amsterdam, and with that of Ouvrard in Paris, for a long time the chief rival in Paris of the Rothschilds.

By this time Jews almost owned the Continent, the gentile banking house of Baring posed a small obstacle, completely destroyed by Jews in the 1890's!

As early as Feb. 5, 1817, the Rothschilds had taken up a Prussian loan of 1,500,000 gulden at 5 per cent; and by the end of the following year the brothers in their collective capacity were reported to be the richest firm in Europe, by 1817!

In 1834, despite their competition, a syndicate of the Foulds, Oppenheims, and others  obtained the Sardinian loan; but the Rothschilds adopted their usual "bearing" policy, with the result that the next papal loan was financed by them.


The Pereires were equally inimical to the Rothschilds, and successfully competed with them for Russian railway contracts.

  • 0

#5 Mr Walker

Mr Walker

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 816 posts

Posted 12 March 2015 - 11:20 AM

Bakunin hated Jews, Proudhon wanted to exterminate them!

Has the time for National Anarchism arrived.. Fascism and National Socialism need a foundation, a fertile soil.. today all the foundations are gone and all the soil is barren.


The two leading anarchists of the 19th century, Bakunin and Proudhon, both hated Jews, Bakunin was a Russian Panslavic anarchist and an opponent of Marx and Marxism, he tried and failed to gain control of the International.

It was Marx who was being funded by the Rothschilds, not Bakunin, and it was Marx who had access to unlimited capital and the support of influential Jews and shabbas Goyim alike.

Bakunin's hatred of Jews was well known, he is quoted as saying.. One exploiting sect, one people of leeches, one single devouring parasite closely and intimately bound together not only across national boundaries, but also across all divergences of political opinion.

Pierre-Joseph Proudhon was the leading French anarchist of the 19th century. He despised Marx, Marxism, Jews and blacks, he tried to establish an honest people's national bank, but his attempt was thwarted by the Judeo banking dynasties.


Proudhon's diaries.. Carnets, ed. P. Haubtmann, Marcel Rivière, Paris 1960 to date.. reveal that he had almost paranoid feelings of hatred against the Jews, common in Europe at the time.

In 1847 he considered publishing an article against the Jewish race, which he said he "hated," the proposed article would have "called for the expulsion of the Jews from France.

"The Jew is the enemy of the human race, this race must be sent back to Asia, or exterminated." H. Heine, A. Weil, and others are simply secret spies. Rothschild, Crémieux, Marx, Fould, evil choleric, envious, bitter men etc., etc., who hate us."


In 1945 the Jew J. Salwyn Schapiro even suggested that Proudhon's ideology was a precursor of fascism: Proudhon had the tendency, inevitable in the anti Semite, to see in the Jews the prime source of the nation's misfortunes.

And to associate them with persons and groups that he hated...Anti-semitism, always and everywhere, the acid test of racialism, with its division of mankind into creative and sterile races, led Proudhon to regard the Negro as the lowest in the racial hierarchy.

During the American Civil War he favored the South, which, he insisted, was not entirely wrong in maintaining slavery. The Negroes, according to Proudhon, were an inferior race, an example of the existence of inequality among the races of mankind...


His book La Guerre et la Paix, which appeared in 1861, was a hymn to war, intoned in a more passionate key than anything produced by the fascists of our time...Almost every page of La Guerre et la paix contains a glorification of war as an ideal and as an institution.

His hysterical praise of war, like his ardent championship of the dictatorship of Louis Napoleon, like his unwavering support of the middle class, was an integral part of his social philosophy... In the powerful polemist of the mid-nineteenth century.

It is now possible to discern a harbinger of the great world evil of fascism. An irritating enigma to his own generation, his teachings misunderstood as anarchy by his disciples, Proudhon's place in intellectual history is destined to have a new and greater importance.


It will come with the re evaluation of the nineteenth century, as the prelude to the world revolution that is now called the second World War.

  • 0

#6 Col Klink

Col Klink

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 416 posts

Posted 26 April 2015 - 03:45 AM

Not Jewish - Freemason.


Napoleon - Freemason.

Rothschild - Freemason


And the rest too.



  • 0

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Copyright © 2020 Pravda.Ru