Jump to content

Theme© by Fisana
 

Photo
- - - - -

Ideas on cancer therapy

If i could

  • Please log in to reply
39 replies to this topic

#21 math

math

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 109 posts

Posted 18 August 2016 - 12:40 PM

shaktiman,

 

I see Consciousness as our link to the future, better and better if to a universal future.

 

Best Regards


  • 2

#22 shaktiman

shaktiman

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 11106 posts

Posted 18 August 2016 - 01:53 PM

shaktiman,

I see Consciousness as our link to the future, better and better if to a universal future.

Best Regards

 

 

 

Beautifully said Mr. Math!

 

I concur.

 

Best!!!


  • 0

#23 NO.*

NO.*

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 44 posts

Posted 20 August 2016 - 07:59 AM

I love,

you love,

they love longevity.

 

(in poetry.com)


  • 0

#24 shaktiman

shaktiman

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 11106 posts

Posted 20 August 2016 - 03:20 PM

I love,
you love,
they love longevity.

 

 

 

For now, it beats the alternative.

 

Ciao!


  • 0

#25 DrSher

DrSher

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 23 posts

Posted 19 November 2016 - 10:28 PM

           Cancer used to be denoted back in the days as having genetic links.  In simplicity cancer is mutation of the DNA and therefore ALL genetics. Failure of repair of mutations before as "reproduce" the DNA is inevitable and needs to be checked by perfect mutation detection and appropriately induced cell death when not noted earlier. 

 

                          We are somewhat discovering some of these properties in age management research and now also science about the Telomeres in the chromosomes. The future is truth and science, not globalization and ignorance through big pharma and politicized gains.


Edited by DrSher, 19 November 2016 - 10:31 PM.

  • 0

#26 math

math

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 109 posts

Posted 20 November 2016 - 06:54 PM

Quote

DrSher said: "The future is truth and science..."

 

 

math: A step that has to do with what goes on in universities...


Edited by math, 21 November 2016 - 10:09 AM.

  • 0

#27 Geode

Geode

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 147 posts

Posted 24 January 2017 - 10:02 AM

Radio waves chords?

Radio waves chords could have a homeostatic effect...

 

For example:

 

4243 Hz (base)
4495
5045
5345
6000
6735
7560

Equivalent to

F# G A Bb C D E

 

or

 

7000 Hz (base)

7857

8819

9899

11112

11773

13214

equivalent to

F# G# A# B# C## D# E#

 

(frequency relation G:F#= 1.0594631)


Edited by Geode, 24 January 2017 - 10:46 AM.

  • 0

#28 NO.*

NO.*

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 44 posts

Posted 30 January 2017 - 08:51 AM

Ectromagnetic chords or

new lights to update our destiny?

 

http://www.gootar.com/theory.htm


  • 0

#29 NO.*

NO.*

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 44 posts

Posted 11 March 2017 - 08:05 PM

Ideas and images:

 

https://www.google.p...6&bih=662&dpr=1


Edited by NO.*, 13 March 2017 - 10:06 AM.

  • 0

#30 Kadir-Buxton

Kadir-Buxton

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 16 posts

Posted 28 July 2017 - 06:25 AM

I read many years ago that oxygen kills cancer, and in fact using oxygen related treatments are being used for this reason.

(Body builders who have good oxygen supplies are less likely to get cancer than average, while those with sleep apnoea have poor oxygen supplies and are more likely to get cancer.)

I found that while doing voluntary work in a cancer ward, that just breathing deeply all day has the ability to kill off the cancer, even in patients written off by the medical profession. The blood supply goes to all areas of the body, including the cancer. It is possible to get dizzy by breathing deeply all the time, but stopping doing it for a while will help with this symptom. The extra oxygen will also increase energy levels in the muscles, so that patients can be more active.
  • 0

#31 DrSher

DrSher

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 23 posts

Posted 04 September 2017 - 06:19 PM

I read many years ago that oxygen kills cancer, and in fact using oxygen related treatments are being used for this reason.(Body builders who have good oxygen supplies are less likely to get cancer than average, while those with sleep apnoea have poor oxygen supplies and are more likely to get cancer.)I found that while doing voluntary work in a cancer ward, that just breathing deeply all day has the ability to kill off the cancer, even in patients written off by the medical profession. The blood supply goes to all areas of the body, including the cancer. It is possible to get dizzy by breathing deeply all the time, but stopping doing it for a while will help with this symptom. The extra oxygen will also increase energy levels in the muscles, so that patients can be more active.


I appreciate this writing very much and let me add in some comments from my medical and biochemical point of view. First of all, Oxydation is a highly effective killing process the body uses to control it's immune system. This is how immune system kills foreign entities like bacteria and also a mode for killer cells to simply "blow up" dangerous entities. One very fascinating thing is that oxidation is also very damaging to our body. I am sure everyone is familiar with the concept of "oxidative damage" to our tissues' which anti-oxidative supplements are meant to help keep in check. There are devices that can measure amount of anti-oxidative capacity in the body to check your oxidative state of mind, to say such. My point is that oxidation is like a powerful tool. Just like nuclear energy, it can grant tremendous powers for good or destruction. I don't think we are quite there yet, but the oxidative balance of the organism, coupled with appropriate distribution of this force may be the closest we will be to true healing properties, although this seems to exist mostly at philosophical level in medicine these days. Maybe the science of physics and electrochemistry can help bridge us closer to new discoveries here. As physicians, we need more integration from the core scientists, like the soldiers in war could't win it without the engineers. The more learned and experienced I get in the field of healing, the more this connection intrigues me and yet I feel like I know less and less.

An old friend of mine from high school years is now a scholar in philosophy and metaphysics lecturing at various universities about neuroscience and healing. One of his emerging concepts is the philosophy of immunology. Today, I became a physician, while he is a university professor. He lectures students in medicine and neuroscience about the metaphysics of the brain at a renowned university in Northern Europe. I have recently reconnnected with him after more than a decade of hiatus and we are looking into collaborating to try evolve this thinking further. The core scientists and the clinicians at ground level do not often collude on intellectual level any more. I feel more estranged from the rigors of scientific thinking today than when I was in high school trying to acquire skill sets and qualifications to enter school of medicine.

If there are any scientists here in the biophysical fields, I would like to hear more opinions about this. With the expenses of healthcare being what they are and our need to define the degree of resource allocations from public and private funds as proportion of our expenses, this would be a new field of medicine and science.

Finally, with regards to breathing and the proper way of respiratory balance, I believe properties more of Yoga needs to undergo same research. The challenge with Yoga is that much of the scientific hypothesis or explanations, to say such, goes back to the Vedas of 4000 years and I think the only way to get to the bottom of this today is to study them in Sanskrit and read the old scriptures. Medicine, science and ancient healing fundamentals needs to come together, but today, the disrespect for history and the past is coupled with an overdose of scientific modernism and evidence-based absolutism. I am unsure how to approach this and feel helpless how to take this further. Anyone with thoughts would be appreciated here.

Bless you all, no matter where on globe you are staying.
  • 0

#32 NO.*

NO.*

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 44 posts

Posted 11 September 2017 - 08:47 AM

My view of rhythms for a healthy lifestyle

 
A- Breathing:
1. Develop outdoor activities.
2. Do breathing exercises.
3. Regularly renew the air inside the dwelling.
 
B- Hydration:
1. Drink water fasting and at meal intervals, every day
(quantities to be adjusted individually)
2. Include recently prepared tea or herbal teas as you like.
3. Don't forget fruit juices. In general adults can consume moderately
alcoholic beverages.
 
C- Physical exercise:
1. It is recommended about 30 minutes of outdoor walking, 6 days a week.
2. At home, it is suggested simple exercises, lasting 10 minutes.
3. Other physical activities you enjoy.
 
D- Time Management:
1. Maintain contact with other people.
2. Be interested in cultural and social activities.
3. Contemplate, meditate, and make decisions when necessary.
 
E-Food:
1. Use fresh and varied foods.
2. Avoid very high temperatures in the confection of meals, such as
the use of direct fire.
3. There's a choice to be made about preferable foods...
 
F- In sickness adopt as much as possible a healthy lifestyle,
why that:
1. Contributes to the balance of your immune system.
2. Improves response to treatments.
3. Gives you self-confidence.
 
G- Limits:
1. There are many books and writings on the topic of lifestyle and
its impact on health; Discuss the subject.
2. Reduce daily stress if on overwork and too many worries.
3. Follow your ideals.
 
H- And remember:
1. Your style can influence the health status of others. For instance,
driving in disastrous conditions can seriously hurt your neighbor.
2. Your style, as part of a community style, can affect
the health of the planet and of all people.
3. "Health is a state of complete physical, mental and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity", according to World Health Organization principles..

Edited by NO.*, 12 September 2017 - 01:21 PM.

  • 1

#33 NO.*

NO.*

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 44 posts

Posted 19 September 2017 - 11:15 AM

Not only a matter of anti-cancer means, but also a matter of complementary therapeutics able to potentiate the immune-genetic system for cure. I'm thinking, for example, of amino acids, vitamins, minerals, plant polyphenols and essential fatty acids.


  • 1

#34 RobertD

RobertD

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 20828 posts

Posted 17 December 2017 - 12:20 PM

Baking soda.

Cancer cells do not survive in alkaline environment.
  • 0

#35 RobertD

RobertD

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 20828 posts

Posted 17 December 2017 - 12:22 PM

Half a teaspoon of baking soda in 2oz water before going to bed.

http://sunridgemedic...bkaAuSAEALw_wcB
  • 0

#36 RobertD

RobertD

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 20828 posts

Posted 17 December 2017 - 12:23 PM

https://natureworksb...ncer-treatment/
  • 0

#37 MirrorMan

MirrorMan

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 8464 posts

Posted 07 February 2018 - 10:55 PM

http://www.independe...a-a8188906.html

 

 

 

Human trials have begun with a new cancer therapy that can prime the immune system to eradicate tumours around the body.

The treatment that works similarly to a vaccine is a combination of two existing drugs, of which tiny amounts are injected into the solid bulk of a tumour.

It works by reactivating immune cells suppressed by the cancer, triggering a body wide immune response which was able to “eliminate tumours all over the body” even ones unrelated to the initially treated cancer, according to researchers at Stanford University who developed it.

 

It is thought that it could be used to prevent cancer returning after surgery.

Following successful trials with mice, the researchers said it was now ready to be tested on humans.

One of the immunotherapy drugs used is already approved for use in humans, while the other is undergoing trials.

Individually they have to be matched to a particular type of cancer, but when used in combination it appears they have a much more potent and wide-ranging impact.

 

A clinical trial began last month to test the effects in human patients with lymphoma – a cancer that infects the white blood cells which travel around the body fighting infection and can therefore rapidly spread.

If the results from mice can be replicated in humans it could have significant potential.

“Our approach uses a one-time application of very small amounts of two agents to stimulate the immune cells only within the tumour itself,” said Dr Ronald Levy a professor of oncology at Stanford University School of Medicine.

“In the mice, we saw amazing, body wide effects, including the elimination of tumours all over the animal.”

While the immune system is able to detect cancer cells and set itself to attack it with killer T white blood cells, tumours are able to neutralise the attackers once they latch on and continue to grow.

 

But, treating the tumours with a 1 microgram dose (one millionth of a gram) of the immunotherapy drugs reawakened these no engulfed cells and allowed them to begin attacking the cancer again, at the treated site and elsewhere.

The treatment cured mice of lymphoma in 87 out of 90 cases and though three mice saw a return, this was successfully treated with a second dose and similar results were seen in mice with breast, colon and melanoma cancers.

The human trial will include 15 lymphoma patients and if successful Dr Levy sees this treatment as a way to significantly reduce the chances of a cancer returning, by injecting the immunotherapy cocktail before surgery to remove the main tumour mass.

“I don’t think there’s a limit to the type of tumour we could potentially treat, as long as it has been infiltrated by the immune system,” Levy said.


  • 0

#38 MirrorMan

MirrorMan

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 8464 posts

Posted 10 February 2018 - 04:36 AM

https://www.nature.c...-cancer-1.18534

 

 

Elephants have evolved extra copies of a gene that fights tumour cells, according to two independent studies1, 2 — offering an explanation for why the animals so rarely develop cancer.

Why elephants do not get cancer is a famous conundrum that was posed — in a different form — by epidemiologist Richard Peto of the University of Oxford, UK, in the 1970s3. Peto noted that, in general, there is little relationship between cancer rates and the body size or age of animals. That is surprising: the cells of large-bodied or older animals should have divided many more times than those of smaller or younger ones, so should possess more random mutations predisposing them to cancer. Peto speculated that there might be an intrinsic biological mechanism that protects cells from cancer as they age and expand.

At least one solution to Peto's paradox may now have been found, according to a pair of papers independently published this week. Elephants have 20 copies of a gene called p53 (or, more properly, TP53), in their genome, where humans and other mammals have only one. The gene is known as a tumour suppressor, and it snaps to action when cells suffer DNA damage, churning out copies of its associated p53 protein and either repairing the damage or killing off the cell.


Edited by MirrorMan, 10 February 2018 - 04:37 AM.

  • 0

#39 Hellboy

Hellboy

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 9848 posts

Posted 22 February 2018 - 01:11 AM

Baking soda.

Cancer cells do not survive in alkaline environment.

 

so why not loads of vegetables and green vegetables?


  • 0

#40 MirrorMan

MirrorMan

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 8464 posts

Posted 03 March 2018 - 08:13 PM

 

so why not loads of vegetables and green vegetables?

Because people are reluctant to give up their unhealthy lifestyles, they want a cure for cancer instead of not getting cancer in the first place by  eating healthy, taking regular exercise and not smoking. 


Edited by MirrorMan, 03 March 2018 - 08:14 PM.

  • 0




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Copyright © 2018 Pravda.Ru