Jump to content

Theme© by Fisana
 

Photo

Russia: We Have Proof US Interfered With Our Elections

Elections

  • Please log in to reply
25 replies to this topic

#1 grog

grog

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 9478 posts

Posted 18 September 2017 - 09:06 AM

Russia: We Have Proof US Interfered With Our Elections
 
 
 
September 18, 2017
 
 
 
 
Russia has accused the United States of interfering in their elections and have threatened to release proof to back up their claims.
 
Officials from the Federation Council Commission in Russia's Internal Affairs announced that they had evidence that proves the US influenced the regional elections that took place in Russia on September 10.
 
Pravdareport.com reports: According to the head of the commission, Senator Andrei Klimov, foreign countries made wire transfers to Russian election funds to support certain candidates at the elections.
 
Klimov added that the funds were transferred through one of Russia's ally in the Customs Union of the Eurasian Economic Union.
 
Transfers were made to the countries where there is no law on foreign agents.
 
"The United States is the most powerful centre, from which such activity comes. As a rule, it comes from Washington," the senator said.
 
On September 10, Russia held elections at various levels.
 
In Moscow, United Russia party scored 76 percent of votes, whereas Yabloko party came second with 11.72%.
 
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
 
 
 
 
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
 
 
 
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
 
 
 
 

  • 2

#2 grog

grog

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 9478 posts

Posted 18 September 2017 - 09:14 AM

Wisconsin Recount Shows Hillary Clinton Rigged Election
 
 
 
 
04 December 2016.
 
 
 
 
 
Wisconsin recount uncovers evidence of rigged election in favor of Hillary Clinton
 
Officials involved in the Wisconsin recount have come forward with evidence of tampered voting machines that they say proves Hillary Clinton rigged the election. 
 
Election observers designated on behalf of Jill Stein have shared images on social media showing nine voting machines with tampered seals.
 
Palmerreport.com reports:
 
The observer, named Wendy, has been observing the recount in St. Croix County. According to the state's official election website, that county is currently doing both a hand recount and a machine recount.
 
That's what makes it notable that Wendy spotted the broken seals on five of the nine machines in question.
 
Based on the photographs she posted to Stein's official campaign website, the broken seals themselves come with the warning label that "Removal of seal voids warranty." Take a look at one of her photos below:
 
wisconsin-tamper-broken-seals
 
There has as of yet been no explanation from Wisconsin officials or St. Croix County officials as to why the majority of vote counting machines in the county have been visibly tampered with, and no one noticed during the original vote tally.
 
It's possible that these seals could have been broken by a hacker who was reprogramming them to produce rigged or false vote totals, and it's also possible that an election worker could have simply pried open the seals for some unknown reason that didn't involve malicious intent. But in any case, the broken tamper seals stand out as alarming - and could serve as legal fodder for expanding the scope of the recount.
 
A judge ruled that there was insufficient evidence to force every Wisconsin county to do a hand recount, and that each county could decide on its own whether to do hand recounts or machine recounts. Sixty of the seventy-two counties have voluntarily agreed to do hand recounts.
 
However, of the twelve counties which refused, Donald Trump won nine of them. These tampered seals could be used to convince the judge to order the remaining twelve counties to do hand recounts.
 
 

  • 0

#3 grog

grog

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 9478 posts

Posted 18 September 2017 - 09:18 AM

Voting Machine Caught Swapping Republican Ballot For Democrat
 
 
 
27 October 2016.
 
 
 
A voting machine has been caught on camera casting a ballot for a Democrat after the voter selected a Republican.
 
Donald Trump thinks Hillary Clinton and the Democrats are going to steal the next election. "I'm afraid the election is going to be rigged, I have to be honest," he told a campaign rally last week.
 
The mainstream media are trying to portray him as mad, but take a look at this evidence:
 
This is attempted election theft through manipulation of the computerized voting machines - and it must be stopped. The party in power in a given state controls the programming of the voting machines.
 
When the establishment asked Trump if he would accept the outcome of the election a whole three weeks before the event, it was like asking a sports coach if he thinks the game was refereed fairly before the game is played.
 
And the Democrats are now attempting to cover all bases. They are sueing the RNC over Trump's election rigging claims, and also suggesting if any evidence of voter fraud does emerge, then it is probably Russia's fault.
 
Do not believe that voter fraud does not exist. It's real, the numbers are huge, and it's undermining true democracy in the United States. We must fight to eradicate it.
 
If you notice any sign if possible voter fraud or election rigging, call the Trump Ballot Security Project toll free on 1-855-245-4634 or email StopTheSteal@gmail.com.
 
 

  • 0

#4 grog

grog

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 9478 posts

Posted 18 September 2017 - 09:21 AM

Video Evidence Of Biggest Election Fraud In U.S. History
 
 
 
1 November 2016.
 
 
 
A bombshell investigation has revealed that software used in almost all precincts across the U.S. is used to commit election fraud on an enormous scale. 
 
Bev Harris, a leading expert on voter fraud, filmed what she describes as  "the most devastating election theft mechanism yet found," that allows officials to change the results of the election.
 
Infowars.com reports:
 
Used in precincts all across the country, the software - deemed "the most devastating election theft mechanism yet found" - allows votes to be fractured and rounded up or down to sway the results for any candidate.
 
According to Harris, a member of the non-partisan Black Box Voting investigative team, this latest discovery constitutes the "missing piece" that blows the lid off of wide-scale voter fraud.
 
"It was put in the system in 2001 but it came into wide use in 2006," Harris said. "It took someone with a special set of skills to know what to look for."
 
A mini-documentary by Black Box Voting on the discovery shows real-time demonstrations with the secretive software.
 
"It can give contract signing authority to whoever the user chooses," the video's description states. "All political power can be converted to the hands of a few anonymous subcontractors."
 
"It runs silently, invisibly, and can produce plausible results that really pass for the real thing."
 
Further analysis on the malicious software provided by Alex Jones reveals how this revelation ties into the 2016 presidential election.
 
 

  • 0

#5 grog

grog

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 9478 posts

Posted 18 September 2017 - 09:25 AM

US Elections: Neither Free nor Fair
 
 
 
28 September 2016.
 
Media across the world are literally transfixed by the spectacle of US elections. The Donald Trump-Hillary Clinton, Republicans vs. Democrats battle is captivating enough to distract public attention from other issues.
 
Democracy promotion has been a centerpiece of US foreign policy for over half a century since the days when President Woodrow Wilson crafted a new foreign policy that involved active democracy promotion. The implementation of the «beacon on the hill» concept presupposes that the United States would act as a model of excellence for others to follow is analogous to contemporary soft-power democracy promotion efforts. Lecturing on democracy is a distinctive feature of American foreign policy. Does the US really provide an influential role model for how elections should run in other countries? Is America really a shining example of real democracy? «Forbear to judge, for we are sinners all».
 
Domestic and international experts rate the US elections as the worst among all Western democracies. According to Electoral Integrity Project, Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden are at the top of the ranking, while the US scores 62.
 
The report gathers assessments from over 2,000 experts to evaluate the perceived integrity of all 180 national parliamentary and presidential contests held between July 1, 2012, and Dec. 31, 2015, in 139 countries. The 2014 US congressional elections rank even worse, 65th out of 180 worldwide.
 
In May, the Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights issued the OSCE / ODIHR Needs Assessment Mission (NAM) Report to assess the pre-election environment and the preparations for the US election on November 8.
 
It notes that in America election observation is regulated by state law, which does not explicitly provide for international observers at odds with the 1990 OSCE Copenhagen Document.
 
The paper says some 4.1 million citizens that are residents of US territories are not eligible and some 600,000 citizens that are residents of the District of Columbia can vote in presidential elections but do not have full representation in Congress. Some 5.8 million prisoners and ex-prisoners continue to be disenfranchised due to prohibitive and disproportionate legal regulations or burdensome procedures for reinstating voting rights in a number of states, particularly affecting minorities.
 
Women are generally underrepresented in public office, holding some 20 per cent of seats in the outgoing Congress and some 25 per cent of seats in the state legislatures. Some OSCE/ODIHR NAM interlocutors noted concerns about negative stereotyping of women. They are also concerned over an increase in inflammatory speech targeting minorities.
 
The OSCE report also notes that there are no limits on campaign spending: no aggregate limit on how much an individual may contribute. Spending by independent groups can be exempt from disclosure requirements. Boundaries of the districts to elect representatives are redrawn in line with partisan interests which may result in uncompetitive races.
 
The paper adds to numerous publications devoted to irregularities of the US voting system. Indeed, there has a been a range of vulnerabilities in the conduct of American elections made public in recent years, recently, especially since the notoriously flawed ballot design in Florida in 2000.
 
There is a widespread suspicion of the role of money in politics. Regardless of their political affiliation, Americans agree that money has too much influence on the outcome of the vote, the wealthy have more influence on elections, and candidates who win office promote policies that help their donors.
 
The people think the country's campaign finance system needs significant changes. Americans do not think donating money to political candidates is a form of free speech.
 
Electoral laws are unfair to smaller parties like the Green Party, favor the governing party, or restrict voter's rights.
 
Gerrymandering of district boundaries to favor incumbents, waiting in line in excess of many hours, inaccurate state and local voter registers, insufficiently trained local poll workers, and the breakdown of voting machines are just a few example in the list of noticeable shortfalls. In 2014 serious problems with electronic voting were reported. The polling machines recorded a vote for the Democratic candidate when the screen was touched to cast a vote for the Republican.
 
In Texas the statewide voter registration system crashed, forcing many to complete provisional ballots when poll workers were unable to confirm voter eligibility.
 
The 2016 race is disappointing enough. There was reported confusion about new photo ID requirements and long lines.
 
The system of superdelegates is evidently undemocratic. For instance, this year Democratic superdelegates, who aren't beholden to vote for a candidate according to the popular choice, could potentially sway the nomination. It caused discontent among rank and file party members who would prefer another candidate instead of Hillary Clinton. G.O.P. candidate Donald Trump called the delegate system «rigged».
 
Noam Chomsky, a famous American scholar and the author of Failed States, believes there is an enormous gap between public opinion and policy in the United States.
 
In the book What We Say Goes: Conversations on US Power in a Changing World he sets an example. In 2005, the Program on International Policy Attitudes did an extensive poll on what people thought the budget ought to be.
 
It turned out to be the inverse of the actual budget: where federal funding was going up, an overwhelming majority wanted it to go down. The public opposed increases in military spending overall and supplemental spending for Iraq and Afghanistan, which is going up even more now. Where the budget was going down-social expenditures, health, renewable energy, veterans' benefits, the United Nations-right across the board, the public wanted spending to increase. US media kept this fact out of public eye.
 
«…when Americans with different income levels differ in their policy preferences, actual policy outcomes strongly reflect the preferences of the most affluent but bear virtually no relationship to the preferences of poor or middle-income Americans. The vast discrepancy I find in government responsiveness to citizens with different incomes stands in stark contrast to the ideal of political equality that Americans hold dear. Although perfect political equality is an unrealistic goal, representational biases of this magnitude call into question the very democratic character of our society», says Martin Gilens, the professor of politics at Princeton University and the author the author of Affluence & Influence: Economic Inequality and Political Power in America.
 
«Now it's just an oligarchy, with unlimited political bribery being the essence of getting the nominations for president or to elect the president. And the same thing applies to governors, and US senators and congress members», concludes former US president Jimmy Carter.
 
The US officials often recklessly accuse other countries of election tempering. There is a reason to believe they do it to obfuscate the real story of fraud and irregularities in their own electoral process. No doubt, America would do a better job of promoting democracy in other countries by setting an example to follow but it's voting system is broken and needs to be fixed. Today the United States is definitely not in the position to lecture and teach others. It has a long way to go if it wants to become a real democracy. 
 
 

  • 0

#6 grog

grog

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 9478 posts

Posted 18 September 2017 - 09:28 AM

Two Million Dead Voters Officially Registered To Vote
 
 
 
18 October 2016.
 
 
 
 
There are 18 million invalid voter registrations and an astonishing two million dead people registered to vote in the United States, according to a report by Pew Charitable Trusts.
 
There are 18 million invalid voter registrations and an astonishing two million dead people registered to vote in the United States, according to a report by Pew Charitable Trusts.
 
One in eight voter registrations are "significantly inaccurate or no longer valid," the study claims, proving the epic potential for voter fraud and election rigging.
 
"One of the more cynical arguments you hear from the left is that 'Oh, well it's not that many people, not that many instances of voter fraud,'" said Charlie Hurt, appearing on Lou Dobbs Tonight. "And I'm thinking, my goodness, just one instance is terrible and unacceptable. Because, of course, one instance of voter fraud means that another person's vote is being canceled out by that, and it undermines the very heart of what this government is supposed to be about."
 
But with soft or nonexistent voter ID laws across the country, and a lack of law enforcement mechanisms to identify and prosecute voter fraud, we are not talking about one or two instances. The evidence points to mass voter fraud, and the potential for election rigging is real.
 
Judicial Warch president Tom Fitten said, "The best solution would be to reform the system in the long run - more voter ID and citizenship verification. In the short run, the American people should pressure law enforcement to prosecute voting fraud. This can be done at the local, state, and federal level."
 
Democrat denial
 
However, in spite of all this, Democrats continue to insist that voter fraud is a myth. They argue that the low numbers of people convicted of voter fraud mean that the amount of voter fraud is negligible. But this is faulty logic. The low number of convictions don't point to a lack of voter fraud, but rather to a culture of acceptance and a lack of serious law enforcement mechanisms to identify and prosecute the fraud.
 
As for Democrats claiming that strong voter ID laws are racist, the Heritage Foundation has shown that black voter turnout actually increased after North Carolina passed its strong voter ID law.
 
Do not believe that voter fraud does not exist. It's real, the numbers are huge, it's undermining true democracy in the United States, and we must work to eradicate it.
 
 

  • 0

#7 grog

grog

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 9478 posts

Posted 18 September 2017 - 09:32 AM

The Troubling Reason the Electoral College Exists
 
 
Updated: Nov 10, 2016 
Originally published: Nov 08, 2016
 
 
 
As Americans await the quadrennial running of the presidential obstacle course now known as the Electoral College, it's worth remembering why we have this odd political contraption in the first place. After all, state governors in all 50 states are elected by popular vote; why not do the same for the governor of all states, a.k.a. the president? The quirks of the Electoral College system were exposed this week when Donald Trump secured the presidency with an Electoral College majority, even as Hillary Clinton took a narrow lead in the popular vote.
 
Some claim that the founding fathers chose the Electoral College over direct election in order to balance the interests of high-population and low-population states. But the deepest political divisions in America have always run not between big and small states, but between the north and the south, and between the coasts and the interior.
 
One Founding-era argument for the Electoral College stemmed from the fact that ordinary Americans across a vast continent would lack sufficient information to choose directly and intelligently among leading presidential candidates.
 
This objection rang true in the 1780s, when life was far more local. But the early emergence of national presidential parties rendered the objection obsolete by linking presidential candidates to slates of local candidates and national platforms, which explained to voters who stood for what.
 
Although the Philadelphia framers did not anticipate the rise of a system of national presidential parties, the 12th Amendment-proposed in 1803 and ratified a year later- was framed with such a party system in mind, in the aftermath of the election of 1800-01. In that election, two rudimentary presidential parties-Federalists led by John Adams and Republicans led by Thomas Jefferson-took shape and squared off. Jefferson ultimately prevailed, but only after an extended crisis triggered by several glitches in the Framers' electoral machinery. In particular, Republican electors had no formal way to designate that they wanted Jefferson for president and Aaron Burr for vice president rather than vice versa. Some politicians then tried to exploit the resulting confusion.
 
Enter the 12th Amendment, which allowed each party to designate one candidate for president and a separate candidate for vice president. The amendment's modifications of the electoral process transformed the Framers' framework, enabling future presidential elections to be openly populist and partisan affairs featuring two competing tickets. It is the 12th Amendment's Electoral College system, not the Philadelphia Framers', that remains in place today. If the general citizenry's lack of knowledge had been the real reason for the Electoral College, this problem was largely solved by 1800. So why wasn't the entire Electoral College contraption scrapped at that point?
 
Standard civics-class accounts of the Electoral College rarely mention the real demon dooming direct national election in 1787 and 1803: slavery.
 
At the Philadelphia convention, the visionary Pennsylvanian James Wilson proposed direct national election of the president. But the savvy Virginian James Madison responded that such a system would prove unacceptable to the South: "The right of suffrage was much more diffusive [i.e., extensive] in the Northern than the Southern States; and the latter could have no influence in the election on the score of Negroes." In other words, in a direct election system, the North would outnumber the South, whose many slaves (more than half a million in all) of course could not vote. But the Electoral College-a prototype of which Madison proposed in this same speech-instead let each southern state count its slaves, albeit with a two-fifths discount, in computing its share of the overall count.
 
Virginia emerged as the big winner-the California of the Founding era-with 12 out of a total of 91 electoral votes allocated by the Philadelphia Constitution, more than a quarter of the 46 needed to win an election in the first round. After the 1800 census, Wilson's free state of Pennsylvania had 10% more free persons than Virginia, but got 20% fewer electoral votes. Perversely, the more slaves Virginia (or any other slave state) bought or bred, the more electoral votes it would receive. Were a slave state to free any blacks who then moved North, the state could actually lose electoral votes.
 
If the system's pro-slavery tilt was not overwhelmingly obvious when the Constitution was ratified, it quickly became so. For 32 of the Constitution's first 36 years, a white slaveholding Virginian occupied the presidency.
 
Southerner Thomas Jefferson, for example, won the election of 1800-01 against Northerner John Adams in a race where the slavery-skew of the electoral college was the decisive margin of victory: without the extra electoral college votes generated by slavery, the mostly southern states that supported Jefferson would not have sufficed to give him a majority. As pointed observers remarked at the time, Thomas Jefferson metaphorically rode into the executive mansion on the backs of slaves.
 
The 1796 contest between Adams and Jefferson had featured an even sharper division between northern states and southern states. Thus, at the time the Twelfth Amendment tinkered with the Electoral College system rather than tossing it, the system's pro-slavery bias was hardly a secret. Indeed, in the floor debate over the amendment in late 1803, Massachusetts Congressman Samuel Thatcher complained that "The representation of slaves adds thirteen members to this House in the present Congress, and eighteen Electors of President and Vice President at the next election." But Thatcher's complaint went unredressed. Once again, the North caved to the South by refusing to insist on direct national election.
 
In light of this more complete (if less flattering) account of the electoral college in the late 18th and early 19th century, Americans should ask themselves whether we want to maintain this odd-dare I say peculiar?-institution in the 21st century.
 
¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦
 
 
¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦

  • 0

#8 grog

grog

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 9478 posts

Posted 18 September 2017 - 09:36 AM

The Presstitutes Have Set Up The Election To Be Stolen
 
 
 
24 October 2016.
 
 
 
Over the course of its history, the New York Times has reported on many American elections that have been rigged or stolen or are suspected of having been being rigged or stolen. For example, as a supporter of the black civil rights movement, the NY Times has many stories in its archives of elections rigged by disenfranchisement of black voters.
 
But this was when the NY Times was an independent voice before it became a whore for the Oligarchs who rule America. When the NY Times reported that black Americans could have no confidence in the integrity of American elections, the NY Times did not denounce itself for delegitimizing American democracy.
 
The NY Times forgot all of this when it published Max Fisher's article yesterday. Fisher fished up "scholars" among the Hillary advocates, and they obligingly told him that Trump's questioning of the integrity of American elections were the tactics of a would-be dictator who is at work delegitimizing democracy so that he can take over.
 
What Fisher and his "scholars" overlook is that the US government is already delegitimized in the eyes of the American population, as well as foreign populations. If the US government was not already delegitimized, Donald Trump would not have been successful in what, despite Trump's damnation by the presstitutes, was an easy sweep-aside of the Establishment's candidates for the Republican presidential nomination.
 
The US government is delegitimized, not only in the eyes of Americans, but also in the eyes of most of the world. Millions of Americans have lost their jobs, their careers, their hopes, because corrupt bought-and-paid-for-Washington enabled Globalism to send the futures of the American people to China and India. Millions of Americans lost their homes, because the corrupt Federal Reserve came down on the side of five "banks too big to fail" at the expense of the American people. Millions of Americans along with much of the world know that the US government has been slaughtering millions of peoples in seven countries based on lies, wasting not only countries and the lives of millions of peoples, but trillions of American dollars that Americans needed for their welfare. Saddam Hussein had no weapons of mass destruction. Assad did not use chemical weapons. Gaddafi was innocent of all the absurd charges that Washington used to destroy Libya, a country that had the most progressive social system on earth. Russia did not invade Ukraine. The Taliban had nothing whatsoever to do with 9/11. Yet countries are in ruins because of Washington's war crimes justified by transparent lies.
 
If the NY Times does not know this, the organization is too stupid to justify its existence. Of course the Times knows it. But the NY Times is no longer a newspaper. It is a cog in the Ministry of Propaganda that works to create a Matrix in which brainwashed Americans accept the dictates of the Oligarchs.
 
The purpose of the Times' article is to discredit in advance criticism of an election that the ruling Oligarchs intend to steal. If the Times believed that Hillary would have a clear election victory, there would be no point to Fisher's article.
 
We see voluminous signs of the intended theft of the election. For example, Hillary's lead in the polls is based on the pollsters skewing the affiliation of those polled to Democrats. The percentage of Democrats in the samples is far higher than their percentage of registered voters. http://www.zerohedge...tage-over-trump
 
It the past it was difficult to steal elections unless they were very close. Exit polls were a check on vote count, and the disenfranchisement of blacks could be risky if it attracted the attention of the US Department of Justice. The new method, which is unfolding before our eyes, steals the election in advance with the Oligarchs' candidate far ahead in the polls (now by 12 points according to the latest fiction) and by making anyone who questions the faked results into a fascist dictator.
 
Obviously, if Hillary was really ahead by 12 points - a landslide - there would be no need for Fisher's article or for the constant drumbeat against Trump. Judging from the hysteria, as reflected in Fisher's NY Times article, for example, the Oligarchs are aware that objections to their rule has elevated Trump. In order to hold on to power, the American Oligarchs must smash Trump and put their bought-and-paid-for-candidate, Hillary - whom the Oligarchs have provided along with Bill a personal fortune of $120 million and endowed the Clinton Foundation with $1,600 million - into the Oval Office.
 
Pollsters by nature of their business are unreliable. If truthful results offend the establishment political organizations, the pollsters are out of work. Polls have to serve the Oligarchs or the polling firms go down. Trump is an outsider toward whom the ruling Oligarchy is totally opposed, which is why Americans support him. Therefore, polling firms are adverse to betting their future on poll results favorable to Trump, especially when the whores who constitute the American print and TV media, such as the NY Times, are all out to put Hillary in the White House.
 
As Hillary's public statements have made clear, Hillary is antagonistic toward Russia and the Russian government, calling the president of Russia "the new Hitler." She promises conflict with Russia, which would certainly be nuclear and end life on earth.
 
Trump says in the face of contrary ruling neoconservative opinion that he sees no point in conflict with Russia and no point in NATO's continued existence a quarter century after the purpose of NATO collapsed with the Soviet Union. Trump might not be successful in appointing a government that serves his instincts, but at least he gives us hope of avoiding military conflict with Russia and China. With Hillary there is no hope whatsoever. My opinion is that the world would not survive Hillary's first term. I have known the neoconservatives since the 1970s. They are crazed fanatics, and they hate Russia. Hillary is their agent.
 
It is unclear that the Russian government understands, or takes seriously, the neoconservative ideology of US world hegemony. Putin's hesitant, indecisive behavior in Syria has done more to set himself and Russia up for demonization than to defeat ISIS. http://www.paulcraig...-craig-roberts/
 
The Western world is corrupt and evil. The list of its victims is almost endless. What disconnect makes some Russians desire association with the Western world?
 
How the Media and Democrats Rig the Perception of Trump
 
 
The Orchestrated Trump-Putin Connection
 
Leaked emails prove that the Trump-Putin connection was orhestrated as campaign talk
 
to deflect attention from damaging content of Clinton's released emails.
 
 
Integrity Of US Elections Among Lowest Of All Countries
 
According to Shyla Nelson, the co-founder of Election Justice USA, US elections are manipulated in many ways, including «voter suppression, unauthorized registration purges, district gerrymandering, gross exit poll variances, the privatization of voting machinery, and the lack of transparency in ballot processing - our elections will continue to rank among the lowest in the world in integrity.
 
US elections are so corrupt that the US has threatened Russian diplomats with arrest if they attempt to monitor the US November presidential election.
 
 
Bill Clinton's Rape Victims (the ones we know about)
 
 
But we must not tolerate Trump's lewd comments.
 
Bill and Hillary are lawless because they have never been held accountable. As the justice system has given Hillary a pass, will voters hold her accountable in November, or will the American public also give her a pass?
 
Hillary Has Never Been Held Accountable For Anything
 
What is worse, Hillary laughing about her success in getting a child rapist off or Trump's lewd comments about women? Why is it that the TV women can't come up with the right answer? How can democracy function when a propaganda ministry takes the place of the media?
 
 
 
A Comparison of Trump's and Hillary's Crowds
 
Trump's crowds are hundreds of times larger than Hillary's, so how is it that she is
 
in the lead? We are being told lies in order to cover up the coming election theft.
 
 
 
Poll of Likely Voters Finds 53% Want Hillary Indicted
 
If 53% of voters want Hillary indicted, how can she be leading in the presidential race?
 
Which of the polls is wrong?
 
 
Rigged Elections Are An American Tradition
 
 
Stephen Lendman pleads: don't let them steal the election, reject the presstitutes' propaganda:
 
 
CONTINUED  >>>>>>>>>
 
 

  • 0

#9 grog

grog

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 9478 posts

Posted 18 September 2017 - 09:40 AM

Rigged elections
 
 
 
24 October 2016.
 
 
 
 
Donald Trump's demand for 'monitors' at polling places to prevent a 'rigged election' is an old and ugly story.
 
The 'rigged election' story dates back to the Constitution. Its Electoral College gave a three-fifths 'bonus' to slave-owners for blacks who could not actually vote. The race card carried through Jim Crow segregation and the KKK terror unleashed against post-Emancipation blacks who dared try to vote. It continues through the Drug War and the tens of millions of African-American and Hispanic citizens stripped of their freedom and franchise.
 
Today it's being done by computer programs that quietly eliminate millions of black and Hispanic voters from the registration rolls.
 
In moves that Trump should love, between the 2004 and 2008 elections, in a state with about 5.5 million eligible voters, 1.25 million Ohioans were de-registered. In 2012, the number purged was 1.1 million. So far this year, Republican secretary of state Jon Husted has de-registered over a million Ohio voters, more than 600,000 clearly eligible to vote and on the rolls of their county boards of elections.
 
Photo ID, limited polling station access, machines that break down, provisional ballots that don't get counted, absentee ballots that don't get sent, elimination of days to vote, deliberate official misinformation and intimidation - all do exactly what Trump wants. They eliminate the 'threat' of non-white voters.
 
Neither Trump nor his mainstream critics mention mass incarceration's 'twin' means of election rigging: electronic voting machines. Some 80% of this year's votes may be cast on touchscreen and other computerized devices that are absurdly easy to flip. The courts say the corporate-owned source code is proprietary. So there's no meaningful accountability. Allegedly safe Scantron paper ballots are easily manipulated with corrupted tallying machines.
 
Corporate-sponsored critics brand this 'conspiracy theory.' But neither they nor Trump can answer this most basic question: 'How, in fact, do we verify the legitimate tally of votes cast on electronic machines with no effective paper trail, i.e. the vast majority of those that will be cast this November?'
 
If we're to have meaningful elections in the future, they must be conducted on paper ballots that are held at their precincts in transparent containers that do not move. Those ballots must be counted in public, by hand. Voter registration should be open automatically to all citizens, with registration rolls open to the public and easily monitored. Voting should be open to all on the basis of a signature. And we need a national holiday for voting so working people do not have to pay with their jobs for exercising their democratic rights.
 
The 'Ohio Plan' would also eliminate corporate money from our elections, end gerrymandering, and abolish the Electoral College.
 
This coming election, up and down the ballot, could indeed be 'rigged.' But it will happen exactly counter to what Trump says. Rather than eliminating millions of black and Hispanic voters, as he wants, we need to guarantee their franchise. We must be able to verify their presence on registration rolls. We need to make sure they have reasonable time and place to cast their ballots - free from KKK/Trump-style thugs intimidating us all.
 
Above all, as they now do in Ireland, Switzerland, Germany, Romania, Japan and Canada, we need to cast our votes on paper ballots that are safety stored and counted by hand, preferably by our nation's high school and college students, and our elders.
 
Maybe then, Trump or otherwise, we can begin to think of America as a country where elections really aren't rigged or stolen, stripped or flipped.
 
 

  • 0

#10 grog

grog

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 9478 posts

Posted 18 September 2017 - 09:43 AM

Polls Show Trump Winning Texas By Landslide
 
 
 
27 October 2016.
 
 
 
Donald Trump looks set to win Texas by a landslide
 
Record numbers of Trump supporters are turning out in their droves to vote for the Republican nominee in Texas.
 
According to Sid Miller, Texas Agriculture Commissioner, a huge surge of Republican voters are turning up to vote for Trump for President in the Lone Star State.
 
According to a Wednesday Fox News interview, Miller says that record numbers of people are turning up on the first and second day of voting in Texas, eager to ensure that Hillary Clinton doesn't get into the White House.
 
Thegatewaypundit.com reports:
 
Sid Miller: We have a record number of people registered to vote in Texas. We're having record turnouts, the first day, the second day of voting.
 
And it's not Bernie Sanders supporters coming out to support Hillary. It's not Barack Obama supporters coming out to support Hillary.
 
It's a new surge of Trump voters, many who have never registered to vote. Many who have not voted in eight or ten elections so they're not reported in the polls…
 
…I know for a fact that the polls are off because they oversample Democrats by eight sometimes up to sixteen percent oversampling Democrats.
 
They're oversampling women by five to eight percent. So the Republican vote is underreported. Plus there is no way to sample this extra twenty to twenty-five percent of new voters that are Trump voters.
 
They're not Republican, they're not Democrats, they're pragmatists. They're tired of the status quo and they want change.
 
 

  • 0

#11 grog

grog

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 9478 posts

Posted 18 September 2017 - 09:46 AM

Poll: More Americans Want Hillary In Prison Than White House
 
 
 
24 October 2016.
 
 
 
Poll reveals more Americans want to see Hillary Clinton in prison than in the White House
 
A recent poll shows that the majority of Americans wold prefer to see Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton in prison than elected into the White House. 
 
Out of 1,000 citizens polled by Rasmussen Reports in October, 65 percent believe that Clinton broke the law with her use of a private email server, and disagree with the FBI's decision not to file criminal charges.
 
Subverse.net reports:
 
Meanwhile, according to Sunday's daily IBD/TIPP tracking poll, only 43% of voters support Clinton for president.
 
When looking at Republican versus Democratic voters opinion, the divide was even more stark.
 
Supporters of Donald Trump overwhelmingly disagreed with the FBI's decision, with a whopping 92%. On the other hand, 85% of Clinton supporters agreed with the lack of charges.
 
Trump himself has been open in his belief that Clinton should have been indicted, even famously stating at the second debate that Clinton would "be in jail," if he had made the laws.
 
"If I win," Trump promised during the presidential debate,"I am going to instruct my attorney general to get a special prosecutor to look into your situation."
 
Currently, Trump has an advantage with Independents, with 44% saying that they are voting for the real estate mogul versus 31% voting for Clinton. Only 77% of Democrats will be voting for Clinton - with 9% voting for Trump and the remaining voters abstaining or voting third party, according to the IBD/TIPP.
 
According to the daily poll, Trump leads Clinton 43.2% to 42.%, with 10% still undecided.
 
Other polls, particularly ones weighted to reflect predicted voter turnout based on 2012, show Clinton with a wide lead. Many have pointed out that these polls may not be accurate, as President Obama inspired far more excitement than the former Secretary of State has. In fact, the excitement seems to be coming more from the Trump camp.
 
Which direction this election will go remains nearly impossible to predict.
 
 

  • 0

#12 grog

grog

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 9478 posts

Posted 18 September 2017 - 09:48 AM

Police Raid Democrat Office Over Voter Fraud Allegations
 
 
 
1 November 2016.
 
 
 
Pennsylvania state police have raided a Democrat office in Delaware county over allegations of voter fraud committed by officials. 
 
The Democrat-linked group FieldWorks may be guilty of conducting voter-registration fraud, according to court records.
 
Screenshot of Democrat organisation FieldWorks' Facebook page, who are now under investigation for voter fraud
 
Philly.com reports:
 
In a warrant filed late last week in County Court, investigators said they were seeking documents, financial information, and lists of employees at the Norwood office of FieldWorks LLC, a national organization that often does street work for Democrats, records show.
 
The warrant did not specify the nature of the probe, but said agents also were looking for "templates . . . utilized to construct fraudulent voter registration forms" and "completed voter registration forms containing same or similar identifying information of individuals on multiple forms."
 
A Delaware County judge on Friday afternoon signed the search warrant, but it was not known when it was executed. The warrant application was approved by the Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office. Jeff Johnson, a spokesman for the Attorney General's Office, declined to comment.
 
In a statement Monday, a spokesman for FieldWorks' national headquarters in Washington, said the company has "zero tolerance for fraud."
 
"FieldWorks is now working with county officials to provide them with information on our program and applications they are investigating," said the spokesman, Matt Dorf. "In keeping with our regular practice, we will work aggressively with authorities to seek the prosecution of anyone involved in wrongdoing."
 
FieldWorks describes itself as "a nationally recognized grassroots organizing firm founded to help progressive organizations, advocacy groups, and members of the Democratic family take their public engagement and electoral strategies to the next level." It was founded in 2001, according to its promotional information online.
 
The company did not respond to requests for comment on which campaigns or political groups have hired them to work in Pennsylvania.
 
In 2012, FieldWorks' voter registration efforts in Ohio sparked some controversy. FieldWorks employees filed thousands of new voter registration cards in the final week before the registration deadline. Some of them were found to be fraudulent.
 
In that same election, FieldWorks included a cover letter with its mass voter filing warning that it itself viewed scores of the submitted names as fraudulent.
 
Police in Cincinnati arrested a former Ohio University student in 2012 working in FieldWorks on charges of forging 22 signatures on a petition drive. Police said at the time that FieldWorks itself played no role in that man's scheme to pad his list.
 
 

  • 0

#13 grog

grog

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 9478 posts

Posted 18 September 2017 - 09:51 AM

Obama Urges Undocumented Aliens To Illegally Vote
 
 
 
6 November 2016.
 
 
 
Barack Obama has gone on record encouraging illegal immigrants to vote in the United States presidential election.
 
Appearing on MiTu, a YouTube channel aimed at Latino millenials, Obama was asked by the host Gina Rodriguez if undocumented immigrants should be fearful of voting.
 
But rather than setting her straight and telling her that voting is a sacred right of citizens, and if you are an undocumented immigrant you are not a citizen, Obama actually encourages illegals to sneak into a booth somehow and vote.
 
VIDEO  >>>>>>>>>
 

  • 0

#14 grog

grog

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 9478 posts

Posted 18 September 2017 - 09:54 AM

Indiana State Police Investigate Widespread Voter Fraud
 
 
 
19 October 2016.
 
 
 
Indiana State police investigate widespread voter fraud in the State
 
Widespread voter fraud has been uncovered in Indiana with thousands of fraudulent voter registrations being investigated by Indiana State Police.
 
The Indiana Secretary of State's office discovered that dates of births and names were changed in voter registration systems, just days after Donald Trump announced that the election was rigged against him.
 
Lawnewz.com reports:
 
"We ran a report in the Statewide Voter Registration System and found thousands of dates of births and first names were changed," said Secretary of State Connie Lawson in a press release.
 
"These records were changed on paper forms, at the BMV and online. At this time, my office is not sure why these records were changed, but we have evaluated the Statewide Voter Registration System and have found no indication it has been compromised.
 
We believe this may be a case of voter fraud and have turned our findings over to the State Police, who are currently conducting an investigation into alleged voter fraud."
 
Lawson further explained that when voters go to find their registration online, they are required to put in their name, county, and date of birth.
 
If the DOB or name is wrong, they won't be able to find their registration, which will cause them to believe they are no longer registered in the upcoming election.
 
For voters who may be affected, the Secretary of State says they can still vote in the upcoming election. More information on what to do can be found here.
 
Indiana State Police are currently investigating the potential voter fraud. This is in addition to another investigation of election tampering which has been extended to include 56 Indiana counties.
 
 

  • 0

#15 grog

grog

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 9478 posts

Posted 18 September 2017 - 10:01 AM

Hillary Clinton Lost More Electors Than Anyone In Last 100 Years
 
 
 
 
21 December 2016.
 
 
 
 
 
Hillary Clinton is inconsolable, according to insiders, after she lost more electors than any politician in the last 100 years. 
 
Clinton's campaign team were hoping that Monday's Electoral College vote would see an overwhemling rejection of Donald J. Trump and a potential swing in her favor. However, the results turned out to be quite the opposite.
 
Thegatewaypundit.com reports:
 
In fact Hillary Clinton lost more electors than Donald J. Trump.
 
Trump lost two electors: One to Ron Paul and one to Governor John Kasich.
 
Hillary Clinton lost Five electors.
 
The Final Count:
 
Clinton defectors
 
4 WA (successful)
 
1 HI (successful)
 
1 MN (attempted)
 
1 ME (attempted)
 
1 CO (attempted)
 
2 Trump defectors
 
TX (successful)
 
In fact Hillary Clinton lost more electors than any politician in the last 100 years.
 
Not since 1912 has a candidate lost more electors.
 
Hillary Clinton lost more electors than any US politician in the last 100 years.
 
Here's the list:
 
2004 - Anonymous (Democrat, Minnesota)
 
2000 - Barbara Lett-Simmons (Democrat, District of Columbia)
 
1988 - Margaret Leach (Democrat, West Virginia)
 
1976 - Mike Padden (Republican, Washington)
 
1972 - Roger L. MacBride (Republican, Virginia)
 
1968 - Dr. Lloyd W. Bailey (Republican, North Carolina)
 
1960 - Henry D. Irwin (Republican, Oklahoma)
 
1956 - W.F. Turner (Democrat, Alabama)
 
1948 - Preston Parks (Democrat, Tennessee)
 
1912 - Eight Republican Electors
 
 
 

  • 0

#16 grog

grog

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 9478 posts

Posted 18 September 2017 - 10:05 AM

Electoral voters now subjected to brutal wave of death threats and intimidation psyops… "faithless" votes being coerced to throw the election
 
 
 
 
15 December 2016.
 
 
 
 
 
Electoral voters now subjected to brutal wave of death threats and intimidation psyops… "faithless" votes being coerced to throw the election
 
 
 
If a thug points a gun to your head, hands you a piece of paper, and says, "Sign this contract," is the contract legally binding?
 
Of course it isn't. It was coerced under the threat of violence, and no court in the nation would uphold the contract as legally binding.
 
Yet right now, electoral voters all across America are being essentially held at gunpoint, threatened with being killed if they don't change their votes to oppose Donald Trump. The dishonest mainstream media is further amplifying the coercion by running an organized psyop campaign of disinfo ("psyop" means psychological operations) which falsely claims the Russians "hacked" the election, despite the complete absence of a shred of evidence to support the narrative.
 
The Russian hack conspiracy delusion has already been completely discredited. It turns out the DNC emails were leaked by a democrat insider who supported Bernie Sanders. The handing over of the emails took place in a wooded area in Washington D.C. and had nothing whatsoever to do with the Russians.
 
"Electors around the country are being harassed with a barrage of emails, phone calls and letters - and even death threats - in an effort to block Donald Trump from being voted in as president by the Electoral College on Monday," reports the NY Post today.
 
The NY Post also reports:
 
Reports of GOP electors being badgered have been reported in numerous states, including Georgia, Idaho, Tennessee, Arizona, Utah and Michigan.
 
For Michael Banerian, a senior at Oakland University in Michigan and a Republican elector, the harassment comes with a dark side.
 
He said he's been getting death threats via email, snail mail, Twitter and Facebook.
 
"Somebody threatened to put a bullet in the back of my mouth," Banerian, 22, told The Post on Wednesday.
 
Leftists are "kidnapping" electoral voters and holding them for ransom
 
What you may not know is that these death threats are a coordinated campaign to threaten electoral voters into throwing the election. Yet the very existence of such persistent, coordinated death threats means that We the People must correct the electoral votes, knowing that many such votes will be cast under the threat of being killed. Thus, electoral votes cast under threat or violence are not legally binding. They may be "reclaimed" by the courts and corrected to represent the will of the voters in their states.
 
In essence, the political left - organized by international terrorist money man George Soros and people with ties to both the White House and Hillary Clinton - has "psychologically kidnapped" the electoral voters, and they're demanding a kind of "ransom" or they will be killed. That ransom is a vote for anyone other than Donald Trump.
 
In other words, this is a "political mugging" where the radical left is holding a gun to their heads and saying, "Your vote or your life."
 
And if they manage to switch 37 electoral votes through such death threats, the left will declare a "victory" for America, proclaiming the very people they threatened with being killed as being "heroes" for saving the country.
 
Unbelievable, isn't it? This is right out of the Kim Jong-Un playbook for how to run a brutal dictatorship, which is probably why the radical left loves it so much. If you do what they want, you're heralded as a national hero. If you don't do what they want, you get a bullet in the head.
 
This really is the way liberals exert power, by the way, which is precisely why the DNC leaks happened in the first place: Some Bernie Sanders supporters were so angry at the Clinton collusion and corruption, they decided to expose the DNC by handing over leaked emails to Wikileaks. The democrats only have themselves to blame for losing the election because the truth came out.
 
Lawless democrats have no respect for real democracy… they're pushing America toward a civil war they will quickly lose
 
What these tactics reveal is how lawless democrats have no respect whatsoever for the laws of this nation. Acting as crybullies and domestic terrorists, if they don't get their way, they threaten to shoot everybody who disagrees with them. (Sound familiar? Look up the history of China's "Cultural Revolution.")
 
That's the kind of behavior we see from totalitarian dictators in places like Cuba, North Korea or Communist China. And it's perfectly aligned with the tyrannical philosophy of the political left: If they don't get their way, they threaten to kill everyone who opposes them.
 
I've got news for those who espouse such threats of violence, coercion and lawlessness: We the People will stop you by invoking the Second Amendment to protect the Republic. And after we stop you, we will imprison you and charge you with crimes of treason. From there, the courts can decide what punishment is appropriate for your crimes.
 
Once President Trump is sworn into office, I hope he unleashes a massive investigation into all those who made death threats against the electoral voters. Those individuals must be arrested, imprisoned and charged with serious felony crimes, including sedition. Putting a gun to the heads of electoral voters is a very serious thing. It threatens the sanctity of the entire Republic. Such threats cannot go unpunished.
 
Hey, we can finally put all those FEMA camps to good use!
 
In observing all this, I've come to realize the radical left is going to push America into a civil war. But I also believe a civil war won't last very long because the left will be very quickly defeated by a combination of police, military and armed American patriots fighting alongside law enforcement.
 
It turns out all those FEMA camps will come in handy after all: That's where we can put all the left-wing terrorists and traitors who tried (but failed) to overthrow the country. There, we'll pump in broadcasts of Sean Hannity and Michael Savage until we break the NLP hypnosis programming the left-wingers have been subjected to for the last eight years under Obama, a master of linguistic subterfuge.
 
Over time, some of them might be rehabilitated to the point where they can rejoin society as sane, rational citizens instead of the mentally ill crybullies they are today. After all, we want to help these people heal their mental illness wherever possible. Unlike the radical left which wants to kill everyone they don't agree with, conservative Americans are far more interested in saving lives and uplifting our fellow brothers and sisters, no matter what sort of psychological trauma they were subjected to by CNN, the Washington Post and the New York Times.
 
Remember: The same kind of psyop the media is running right now against the electoral voters has been pursued for years against liberals and progressives. That's why they are so traumatized by reality: They've been poisoned, programmed, hypnotized and traumatized by the left-wing media for as long as they can remember!
 
It's time to finally set all Americans free from the psychological prisons that have been built for them by the corrupt political left. That effort begins anew on January 20, 2017, which is precisely why the radical left is planning to stage a mass uprising on that day. They last thing the left wants is Americans who aren't subjected to a daily dose of left-wing propaganda.
 
 

  • 0

#17 grog

grog

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 9478 posts

Posted 18 September 2017 - 10:07 AM

electoral college bribed 
 
 
 
25 October 2016.
 
 
 
The democrats have bribed electoral college representatives to "fix" the election outcome in favor of Hillary Clinton, admits George Soros in a recently unearthed video. 
 
Soros, the same globalist terrorist who funded Black Lives Matter executions of police officers in Dallas -- and who also funds hundreds of liberal websites and violent activist organizations who staged violence at Trump rallies to blame Republicans -- says in the video that Trump will win the popular vote in a "landslide" but that he will lose the electoral vote because it's already a "done deal" for Hillary Clinton.
 
This astonishing revelation confirms what Dave Hodges recently told me in an interview: 
That electoral college representatives ("Electors") are being approached with bribes to buy their final votes.
 
CONTINUED  >>>>>>>>>
 

  • 0

#18 grog

grog

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 9478 posts

Posted 18 September 2017 - 10:10 AM

Elector: Clinton Supporters Threatened To Put A Bullet In My Head
 
 
 
 
15 December 2016.
 
 
 
 
 
Electoral College voter claims Clinton's team threatened him with a bullet in his head
 
A GOP Electoral College voter in Michigan claims that Hillary Clinton supporters sent him several death threats and threatened to shoot him in the head if he votes for Trump.
 
Mike Banerian says that he now fears for his life as the December 19 deadline looms for Electors to cast their vote for President.
 
Thegatewaypundit.com reports:
 
Mike says he has contacted police and was threatened to be shot in the head if he cast his vote for Trump.
 
Mike Banerian is a youth chair of the Michigan Republican Party and an official elector obligated to cast his electoral vote for President-elect Donald Trump.
 
Mike Banerian: I've been inundated with hundreds and hundreds of letters to my house and Facebook messages and some of those Facebook messages are death threats. I've had people threaten to put a bullet in the back of my mouth.
 
People saying to throw myself in front of a bus, sending me pictures of a noose. Saying if I don't do the right thing that they'll get me.
 
Mike has notified the Michigan police.
 
He said most of the threats were coming from blue states.
 
Via FOX Business Network:
 
 

  • 0

#19 grog

grog

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 9478 posts

Posted 18 September 2017 - 10:12 AM

Election Fraud: Three Million Votes Were Cast By Illegal Aliens
 
 
 
15 November 2016.
 
 
 
 
3 million illegal aliens voted in this years election
 
Three million votes counted in this years U.S. presidential election were cast by illegal aliens, according to well known election monitoring organization.
 
Greg Phillips of VoteFraud.org claims that Trump would have won the election by a huge landslide if the widespread vote fraud had been stamped out ahead of the election.
 
"We have verified more than three million votes cast by non-citizens," he tweeted, after confirming that the group had extensively analysed a database of 180 million voter registrations.
 
"Number of non-citizen votes exceeds 3 million. Consulting legal team," he tweeted.
 
Infowars.com reports:
 
According to current indications, Hillary Clinton won the popular vote by around 630,000 votes, although around 7 million ballots remain uncounted.
 
Virtually all of the votes cast by 3 million illegal immigrants are likely to have been for Hillary Clinton, meaning Trump might have won the popular vote when this number is taken into account.
 
Vote fraud using ballots cast in the name of dead people and illegal alien voters was a huge concern before the election.
 
On the morning of the election there were 4 million dead people on U.S. voter rolls.
 
Although some states require some form of ID before voting, California, Illinois, Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Vermont, West Virginia, Wyoming, and Washington, D.C. all require no identification before voting.
 
 

  • 0

#20 grog

grog

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 9478 posts

Posted 18 September 2017 - 10:14 AM

Election Fraud: Texas Votes Switched From Republican To Democrat
 
 
 
25 October 2016.
 
 
 
Voting machines in Texas swapping votes from Republican to Democrat
 
Thousands of voters in Texas are complaining that voting machines are switching their votes from Republican to Democrat. 
 
In what is possibly the worst case of election fraud ever reported, voters in Arlington have taken to social media to show evidence of machines switching their votes from Trump to Clinton.
 
Iamatexan.com reports:
 
Shandy Clark states:
 
Hey everyone, just a heads up! I had a family member that voted this morning and she voted straight Republican.
 
She checked before she submitted and the vote had changed to Clinton! She reported it and made sure her vote was changed back.
 
They commented that It had been happening. She is trying to get the word out and asked that we post and share.
 
Just want everyone's vote to be accurate and count. Check your vote before you submit!
 
Arlington:
 
Amarillo:
 
Houston:
 
Corpus Christi:
 
Others have begun speaking out of social media:
 
This is confirmation that when voting on a machine, it is important to double check what the machine says you voted. If there is an error, make sure you speak to an elections official before casting your ballot.
 
This example is from Missouri today (It's illegal to film or take photos in Texas voting places.)
 
Most counties also offer paper ballots on which write-in candidates can be placed. If you are wary of the voting machines, or think there is fraud going on, you have a right to request a paper ballot.
 
 

  • 0





Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: Elections

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Copyright © 2020 Pravda.Ru