Jump to content

Theme© by Fisana
 

Photo

Explain difference in "depopulation" and mass murder ... thanks


  • Please log in to reply
17 replies to this topic

#1 John Prewett

John Prewett

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1429 posts

Posted 18 November 2017 - 06:56 AM

smP690l.png

 

 

rR1Rg6b.png

 

 

 

 

 

 


Edited by John Prewett, 19 November 2017 - 05:02 AM.

  • 1

#2 Nemesis

Nemesis

    Administrator

  • Administrators
  • 18786 posts

Posted 18 November 2017 - 08:07 AM

There is no such thing as climate change and there is no danger of the population causing the same.

 

Quite correct, what they want is mass murder.  It's all for capitalist fun and profit and they are the ones destroying air, water, land hoping they will kill off a significant amount of people.  More for them they erroneously think.  But people are wising up.


  • 1

#3 Desther

Desther

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 5184 posts

Posted 18 November 2017 - 03:57 PM

Depopulation obviously can be achieved without any form of murder. Lowering the birth rate via plain old family planning and contraceptives will do that. HOWEVER, that approach does create the minor problem of an imbalance between the elderly and young populations, so that it becomes a problem to pay for the care of the elderly.

 

The reality of climate change means that humanity must as a whole take important steps to stop and hopefully reverse that damage. I don't know how important population control is to that, but I do know that cleaner technologies that lower the "carbon footprint" of every person on earth are a no-brainer. I feel that one of the primary issues here is taking all of that carbon stored deep in the earth in the form of coal and petroleum and releasing it rather suddenly into the environment by burning it. Using algae or other living carbon sources would be FAR less harmful, because that carbon is already a part of the active carbon cycle; releasing it would only be releasing what was already loose in the environment before that algae or whatever used it in the first place. BIofuels, my friends. Leave the oil and coal in the ground and use the endless supply of algae and plant matter we have around us.


  • 0

#4 Christo Alado too

Christo Alado too

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 358 posts

Posted 18 November 2017 - 04:54 PM

"Many hands make for light work." The problem here is that these so-called elitist who 'think' that they know what is best, are way too incompetent to get the simplest of facts in life.

 

When a population's growth is based in/on old/outdated modes of thought and processes, and where the controllers are unwilling to change these processes (for the sake of high profits) then all that should be naturally evolving to meet the needs of said growth, goes stagnant and so festers in that cesspool of ill-reasoned planning.

 

This whole aspect of ill-reasoned planning is doing some serious damage to humanities' growth as a collective of beings on a singular planet.

 

The solution is fairly simple, disregard all those whom merely 'think' that they know what is best, and turn to those who show more concern and can present a better way for all to contemplate and choose there from. We (collectively) could 'recycle' all that old stuff, into new stuff... new stuff that doesn't pollute and is highly efficient and effective for our collective needs--without hardly a need to mine any more resources from this loving planet that only gives-gives-gives until it hurts.

 

Our planet goes through climate change on a regular basis, and typically it is so gradual that only the generational record-keeping thereof show us the true reality of it. It's the technologies e.g. H.A.A.R.P., chemtrails and other devices/processes that give an 'appearance' of accelerated climate change. Humankind's worse contribution is the pollution caused by their many wrong choices of fuel for their transport and power-plant needs.

 

In my view of it all, electricity has been around since the beginning of time/creation. This energy is the basis for all of creation as when energy is greatly compressed, matter is formed. It's the decompression of energy that un-creates matter in all of its various forms. For example, when something is burned it reverts back to its most basic form substance, ash/slag (minimal energy binding) and where its greater binding energy is released back whence it came. The restriction of energy, either by misuse or to meet specific needs will cause heat to build-up and so a slow-burning effect will cause whatever the device is to breakdown, lose its tolerances and burnout. But it doesn't need to be that way because energy can be released (freed) to be reused or be allowed to return to its state of rest... until there is need of it again.

 

We call upon the forces of this energy to assist us, each and every day, whether we realize it or not... and it serves us well... even when we abuse it or use it in a wrong manner.


  • 0

#5 Ivan88

Ivan88

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 12199 posts

Posted 18 November 2017 - 05:01 PM

Thanks Christo Alado too for your words on how electricity is our best option. "Nature's God" sent us Nicolas Tesla to help us do that. But we chose to follow traditions & doctrines that make Word of that God of none effect.  Thus we plunge ever deeper into many Judgments each 7 times worse than previous, until we all perish and some repentant soles survive.


Edited by Ivan88, 18 November 2017 - 05:02 PM.

  • 0

#6 Christo Alado too

Christo Alado too

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 358 posts

Posted 18 November 2017 - 05:44 PM

"Thought is energy expressing itself." How we express our thoughts shapes that which we have or shapes what can become of any future reality. In other words: thoughts become things, therefore think good thoughts.

 

Ivan,

 

You are welcome. It's true that Nikola Tesla was in tune to the many energies of life, and he very-well knew what it means to 'command' these energies to do whatever work for us, in a proper and fitting manner. One who predates Tesla is a Canadian inventor named Wesley Gary whose earliest patent was issued 1877, when Tesla was just 21 years old. Tesla didn't move to the USA until his late twenties and after he did, he was met with too much opposition from the 'investor class' who had other ideas which were/are more profitable than what Tesla was proposing with his non-polluting, highly efficient inventions. Nikola Tesla was given credit for his alternating current electrical generators because such is flawed from the outset, in that it isn't efficient and therefore a profit maker for the investors who control and therefore allowed such technologies to come into being.  Alternating currents are symmetrical in nature and do not release any back-flow of electromotive forces, and so heat builds up and the many systems will eventually breakdown--where said systems will be in need of repair or replacement, which is good for greedy investors and extremely bad for everyone else.


  • 0

#7 Hellboy

Hellboy

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 9520 posts

Posted 18 November 2017 - 07:20 PM

shrinkingCountries-1.png

 

uzK5rvB3llJvunEutX2UJKtLzTJ2bWCUYSSwIpSx


  • 0

#8 Hellboy

Hellboy

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 9520 posts

Posted 18 November 2017 - 07:21 PM

Let's give swine flu shots to all eastern Europeans.

 

That will teach them for doing the pogroms.


  • 0

#9 Desther

Desther

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 5184 posts

Posted 18 November 2017 - 07:37 PM

shrinkingCountries-1.png

 

uzK5rvB3llJvunEutX2UJKtLzTJ2bWCUYSSwIpSx

 

Cultural and economic differences that will need to be sorted out in the long-term. They'll get there (the Africans).


  • 0

#10 Ivan88

Ivan88

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 12199 posts

Posted 18 November 2017 - 08:02 PM

How can anyone doubt that de-population is an active policy of US officialdom considering the following:

Hundreds of millions of lives destroyed by US wars and arranged famines & plagues.

Slaughter of millions via abortion & sterizattion.

And, since 1991, Congress has officially declared all of mankind to be mere 2 legged cattle to be managed by our Talmudic High Priests of Hypocrisy.


Edited by Ivan88, 18 November 2017 - 08:03 PM.

  • 0

#11 Christo Alado too

Christo Alado too

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 358 posts

Posted 18 November 2017 - 08:03 PM

Maybe I'm wrong here, but... it seems to me that every country on the first list titled "The top 10 fastest shrinking countries {[(*)])" partaketh in the fruits of 'swineus fluodious stabroideum' otherwise known as 'flu shots'.

 

They never learn lessons regarding said pogroms because {[(*)]} factors in to the equation as a greater than marginal factor... (it a rather overwhelming factor, as a matter of fact.)

 

-* x -*= +* where * equals 1 and where - & + are negative & positive indicators of value. The negative values in this instance are 1 each of any known apparent fallacies/perversions* of common sense.

This formula as shown, is used for any given 'thing/situation' that fits any sense of "that ain't right", where it is too obvious that such is wrong... just wrong.  

 

?!

 

Any calculator will produce this result: 1, when multiplying -1 x -1... because 1 = -1 x -1 and so -1 x -1 = 1

 

?!

 

What is to become of a thought process that chooses the abstract in calculating what is to be? Two negatives become one positive... (gives me a woody just thinking about it).

 

Can you formulate a reality based in that regard... for the benefit of all, including the negatives, as they've shown themselves? (how can anyone be that inept?)

 

*pervertitives=perversions+tainted anything; an over generalization of all that is wrong... in a single word. in a sentence: the use of one too many pervertitivies caused the two groups of sheeple to tolerate the intolerable. (poisoned to idiocy where common sense is completely absent in their every doing.) 


Edited by Christo Alado too, 18 November 2017 - 08:12 PM.

  • 0

#12 Ivan88

Ivan88

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 12199 posts

Posted 18 November 2017 - 08:07 PM

  Canadian inventor named Wesley Gary whose earliest patent was issued 1877, when Tesla was just 21 years old. Tesla didn't move to the USA until his late twenties and after he did, he was met with too much opposition from the 'investor class' who had other ideas which were/are more profitable than what Tesla was proposing with his non-polluting, highly efficient inventions. Nikola Tesla was given credit for his alternating current electrical generators because such is flawed from the outset, in that it isn't efficient and therefore a profit maker for the investors who control and therefore allowed such technologies to come into being.  Alternating currents are symmetrical in nature and do not release any back-flow of electromotive forces, and so heat builds up and the many systems will eventually breakdown--where said systems will be in need of repair or replacement, which is good for greedy investors and extremely bad for everyone else.

Thanks for link to Wesley Gary. I expect to check it out shortly.

I do not comprehend your explanation as to why alternating current is not a good idea.

 

Furthermore, I have never comprehended how 2 negatives multipled can become positive.

Last I recall, multiplication is shorthand for addition. 

Yet math gurus teach that more negatives ... debts = more positives...... for the bankers, anyway.


Edited by Ivan88, 18 November 2017 - 08:12 PM.

  • 0

#13 Christo Alado too

Christo Alado too

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 358 posts

Posted 18 November 2017 - 10:17 PM

 

I do not comprehend your explanation as to why alternating current is not a good idea.

 

Furthermore, I have never comprehended how 2 negatives multipled can become positive.

Last I recall, multiplication is shorthand for addition. 

Yet math gurus teach that more negatives ... debts = more positives...... for the bankers, anyway.

To answer your first expression as to why alternating current is not a good idea:

 

It is a very good idea... just not the 'best' idea... a better choice could have been any number of alternatives that allow for any kind of releasing and/or back-flow of the energy doing work in a system. Today's alternating current is symmetrical in every way... as perfect as a sine wave can get... which isn't a natural occurrence in its actual product in application upon initial production. In other words: when a static magnetic field becomes active e.g. rotates, and said field is located in close proximity to a generator coil, the first half of the sine wave is created and it will look like the first half of this symbol:  ~ . The last half, although inverted is identical to the first half which is a 'perfected' sine wave. Nature isn't so choosy to perfect an energy flow in any symmetrical way, whatsoever. No, nature's way is far more interesting in a manner that is absolutely asymmetrical in its activities as viewed on an o-scope (sillyscope).

 

What nature produces, by way of readings on a sillyscope, is a sine wave of a very different variety that looks like a wave at sunset, cresting to shore at a public beach near you. When the rotating field of a magnet 'pulls away' from the generating coil, the second half of its sine wave is produced and so it shows on the sillyscope's display. The following symbol: nv represents a full wave form in an alternating current that is asymmetrical in nature, and it occurs without any losses of unnecessary current flows that prevent any of the 'used' energy from escaping the circuit, naturally, where it must then escape said circuit in the form of heat or just excess losses due to over use... without a break. 

 

It's a wonder that two negative numbers come up positive when multiplied. But it does... and that's where my mind wanders/wonders in the application thereof as applied to all that which appears negative in life. I mean, come on... one positive anything sounds much better than any too negative things, IMHO.

 

The bankers do not have much of a problem with negative debt loads because it is all fabricated... it the sheepish sheeple who have the debt problem... to the bankers, any deficit is an asset... as said deficit is the public's future earnings lent to them now. Sheeple barrow their own future earnings, with interest due, because they are... s t u p i d. Bankers love that.

 

Edit: editing sucks! (It's the author's fault) changed second instance of releasing to 'black-flow' as in: ...kind of releasing and/or back-flow of... & added 'to' to ...as applied (to) all that...

 

(I'm editing my editor's notes... just so you know)


Edited by Christo Alado too, 18 November 2017 - 11:17 PM.

  • 0

#14 John Prewett

John Prewett

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1429 posts

Posted 19 November 2017 - 06:34 AM

uRgSRUx.png


  • 0

#15 RobertD

RobertD

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 20208 posts

Posted 19 November 2017 - 02:36 PM

Let's give swine flu shots to all eastern Europeans.
 
That will teach them for doing the pogroms.


You are a deranged libtard.
  • 0

#16 Ivan88

Ivan88

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 12199 posts

Posted 19 November 2017 - 03:24 PM

Back in 1960's Congress was told a scary story about a 3rd world that would swarm over our wonderful "civilization".

They appropriated money to create new diseases to use on this "3rd world".

It was created.

It's first trial run  was on homosexuals in San Francisco, California and New York, New York under disguise of being a hepatitus vaccine.

Shortly thereafter, these homosexuals started dying from a new disease that was called AIDS.

And it certainly was a great aid in causing mass deaths, especially in Africa.


Edited by Ivan88, 19 November 2017 - 03:28 PM.

  • 0

#17 Ivan88

Ivan88

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 12199 posts

Posted 19 November 2017 - 03:39 PM

That 666 stuff derived from Revelation 13:18, "number of the beast: for it is number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six."

That "man" is anthropos meaning man faced beast.

Number 6 is for 6 pointed star of Remphan multiplied.

It is the doctrines & traditions of man faced beasts that make Perfect Word of God of none effect.


  • 0

#18 Christo Alado too

Christo Alado too

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 358 posts

Posted 19 November 2017 - 05:27 PM

John Prewett,

 

the answer is obvious... there is no difference between depopulation and mass murder.

 

The deranged sub-humans whom are currently in control of those vital modes of living are so bad at resource management that, in order to excuse away their incompetence, they resort to placing the blame on those whom they are suppose to be managing, protecting and so on.

 

Their 'high and mighty' days are numbered because they are nobody special... anything that can kill you, me or anyone else, can/will kill them also. Their arrogance and sanctimony will do them in when enough people come to realize the truth of their being... which is "they are no one special" just more flesh and blood that is incapable of knowing... theirs is a string of thought processes born of greed, a desire to control, not only others, but everything in creation and that particular type of ignorance that is dangerous to everyone, especially themselves.


  • 0




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Copyright © 2017 Pravda.Ru