Jump to content

Theme© by Fisana
 

Photo

US Govt evil beyond belief...Hillary Approved Sending Libya’s Sarin to Syrian Rebels


  • Please log in to reply
8 replies to this topic

#1 Mario Milano

Mario Milano

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 27016 posts

Posted 13 February 2018 - 04:05 AM

Seymour Hersh Says Hillary Approved Sending Libyas Sarin to Syrian Rebels

ERIC ZUESSE | 28.04.2016

Seymour Hersh Says Hillary Approved Sending Libyas Sarin to Syrian Rebels

The great investigative journalist Seymour Hersh, in two previous articles in the London Review of Books («Whose Sarin?» and «The Red Line and the Rat Line») has reported that the Obama Administration falsely blamed the government of Syrias Bashar al-Assad for the sarin gas attack that Obama was trying to use as an excuse to invade Syria; and Hersh pointed to a report from British intelligence saying that the sarin that was used didnt come from Assads stockpiles. Hersh also said that a secret agreement in 2012 was reached between the Obama Administration and the leaders of Turkey, Saudi Arabia, and Qatar, to set up a sarin gas attack and blame it on Assad so that the US could invade and overthrow Assad. «By the terms of the agreement, funding came from Turkey, as well as Saudi Arabia and Qatar; the CIA, with the support of MI6, was responsible for getting arms from Gaddafis arsenals into Syria». Hersh didnt say whether these «arms» included the precursor chemicals for making sarin which were stockpiled in Libya, but there have been multiple independent reports that Libyas Gaddafi possessed such stockpiles, and also that the US Consulate in Benghazi Libya was operating a «rat line» for Gaddafis captured weapons into Syria through Turkey. So, Hersh isnt the only reporter who has been covering this. Indeed, the investigative journalist Christoph Lehmann headlined on 7 October 2013, «

Top US and Saudi Officials responsible for Chemical Weapons in Syria» and reported, on the basis of very different sources than Hersh used, that «Evidence leads directly to the White House, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Martin Dempsey, CIA Director John Brennan, Saudi Intelligence Chief Prince Bandar, and Saudi Arabia´s Interior Ministry». And, as if that werent enough, even the definitive analysis of the evidence that was performed by two leading US analysts, the Lloyd-Postal report, concluded that, «The US Governments Interpretation of the Technical Intelligence It Gathered Prior to and After the August 21 Attack CANNOT POSSIBLY BE CORRECT». Obama has clearly been lying.

However, now, for the first time, Hersh has implicated Hillary Clinton directly in this «rat line». In an interview with Alternet.org, Hersh was asked about the then-US-Secretary-of-States role in the Benghazi Libya US consulates operation to collect weapons from Libyan stockpiles and send them through Turkey into Syria for a set-up sarin-gas attack, to be blamed on Assad in order to justify the US invading Syria, as the US had invaded Libya to eliminate Gaddafi. Hersh said: «That ambassador who was killed, he was known as a guy, from what I understand, as somebody, who would not get in the way of the CIA. As I wrote, on the day of the mission he was meeting with the CIA base chief and the shipping company. He was certainly involved, aware and witting of everything that was going on. And theres no way somebody in that sensitive of a position is not talking to the boss, by some channel».

This was, in fact, the Syrian part of the State Departments Libyan operation, Obamas operation to set up an excuse for the US doing in Syria what they had already done in Libya.

The interviewer then asked: «In the book [Hershs The Killing of Osama bin Laden, just out] you quote a former intelligence official as saying that the White House rejected 35 target sets [for the planned US invasion of Syria] provided by the Joint Chiefs as being insufficiently painful to the Assad regime. (You note that the original targets included military sites only nothing by way of civilian infrastructure.) Later the White House proposed a target list that included civilian infrastructure. What would the toll to civilians have been if the White Houses proposed strike had been carried out?»

Hersh responded by saying that the US tradition in that regard has long been to ignore civilian casualties; i.e., collateral damage of US attacks is okay or even desired (so as to terrorize the population into surrender) not an issue, except, perhaps, for the PR people.

The interviewer asked why Obama is so obsessed to replace Assad in Syria, since «The power vacuum that would ensue would open Syria up to all kinds of jihadi groups»; and Hersh replied that not only he, but the Joint Chiefs of Staff, «nobody could figure out why». He said, «Our policy has always been against him [Assad]. Period». This has actually been the case not only since the Party that Assad leads, the Baath Party, was the subject of a shelved CIA coup-plot in 1957 to overthrow and replace it; but, actually, the CIAs first coup had been not just planned but was carried out in 1949 in Syria, overthrowing there a democratically elected leader, in order to enable a pipeline for the Sauds oil to become built through Syria into the largest oil market, Europe; and, construction of the pipeline started the following year.

But, there were then a succession of Syrian coups (domestic instead of by foreign powers 1954, 1963, 1966, and, finally, in 1970), concluding in the accession to power of Hafez al-Assad during the 1970 coup. And, the Sauds' long-planned Trans-Arabia Pipeline has still not been built. The Saudi royal family, who own the worlds largest oil company, Aramco, dont want to wait any longer. Obama is the first US President to have seriously tried to carry out their long-desired «regime change» in Syria, so as to enable not only the Sauds Trans-Arabian Pipeline to be built, but also to build through Syria the Qatar-Turkey Gas Pipeline that the Thani royal family (friends of the Sauds) who own Qatar want also to be built there. The US is allied with the Saud family (and with their friends, the royal families of Qatar, Kuwait, UAE, Bahrain, and Oman). Russia is allied with the leaders of Syria as Russia had earlier been allied with Mossadegh in Iran, Arbenz in Guatemala, Allende in Chile, Hussein in Iraq, Gaddafi in Libya, and Yanukovych in Ukraine (all of whom except Syrias Baath Party, the US has successfully overthrown).

Hersh was wrong to say that «nobody could figure out why» Obama is obsessed with overthrowing Assad and his Baath Party, even if nobody that he spoke with was willing to say why. They have all been hired to do a job, which didnt change even when the Soviet Union ended and the Warsaw Pact was disbanded; and, anyone who has been at this job for as long as those people have, can pretty well figure out what the job actually is even if Hersh cant.

Hersh then said that Obama wanted to fill Syria with foreign jihadists to serve as the necessary ground forces for his planned aerial bombardment there, and, «if you wanted to go there and fight there in 2011-2013, Go, go, go overthrow Bashar! So, they actually pushed a lot of people [jihadists] to go. I dont think they were paying for them but they certainly gave visas».

However, its not actually part of Americas deal with its allies the fundamentalist-Sunni Arabic royal families and the fundamentalist Sunni Erdogan of Turkey, for the US to supply the salaries (to be «paying for them», as Hersh put it there) to those fundamentalist Sunni jihadists thats instead the function of the Sauds and of their friends, the other Arab royals, and their friends, to do. (Those are the people who finance the terrorists to perpetrate attacks in the US, Europe, Russia, Afghanistan, Pakistan, India, India, Nigeria, etc. i.e., anywhere except in their own countries.) And, Erdogan in Turkey mainly gives their jihadists just safe passage into Syria, and he takes part of the proceeds from the jihadists sales of stolen Syrian and Iraqi oil.

But, they all work together as a team (with the jihadists sometimes killing each other in the process thats even part of the plan) though each national leader has PR problems at home in order to fool his respective public into thinking that theyre against terrorists, and that only the enemy is to blame. (Meanwhile, the aristocrats who supply the «salaries» of the jihadists, walk off with all the money.)

This way, US oil and gas companies will refine, and pipeline into Europe, the Sauds oil and the Thanis gas, and not only will Russias major oil-and-gas market become squeezed away by that, but Obamas economic sanctions against Russia, plus the yet-further isolation of Russia (as well as of China and the rest of the BRICS countries) by excluding them from Obamas three mega-trade-deals (TTIP, TPP & TISA), will place the US aristocracy firmly in control of the world, to dominate the 21st Century, as it has dominated ever since the end of WW II.

Then, came this question from Hersh: «Why does America do what it does? Why do we not say to the Russians, Lets work together?» His interviewer immediately seconded that by repeating it, «So why dont we work closer with Russia? It seems so rational». Hersh replied simply: «I dont know». He didnt venture so much as a guess not even an educated one. But, when journalists who are as knowledgeable as he, dont present some credible explanation, to challenge the obvious lies (which make no sense that accords with the blatantly contrary evidence those journalists know of against those lies) that come from people such as Barack Obama, arent they thereby though passively participating in the fraud, instead of contradicting and challenging it? Or, is the underlying assumption, there: The general public is going to be as deeply immersed in the background information here as I am, so that they dont need me to bring it all together for them into a coherent (and fully documented) whole, which does make sense? Is that the underlying assumption? Because: if it is, its false.

Hershs journalism is among the best (after all: he went so far as to say, of Christopher Stephens, regarding Hillary Clinton, «theres no way somebody in that sensitive of a position is not talking to the boss, by some channel»), but its certainly not good enough. However, its too good to be published any longer in places like the New Yorker. And the reporting by Christof Lehmann was better, and it was issued even earlier than Hershs; and it is good enough, because it named names, and it explained motivations, in an honest and forthright way, which is why Lehmanns piece was published only on a Montenegrin site, and only online, not in a Western print medium, such as the New Yorker.

The sites that are owned by members of the Western aristocracy dont issue reports like that journalism thats good enough. They wont inform the public when a US Secretary of State, and her boss the US President, are the persons actually behind a sarin gas attack theyre blaming on a foreign leader the US aristocrats and their allied foreign aristocrats are determined to topple and replace.

https://www.strategi...ian-rebels.html
  • 0

#2 Traveler

Traveler

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1714 posts

Posted 13 February 2018 - 05:58 AM

With all the information coming out, why are these people not in the court systems yet. I know Trump wants to bring this all to an end but it is like the rot has gained such a strong foothold that it can't be dislodged.


  • 0

#3 John Prewett

John Prewett

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1506 posts

Posted 13 February 2018 - 11:53 AM

Trump's trapped, even if he sincerely ever did intend to "drain the swamp" - "turn the ship around"  ...

 

Pope led Globalist cabal caused Trump to become POTUS just so a Nationalist Republicanish 

Christianish straight white man would be captain (to be blamed) when the Globalist sink the ship. 


  • 0

#4 LebenUndLieben

LebenUndLieben

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 425 posts

Posted 13 February 2018 - 03:35 PM

He may get that blame if He continues being a slave to same thing US Presidents have been to since 1913 & 1919.

 

As for His promises to America and for Peace, He has dictatorial powers, given by Congress, to arrest, imprison & kill anyone.

He doesn't mind doing it to innocent people of all ages & sex in Yemen, Syria and so on and seems to protect the worst.

O_Trump_Gators_clr.jpg


Edited by LebenUndLieben, 13 February 2018 - 03:45 PM.

  • 1

#5 LebenUndLieben

LebenUndLieben

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 425 posts

Posted 13 February 2018 - 04:11 PM

USA has been telling lies for  over 200 years to all nations:

Here's one testimony for Koreans to consider:

colorado-billboard-gun-rights-native-ame


  • 1

#6 Mario Milano

Mario Milano

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 27016 posts

Posted 13 February 2018 - 04:45 PM

Trump before he was elected president....

 

TrumpSarkozyMeme1.jpg

 

Now he is doing even worse than that Jew piece of shit Sarkozy.....Trump is doing a Libya to Syria, Yemen...trying with North Korea and Iran...

 

Here's what Trumpenstein, hand yourself into the Hague for the absolute criminal you are...of what you were accusing Sarkozy of...YOU  ARE WORSE!


  • 0

#7 Ivan88

Ivan88

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 13108 posts

Posted 13 February 2018 - 05:03 PM

It is all legal and required because most Christians want it that way, and wilfully consent to Noahide code acopted in 1991 by USA..

They don't know that murdering their mother, Syria, will earn them a short life. But then, they are proud, arrogant, insane fools, so let'em go down.

 

And, President Trump declared his love for anti-Christ fake Israel all along. So we shouldn't be surprised that He is following Noahide code and desires of sinogog of satan.

 

BTW, we know now what His sentence is on former President, assuming that former President had any real say in things:  $$$'s &  :cheers:


Edited by Ivan88, 13 February 2018 - 05:07 PM.

  • 1

#8 wirehaired

wirehaired

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 13597 posts

Posted 13 February 2018 - 06:45 PM

With all the information coming out, why are these people not in the court systems yet. I know Trump wants to bring this all to an end but it is like the rot has gained such a strong foothold that it can't be dislodged.

Because those criminals are above the law.


  • 0

#9 Mario Milano

Mario Milano

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 27016 posts

Posted 13 February 2018 - 06:49 PM

Because those criminals are above the law.

Only because the psychopaths think Noahide insane laws are above natural laws...

 

The jew is trying to change the natural laws of the Universe.......that will never happen...as has been proven by the insane Jews getting kicked out of 109 countries...but they still can't help themselves....

 

put simply the jew is psychopathic


  • 0




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Copyright © 2018 Pravda.Ru