Jump to content

Theme© by Fisana
 

Photo

This man promised to reopen the 9/11 investigation

9/11

  • Please log in to reply
307 replies to this topic

#1 grog

grog

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 5189 posts

Posted 05 August 2018 - 09:50 AM

This man promised to reopen the 9/11 investigation
 
He is not so enthusiastic to do that now he has been told who really did it.
 
 
Trump.jpg
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

  • 0

#2 grog

grog

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 5189 posts

Posted 05 August 2018 - 09:54 AM

9-11_truth_trump_wtc_bombs_controlled_de


  • 0

#3 grog

grog

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 5189 posts

Posted 05 August 2018 - 09:55 AM

28pnac_demo.jpg


  • 0

#4 RobertD

RobertD

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 21094 posts

Posted 05 August 2018 - 03:03 PM

28pnac_demo.jpg


Silverstone made a cool 2B on the job.
Who cares if 50k people/dogs died...?
  • 0

#5 grog

grog

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 5189 posts

Posted 08 August 2018 - 07:48 AM

 

  • 0

#6 grog

grog

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 5189 posts

Posted 10 August 2018 - 02:18 PM

https://en.wikipedia...#Foreign_deaths

 


  • 0

#7 grog

grog

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 5189 posts

Posted 10 August 2018 - 02:23 PM

Number of foreign casualties on 9/11
 
 
 
 
 Argentina 4 [67]
 Australia 10 [68]
 Bangladesh 6 [69]
 Belarus 1 [70]
 Belgium 1 [71]
 Bermuda 2 [72]
 Brazil 3 [73]
 Canada 24 [74][75][76][77]
 Chile 1 [78]
 China 2
 Colombia 18 [78]
 D.R. Congo 2
 Dominican Republic 47 [78][79]
 Ecuador 13 [78]
 El Salvador 2
 Ethiopia 2 [80]
 FR Yugoslavia 2
 France 4 [81]
 Germany 11
 Ghana 2
 Guyana 3
 Haiti 2
 Hong Kong 2
 Honduras 1
 India 41 [82]
 Indonesia 1 [83]
 Ireland 6 [84][85]
 Israel 5 [86]
 Italy 10 [87]
 Ivory Coast 1
 Jamaica 16 [88]
 Japan 24 [76][89]
 Jordan 2 [90][91][92]
 Kenya 1
 Lebanon 4
 Lithuania 1
 Malaysia 3 [93]
 Mexico 15 [78]
 Moldova 1
 Netherlands 1
 New Zealand 2 [94][95]
 Nigeria 1
 Pakistan 6 [96]
 Paraguay 2
 Peru 5
 Philippines 16 [97][98]
 Poland 6
 Portugal 5 [99]
 Romania 4 [100]
 Russia 1
 South Africa 2
 South Korea 28 [76][101]
 Spain 1
 Sri Lanka 1 [102]
 Sweden 1 [103][104]
  Switzerland 2
 Taiwan 1
 Trinidad and Tobago 14
 Ukraine 1
 United Kingdom 67 [76][105][106]
 Uzbekistan 1
 Venezuela 1
______________________________________________
 
______________________________________________

  • 0

#8 Mario Milano

Mario Milano

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 29668 posts

Posted 10 August 2018 - 02:29 PM

and this satan..

 

video_youtube_5ZWsS2qdk70.jpg?itok=XIDzM

 

 

would have reminded Trump what they did to JFK.....


  • 0

#9 Marmoset

Marmoset

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 328 posts

Posted 02 November 2018 - 02:08 AM

Roy Cohn

 

Roy Cohn was Drumpf's mentor and a faggot. He was on the board of Permindex , the corporation that organised the JFK assassination and the 1962 attempt on the life of Charles De Gaulle.


  • 0

#10 Marmoset

Marmoset

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 328 posts

Posted 02 November 2018 - 02:09 AM

Documents

 

Drumpf has also gone back on his promise of releasing CIA documents relating to the JFK assassination.


  • 0

#11 Mario Milano

Mario Milano

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 29668 posts

Posted 02 November 2018 - 04:22 AM

He promised to drain the swamp, but has opened to flood gates and let in even more of those monsters in


  • 0

#12 grog

grog

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 5189 posts

Posted 02 November 2018 - 10:36 AM

Roy Cohn

 

Roy Cohn was Drumpf's mentor and a faggot. He was on the board of Permindex , the corporation that organised the JFK assassination and the 1962 attempt on the life of Charles De Gaulle.

 

iMAGINE THOSE FRAGILE WINGS CUTTING SLOTS IN MASSIVE STEEL COLUMNS !!!!!!!!!!

HOW STUPID DO THEY THINK THE PEOPLE ARE TO BELIEVE THAT CRAP !!!???


  • 0

#13 grog

grog

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 5189 posts

Posted 02 November 2018 - 10:44 AM

 

iMAGINE THOSE FRAGILE WINGS CUTTING SLOTS IN MASSIVE STEEL COLUMNS !!!!!!!!!!

HOW STUPID DO THEY THINK THE PEOPLE ARE TO BELIEVE THAT CRAP !!!???

 

 

 
Wings did not cut through steel columns. 
 
Aircraft entered building. 
 
Wings remained outside building. 

  • 0

#14 grog

grog

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 5189 posts

Posted 02 November 2018 - 11:09 AM

26 Questions That Deceived Americans Need To Ask About 9/11
 
 
 
10 September 2016.
 
 
 
Do you know anybody who still believes the official 9/11 narrative? 
 
Ask them a few of these 26 questions - you may change their life.
 
 
 
1) Did you know that a third World Trade Center high-rise building also fell on September 11th? WTC Building 7 was a 47-storey, steel-framed skyscraper located a full block away from the Twin Towers and it was not even hit by any plane. Nonetheless, it fell at near free-fall speed straight down into its own footprint at 5:20 p.m. that afternoon.
 
2) Did you know that the owner of Building 7, Larry Silverstein, said "We've had such a terrible loss of life that maybe the smartest thing to do is "pull it" [Building 7] and they made that decision - to pull - and then we watched the building collapse"? And yet The 9/11 Commission Report never mentioned a thing about Building 7 ["Pull" is an industry term for using controlled demolition.]
 
3) Did you know that "Lucky" Larry Silverstein was awarded 4.68 billion dollars in insurance claims for the Twin Towers which he had just leased six weeks before 9/11 from the Port Authority of New York. The Port Authority had previously declined to spend the multi million dollars necessary to remove the asbestos and bring the Towers up to code required by law?
 
4) Did you know that - in the history of architecture - fire has never caused any steel-frame building to collapse, except on 9/11 when three skyscrapers fell at near free-fall speeds despite the fact that there were scores of massive steel columns in the core of each of the Twin Towers?
 
5) Did you know that almost every one of the WTC steel beams and girders were quickly shipped overseas - before any independent investigation - and melted down? (This is unprecedented and contrary to federal crime scene laws, making Rudy Giuliani indictable for those federal crimes.)
 
6) Did you know that fighter jets routinely are scrambled the minute any airplane loses contact with the FAA or deviates from its flight path and the jets usually only take 20 minutes to get in the air?
 
7) Did you know that in the nine months preceding 9/11 there were 67 jet fighter scrambles of wayward airplanes and that on average 100 intercepts occur each year?
 
8) Did you know that the Secret Service broke established protocols by allowing President Bush to remain in a well-publicized classroom photo op for at least 8 minutes after it was revealed to him that "America was under attack" (when Andy Card informed him that the second plane had hit the second tower)?
 
9) Did you know that the Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) has never revealed the unidentified traders who made millions of dollars in profits by short-selling the stocks of American and United airlines that were impacted by the attacks?
 
10) Did you know that there were countless warnings of "impending terrorist attacks" from at least 11 countries prior to 9/11 and that the threat level for such an attack was 'blinking red' according to the Director of the CIA George Tenet?
 
11) Did you know that Attorney General John Ashcroft, San Francisco Mayor Willie Brown, author Salmon Rushdie and (according to Newsweek) a group of high-ranking generals at the Pentagon were warned not to fly on 9/11 but never revealed who told them?
 
12) Did you know that in September of 2000 a NeoConservative group of Republicans known as The Project for A New American Century (PNAC, many of whom would become key officials in the Bush administration the next year) wrote that their proposed massive military buildup would proceed slowly "absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event - like a new Pearl Harbor"?
 
13) Did you know that at least 6 of the alleged 9/11 hijackers were reported to be still alive according to BBC and UK print media reports in the weeks following 9/11?
 
14) Did you know that the FBI has said that there is no evidence to link Osama bin Laden to 9/11 and that Osama was never wanted for the crime of 9/11 on its Ten Most Wanted Fugitives list?
 
15) Did you know that the leading scholar of Osama bin Laden (Bruce Lawrence) stated that the December 2001 confession tape, which the Bush White House flaunted, was a fake?
 
16) Did you know that Secretary of State Colin Powell promised a White Paper proving that Osama bin Laden and al Qaeda were responsible for 9/11 back in 2001 - but never produced it?
 
17) Did you know that the Bush administration resisted the formation of the 9/11 Commission for 441 days? Or that similar investigations, such as those for Pearl Harbor, the JFK assassination and the space shuttle disasters, all started within one week?
 
18) Did you know that "The Jersey Girls" - four courageous 9/11 widows - finally forced the 9/11 Commission into existence and presented many questions, 70% of which were ignored? Or that under the leadership of Bush administration insider, Philip Zelikow, the final report failed to address any of the evidence pointing to official complicity? (And the 9/11 Commission Report never said word one about WTC 7?)
 
19) Did you know that no official agency (the FAA, FBI or the airlines) has ever released a list of the 9/11 passengers - including the names of the supposed hijackers, but within hours after the attacks, the FBI unbelievably released a definitive list of the 19 so-called hijackers?
 
20) Did you know that multiple air defense drills (war games) were planned for the morning of 9/11 and that these exercises left only a few pairs of fighter jets available to protect the entire North East Air Defense Sector of the United States leaving Washington and NYC vulnerable to an attack?
 
21) Did you know that there was no visible airplane debris where Flight 93 supposedly crashed near Shanksville, PA. There was only a small smoking hole in the ground, much like a bomb crater, with a pile of planted scrap metal, but that there was debris from the aircraft found 8 miles away at New Baltimore? And that Shanksville Mayor Ernie Stull said three different times in an interview (for a 2003 German documentary) that there was "no airplane"?
 
22) Did you know that office furniture burns at low temperatures of 600 to 800°F, and that jet fuel (kerosene), an ordinary hydrocarbon, has a maximum burning temperature of 1200°F, but that steel doesn't start melting until temperatures reach 2750°F?
 
23) Did you know that tests have shown that cellphone calls - back in 2001 - could not have been made at altitudes over 8,000 feet for any meaningful duration and that, more significantly, United Airlines Flight 93 was proven to be 35,000 to 40,000 feet when calls were said to have been made?
 
24) Did you know that bombs went off in the North Tower in the sub-basement a few seconds before the first plane hit - according to Willie Rodriguez, a janitor who became known as the last man out and who was awarded a medal by President Bush for his bravery in rescuing dozens of people from the North Tower before it collapsed? Rodriguez testified that he and fellow workers heard multiple explosions coming from various locations in the floors above.
 
25) Did you know that alleged hijacker Hani Hanjour was known as an incompetent pilot to his trainers and yet he supposedly pulled off an unprecedented 270° turn at 500 mph, diving 7,000 feet in less than 3 minutes? And then supposedly crashed Flight 77 into the least populated, most reinforced section of the Pentagon?
 
26) Did you know that the mainstream media (MSM) in the US is owned and controlled by five or six major corporate conglomerates and that there has been very limited and sporadic coverage of alternative views about 9/11? Any time the issue of 9/11 is raised, the MSM accuses the questioner of being a conspiracy theorist or even a traitor.
 
 

  • 0

#15 grog

grog

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 5189 posts

Posted 02 November 2018 - 11:53 AM

9/11 - Hard Facts, Hard Truth
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
WTC Building 7
I. Introduction:
II. Natural Skepticism
III. Reframing the Story
IV. Background and Motive
V. Historical Precedent
VI. Government Complicity and Intelligence Breakdowns
VII. WTC Building 7
A. WTC7 videos
VIII. The Twin Towers
IX. Marvin Bush and the Planting of Explosives
X. Underground Explosions
XI. Evidence Destroyed
XII. Military Response
XIII. AA Flight 77
XIV. Hani Hanjour and Flight 77's Unexplained Expert Maneuvers
XV. Video Evidence at the Pentagon
XVI. The Pentagon
XVII. Flight Manifests and Passenger Lists
XVIII. Flight 93
XIX. Bin Laden 'Confession' Tapes
XX. Too Grand a Conspiracy?
XXI. The Media, Official Investigations, Debunkers, and other Misinformation
XXII. Conclusion
XXIII. Links
XXIV. Charlatans and Scoundrels
XXV. What can be done?
XXVI. Note about the Author
While these intelligence failures suggest at least the reasonable possibility of U.S. government complicity in 9/11, there is a mountain of physical evidence that directly implicates high-level government knowledge and participation in the planning and execution of September 11. Perhaps the most damning evidence lies in the bizarre collapse of WTC Building 7. Anyone familiar with the story of 9/11 knows about the collapse of the WTC North and South Twin-Towers. But a third high rise also fell that day. At 5:20 p.m., the massive 47-story steel frame Building 7, untouched by the hijacked airplanes, imploded in the exact manner of a professionally engineered demolition - at near free-fall speed, straight down, and with scientific precision into a compact pile of rubble, barely damaging any of the surrounding buildings.
 
WATCH VIDEO
The official explanation for the collapse is fire - as in fire weakened the building's structural support steel to the point where it could no longer hold its own weight upright. The magazine Popular Mechanics has tried to posit the theory of lethal structural damage caused by the falling debris of the North Tower as reason for Building 7's collapse. But no existing public photographs, nor videos, show anything near their claim that 1/3 of Building 7's façade was gouged out. Furthermore, even if structural damage was significant, this would not account for Building 7's eventual symmetrical, box-like collapse, where all four corners, and all four facades of the building fell simultaneously straight to the ground. And most significantly, the official government explanation is still fire. So this essay will stay with fire as the stated cause.
 
Flames were visible on 3-4 floors of the building, having been apparently ignited by falling debris and ruptured diesel tanks at the base of the structure. And while relatively minor in severity, these fires were apparently responsible for the building's demise. But fire as the cause for collapse poses a number of significant problems - problems that break fundamental laws of nature. Firstly, fire from diesel fuel and building debris does not remotely approach the necessary temperature required to weaken and melt steel. Steel is melted and forged in sophisticated blast furnaces at incredibly high temperatures. Secondly, even if fire did cause the necessary weakening of the buildings steel support beams, each of those more than 50 beams would have had to weaken and fail at the exact same time to account for the symmetrical downward trajectory of the collapse. A wildly contentious scenario. Dr. Steven Jones, Professor of Physics at BYU who specializes in the fusion of metals, has comprehensively and scientifically debunked the possibility of Building 7 collapsing due to fire (or the minor damage to the building's façade from the falling debris of the North Tower). A video and transcript of his detailed lecture arguing controlled demolition as cause for collapse can be downloaded here. Or his power-point presentation with audio can be downloaded here
READ MORE
In the spring of 2007, Professor Jones published his second major paper on 9/11 - 
 
"Revisiting 9/11/2001 --Applying the Scientific Method"
Professor Jones' meticulous research explains why no other steel frame building has ever suffered a total collapse anywhere on the planet before or after 9/11 due to fire (remember, Building 7 was NOT hit by an aircraft). Including WTC 4, 5, and 6, which were more intensely pelted by debris from the Twin Towers' collapse, and had fires of equal intensity burning for many more hours than the adjacent Building 7. (For more examples of other intense high-rise building fires that did not cause collapse, click here or here.
 
Jones specifically references the fire at the Windsor Building in Madrid, Spain in February of 2005, which did not result in total structural collapse. This 32-story high rise burned fiercely for 20 hours, with flames shooting hundreds of feet into the air, gutting the entire building. And while significantly more severe than the fires of Building 7, which burned for only a few hours on only a few floors, the Windsor Building flames did not bring the building down. The damage from the fire did produce a partial collapse, and this collapse behaved exactly in line with the laws of physics and nature. Part of the building fell in an isolated collapse into the street below, leaving a huge, gaping wound in the middle of the high-rise with exposed rebar and debris hanging hundreds of feet into the air. The inferno did not produce a symmetrical, straight down, box-like, virtual free-fall total collapse witnessed in the fall of Building 7. Strategically planted, well-timed explosive devices are what weaken steel symmetrically and create coordinated downward implosions. Not random fires scattered throughout a building.
 
Another, and perhaps stronger, piece of evidence for controlled demolition of Building 7 is the speed at which the structure fell. It was a 576-foot tall building, and a conservative estimate of available video evidence shows that it fell in 6.5 seconds. A marble, with nothing but wind resistance in its path, would fall to the ground from the same height in roughly 6 seconds. Somehow, the top of this building fell to the ground in a perfectly symmetrical downward trajectory, with 47 floors of steel, concrete, and thousands of tons of upright standing debris in its path providing huge amounts of vertical resistance, at virtually free-fall speed. Allegedly because of random fires on a few floors. This is a physical and mathematical impossibility, violating laws in the conservation of momentum covered at length in this paper by Dr. Kenneth Kuttler here. Or go to the June 2006, Volume 1 edition of this online journal here.
 
It is important to note that even if Popular Mechanics is right in its assertion that damage to Building 7 from falling debris of the Towers caused its collapse, this still does nothing to explain the impossible speed at which it fell. Only controlled demolition, as Dr. Kuttler states at the end of his computation, resolves the observed rate of collapse. Because in a controlled demolition, waves of progressive explosions from the top down would remove sections of resistant columns and supports, providing the vacuum-like pocket needed to account for the 6.5-second collapse. No other hypothesis, including the premise narrated in the 'official story', accounts for this speed.
 
Because all available evidence points to this controlled demolition as the most logical reason for Building 7's particular collapse pattern, serious questions now need answering. To wire a building of that size for implosion requires weeks of careful study and planning. Which means whoever wired the explosives knew far in advance of the September 11 plot. So who? And why? Perhaps Larry Silverstein has an answer. In July of 2001, 2 months before the attack, the new leaseholder of the Twin Towers and Building 7 took out a huge insurance policy on his buildings. In it, there was a special clause 'in case of terrorist attack'. As a result of the collapse of Building 7, Larry Silverstein pocketed almost $1 Billion, $500 million of it in profits. For the collapse of the Twin Towers, which he also owned, Silverstein argued in court that he should be compensated twice because two separate airplanes flew into his two separate buildings. And this, according to his argument, constituted two terrorist attacks. He won this argument, and was awarded $7 Billion for the Towers' collapse, quite a return for his initial investment.
 
A short time after September 11, Silverstein further implicated himself when he made a grave verbal blunder in an interview for a PBS special where he admitted that he and the fire authorities decided to 'pull' (implode) Building 7 on the afternoon of 9/11 as a way to avoid incurring more loss of life. The video clip of this blunder can be viewed here. But a last minute decision to 'pull' by Silverstein and the authorities would have been flatly impossible because of the weeks required in the planning and planting of explosives. When asked to explain these strange, incriminating comments, Silverstein refused, for two years, to clarify. Until finally his office released a statement claiming that what Silverstein meant by 'pull' was to pull the firefighters out of the building before it collapsed. But this is another in a long line of nonsensical statements made by principals in the 9/11 debacle. Silverstein and the 'officials' to whom he was speaking knew that firefighters had been evacuated hours before the alleged conversation and subsequent collapse took place. For further analysis on this subject, click here: It is worth noting that on the morning of 9/11, all of the buildings making up the WTC complex not owned by Larry Silverstein managed to remain upright, despite equally heavy fire and structural damage.
 
Perhaps a government official from the CIA, Department of Defense, the IRS, the SEC branch investigating the infamous Wall Street corporate fraud cases, the Secret Service, or New York City's Office of Emergency Management (OEM) knows something about Building 7's odd collapse. All of those agencies strangely had offices in Building 7. The presence of OEM is particularly disturbing. They occupied a recently reinforced bunker-like space on the 23rd floor. Equipped with bulletproof windows, bomb-proof walls, and hurricane resistant windows, the office housed a sophisticated command center with top of the line military communication and logistical equipment. Perhaps Building 7 was a command center of a different kind, used as the true Ground Zero for the operation carried out on 9/11. A command center that became a crime scene after 8:46 a.m. that morning. A command center that needed to be destroyed.
 
Perhaps this OEM department could also explain the miraculously coincidental fact that on September 10, FEMA officials, in conjunction with NYC authorities, had arrived in the city and set up a command post near the World Trade Center for an extensive simulated terrorist attack operation to be carried out on September 12. Perhaps Mayor Rudolph Giuliani could shed some light on this subject. He confirmed this miraculous coincidence in his own testimony to the 9/11 Commission, all of which, unsurprisingly, never made it into their 'official' Report. "... the reason Pier 92 was selected as a command center was because on the next day, on September 12, Pier 92 was going to have a drill, it had hundreds of people here, from FEMA, from the Federal Government, from the State, from the State Emergency Management Office, and they were getting ready for a drill for biochemical attack. So that was gonna be the place they were going to have the drill. The equipment was already there, so we were able to establish a command center there, within three days, that was two and a half to three times bigger than the command center that we had lost at 7 World Trade Center. And it was from there that the rest of the search and rescue effort was completed."
 
How in the world is this wild coincidence not front-page news of every newspaper in the country? Why in the world was FEMA in NYC, down on Pier 92 near the WTC, on the night of September 10th ready to 'go into action' on the morning of September 11th? Did certain leaders in the U.S. government know full well what was about to happen? Can this 'terror drill' possibly be a random coincidence? Did they send in good men and women from FEMA and other emergency services under the guise of a prospective 'terror drill' to be at the ready to quickly clean up their mess? Did they orchestrate the entire operation, and then swoop in, fully armed and prepped, to prove and prop themselves up as the ready saviors they have spent the last five years reminding us they are? And if Giuliani becomes President, what grounds, what lasting image do we suppose he will be using to bolster his campaign?
 
Perhaps this is just wild conjecture. Perhaps there is a simpler answer to the questions raised by Building 7's collapse. But ultimately these questions are not an investigator's responsibility to answer. They are the responsibility of the investigator to raise. The responsibility in answering those questions lies with the official storytellers. They are responsible for plugging any holes in their narrative. Questions that arise regarding Building 7 are simply part of the natural speculation inevitably aroused by its suspicious collapse. They are important questions. They are the type of questions that, as stated before, the 9/11 Commission was formed to answer. But, incredibly, the Commission did not even allude to the existence, nor the absurd collapse, of Building 7.
 
It would seem logical that the collapse of a massive 47-story building (which is as big as the Bank of America Building in San Francisco), the first steel frame high rise in history to collapse solely from fire, which also housed the offices of important government agencies in downtown Manhattan, would warrant an investigation. Or at least a citation by the government commission assigned to thoroughly investigate the events of 9/11. It would seem logical to think that structural engineers, chefs, and wood-burning stove owners around the world would be interested to know that steel has suddenly become susceptible to fire. It would be logical to think that the tell-tale shock wave, 'squibs', internal box-like implosion, freefall speed, and neat footprint rubble pile clearly pointing to a controlled demolition of Building 7 would interest those investigating its collapse. But the 9/11 Commission Report does not even mention its existence. Nor does NIST, the government agency assigned to investigate the collapse of the Twin Towers. Like the 9/11 Commission, they did not mention its existence, its collapse, nor the bizarre specifics of that collapse - which so contradict official accounts.
 
WATCH VIDEO
Close-Up of WTC-7 Collapse Footage Shows Unmistakable Demolition Charges
 
Only FEMA has officially reported on Building 7's demise. And while their report hints at fire as the cause of the building's fall, even they admit the inherent weakness of that premise. "The specifics of the fires in WTC 7 and how they caused the building to collapse remain unknown at this time. Although the total diesel fuel on the premises contained massive potential energy, the best hypothesis has only a low probability of occurrence. Further research, investigation, and analyses are needed to resolve this issue." That the necessary evidence to further investigate Building 7's collapse, (i.e. the steel beams, trusses, and support girders) was quickly and illegally cleared, shipped overseas, and recycled - before photographs could be taken or qualified investigators and explosives experts could be called in to sift through the evidence - only deepens the efficacy of the hypothesis that a well-planned, high-level intentional demolition caused the collapse of WTC Building 7.
 
It should again be noted here that Popular Mechanics magazine has tried to debunk some of the issues raised by the 9/11 Truth community - both in a feature article in March of 2005, and a recent 2006 book. Besides the inherent absurdity of a magazine tackling the research that should be undertaken by Congress and an independent Special Prosecutor with full subpoena power, their work is riddled with the same inconsistencies and conveniently isolated and selected bullet points they claim undermines the very research they are attempting to debunk. For a comprehensive and specific critique of their work, see the following link.
 
Update: In an extraordinary development, a 9/11 blogger has uncovered live BBC news video footage from the afternoon of 9/11 showing its reporters detailing the collapse of WTC7 (the Salomon Brothers Building) 23 minutes before that building actually collapsed. The following video is a recap of some of that footage. Notice the extraordinary fact that as the female reporter speaks, the scrolling text at the bottom of the screen confirms what the male lead reporter had been saying for the first 15 minutes of the broadcast, namely that the Salomon Brothers Building (WTC 7) had collapsed, and that very building is standing wholly upright directly over the reporter's shoulder!
 
WATCH VIDEO
Live BBC news video footage.
 
How is this possible? Who knew what when? "We might reasonably guess that before making its way to the BBC by whatever means, the information originated among the authorities in New York. And that is the question here: Who was the original source of the information? Did the source also phrase the event in the past tense? How was the source certain the building would collapse?" This is not a suggestion that the BBC was 'in' on the conspiracy. They are just passing on a report. So where did that report originate? And how could the sources of that report possibly know a giant building with some peripheral fires was about to fall? There is no historical precedent for that. It is a clairvoyance beyond any reasonable explanation.
 
For a more detailed, written analysis of this story, click here. It should be noted that the BBC has given an absurd response to 911truth.org in regards to this strange string of events. And to no one's surprise, the archival video library in which this massive blunder was discovered has removed the clip in question from its stacks.
 
 
A. WTC7 videos:
 
WATCH VIDEO
A short, well-produced 15 minute video on the smoking gun that is WTC 7. 
 
For a look at the best feature length documentary-style production I have yet seen in regards to 9/11 and, specifically, the collapse of all the WTC buildings, click here. . For footage directly related to Building 7, fast-forward the video to the 56:20 point.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

  • 0

#16 grog

grog

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 5189 posts

Posted 02 November 2018 - 12:04 PM

9/11 Journalist Arrested For Asking Questions About Building 7
 
 
 
 
 
13 September 2016.
 
 
 
 
 
A group of Florida police officers arrested a 9/11 journalist over the weekend after he conducted interviews asking members of the public how they think Building 7 collapsed. 
 
Bob Tuskin, co-founder of the Free Your Mind conference, interviewed passersby, asking them if they would like to watch a video of a building collapsing.
 
Activistpost.com reports:
 
Tuskin's schtick was simple. He would show people a video of a building collapsing in six seconds and then ask them what that looked like to them. Everyone replies the same, saying it looks like controlled demolition. But when Tuskin tells them that this building is Tower 7 and fell on 9/11, he's quickly met with denial, angst, vitriol, ridicule, and now police force.
 
Below is a video from last year, when Tuskin conducted the same interviews. Notice how the police in this video were actually nice and participated - instead of kidnapping and caging Tuskin.
 
Apparently, one of the people who became offended after watching Tower 7 fall this weekend called police, who had no problem acting as attack dogs to violate the First Amendment.
 
As the video shows, when police arrive they demand Tuskin and his crew leave. Tuskin, knowing his rights, immediately and politely refused. This assertion of his rights infuriated the officers.
 
Tuskin quickly found himself surrounded by Alachua County Sheriff's deputies who were threatening him with arrest if he didn't stop practicing his free speech.
 
When Tuskin asks the deputies what he's being arrested for, they cannot give him a clear answer, but they continue with the threats. Not wanting to be arrested, Tuskin concedes and begins packing up his things to leave.
 
However, Lt. Lalonde, with the Alachua County Sheriff's department, did not feel like waiting for Tuskin to leave and quickly moves in to deprive him of his freedom.
 
While they were placing him in cuffs, the deputies can be heard telling Tuskin to 'stop resisting.' Apparently, it has simply become second nature for officers to repeatedly say this phrase during arrests as Tuskin never resisted.
 
For practicing his freedom of speech, Bob Tuskin was handcuffed and brought to a holding cell. However, knowing that they had absolutely nothing to charge him with, police were eventually forced to let him go - but not before silencing his freedom of speech.
 
Tuskin tells the Free Thought Project that as he's being walked to the holding cell by his captors, he asked them why they were doing this and if they thought it was right. He explained to them that this video was going to go on YouTube and be terrible press for police, but they did not care. The deputies candidly stated that they 'are just doing their jobs.'
 
Lt. Lalonde then said to Tuskin, "you guys are doing conspiracy theory stuff so you should expect this."
 
Showing the video of Tower 7 collapsing has nothing to do with the realm of conspiracy theory. However, in a society rife with ignorance and corruption, as the video below shows - telling people the truth is now a revolutionary act.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

  • 0

#17 Mario Milano

Mario Milano

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 29668 posts

Posted 02 November 2018 - 12:30 PM

Jews did 9/11 irrefutable proof, Trump will never deliver on that promise because.....

 

t1.jpg?width=605


  • 0

#18 grog

grog

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 5189 posts

Posted 02 November 2018 - 01:51 PM

November 2, 2018 
 
9/11 Revisited: Declassified FBI Files Reveal New Details About ‘The Five Israelis’
SEPTEMBER 11, 2015 BY 21WIRE 36 COMMENTS
 
Editor’s Note: The story of the Dancing Israelis remains one of the most controversial and explosive untold stories of Sept. 11, 2001. Previous efforts to analyze this aspect of 9/11 have been mostly emotive OpEds and conspiratorial rants – until now. Writer Greg Fernandez presents some new declassified FBI material as part of a newly compiled and highly detailed account of this chilling chapter in the 21st century’s most iconic event.
Greg Fernandez Jr.
21st Century Wire
It only took only a few hours for the Twin Towers to fall to the ground on September 11th, 2001.
Later that same day, World Trade Center Building 7 became the third tallest building in the world to implode into its own footprint, allegedly from ‘fire.’ Additionally, to date there is still no evidence that commercial airline Flight 77 struck the Pentagon, even though authorities insist that they have the attack captured on film (but for some reason, they cannot show it to us).
Added to the long list of strange events that happened on September 11th is the infamous story of the five Israeli nationals who were arrested by New Jersey police officers in connection with the WTC attacks on the day. The five suspects were held in detention for three months while the FBI investigated their “jovial” behavior after the North Tower was struck by an aircraft. As the N
 
 
 
1-911_flight175.jpg
 
 
 
 

Edited by grog, 02 November 2018 - 01:54 PM.

  • 0

#19 LebenUndLieben

LebenUndLieben

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 847 posts

Posted 02 November 2018 - 02:01 PM

It is now illegal to doubt the pancake hypothesis and the magic bullet hypothesis.

And when the glorious peoples leaders yap about how much they love the Home Land of the Pharisees, they are confessing to hating everything else.


  • 1

#20 grog

grog

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 5189 posts

Posted 02 November 2018 - 02:17 PM

It is now illegal to doubt the pancake hypothesis and the magic bullet hypothesis.

And when the glorious peoples leaders yap about how much they love the Home Land of the Pharisees, they are confessing to hating everything else.

 

 

The Khazar Attack 


  • 0





Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: 9/11

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Copyright © 2018 Pravda.Ru