Jump to content

Theme© by Fisana
 

Photo

A Pravda Exclusive.


  • Please log in to reply
12 replies to this topic

#1 Vanka Savolov

Vanka Savolov

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1177 posts

Posted 05 November 2018 - 05:25 PM

I had promised this missive sometime ago, and here it is...

 

I've made it no secret that I fight against injustice, or more to the point, the corruption of public officials. I had put the word out, about ten years ago, that America was/is being overrun by the same trash that Russia had just overcome. There's much narrative to that, to which the poster DUMA had offered some valuable input, of which, to date has proved to be correct.

 

It very much seems that no sooner than the Russians had booted out the scourge from their country, that said scourge had moved right into the USA. Follow the timeline from 1989 to the present. After enough time had past, Russians had come out of the woodwork and were showing the world that they are no different than anyone else on this planet. They had proved to me that they have heart and soul, and that to share with and care about others is the only way to go in life. What I was witnessing led me to the knowing that the American government/media had been lying to their people regards the true nature of Russians in general. (I don't like being lied to.)

 

In this world, we have International Law where human rights issues are addressed, and more locally, we have Constitutions with which to address civil rights issues. Both human and civil rights are God given rights in that every creature, including the human kind, have the right to take care of their own business, without interference from others. e.g.: the right to food & water, shelter & clothing, and above all: the right to a peaceful environment. The later is found everywhere in law and to violate it, one can be charged with "disturbing the peace".

 

Here in the states, our Constitution has many provisions, not to grant these rights, but to PROTECT these rights, and this is the area of law I plan to cover in detail to prove the massive corruption among public officials, here in the USA. The American system of Justice ignores International and Constitutional Law, as I am sure that the Russians are well aware of by now.

 

To subjugate the Constitution is an act of treason by any measure. Here are the clauses of Constitution of which have been subjugated and eliminated to the point that such is merely a 'shadow' of its intent and where such is only for show. When anyone demands their God given rights, it is only given to them in a manner by which that only gives 'false hope' that such rights will be protected and honored.

 

I'm using the Constitution as an example here because it is what was taught to me, in the public school system, as being the Supreme Law of the land, and everyone in public office and/or the military is REQUIRED to swear an oath to uphold and defend these Laws against all enemies, foreign and domestic. 

 

Starting in Article I, section 9, clause 2:

 

The privilege of the writ of habeas corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in the case rebellion or invasion, the public safety may require it.

 

Article I, section 9, clause 3:

 

No bill of attainder or ex post facto law shall be passed.

 

ha·be·as cor·pus

/ˌhābēəs ˈkôrpəs/

noun LAW
a writ requiring a person under arrest to be brought before a judge or into court, especially to secure the person's release unless lawful grounds are shown for their detention.
the legal right to apply for a habeas corpus.

 

at·tain·der

/əˈtāndər/

noun HISTORICAL
noun: attainder; plural noun: attainders
the forfeiture of land and civil rights suffered as a consequence of a sentence of death for treason or felony.

 

ex post fac·to

/ˌeks pōst ˈfaktō/
adjective & adverb
with retroactive effect or force.
"ex post facto laws"

 

These three clauses alone are defiled on a daily basis. As to the habeas corpus clause: They will detain anyone without LAWFUL grounds to do so, save by their own measure of statutory law, of which they use to subjugate the Supreme Law itself. The ex post facto clause is the most disturbing "breach of Law" because they actually do write laws, years after a conviction, and hold people accountable contrary to the terms/law they were convicted under. e.g.: if you were to get a speeding ticket and were fined $100.00 and the fine was paid, and so the matter settled, then they have no right to double that fine to $200.00 the next year and force you to pay another $100.00, or go to jail. This kind of dirty-under-handed breach of trust, and indeed a breach of the Law itself, is an on going thing here in the states. 

 

In actual Law, there must be some measure of harm, loss or damage to another's person, place and/or things, before considering charging someone with a crime. During that period of consideration, there must be findings that the accused had committed an offence willfully, with the intent to cause harm/loss/damage to another's person, place or things. If there was no intent, then no crime had been committed and the matter can go to the Civil courts in the form of 'tort law' where the responsible party can be sued for damages... but by no means is anyone kidnapped and held for ransom.

 

Anyway, I plan to only present that, which I have been subjected to, and I will do so in a backward fashion, starting from the latest, most current crimes committed against me, in relation to what I've presented here so far. Take note that as I go backward in time, that the weight and frequency of these treasonous acts is constant and such will show how they have grown in their corruption as the years go on.


Edited by Vanka Savolov, 05 November 2018 - 05:46 PM.

  • 0

#2 Vanka Savolov

Vanka Savolov

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1177 posts

Posted 07 November 2018 - 05:50 PM

I don't know if I could ever express this in a way that anyone could fully understand, and it's mostly due to the fact that few people actually care. Every time I set out to do what I know is right, like exposing the treason/corruption here in the USA, I get angry, and then the depression sets in. When I step back and take a look at the world at large, I see that same corruption within the minds of many. It was said that: "evil prospers when good people do nothing". 

 

I have too much proof that I wasn't living in the state of California, and who cares? I have witnesses and documentation attesting to this fact, and who cares? I'm nearing the end of my life and I wish to clear my name of these false charges... but no one really cares. How do I know that no one cares? All I need do is ask: "do you actually care?" The only truthful answer is "NO", and the rest is just a bunch of phony-bologna pretense of caring. Evil prospers when good people do nothing, and evil has been prospering on this planet for hundreds, if not thousands of years.

 

I have asked two people to come forward and present a written statement that refutes these false charges... neither one of them, to date have fulfilled this request, even though they both had stated that they would do so, in short order. Evil prospers when good people do nothing. I could actually prove my case despite their lack of caring, their "do nothing" attitudes that allows for evil to perpetuate itself to the ruination of everyone and everything. How could it be that the conscious minds of people would allow for lies to ruin another completely and do nothing? Well, I'll tell you why that is, they are not "good people" to begin with, as they are agents of evil by way of their complacency.

 

In the mean time, this is what I am subjected to, and I will point out some facts as to the changing of and adding to the public record, even after decades have gone by.

 

https://www.homefact...len-Dowdle.html

 

I had been arrested, later for 'failure to register' in a case where such an arrest was a vendetta, revenge for exposing the absolutely-corrupt-creepy-bastards in San Bernardino county. The charges of this corruption were posted here, at this message board. What I'm needing to get at here is this: The records for that arrest were sealed by order of the court. Sealed records are not available to the public, period. Take notice that the "failure to register" charges show on the Arizona website, where, in fact such did not show on both the California and Utah website. Arizona added yet another thing that NEVER showed on any other website in the almost thirty years I have been registering. Arizona added this: Sexual Motivation to their registry site. Why all of a sudden is that added to my public record? These are false charges to begin with, but do you actually care?

 

Here's a little true story about Arizona, who is no less corrupt than the rest of the states. When I moved to Arizona, I am required by STATUTES, (not law) to register with that state or face arrest and imprisonment. When I showed up at Arizona's registration office, they handed me paper-work which is literally loaded with code-numbers, the likes of which I had never seen before. I am expected to sign this paper-work--on the spot--or face immediate arrest, and go straight to jail. I had asked for a "code-book" which defines/explains these codes, but I was told that: "I should already know what these codes mean", and I was denied any access to the code-book, and I was forced to sign that paper-work anyway, while not having a clue as to what I was signing my name to.

 

The Sheriff, of whom had no business being in the registry office, was prattling on about how I'm expected to just know these codes, even when I had told them that I do not have a clue as to what any of that means--that I do not understand these documents I am being forced to sign. His persistence began to seriously irritate me to no end, and I had asked him politely to stop talking to me, because he is obviously just as corrupt as California's version of same. He would not stop irritating me with his incessant rantings of how "special" he is and I just told him to "SHUT UP!"

 

The idiot got in my face and demanded that I apologize for telling him to shut up in his own office. Super-fat-chance that I'd ever apologize to a fascist-arrogant-sanctimonious-asshole, and indeed, I ignored him entirely. No apologies from me is all I'm saying. What I'm saying here is that these Arizona assholes added to my record, these other things that showed virtually nowhere else, ever. What they/he did was/is an act of revenge, which they do get away with under the color of law and authority.

 

I have a attache case stuffed full of documents that prove what I am saying here, but no one cares and the evil prospers like it had never prospered before.


Edited by Vanka Savolov, 07 November 2018 - 06:07 PM.

  • 0

#3 Vanka Savolov

Vanka Savolov

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1177 posts

Posted 09 November 2018 - 05:46 PM

Today I am interjecting some seemingly unrelated information, but however unrelated it may seem, it fits squarely into what I'm speaking to here, in relation to that corrupted mindset I had alluded to in post # 2. I've made it no secret that there is a 'method to my madness' and that method is "Applied Theatrics". The melancholy and melodrama as applied is for effect... there are too many other dire things, of a much higher priority then the ongoing character assassination of me. I am largely just a lone soldier in my fight to set this right and free myself of the stigma of being labeled a "registered sex offender". I chose to fight this whole mess with words, as a keyboard warrior, then to inflicted bodily harm on another in an act of revenge, even though what was, and is being done to me is a fate worse than death. To kill me would be a show of mercy, but torturing others is a part of that uncaring mindset that has largely infested the world at large, where no one gives a dam about provable facts and hangs onto hearsay, with nothing backing it. And yes, people will hold to the hearsay and disregard anything to the contrary. My fight isn't just me against a corrupt justice system, no it's me against a corrupted world mindset. 

 

So lets see here, what does it feel like to be labeled as 'uncaring'? Ask yourselves what it must be like to be labeled a 'registered sex offender'. Get my point? No one likes to be labeled what they are not, and yet that's what people do to each other. But in my case, such libel/slander is a matter of permanent record, that is published (in the form of a blacklist) that anyone can gloat over to satisfy that, "at least I'm not that" attitude in which they can feel better about themselves, while seriously ruining the lives they gloat over.

 

The breaks I will give everyone else is that everyone is under some form of mind control, have been poisoned via the air, water, food and environmental pollution in general. In the interest of 'fairness' I grant these things unto you, but in the interest of fairness, what do you grant unto me? 

 

I need to digitize all the documents I have in order to present such in a fashion to expose the on going crimes... and yes these are crimes perpetrated against me, as such has cause much damage, loss and harm to me in immeasurable ways.  

 

 


Edited by Vanka Savolov, 09 November 2018 - 05:49 PM.

  • 0

#4 Vanka Savolov

Vanka Savolov

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1177 posts

Posted 10 November 2018 - 08:28 PM

Today I'm wishing to present a clause that reads: "There shall be no punishment handed down to the accused without the aid and benefit of a jury trial." I'm yet to find that clause and present it word-for-word... but I found this interesting missive written by a Mr. Justice David Davis of the Supreme Court, and it reads: (emphasis added) 

 

"The founders of our government were familiar with the history of the struggle for liberty and they made secure in a written Constitution every right which the people had wrested from the power during a contest of ages... Those great and good men foresaw that troublous times would arise, and that the principles of Constitutional liberty would be in peril, unless established by irrepealable law. The Constitution of the United States is a law for rulers and people, equally in war and in peace, and covers with the shield of its protection all classes of men, at all times, and under all circumstances. No doctrine, involving more pernicious consequences, was ever invented by the wit of man than that any of its provisions can be suspended during any of the great exigencies of government. Such a doctrine leads directly to anarchy or despotism. Wicked men, ambitious of power, with hatred of liberty  and contempt of law, may fill the place once occupied by Washington and Lincoln. Our fathers knew that unlimited power was especially hazardous to freedom."

 

And then there's this; RESERVED FOR THE PEOPLE:

 

Amendment 9

 

The enumeration in the Constitution of certain rights shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people. And it goes on to say:

 

Provides that whatever rights are given under the Constitution shall not limit the people as to any other rights or privileges they may have.

 

Section 3. 1. Treason against the United States shall consist only in levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort. No person shall be convicted of treason unless on the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act, or on the confession in open court.

 

I charge treason for it is "We the People of the United States" that they have declared every manner of war against, be it a "war on drugs" and/or a "war on poverty" or any one of their declarations of war on domestic soil waged against the people. They give aid and comfort to the enemy by way of subversion of these irrepealable laws to fuel a system that consistently and constantly removes the rights retained by the people. The greater rub here is that they do this without any real/true facts with which they convict others. If you want proof, just check the stats regarding the number of prisoners held captive on a daily basis here in the USA. (2.5 million people imprisoned at any given time is the latest figure I can recall)


  • 0

#5 Vanka Savolov

Vanka Savolov

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1177 posts

Posted 10 November 2018 - 08:58 PM

I'm having one of those WTF, damn that's puzzling, moments... Some commentary regards those alphabet agencies:

 

SCOTUS: I'm just guessing that The Supreme Court had, at one time, the desire to protect the rights of the people as set forth in the Constitution, but what is puzzling about that is this: we have far fewer rights than ever before.

 

CDC: The Center for Disease Control, WTF!.... we have more diseases now than ever before!

 

FDA: The food and Drug Administration, uh huh... I'm yet to find anywhere in history where our food and drugs were more dangerous to life than right here and now. (I applaud the Russians for ending the practice of GMOs and returning to organic farming.)

 

AMA: The American Medical Association... just take the damn shot! in full disregard of the overwhelming evidence that these shots do more harm than good.

 

EPA: The Environmental Protection Agency... protecting the environment from what, people? There is no time in the history of the world where there was more pollution--entire areas that are completely abandoned insofar as to visit these places is to assume a dire risk of injury, due to the contamination of various, almost uncountable pollutants.

 

Yes, there are more seriously demented things about the US government than what they had done to me. But it all adds up to one big crime against humanity.


  • 0

#6 Ivan88

Ivan88

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 13694 posts

Posted 10 November 2018 - 09:33 PM

First of all, Vanka, whatever "Rights" you have or had are subject to:  VOID WHERE PROHIBITED BY LAW.

Congress abolished the Writ of Habeus Corpus. In San Bernardino County, California, the Courts had forms for filing for such writs.

Not anymore.  Remember the "Patriot Act?  It wiped out habeas corpus.  So there are no "Rights". You have privileges that can be taken at any time.

These same types of people invented "sex offender" phrase as part of a Divine Judgment on male Americans for their failure to be Real Men; And when Judgement comes on a land, anyone can become subject to the effects of that Judgment. See Isaiah 3:4 & 3:12

There are people in the law enforcement growth industry that like labels, parole etc. that gives them immense power over those who are saddled with those labels.

When they impose some statute riddled "contract" on you, Simply write in signature box, "Under Duress & Without Counsel" or in Latin, ",sub coercitione inlicite" and Without Counsel, then sign your name, and be sure to get a certified copy of it.

You should also realize that hassling our glorious peoples leaders can get you killed. Better to out wit them, and keep a low profile.

This is especially true since they adopted the Talmudic Noahide code.

 

When a nation is conquered, close to the first thing is to get control of females and alienate them to the conquered males. Being a "sex offender" is part of that process.

 

As for a Supreme Court, President Lincoln over threw it when he forcibly refused to honor court writs of Habeaus Corpus.  Since that time, the Supreme Court consults with President and Congress before making any significant ruling.

 

In Miranda vs. Arizona, the Supreme Court said that when officials break the Law, they encourage the people to do the same...


Edited by Ivan88, 10 November 2018 - 09:40 PM.

  • 0

#7 Vanka Savolov

Vanka Savolov

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1177 posts

Posted 11 November 2018 - 05:51 PM

I tried a different route by invoking UCC 1-308 but it was ignored. UCC 1-308 is a full reservation of rights under international law.  The big problem here, in relation to me is that I had little to no idea as to how the system works, 28 years ago. Hindsight is 20/20, which is to say, if I would have known then, what I know today, there might have been a different outcome in my case. 

 

I agree, there are no rights left... it's all privileges. I just need to accept the fact that I will die with my name going down in infamy. 

 

I have some good news for the gloats out there.

 

On 10/26/2018 I had another heart attack. I took a blood pressure reading shortly after I woke up and it was 150/90/68 the last number being my heart rate. My heart rate when my blood pressure is that high is typically around 100 bpm. Around 10:00 am I decided to play the drums and about 15 to 20 minutes in, I felt severe chest pains and became extremely light-headed. I had to crawl to my bed where I tried to take a blood another blood pressure reading... but the machine couldn't take a reading. At 10:30, I finally was able to get a reading: 123/99/122. Take note of the bpm, and gloat over these next readings...  @ 11 am: 91/75/121 and @ 11:30: 76/61/120. These reading varied only slightly until 5 pm when such finally fell within a somewhat normal range: 103/72/83.

 

What that means is that my heart was having to work twice its normal rate just to give me a blood pressure reading well below average. Did I go to the hospital? No. I left specific instructions in my medical records: do not revive. I was denied SSI citing that, heart-failure wasn't enough of a reason to claim disability.

 

I was assured that "these people will not get away with anything" and in effect, karma will get them in ways never seen before... I'll just die happy that I was at least recognized in life, even if it was just infamously, because some people go through life without any recognition. They say that "no publicity is bad publicity"... but whose loss is this really, mine or yours?


Edited by Vanka Savolov, 11 November 2018 - 06:23 PM.

  • 0

#8 Vanka Savolov

Vanka Savolov

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1177 posts

Posted 12 November 2018 - 04:39 PM

Ivan, I had to 'sleep on' some of the things you've said here before I made any comment. Is it any mystery that I'm caught up in a mess that has left me in a state where I'm seeing things solely from my own perspective? I value anyone's opinion providing that there is some substance to it. I've already stated that you are intelligent and made some wise-crack about being on my S.H.I.T. list, which isn't at all the same as my other shit list... anyway...

 

Life was indeed better pre-9/11-Patriot Act, and I remember some things regards the Noahide code that were briefly talked about, many years ago and I seem to recall that the subject was brought up again not too long ago. The rub with that is this: that leadership is still taking an oath to up hold the Constitution, etc.. That fact leads me to believe that a full-on usurpation of Supreme Law has taken place (right under our noses) and no one seems to have noticed or they don't seem to care. I can see that something isn't right about all of that, but there are so few people out there who see what I see. Supreme Law was written in plain English for the most part, e.g., one does not need a Law degree to understand it, as a common dictionary will do just fine in understanding its meaning and intent.

 

The American society has been 'dumb-down' to a point that even simple phrases like "no bills of attainder" and "these rights shall not be infringed" no longer have the force and weight of their intended meaning. I'm not the sharpest tack on the box and I get it... our country has been torn down from within, and its people are nothing less than the property of foreign interests--by way of the traitors in government whom have sold all of us out. 

 

I wish people would get a grip and see it for what it is. They STILL claim adherence to the Constitution and swear an oath to same, BUT there is not-a-thing by way of their actions that even remotely indicates that such is true. Just how stupid can Americans be? If words do not match deeds, then there is no integrity. A leadership without integrity is nothing short of a criminal organization. 

 

My view is this, in all honesty: Americans are mindless, nutless, gutless, spineless and as creepy as fu*k... and they aren't even smart enough to be stupid.... so sad to say.


Edited by Vanka Savolov, 12 November 2018 - 05:15 PM.

  • 0

#9 Vanka Savolov

Vanka Savolov

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1177 posts

Posted Yesterday, 05:11 PM

A few things to add that expound upon what Ivan had mentioned:

 

One can also challenge the 'jurisdiction' of the judge(s) that preside over your case. This is done by demanding documentation PROVING jurisdiction.

 

I came across this one just a few days ago and so I'll post the whole premise of it here:

 

This must be done at the very outset of any court case, criminal or civil, and you must avoid the whole issue of the "name game" entirely.  When asked to "state your name" say only your first name -- "John" for example, or "John Michael" -- and admit that you are here to address the court "in this matter"--- which actually means, in your fleshly body. 

There are only three jurisdictions available to the courts now assaulting the American People --- ecclesiastical courts, maritime (commercial) courts, and admiralty (military) courts.  To defeat the action against you, you must establish that you are outside all three of these potential jurisdictions. 

At each step of the process the jurisdiction changes and the change is signaled when the judge gets up from the bench and leaves the courtroom.  When he returns, you have "ratcheted up" into another and more serious jurisdiction.

They always follow the same order and begin in the maritime (commercial) jurisdiction where the answer is to "wish for" remedy. 

The second more serious jurisdiction is admiralty (martial law) where the answer is to "wish for" cure and relief.

If the judge dares to leave and come back again, you are both playing for High Stakes, and are now in ecclesiastical court (cannon law).....  where the answer is to identify your self in connection with the Creator.  A Judge who violates your sovereignty in this jurisdiction loses his job permanently.   

This is the "iteration" method when facing any action in one of their courts.   You make these three "iterations" as your only replies.

"Your Honor, for and on the record of this court, I am a living man, the blood flows and the flesh lives and I wish for remedy....."
He will have to get up and leave the courtroom.  When he comes back....

"Your Honor, just to reiterate, for and on the record of this court, I am a living man, the blood flows and the flesh lives and I wish for cure and relief...."

He will have to exit again, or dismiss outright.  Most judges will dismiss at this point rather than risk the consequences of a final confrontation, but if he comes back a third time, you reiterate.

"Your Honor, to reiterate, for and on the record of this court, I am a living man, the blood flows and the flesh lives, and we are sovereign.  Nothing stands between my self and the Divine Creator of All That Is." 

And there is the final end of the nightmare.  He has no further recourse, no other jurisdiction to exercise, and he has to exit --- permanently.

The DA may be dumb enough to set up another case and the Clerk may attempt to assign another Judge, but after a few judges lose their jobs by pushing the envelope and running afoul in canon law,  they all get the message.

 

This last one I had also tried: remaining anonymous; which is everyone's right to remain silent and also, never sign nor give up a finger print on any document(s). In this case, the burden of 'proof' falls on the prosecution because you have neither confirmed nor denied anything.

 

This is what happened to me when I tried this: I was placed in a holding cell, citing that "I am now under a delayed booking procedure." Later, they then placed me in a booking room, with some extremely bright lights shining directly onto my face, effectively blinding me. I still hadn't said anything and while I was standing there, one of the booking officers grab my right thumb and forced my thumb-print onto a document that was held in her left hand. Anyone can tell that said print WAS NOT given voluntarily, because she had no choice but to 'cup' her hand to hold onto said document while forcing my thumb-print upon it with her other hand.

 

Any voluntarily given print would be done on a flat/hard surface where the print would be cleanly and clearly placed. Take a piece of paper, cup it in your hand and then print your own thumb-print on it. When said paper is laid flat, it will be obvious that such is neither done by any standard procedure nor does it in anyway show to be a clean/clear thumb-print. As far as I know, that document is still on file. I had also witnessed another document, sitting on a nurse's desk that had my name on the signature-line... the problem with that is, I did not sign it, and it was all too obvious that said signature wasn't mine. I've spent much of my life working in the maintenance and construction business and I do not have a delicate hand when writing/signing things. "Chicken-scratch" very much describes my handwriting. 

 

How do they get away with these kind of things? The idiot public elects and reelects the assholes that have betrayed us all, and not only that, they continue to pay the taxes that support this premeditated-crime-against-humanity.


  • 0

#10 Vanka Savolov

Vanka Savolov

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1177 posts

Posted Yesterday, 05:30 PM

And check this one out: upon first reading this, it leaves an initial impression that I am currently in jail at: 147 MARYLAND ST, INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204. My 'status' is: active; and my 'inmate status' is: active. SERIOUSLY PEOPLE?!

 

https://arrestfacts....r-Dowdle-2m1n74


  • 0

#11 Asterix

Asterix

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 33973 posts

Posted Yesterday, 06:43 PM

trump-macron.jpg

aristocats votes taken into account

is not exactly the ritz but it is quiet

 

the so called bear necessities

 

russian-bear-myths-and-reality-en.jpg


Edited by Asterix, Yesterday, 06:58 PM.

  • 0

#12 Vanka Savolov

Vanka Savolov

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1177 posts

Posted Yesterday, 07:38 PM

This is my favorite version of "Puttin on the Ritz".

 


  • 0

#13 Vanka Savolov

Vanka Savolov

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1177 posts

Posted Yesterday, 09:28 PM

This fits, and rather scarily so... Speak of the devil (the patriot act) and the devil shows up! I like this kind of synchronicity...

 


  • 0




2 user(s) are reading this topic

1 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users


    Vanka Savolov
Copyright © 2018 Pravda.Ru