Need for international Jewish Studies groups and think-tanks
Postby rerevisionist » 13 Jan 2012 15:30
Let me list (in no special order; and not remotely comprehensive) Jewish influences over the last few centuries--
** Participation in science frauds: AIDS, NASA, nuclear matters, cell biology, climate science . There's a long list in which there is considerable Jewish participation and also of course considerable Jewish obfuscation
** Financial frauds, generally involving credit and paper money, and generally with collaboration from lenders or politicians - the 'Fed', and recent PFI schemes in Britain, being just two examples
** Systematic propaganda aimed against non-Jews in ways which dominant Jews seem to think is in their interest
** Economic propaganda deception of the sort where e.g. African assets are controlled by Jews
** Systematic media dishonesty, dating back almost to the start of modern mass printing methods
** Social engineering: e.g. the Hart-Cellar Act type in the USA (designed to force immigration into the USA), and the dumbing-down of education in the UK - the 'look say' method and removal of grammar schools being typical examples, in which public schools (in fact schools outside the state system) and specifically Jewish schools were exempt
** Control of mass murder in the USSR and gradations - e.g. Jewish cliques in Poland, Hungary etc
** Control and influence and profit in post-1945 US wars
** Different techniques - financial, debt, divide-and-rule, fomenting wars, control of essentials, corrupting the legal system - as applied to different states: thus Poland, France, Netherlands, Spain, Germany, Britain, the USA have had different interventions, all of which ought to be studied as facets of essentially the same aims. The same analysis should be applied to the entire EU
** True history of so-called Jews, mostly involving eastern Europe, has been mostly suppressed
** Truth of Jewish 'holy books' which has also of course largely been suppressed
** Jewish role in slavery, notably in the USA.
There clearly ought to be careful study of the effects of Jews, at least if history, sociology, and economics are ever to become serious subjects. As things stand, it seems impossible that a set of departments across the world could be set up to co-operate on serious research, possibly with some central organisation situated in an intellectually liberal country - if there is one. It's conceivable (I suppose) that China or India might form a seed, as happened, in part, with the AIDS fraud, and may well happen with nuclear frauds.
Jews & Muslims-Very Similar Violent Parasitical Tribal Cults
Postby rerevisionist » 28 Jul 2011 02:12
Judaism and Islam - comparison.
This is only indirectly related to nuclear issues, though of course if nuclear weapons exist, any possible cause for war is important. If they don't, the 'Samson Option' would have to be by conventional weapons.
This is to show
 Islam closely resembles Judaism (apart from allowing easy conversion, something Islam copied from Christianity).
 Jews go to great effort to conceal the similarities, because they don't want people to notice the primitive savagery of Judaism. Muslims also hide the similarities.
Therefore it's likely that behaviour characteristic of Jews will be found, increasingly, in Muslims.
These comments are based on critiques of two books, The West, Islam and Islamism: Is Ideological Islam Compatible with Liberal Democracy? by John Marks and Caroline Cox, and Londonistan: How Britain Has Created a Terror State Within by Melanie Phillips (who believes herself to be a Jew). (Remarkably, Phillips's book has almost no detail about London, despite the title.)
Similarities between Judaism and Islam
*Art: both have taboos against representative art
*Cruel ritual slaughter and food taboos
*Calendar system influenced by the moon
*Distinctive odd clothing
*Very pronounced racist (Judaism) and tribalist (Islam) feeling aganst goyim and kuffar
*Deliberate dishonesty to non-members (Kol Nidre in Judaism, Taqqiya in Islam)
*Deliberate refusal to extend ethics to non-members (e.g. religious Jews and Muslims regard medical help to outgroup members as unnecessary). Even the most vicious and dangerous and damaging criminal members are, in practice, shielded by the vast majority of both groups
*Genetics: the breeding systems cause genetic defects: so much so these were known to 19th century medical doctors as 'Jewish Diseases'. It's less well-known - because of media censorship - that some Muslim groups have genetic diseases, the costs of course being offloaded onto the 'host community'.
*Legal system of a sort
*Religious buildings which are in fact tribalist
*Serious penalties for leaving
*Sacred texts preserved as much as possible
*Slavery - very much emphasised in the Quran and in Jewish books. Both religions have had huge involvements - Jewish involvement has only recently been rediscovered
*Prostitution - because of contempt for Goyim and Kuffar prostitution of whites is promoted
*Sex with children explicitly encouraged
*Similar attitudes to blacks and 'Semites'
*Both ideologies are parasitic
*In both cases the tribalism has limits - there are subsets of Jews and Muslims regarded as very inferior
*Women treated more or less as inferior
*Violence offered to critics, and with minimal attempt at self-criticism and self-understanding
*Violence as part of the history, though somewhat concealed: thus the wars and violence of Muhammad are presented as somewhat defensive; the mountain-dwelling 'Habiru' are supposed to have something to do with Hebrews
*Fanaticism: slightly more difficult to explain. A rigid mental model of the world tends to cause decisive and determined behaviour. The huge expansion of Islam when it was new; the separation from India of W and E Pakistan in 1948, with massive massacres; the destruction of an ancient Buddha recently are typical manifestations of fanaticism. Jewish behaviour can include years of study of work in law, politics, media, academia etc, not for career reasons, but with the extra motive of causing damage to goyim. And as with Islam, destructive behaviour becomes almost an instinct, as for example the mass murders of the USSR, the bombing and chemical warfare in Vietnam, the deliberate damage to Sweden (see the Barbara Lerner Spectre videos). It's difficult to imagine any civilised people doing these sorts of things.
. . .Religion: note that neither cult is simply a 'religion' in the usual western sense, which is a system of beliefs backed by some sort of creed, which can be changed if the reliigous person feels like it. Islam and Judaism are lifestyles rather than religions. To illustrate, someone in Switzerland defended Islamification in Switzerland by saying "the Swiss Constitution guarantees freedom of reliigon." She couldn't understand that Islam is a lifestyle: the Swiss Consititution does not guarantee polygamy, deliberate miseducation, prostitution of Kufr girls, genital mutilation, death threats against converts out.
Differences between Judaism and Islam
*Sheer population numbers - Islam is not particularist, unlike Judaism, and can spread anywhere; there are 1.6 billion reasons for concern
*Jihad - struggle. It's only recommended when the population proportion is above 20%. Mass murders arranged by Jews are historically comparable, but the machanism is different, because they expected to be a minority. EXCEPT THAT it's now generally accepted that the Khazar conversion is the source of most modern Jewry, despite their being not 'Semites'. (Some people think only a Khazar elite were converted, but this seems unlikely in view of the large numbers in Poland, Russia, and eastern Europe generally). In effect modern Zionism is something like a Jihad, but operates differently.
*Although both ideologies are parasitic, the differences are caused by population numbers, and by geography. Judaism is (vaguely) like a behaviour-changing tapeworm, Islam like a swarm of dangerous locusts. Islam until recently, unlike Judaism, had no great resources to exploit. A similar comment applies to democracy: both are theocratic rather than undemocratic, but in practice there have been many more Muslim theocracies
*Judaism is almost always a minority cult (though in pre-USSR Russia, in some areas Jews and Orthodox Russians were about equal in numbers). It is therefore natural, and almost inevitable, that Jewish power must be secret - with lies, deception, secret 'education' amongst themselves, long-term secret planning, subversion of some goyim and their institutions, vicious reactions when exposed - if possible; if not, slimy and wheedling reactions when exposed.
*Descent is supposedly by female line in Jews, male line in Muslims
How are the similarities evaded?
* Selection of sources. Western newspapers are mostly owned by Jews. Intelligence stuff is usually from secret sources. Absurdly biased funded quangos - In Britain, corrupt outfits such as the Runnymede Trust, the 'Equalities and Human Rights Commission', the Muslim Council of Britain, are treated as though independent.
* Simple bias. Omission for example by Jews of the Deir Yassin massacres, or British troops hanged in Jerusalem. And nothing about remote killing by drones in e.g. Afghanistan, so we have the ridiculous hypocrisy about a few deaths in one area vs. huge numbers of the 'enemy'. Assumptions about 'liberal democracies' compared with Islamic societies and Marxist societies - 'In western societies.. pluralism is encouraged and realised. .. there are commitments to equality..' I'd rather live here than there, but the blithe easy assumptions are untrue, as wars in Vietnam, Iraq and so on, and attacks on democracy in for example the EU, and censorship, prove.
* 'Group memory' of official lies, such as the 'Holocaust', 9/11, the USSR as 'socialist', the manufacture of wars. More recent examples include 'Al Qaeda' - does it exist, or is it just 'the database'? Did Ahmadinejad really say 'wipe Israel off the map'? Was Osama bin Laden a friend of the Bush families? Are judges 'independent', given that their promotions are by secret decisions? And there are pervasive false beliefs pushed by the media. For instance, immigration to northern English towns was not 'cheap labour' - all the housing, education, police, health and other costs were offloaded onto the taxpayer. The law was deformed to allow access to the social safety net to people for whom it was never remotely intended.
* Refusal to mention Jewish secret activities. People like Ken Livingstone in London take their instructions from Jewish-funded seedy 'lefties', but, like much Jewish activity, all this goes unreported. All the big political parties are backed financially by Jews. Race Relations Acts and the like were largely promoted by Jews in Britain and in European countries, just as in the USA. This of course now has parallels with secret Muslim activity.
The outcome in Europe now
* Immigration levels to the UK are so high that the entire population structure will be altered, unless something is done.
* In Britain immigrants get more rights than the 'natives' and deliberately outbreed them. Women have few rights (the police and the system collude in not helping them; Muslim police are known to be relatively corrupt). The women have arranged 'marriages', polygamy, are often uneducated and linguistically incompetent, and have little choice but breed.
So what should be done? There are roughly four possible approaches:  do nothing with the virtual certainty there'll be an ineducable underclass - or overclass; a sub-scientific society might result;  hope they can be reformed, and encourage reform;  withdraw their benefits etc;  explicitly do everything to remove them, by, for example, enforcing laws against ritual slaughter and mosques, preventing separatist education, and prosecuting all apostles of violence.
NOTE ON PARASITISM
I'd say that creativity, building an entire organic reasonably-functioning society, is the most difficult task of politics. The easiest is pure destruction: bombing, killing, looting, raping, demolition are easy.
Intermediate is parasitism. All that's needed is the ability to spot a chance: money, assets, weak points can be exploited. This is a common characteristic of the uncreative tribal cults of Judaism and Islam. Neither has built any society of its own of any stability, and neither has produced any first-rate thinkers or creative people. The psychology must presumably be very deeply rooted, possibly even to the level of being genetically fixed.
If you consider someone who made money by working for aristocrats (in the 17th century maybe) - there seems to outsiders no obvious reason why such people couldn't sit back, be wealthy, and observe things. But presumably such people as the Rothschilds are continually faced with requests from money for schemes - everything from cornering meat, buying up rentable property, purchasing newspapers for propaganda reasons, financing scientific fraud, financing wars, buying up politicians, corrupting education, and so on. To the extent that, now, and for a century at least, they have become a worldwide nuisance.
My best guess is that their sheer recklessness is a function of parasitism, too. A parasite has little understanding of the host; it simply has to assume the host will limp along, doing what it always has, and contributing to the parasite's well-being. I think this psychology explains why, for example, huge genocides over Russia, vast wartime cruelties and killings, huge environmental risks, enormous frauds, calculated false-flag killings, vast speculative financial corruptions and risks, and huge population replacements are undertaken without apparently the slightest thought, as under a sort of robotic genetic programming. The same sort of thing applies to Islam, which has a history of both casual and deliberate destruction, of environmental damage and desertification, and casual vast cruelties reminiscent of Jews.