Jump to content

Theme© by Fisana
 

Photo

Joseph Goebbels' 1945 Editorial on the Influence of Jewish Elites in the US, UK and Russia


  • Please log in to reply
46 replies to this topic

#1 Cosssack

Cosssack

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 58088 posts

Posted 24 May 2019 - 12:55 AM

Joseph Goebbels' 1945 Editorial on the Influence of Jewish Elites in the US, UK and Russia

https://russia-insid...-russia/ri27100

Joseph Goebbels Wed, May 22, 2019 | 2120 words 6,Email
 

Published on January 21, 1945 in Das Reich, the leading German weekly newspaper of that time.

One could not understand this war if one did not always keep in mind the fact that International Jewry stands behind all the unnatural forces that our united enemies use to attempt to deceive the world and keep humanity in the dark. It is, so to speak, the mortar that holds the enemy coalition firmly together, despite its differences of class, ideology, and interests. Capitalism and Bolshevism have the same Jewish roots, two branches of the same tree that in the end bear the same fruit. International Jewry uses both in its own way to suppress the nations and keep them in its service. How deep its influence on public opinion is in all the enemy countries and many neutral nations is plain to see that it may never be mentioned in newspapers, speeches, and radio broadcasts.

fotonoticia_20110217183250_800_1.jpg?ito

There is a law in the Soviet Union that punishes anti-Semitism — or in plain English, public education about the Jewish Question — by death. The expert in these matters is in no way surprised that a leading spokesman for the Kremlin said over the New Year that the Soviet Union would not rest until this law was valid throughout the world. In other words, the enemy clearly says that its goal in this war is to put the total domination of Jewry over the nations of the earth under legal protection, and to threaten even a discussion of this shameful attempt with the death penalty.

It is little different in the plutocratic nations. There the struggle against the impudent usurpation of the Jewish race is not punished by the executioner, but rather by death through economic and social boycott and by intellectual terror. This has the same effect in the end. Stalin, Churchill, and Roosevelt were made by Jewry. They enjoy its full support and reward it with their full protection. They present themselves in their speeches as upright men of civil courage, yet one never hears even a word against the Jews, even though there is growing hatred among their people as a result of this war, a hatred that is fully justified. Jewry is a taboo theme in the enemy countries. It stands outside every legal boundary and thus becomes the tyrant of its host peoples.

akg361445.jpg?itok=2q1NkwV0

While enemy soldiers fight, bleed, and die at the front, the Jews make money from their sacrifice on the stock exchanges and black markets. If a brave man dares to step forward and accuse the Jews of their crimes, he will be mocked and spat on by their press, chased from his job or otherwise impoverished, and be brought into public contempt. Even that is apparently not enough for the Jews. They want to bring Soviet conditions to the whole world, giving Jewry absolute power and freedom from prosecution. He who objects or even debates the matter gets a bullet in the back of his head or an axe through his neck. There is no worse tyranny than this. This is the epitome of the public and secret disgrace that Jewry inflicts on the nations that deserve freedom.

That is all long behind us. Yet it still threatens us in the distance. We have, it is true, entirely broken the power of the Jews in the Reich, but they have not given up. They did not rest until they had mobilized the whole world against us. Since they could no longer conquer Germany from within, they want to try it from without. Every Russian, English, and American soldier is a mercenary of this world conspiracy of a parasitic race. Given the current state of the war, who could still believe that they are fighting and dying at the front for the national interests of their countries!

The nations want a decent peace, but the Jews are against it. They know that the end of the war would mean the dawning humanity’s knowledge of the unhealthy role that International Jewry played in preparing for and carrying out this war. They fear being unmasked, which has in fact become unavoidable and must inevitably come, just as the day follows the night. That explains their raging bursts of hatred against us, which are only the result of their fear and their feelings of inferiority. They are too eager, and that makes them suspicious. International Jewry will not succeed in turning this war to its advantage. Things are already too far along. The hour will come in which all the peoples of the earth will awake, and the Jews will be the victims. Here, too, things can only go so far.

Bundesarchiv_Bild_146-1978-086-03_Joseph

It is an old, often-used method of International Jewry to discredit education and knowledge about its corrupting nature and drives, thereby depending on the weaknesses of those people who easily confuse cause with effect. The Jews are also masters at manipulating public opinion, which they dominate through their network of news agencies and press concerns that reaches throughout the world. The pitiful illusion of a free press is one of the methods they use to stupefy the publics of enemy lands. If the enemy press is as free as it pretends to be, let it take an open position, for or against, on the Jewish Question.

It will not do that because it cannot and may not do so. The Jews love to mock and criticize everything except themselves, although everyone knows that they are most in need of public criticism. This is where the so-called freedom of the press in enemy countries ends. Newspapers, parliaments, statesmen, and church leaders must be silent here. Crimes and vices, filth and corruption are covered by the blanket of love. The Jews have total control of public opinion in enemy countries, and he who has that is also master of all of public life. Only the nations that have to accept such a condition are to be pitied. The Jews mislead them into believing that the German nation is backward. Our alleged backwardness is actually proof of our progress. We have recognized the Jews as a national and international danger, and from this knowledge have drawn compelling conclusions. This German knowledge will become the knowledge of the world at the end of this war. We think it our primary duty to do everything in our power to make that happen.

fingerteaser2.jpg?itok=7jekA407

Humanity would sink into eternal darkness, it would fall into a dull and primitive state, were the Jews to win this war. They are the incarnation of that destructive force that in these terrible years has guided the enemy war leadership in a fight against all that we see as noble, beautiful, and worth keeping. For that reason alone the Jews hate us. They despise our culture and learning, which they perceive as towering over their nomadic worldview. They fear our economic and social standards, which leave no room for their parasitic drives.

They are the enemy of our domestic order, which has excluded their anarchistic tendencies. Germany is the first nation in the world that is entirely free of the Jews. That is the prime cause of its political and economic balance. Since their expulsion from the German national body has made it impossible for them to shake this balance from within, they lead the nations they have deceived in battle against us from without. It is fine with them, in fact it is part of their plan, that Europe in the process will lose a large part of its cultural values. The Jews had no part in their creation. They do not understand them. A deep racial instinct tells them that since these heights of human creative activity are forever beyond their reach, they must attack them today with hatred. The day is not distant when the nations of Europe, yes, even those of the whole world, will shout: The Jews are guilty for all our misfortunes! They must be called to account, and soon and thoroughly!

International Jewry is ready with its alibi. Just as during the great reckoning in Germany, they will attempt to look innocent and say that one needs a scapegoat, and they are it. But that will no longer help them, just as it did not help them during the National Socialist revolution, The proof of their historical guilt, in details large and small, is so plain that it can no longer be denied even with the most clever lies and hypocrisy.

Who is it that drives the Russians, the English, and the Americans into battle and sacrifices huge numbers of human lives in a hopeless struggle against the German people? The Jews! Their newspapers and radio broadcasts spread the songs of war while the nations they have deceived are led to the slaughter. Who is it that invents new plans of hatred and destruction against us every day, making this war into a dreadful case of self-mutilation and self-destruction of European life and its economy, education and culture? The Jews! Who devised the unnatural marriage between England and the USA on one side and Bolshevism on the other, building it up and jealously ensuring its continuance?

Who covers the most perverse political situations with cynical hypocrisy from a trembling fear that a new way could lead the nations to realize the true causes of this terrible human catastrophe? The Jews, only the Jews! They are named Morgenthau and Lehmann and stand behind Roosevelt as a so-called brain trust. They are named Mechett and Sasoon and serve as Churchill’s moneybags and order givers. They are named Kaganovich and Ehrenburg and are Stalin’s pacesetters and intellectual spokesmen. Wherever you look, you see Jews. They march as political commissars behind the Red army and organize murder and terror in the areas conquered by the Soviets. They sit behind the lines in Paris and Brussels, Rome and Athens, and fashion their reins from the skin of the unhappy nations that have fallen under their power.

That is the truth. It can no longer be denied, particularly since in their drunken joy of power and victory the Jews have forgotten their ordinarily so carefully maintained reserve and now stand in the spotlight of public opinion. They no longer bother, apparently believing that it is no longer necessary, that their hour has come.

And this is their mistake, which they always make when think themselves near their great goal of anonymous world domination. Throughout the history of the nations, whenever this tragic situation developed, a good providence saw to it that the Jews themselves became the gravediggers of their own hopes. They did not destroy the healthy peoples, but rather the sting of their parasitic effects brought the realization of the looming danger to the forefront and led to the greatest sacrifices to overcome it. At a certain point, they become that power that always wants evil but creates good. It will be that way this time, too.

The fact that the German nation was the first on earth to recognize this danger and expel it from its organism is proof of its healthy instincts. It therefore became the leader of a world struggle whose results will determine the fate and the future of International Jewry. We view with complete calm the wild Old Testament tirades of hatred and revenge of Jews throughout the world against us. They are only proof that we are on the right path. They cannot unsettle us. We gaze on them with sovereign contempt and remember that these outbursts of hate and revenge were everyday events for us in Germany until that fateful day for International Jewry, 30 January 1933, when the world revolution against the Jews that threatened them not only Germany, but all the other nations, began.

It will not cease before it has reached its goal. The truth cannot be stopped by lies or force. It will get through. The Jews will meet their Cannae at the end of this war. Not Europe, but rather they will lose. They may laugh at this prophecy today, but they have laughed so often in the past, and almost as often they stopped laughing sooner or later. Not only do we know precisely what we want, we also know precisely what we do not want. The deceived nations of the Earth may still lack the knowledge they need, but we will bring it to them. How will the Jews stop that in the long run? They believe their power rests on sure foundations, but it stands on feet of clay.

One hard blow and it will collapse, burying the creators of the misfortunes of the world in its ruins.

Go to the Goebbels Page.

Go to the 1933-1945 Page.

Go to the German Propaganda Archive Home Page.

Source: Calvin.edu

 


  • 0

#2 Cosssack

Cosssack

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 58088 posts

Posted 24 May 2019 - 08:16 AM

THIS MAN TRULY WAS DOING SOMETHING ABOUT JEWISH PROBLEM....

 

AND WHERE ALL THOSE CRITICS OF HOOK-NOSED BASTARDS..... SUPPORTING MEN LIKE HIM... NOWHERE TO BE FOUND...

 

CRICKETS!

 

PERHAPS U JUST LIKE WHINING... ABOUT JEW BUT  DO NOTHING.. hmm that is the idea right?

 

AND WHEN COMES TO EFFECTIVE ACTION U QUIETLY SNEAK UNDER THE BED AND CRITICIZE IN TANDEM WITH JEW MEDIA HOLLYWOOD ..PRESIDENT TRUMP...

 

God!


  • 0

#3 Atossa

Atossa

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 43206 posts

Posted 24 May 2019 - 08:37 AM


Joseph Goebbels' 1945 Editorial on the Influence of Jewish Elites in the US, UK and Russia
https://russia-insid...-russia/ri27100


There is a law in the Soviet Union that punishes anti-Semitism or in plain English, public education about the Jewish Question by death. The expert in these matters is in no way surprised that a leading spokesman for the Kremlin said over the New Year that the Soviet Union would not rest until this law was valid throughout the world. In other words, the enemy clearly says that its goal in this war is to put the total domination of Jewry over the nations of the earth under legal protection, and to threaten even a discussion of this shameful attempt with the death penalty.





Putin celebrates and glorifies the victory of antichrist Stalin and his evil Edomite-jew-bolshevik mass-murderers who destroyed the only world leader [Hitler] who had the knowledge, understanding, will, ability and courage to stand up and fight against the evil antichrist Edomite-jew-bolsheviks who were in the process of totally destroying Aryan Christendom worldwide.



Edited by Atossa, 24 May 2019 - 08:39 AM.

  • 0

#4 Zharkov

Zharkov

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 35325 posts

Posted 24 May 2019 - 06:45 PM

Isn't the internet wonderful?

 

You can discover all kinds of interesting stuff.

 

Even Goebbels is resurrected.


  • 1

#5 Cosssack

Cosssack

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 58088 posts

Posted 25 May 2019 - 06:37 AM

he he he .... correct :)

 

How was Hitler's Reich viewed before the propaganda set in?

 

https://russia-insid...umanity/ri26829

 


Inside Nazi Germany: An American Intellectual Finds Order, Reason, Humanity



How was Hitler's Reich viewed before the propaganda set in?


Thomas Jackson Mon, Apr 22, 2019 | 2100 words 3,313 46

Share to TwitterShare to RedditShare to VkontakteShare to MessengerShare to TelegramShare to WhatsAppShare to Email

MORE: History

Into the Darkness, Lothrop Stoddard, Noontide Press, 2000, 311 pp.

Today it is impossible to dissent openly from racial orthodoxy without sooner or later being called a “Nazi.” Despite (or perhaps because of) the stupidity of doing so, egalitarians are quick to equate with Hitler anyone who endorses American racial views that antedate Hitler by centuries. Most liberals are not so silly as to call Lincoln a Nazi, but if he were to rise from the grave and restate his views from the debates with Douglas that is just one of many things they would call him.

Into-the-Darkness-Lothrop-Stoddard.jpg?w

The idea of a racial nation was National Socialism’s point of departure, but from the outset it was a comprehensive theory of applied government designed to funnel the energies of every German into collective goals. It was similar to Communism in this respect, and similar also in the sweeping institutional changes it imposed. In its historical period, however, racial policy was not the most striking aspect of Nazism. In the 1930s, the view that race was an essential element of the nation was no more foreign to Americans than to Germans—indeed, no more foreign than it is to virtually every non-white living today. It was hardly the distinctive characteristic of the regime.

What was distinctive? What, in fact, did racially aware Americans of the period — people whose ideas would, today, be called “Nazi”—think of the Third Reich? We have a fascinating answer in Into the Darkness, the last book by one of the most influential American champions of racial consciousness, Lothrop Stoddard.

Stoddard wrote this book—recently reissued as a trade paperback—after spending four months in Germany as a reporter during the “phony war” of 1939-40. A Harvard Ph.D. and foreign affairs specialist, Stoddard was particularly keen on understanding how war and Nazism had changed everyday life in Germany, and his account has a frank, contemporaneous quality untouched by the acrimony that became common after the United States went to war.

Many of Stoddard’s strongest impressions were colored as much by war as by the politics of the new regime. The title, for example, does not refer to a nation plunging into barbarism but to the rigorous blackout all Germans maintained against the possibility of night bombardment by the British. Darkness was, in fact, Stoddard’s first experience of Germany. Even the train by which he entered from Italy had to douse its lights at the border, and passengers crept about by the light of tiny blue bulbs. Stoddard couldn’t see the slightest glimmer from his train window, not even as he glided through Munich: “Passing through this great darkened city, the sense of unnatural silence and emptiness became positively oppressive.”

In Berlin, where he spent most of his four months, headlights of cars were heavily hooded, making it impossible to drive at night at speeds greater than a crawl. Pedestrians carried pocket flashlights to see where they were going, but were forbidden to shine them upwards to read street signs, since even a flashlight might catch the eye of a British bombardier. Stoddard hated the blackout, complaining that it had a “depressing, almost paralyzing effect. It must be lived to be understood.”

Another war-time measure Stoddard described in detail was the rationing regimen according to which everything including food and clothing was doled out with typically German efficiency. The government issued everyone—including travelers—monthly food coupons that had to be exchanged even for a restaurant meal. Coupons restricted quantity, not quality, so the rich ate better than the poor but not more. Stoddard found that when wealthy friends invited him to restaurants and paid for his meals, he still had to turn over coupons to the waiters because not even the rich had coupons to spare. Clothing and other goods were rationed the same way, in a system designed to “assure to the poorest German the basic necessities of life, while the richest cannot get much more than his share.”


article-2240351-16455ffd000005dc-940_964

Stoddard complained bitterly about the poor quality and limited variety of the food—Germans drank roasted barley rather than coffee because of the British naval blockade—but confessed there was enough starch in a German ration for him to put on 12 pounds in four months.

If even the privileged position of a foreign correspondent seemed grim to Stoddard, it is not surprising that he found no enthusiasm for the war: “The Germans detest this war . . . This attitude is shared by Nazis and non-Nazis. On this point there is no difference between them.” He wrote that most Germans never believed France and England would declare war over Poland but that even ardent Nazis were willing to criticize Hitler for taking the risk. Stoddard noted that memories of “the Great War” were still fresh enough to keep any hint of romance or overconfidence out of this one. But Stoddard found as much resolution as privation:


No intelligent foreigner can be in Germany a week without asking himself: ‘How do these people stand it?’ When he has been there a month, he says: ‘How long can they stand it?’ After three months, his verdict will probably be: ‘I guess they’ll stand it a long time.’

The reason, concluded Stoddard, was that Germans were convinced defeat would mean extinction for Germany, and that even if the war had been a great blunder, it was a crisis of titanic proportions that called for heroism.

‘An absolute dictatorship’

And what of Nazism itself? What most struck Stoddard was its revolutionary, authoritarian nature. “The National Socialist upheaval that has created the Third Reich,” he wrote “goes far deeper than the Fascist regime in Italy, and is perhaps a more defiant breach with the historic past than even the Communism of Soviet Russia.” “[I]ts leaders,” he added, “are revolutionists from the ground up.”

Many of the Nazi policies seemed similar to Communism: “Agriculture has basically been socialized,” he wrote, adding that the Nazis “co-ordinated everybody connected with industry into a huge vertical trust.” He wondered whether Hitler Youth programs and National Labor Service did not turn the lives of young people into one long Nazi summer camp. He complained about “the liquidation not only of the Catholic youth organizations but of most of the parochial schools as well.” He shuddered at the words of Bernhard Rust, Reich Minister of Education: “All forms of instruction have one aim—the shaping of the National Socialist human.” (emphasis in the original)


dw5zqbfx0aejxnd.jpg?itok=mAoipqVa

Stoddard was bemused by Strength Through Joy, or workplace-based leisure: “This is the most gigantic scheme of organized, state-directed entertainment that the world has ever seen. It includes a wide variety of activities, from ‘highbrow’ art and music to popular amusement, travel, and sport.” Germans seemed to enjoy it, but he added that “to the individualist Anglo-Saxon, all this regimented ‘leisure to order’ may not sound particularly attractive.”

By the end of his stay, Stoddard believed he had found the answer to riddles that baffled experts: “Nazi achievements in finance and industry are generally regarded as deep, dark mysteries abroad. To me, the answer is very simple: An absolute dictatorship over an industrious, resourceful people.” (emphasis in the original)

What about racial policies? As Rachel Dixon points out in a useful new introduction to this edition, Stoddard had been cool towards the Nazis from the beginning. In 1935 he wrote:


These [racial] ideas, however, are so mixed up with an ulcerated nationalism and are so surcharged with mere emotion that the resulting compound is hard to evaluate. Ever since the [First World] war, Germany has been highly abnormal in almost every respect.

One of the final passages of Into the Darkness suggests that four months of direct observation did not greatly change his views. When he finally found himself back among Americans on a steamship bound for home, he was delighted by creature comforts but by something else, too: “Even more deeply satisfying is the sense that you are among your own kind who are not worried and harassed and ulcerated by nationalistic hatreds.”

Stoddard writes surprisingly little about Jews, perhaps because he had little material:


The average German seems disinclined to talk much to the foreign visitor about this oppressed minority. However, I gathered that the general public does not approve of the violence and cruelty which Jews have suffered. But I also got the impression that, while the average German condemned such methods, he was not unwilling to see the Jews go and would not wish them back again.

Stoddard spoke good German, had lived in Austria, and generally liked Germans, but was not often impressed by Nazis. He concluded that polished and capable party members gravitated to Berlin but the provincial leavings were a sorry lot. He described officials he met in Weimar:


Few of them could have amounted to much before they landed a Party job. Even more revealing were their womenfolk . . . Most of them were pretentiously dowdy. They exemplified better than anything I had yet seen the fact that National Socialism is not merely a political and economic upheaval but a social revolution as well. To a very large extent it has brought the lower middle class to power.

Stoddard took an immediate dislike to a Gauleiter he met in Deusseldorf: “He was a distinctly sinister-looking type; hard-faced, with a cruel eye and a still crueler mouth. A sadist, if I ever saw one. I imagine how unpopular he must be among the good-natured, kindly Duesseldorfers.”

Stoddard managed to interview several top Nazis, including Hitler—who seems to have disappointed him by being insufficiently mesmerizing. He contrasted the Führer to Mussolini:


[Mussolini] uses his big, compelling eyes; thrusts out his chin; aims to semi-hypnotize you. It’s all very intriguing. Perhaps, to an Anglo-Saxon, it’s a bit too obvious. But it flatters your ego, just the same.

Nothing like that with Hitler. Though always pleasant and courteous, he makes no obvious attempt to impress or win you.

Of the top Nazis, Goebbels seems to cut the most distinctive figure: “This lithe, brunet Rhinelander, with his agile mind, cynical humor, and telling gestures, is an excellent person to interview. He is mentally on his toes every instant, and he is full of what the journalist calls ‘good lines.’”

Stoddard notes the Nazi’s accomplishments—resurrection of an inert economy, a clampdown on crime, full employment—but bestows little unqualified praise. The closest he comes to enthusiasm is his report on the proceedings of a eugenics court. The law provided for mandatory sterilization of people with certain hereditary disabilities, but sterilization decisions could be appealed. Stoddard spent a day at the appeals court and was impressed:


The thing that struck me most was the meticulous care with which these cases had already been considered by the lower tribunals. The dossier of each case was voluminous, containing a complete life-history of the subject, reports of specialists and clinics, and also exhaustive researches into the subject’s family history.

The “subject,” of course, was the candidate for sterilization who was, in every case, present at the appeal and questioned once more by officials. Stoddard thought that, if anything, the courts were overly hesitant to order sterilization for “subjects” who appeared to him obviously defective, but he gave the process high marks: “On the evidence of that one visit, at least, the Sterilization Law is weeding out the worst strains in the German stock in a scientific and truly humanitarian way.”


shockblast-berlin-in-the-1930s-29.jpg?it

Although the United States was not at war with Germany and Stoddard did not hope for war, he was continually sizing up Germany as a potential opponent. He speculated on how long its food-stocks would last, whether Buna would work as a rubber substitute, and tried to keep his fingers on the pulse of civilian morale. At the end of the book he wrote:


Most Germans are unwilling to admit even the possibility of defeat. Those who do, couple it with remarks which amount to some such phrase as: ‘If we don’t win, there will be no victor.’ What that means is about as follows: ‘If this war is fought to the bitter end, all Europe will be plunged into chaotic ruin. Then, with everybody down in the ditch together, we Germans, with our innate sense of organization and discipline, willingness to work hard, and knack of pulling together, can lift ourselves out of the ditch quicker than anyone else.

The poignant accuracy of this passage is not surprising, coming from a man who so clearly foretold the consequences of policy choices in the United States. Stoddard was a keen observer whether at home or abroad.


  • 0

#6 Cosssack

Cosssack

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 58088 posts

Posted 25 May 2019 - 06:53 AM

D7ZNeOOXkAAS_rl.jpg


  • 0

#7 Atossa

Atossa

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 43206 posts

Posted 25 May 2019 - 07:03 AM




That last article is trash propaganda


  • 0

#8 Zharkov

Zharkov

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 35325 posts

Posted 25 May 2019 - 02:41 PM

"Ever since the [First World] war, Germany has been highly abnormal in almost every respect."

 

Germans only look normal on the surface.

 

Germans are wonderfully interesting people but "normal" does not exist, not even before WW1, and if there ever was a normal German, it would be one who immigrated to America.     

 

No intelligent foreigner can be in Germany a week without asking himself: ‘How do these people stand it?’

 

More true today than ever before!

 

Mass immigration would make Hitler want to rise from the dead and try again.


Edited by Zharkov, 25 May 2019 - 02:46 PM.

  • 0

#9 Zharkov

Zharkov

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 35325 posts

Posted 25 May 2019 - 03:16 PM

Goebbels looks so Jewish.  

Even his name sounds Jewish.

Could he be...a self-hating Jew?

 


That last article is trash propaganda
 

Except that Stoddard was there, in that moment of history, and saw things for himself, and drew his own conclusions from what he saw.

 

None of us were standing in his shoes to see what he saw.


  • 0

#10 Atossa

Atossa

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 43206 posts

Posted 25 May 2019 - 04:43 PM


Except that was there, in that moment of history, and saw things for himself, and drew his own conclusions from what he saw.






Stoddard was anti-Hitler and concerned that Hitler might hurt the jews. Anyone with half a brain reading Stoddard's propaganda trash should be able to see his anti-NS spin.



Edited by Atossa, 25 May 2019 - 04:44 PM.

  • 0

#11 Atossa

Atossa

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 43206 posts

Posted 25 May 2019 - 04:59 PM


None of us were standing in his shoes to see what he saw.




You could say the same thing about Pelosi and Trump at their infrastructure meeting...
but each of them have their own perspective of what happened.

http://www.google.co...rch&hl=en&gbv=1



Edited by Atossa, 25 May 2019 - 05:02 PM.

  • 0

#12 Zharkov

Zharkov

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 35325 posts

Posted 25 May 2019 - 05:01 PM

One gains an opinion from observation and experience.  

 

If Stoddard was anti-Hitler, he got to that opinion from what he saw and heard.


  • 0

#13 Zharkov

Zharkov

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 35325 posts

Posted 25 May 2019 - 05:05 PM

I wonder how Germans like paying part of their salaries for supporting Muslim immigrants who hate them?

 

Possibly as much as American workers like paying for Mexican immigrant welfare support while Mexican gangs spray paint homes and businesses with unintelligible graffitti?


  • 0

#14 Mario Milano

Mario Milano

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 31767 posts

Posted 25 May 2019 - 05:05 PM

THIS MAN TRULY WAS DOING SOMETHING ABOUT JEWISH PROBLEM....

 

 

I agree, but then the Jews installed Adolf to nullify Goebbels and the other Germans that had enough of the Jews destroying a once awesome country...The rest is history (thanks to the USA)...Germany is now a total slave to the Jews


  • 0

#15 Mario Milano

Mario Milano

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 31767 posts

Posted 25 May 2019 - 05:11 PM

I wonder how Germans like paying part of their salaries for supporting Muslim immigrants who hate them?

 

Possibly as much as American workers like paying for Mexican immigrant welfare support while Mexican gangs spray paint homes and businesses with unintelligible graffitti?

Or the thousands of homeless americans because illegal mexicans have taken their Jobs which Trump pretends he is against but allows the country to keep being flooded by these illegals


  • 0

#16 Zharkov

Zharkov

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 35325 posts

Posted 25 May 2019 - 05:13 PM

"Strength Through Joy"

 

Great idea.

 

Build muscles, be happy, get rich.

 

(How this got posted twice is a mystery.   I only clicked once.)


Edited by Zharkov, 25 May 2019 - 05:14 PM.

  • 0

#17 Zharkov

Zharkov

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 35325 posts

Posted 25 May 2019 - 05:16 PM

It's an outrage that a small number of government officials can tell an entire country that the citizens must support invaders with their hard-earned money and not complain about it.


  • 1

#18 Atossa

Atossa

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 43206 posts

Posted 25 May 2019 - 05:17 PM


One gains an opinion from observation and experience.

If Stoddard was anti-Hitler, he got to that opinion from what he saw and heard.






I was taught a long time ago that when reading a book or an article, etc... one must take into consideration who the author is and what are his prejudices and spin.

Just because Stoddard was a White racist means little... the vast majority of European Whites were White racists in his day.

As an American, his opinion of Hitler and the Third Reich was influenced long before he visited Germany. As I said, he was concerned what Hitler might do to the poor sweet little innocent jews [gag me!]


  • 0

#19 Atossa

Atossa

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 43206 posts

Posted 25 May 2019 - 05:24 PM

It's an outrage that a small number of government officials can tell an entire country that the citizens must support invaders with their hard-earned money and not complain about it.




Stupidity knows no bounds.

That goes for those stupid government officials too...
when the stupid peasant worm turns to Madame Guillotine


  • 0

#20 Zharkov

Zharkov

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 35325 posts

Posted 25 May 2019 - 05:26 PM

Hitler, and other Germans also derived their opinions of Jews from observation and experience.

 

The problem is not with the observer but with the observed.


  • 0




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Copyright © 2019 Pravda.Ru