Jump to content

Theme© by Fisana
 

Photo

FACEBOOK YOUTUBE AND TWITTER FALLS UNDER THE 1ST AMENDMENT, PER SCOTUS


  • Please log in to reply
58 replies to this topic

#21 Cosssack

Cosssack

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 59149 posts

Posted 16 November 2019 - 01:37 AM

c6dfbf2b31064f72c4b968af09a248208e4b7ce0


  • 0

#22 Zharkov

Zharkov

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 36423 posts

Posted 16 November 2019 - 03:04 AM

 

not true,

private club can not make any rules that are in conflict with civil and political rights act  ... for that are heavy penalties  

 

CIVIL AND POLITICAL RIGHTS are a class of rights that protect individuals' freedom from infringement by SOCIAL ORGANIZATIONS , PRIVATE INDIVIDUALS AND GOVERNMENT. They ensure one's entitlement to participate in the civil and political life of the society and state without discrimination or repression.

 

Civil rights include the ensuring of peoples' physical and mental integrity, life, and safety; protection from discrimination on grounds such as  race, gender, sexual orientation, national origin, color, age, ... POLITICAL AFFILIATION ... ethnicity, religion, and disability and individual rights such as privacy and the freedom of thought, speech, religion, assembly, and movement.  

 

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_and_political_rights

 

btw.

 

in 2017 social media was ruled by supreme court to be "public square"  so u do not need even invoke civil rights act ....

 

..............................

Marsh v Alabama, 1946; a "public square" is controlled by the 1st Amendment. Even if it's on company owned property

 

6/19/2017 Packingham v. North Carolina     After NC banned access to social media from certain criminals SCOTUS ruled social media to be "modern public squares", therefore social media is covered under the 1st Amendment

 

“A fundamental First Amendment principle is that all persons have access to places where they can speak and listen, and then, after reflection, speak and listen once more...”

 

"Social media allows users to gain access to information and communicate with one another on any subject that might come to mind. With one broad stroke, North Carolina bars access to what for many are the principal sources for knowing current events, checking ads for employment, speaking and listening in the modern public square, and otherwise exploring the vast realms of human thought and knowledge."

 

 

 

..............

 

if owners of social media can not handle US Laws they can always look for other business to pursue ... open a bakery where they could refuse to bake cakes for people they do not like as conservative white males, , start busing or taxi business where conservatives could be then sited at the back of the bus ... or something like that   ...simple

 

You have to look at the parties involved, not one was social media.

 

The ruling merely confirms that the state cannot limit a prisoner's right to free speech, it does NOT say that social media cannot limit free speech, but only that social media is generally a public forum that cannot be denied to prisoners.

 

Justice Samuel A. Alito, Jr., wrote an opinion concurring in the judgment in which he argued that the majority opinion erred in equating the entire internet with a traditionally public forum instead of recognizing the importance of allowing states to regulate certain types of websites.

 

Social media rights were not directly involved or litigated, only prisoner rights were litigated.

 

My argument is that social media, by reason of passwords and sign-up data, is more restricted than the typical public forum or mall, and that the analog would be of a private country club whose rules for members could include no KKK, or no discussion of politics, and if the members waive their free speech rights to join, they can litigate the issue but they won't likely win.   You CAN sign away your constitutional rights in America.

 

I gave examples previously, so I won't repeat them, but it should be obvious that people waive their civil rights and constitutional rights rather often when necessary.   One example is signing up for military service, you waive your right to travel where you want.   You must go where the government sends you.


  • 0

#23 Cosssack

Cosssack

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 59149 posts

Posted 16 November 2019 - 09:29 AM

 you missed;

 

Marsh v Alabama, 1946; a "public square" is controlled by the 1st Amendment. Even if it's on company owned property

6/19/2017 Packingham v. North Carolina      SCOTUS ruled social media to be "modern public squares", therefore social media is covered under the 1st Amendment.

 

also you do not wave your constitutional  and civil political rights unless it is explicitly stated:  "by joining our social media community You are  waving your Constitutional and Civil  & Political Rights - as stipulated in US Constitution and US Civil and Political Rights Acts"

 

I  am yet to see such disclosure,

….

 

 

Lastly , yes, in the USA we waved our Property Rights under Civil and Political Rights Acts ..... (as the saying goes .....bake the fucking cake or else)


Edited by Cosssack, 16 November 2019 - 10:20 AM.

  • 0

#24 Cosssack

Cosssack

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 59149 posts

Posted 16 November 2019 - 09:52 AM

also waiver of your Constitutional and Civil Rights must be clearly displayed at the "Entrance" to the social media, on front page:

 

"by joining our social media community You are  waving your Constitutional and Civil  & Political Rights - as stipulated in US Constitution and US Civil and Political Rights Acts"

 

just like "no trespassing" sign in front of your house

 

if not you can be sued easily , only conservative non-activist judge is missing to put u in to the slammer

 

again:

 

Civil Rights acts took your Property Rights away from you ...sorry ... now "bake the fucking cake or else"  .... hehe try to build a Hotel " for Whites Only" on your property... u will see ....what will happen to your Property Rights and your TOS with guests ha ha ha ha ..and what will happen to you will see also :)


Edited by Cosssack, 16 November 2019 - 12:30 PM.

  • 0

#25 Bruce M Cow

Bruce M Cow

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 5000 posts

Posted 16 November 2019 - 10:44 AM

The only rights you have is what you can enforce  .By what ever it takes.


  • 1

#26 Cosssack

Cosssack

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 59149 posts

Posted 16 November 2019 - 07:02 PM

The Anti-White, Post-Christian Church – Fash the Nation http://fashthenation...ristian-church/

Michigan to Create Thought Criminal Database – Fash the Nation http://fashthenation...minal-database/

House Passes Resolution Condemning White Americans – Fash the Nation http://fashthenation...hite-americans/

Congress Holds Hearing on Eliminating Free Speech for White Americans – Fash the Nation http://fashthenation...hite-americans/


  • 0

#27 Zharkov

Zharkov

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 36423 posts

Posted 16 November 2019 - 07:29 PM

 you missed;

 

Marsh v Alabama, 1946; a "public square" is controlled by the 1st Amendment. Even if it's on company owned property

6/19/2017 Packingham v. North Carolina      SCOTUS ruled social media to be "modern public squares", therefore social media is covered under the 1st Amendment.

 

also you do not wave your constitutional  and civil political rights unless it is explicitly stated:  "by joining our social media community You are  waving your Constitutional and Civil  & Political Rights - as stipulated in US Constitution and US Civil and Political Rights Acts"

 

I  am yet to see such disclosure,

….

 

 

Lastly , yes, in the USA we waved our Property Rights under Civil and Political Rights Acts ..... (as the saying goes .....bake the fucking cake or else)

 

Actually studied the Marsh decision, and it applies to true public areas, such as sidewalks, malls, parking lots, anywhere the public is allowed to be.   There is no censoring of free speech in those areas.

 

The Packingham case is quite different in that no mall or social media was a litigant, the case only involved a prisoner and his state prison system, so it is not a binding decision on whether social media is a public forum - some of it is, some is not.  

 

The terms of service for private social media do not need to explicitly say you waive your constitutional rights because they are not police or government agency.   When the government demands a waiver of rights, they must explicitly say so by reading your rights to you, but private social media can just make rules in terms of service that do similar things.

 

A password is like a lock on a door.   You don't get in unless you have a key and identify yourself.   That makes it non-public.

 

But like I said, it's just an argument.   No court has yet made the distinction I make, but they may eventually.

 


Edited by Zharkov, 16 November 2019 - 07:35 PM.

  • 0

#28 Zharkov

Zharkov

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 36423 posts

Posted 16 November 2019 - 07:31 PM

 

Not that it matters, but social media usually has a term of service that if you sue them and lose, you agree to pay their lawyer's fees and indemnify them for all court costs and expenses.   If they don't have that in the agreement, then it depends on state law whether a court can award attorney's fees to the winner.


Edited by Zharkov, 16 November 2019 - 07:33 PM.

  • 0

#29 Cosssack

Cosssack

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 59149 posts

Posted 16 November 2019 - 11:59 PM

ha ha ha ha

 

let us agree to disagree agreeably .......................... 

 

Marsh v Alabama, 1946; a "public square" is controlled by the 1st Amendment. Even if it's on company owned property...FACT

 

6/19/2017  SCOTUS ruled social media to be "modern public squares", therefore social media is covered under the 1st Amendment.FACT

 

 

 

p.s.

 

again:

 

Civil Rights acts took your Property Rights away from you ...sorry ... now "bake the fucking cake or else"  .... hehe try to build a Hotel " for Whites Only" on your property... u will see ....what will happen to your Property Rights and your TOS with guests ha ha ha ha ..and what will happen to you will see also

 

U CAN SHOVE YOUR PASSWORD AND LOCK ON DOOR UP YOURS ...NOW


Edited by Cosssack, 17 November 2019 - 12:01 AM.

  • 0

#30 Cosssack

Cosssack

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 59149 posts

Posted 17 November 2019 - 04:22 AM

I will be sharing this with all the groups that I belong to as well as my facebook page every day until Black Friday.

Please take the time to do this!
It is a letter campaign to be mailed on Black Friday!

It only takes the following: (per person)
Six stamps
Six envelopes
Six pieces of paper to print it out on
And very little of your time!

This is a campaign supported by the Letter Brigade. The Letter Brigade is a group on Facebook that supports the President of the United States of America & is against impeachment by the House of Representatives (democrats)!

Aside from voting there is little we can do to stop these politicians from wasting time & money; but we can do this!

Imagine millions of letters showing up on the week following Black Friday & the look on their faces when they realize that we are a force that they will have to contend with & can not be denied!

 

Will you please join me, my family, and all other Americans that support the President and do not support this impeachment sham!

 

America needs you to stand up & be counted!

 

Thank you.

 

 

 

Nancy Pelosi
1236 Longworth H.O.B.
Washington D.C. 20515

Chuck Schumer
322 Hart Senate Building
Washington, DC 20510

Adam Schiff
2269 Rayburn House
Office Building
Washington, DC 20515

Mitch McConnell
317 Russell Building
Washington, DC 20510

FOX NEWS
1211 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10036

P.O.T.U.S.
Donald J Trump
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20500

Date: ________________________

Notice of Dispute and Request to Halt Impeachment

Being a citizen of these United States, a registered voter and tax payer, I call for the Impeachment Proceeding against Donald J. Trump to be halted immediately. These actions are biased and unwarranted. NO evidence of wrong-doing has been submitted. These proceedings are a waste of resources, money and an obscene abuse of power.

I am a constituent living in _______________________________ [CITY/TOWN] and my zip code is ________________. I’m writing to ask all representatives dutifully adhere to our democratic way and let any grievances, if any be resolved at the ballot box.

This is a call to end the resolution calling into the unwarranted impeachment of President Trump.

Please be advised, we will not be deterred or ignored any longer. This includes any and all legal options available to us including organized peaceful protests, united buying strikes and/or any other legal means available to get your attention.

As a constituent and taxpayer, a written acknowledgment is requested to be sent to:
__________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
With utmost urgency,

____________________________________
Signature, American Taxpayer


Edited by Cosssack, 17 November 2019 - 04:24 AM.

  • 0

#31 Zharkov

Zharkov

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 36423 posts

Posted 17 November 2019 - 06:25 AM

The better title would use some legal terminology, such as "NOTICE TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM IMPEACHMENT PROCEEDINGS"

 

or make it shorter, such as, "U CAN SHOVE YOUR IMPEACHMENT AND ADAM SCHIFF UP YOURS ...NOW"


  • 1

#32 Cosssack

Cosssack

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 59149 posts

Posted 17 November 2019 - 07:35 AM

PRO TRUMP NEWS - THE ANTIDOTE TO MEDIA BIAS

https://protrumpnews.com/


  • 0

#33 Mario Milano

Mario Milano

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 36790 posts

Posted 17 November 2019 - 01:49 PM

Look guys it isn't rocket science.....All humanity wants to do is be able to talk/communicate with each other...there is nothing nefarious in that...But some how the Jews at Google/Facebook/Twitter think humans should not be allowed do that because the Jew satanists somehow made themselves Gods of communication ...(they are taking their psychotic chosenite shit a bit far with muting people dontcha think?)

 

I don;t know about you guys but this seems like something that the shooting should start for....

 

Imagine that, some psychopathic lunatics telling you who you can talk to.....

 

There is a reason for the second amendment (and why it was second) and that was to protect the first.

 

Jews are out of control now


  • 2

#34 Cosssack

Cosssack

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 59149 posts

Posted 18 November 2019 - 05:56 AM

75446650_552103178692482_514466356834336


Edited by Cosssack, 20 November 2019 - 08:22 AM.

  • 0

#35 Cosssack

Cosssack

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 59149 posts

Posted 18 November 2019 - 11:58 PM

HMMMM

 

78534453_552676445301822_342764079708687


  • 0

#36 Bruce M Cow

Bruce M Cow

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 5000 posts

Posted 19 November 2019 - 12:06 AM

The only way is to Nationalize our Media and remove the jews from power everyplace.If it come to civil war then let it start now.


  • 1

#37 Cosssack

Cosssack

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 59149 posts

Posted 19 November 2019 - 12:11 AM

74626970_552682621967871_114235066237845


  • 0

#38 Cosssack

Cosssack

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 59149 posts

Posted 19 November 2019 - 12:12 AM

The only way is to Nationalize our Media and remove the jews from power everyplace.If it come to civil war then let it start now.

 

Compromise Is Not Possible. Want Change? Declare Total War on the System

Bourgeois and intellectual political groups never effect real change. To overturn a corrupt order, you need a revolutionary movement with devoted, disciplined followers and a simple, clear doctrine.

Adolf Hitler

https://russia-insid...-system/ri27856


  • 0

#39 Cosssack

Cosssack

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 59149 posts

Posted 19 November 2019 - 07:21 AM

73065688_418794878813096_848266688183926


  • 0

#40 Cosssack

Cosssack

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 59149 posts

Posted 20 November 2019 - 12:10 AM

Donald J. Trump

@realDonaldTrump

https://twitter.com/...832113447845889

 

A MUST WATCH AND SHARE: NEW AD BY PRESIDENT TRUMP

 

 

76688997_10220760006739690_2800966237801

 

b4694eeeffdd79d962e38c245619e214ca58a827


Edited by Cosssack, 20 November 2019 - 01:05 AM.

  • 0




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Copyright © 2020 Pravda.Ru