7545 replies to this topic

[woj1@cyberonic.]

.

Russia intensified the control of the Arctic, with its scientists saying that samples from a vast mountain range under the ocean show that it is part of Russia

[woj1@cyberonic.]

Originally posted by pacific
Ireland is in Europe.

But thanks God is not in NATO!

[pacific]

Ireland is with only self-defence forces, it's not a real army.

[woj1@cyberonic.]

Art colection of M?cis?aw Leopoldowicz Rostropowicz (1927-2007), returns to Russia from West.

[woj1@cyberonic.]

Do you want to say that would be better if Ireland had really army in NATO? :wonder:

[pacific]

Originally posted by woj1@cyberonic.
Do you want to say that would be better if Ireland had really army in NATO? :wonder:

A pacific nation doesn't need army.

[woj1@cyberonic.]

In his September 20 interview with Reuters, Serbian Minister for Kosovo-Metohija ) Samardzic said Belgrade's proposal for Kosova would require the EU to act as an international guarantor "in the form of a civilian and military mission for some period, to keep the peace."
"The European experience is to resolve these issues through compromise solutions, which are all different, like South Tyrol and the Basque country," Gusenbauer reportedly floated the idea that the position of German-speakers in the Italian region of South Tyrol .
"Vecernje novosti" on September 19, Samardzic said that "more and more European countries, including even EU member states, are defying" the U.S. position of support for Kosova's independence:clap:

[Bader]

Originally posted by pacific
Ireland is with only self-defence forces, it's not a real army.

Its called the IRA

[woj1@cyberonic.]

Originally posted by pacific
A pacific nation doesn't need army.

My favorite peaceful action was in Australia. where 3000 kangaroo attacked military base but soldiers refuse to use an arms.

[Bader]

Originally posted by pacific
A pacific nation doesn't need army.

I would say that Japan and Switzerland were pacific nations
as they only have defence forces, that is, they dont have the capacity to attack any other country.

Nations that do develop offencive capabilities are then a threat to others.

The US is the safest positioned nation with two neighbours only who are friendly and have no capacity to invade them and also the two largest seas down both sides and yet it has been militarily involved all over the world and set up bases likewise.
They are trying to set up new military instalations in central Europe which offends and threatens Russia. It cant be in the interests of the US itself, so the US people have a monkey on their back.

[woj1@cyberonic.]

RUSSIA CRITICIZE OPEN SUPPORT FOR KOSOVAR INDEPENDENCE AS 'COUNTERPRODUCTIVE'

[woj1@cyberonic.]

As far I know, Japan government sends their military to Afghanistan in contrary to opinion their citizens .
The premier forcibly resigned..
US society too much trust its leaders, and they take advantage of it.
Unfortunately cost of war would be paid by all.
Naive doesn

[Bader]

[QUOTE]Originally posted by woj1@cyberonic.
[B]As far I know, Japan government sends their military to Afghanistan in contrary to opinion their citizens .
The premier forcibly resigned..
US society too much trust its leaders, and they take advantage of it.
Unfortunately cost of war would be paid by all.
Naive doesn

[woj1@cyberonic.]

Chinese more dangerous for Slavs than USA, it looks that we have only one option- to yodel.

[Bader]

[QUOTE]Originally posted by woj1@cyberonic.
[B]As far I know, Japan government sends their military to Afghanistan in contrary to opinion their citizens .
The premier forcibly resigned..
US society too much trust its leaders, and they take advantage of it.
Unfortunately cost of war would be paid by all.
Naive doesn

[Bader]

"But, once again, I believe this type of approach has been running rampant throughout Western society for decades. Further, I believe this is the method used to re-write history in our modern school system, to where today, children are not taught true history at all! One of the major reasons our public school system cannot teach academics any longer is that textbooks have been re-written constantly since World War I and now children are not educated as much as they are indoctrinated to be good, obedient World Citizens.

Pensacola Christian College educators had discovered that, in order to produce their 'A Bekka Curricula', they had to go back to textbooks printed prior to 1914 to get true educational material. Since World War I, textbooks had been systematically "dumbed down".

Taken from CuttingEdge newsletter

[woj1@cyberonic.]

Will debate Kaczynski, Kwasniewski bring anything good to Poland?

[woj1@cyberonic.]

No, because it is not debate the oppositionists only meeting the secretly supporters. :wonder:

[pacific]

What would it take for Russia to be #1?

[pacific]

Remember, there is allways a white pale face inside yourself or in front of you.


Coloured Axioma