"Any failure on the part of Iraq to comply fully as required by the established dates would justify the United States and its allies to use military force in order to enforce the U.N. resolution.
Show me where Irak failed to comply , I agree that it took time for Irak to show all the site , but thank to US pressure it occured
http://www.guardian....,941533,00.html"The UN chief weapons inspector, Hans Blix, yesterday condemned the prewar efforts of British and American intelligence to show that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction, and insisted that, without UN verification, their postwar inspections lacked credibility.
"We may not be the only ones in the world who have credibility, but I do think we have credibility for being objective and independent," he said.
Mr Blix, who is due to retire from his post in June, briefed the UN security council on his readiness to send inspection teams back to Iraq.
Earlier, in a BBC radio interview, he said the coalition had appeared to use "shaky" evidence, including forged documents, as a pretext for making war on Iraq.
Afterwards he said it was "conspicuous" that coalition forces had so far failed to find "anything relevant" in their search for proscribed weapons.
The White House, which accused Mr Blix of hindering its drive for international support for the war, is reluctant to see him return to Iraq and has already sent its own teams to search for illegal weapons. It is is recruiting former UN inspectors from the US, Britain and Australia to verify any discoveries.
British officials now admit that documents purporting to show that Iraq was trying to obtain uranium to develop nuclear weapons were forgeries.
The claim that that Saddam Hussein was trying to procure uranium from Niger, in west Africa, was presented as hard intelligence-based evidence in the dossier on Iraq's possession of weapons of mass destruction which the government published in September.
The claim was taken seriously by the UN weapons inspectors until, with the help of independent experts, they found that the documents were forged.
In early March Mohamed El Baradei, director of the International Atomic Energy Agency and chief nuclear inspector for Iraq, contradicted the Downing Street and MI6 claim.
He said the documents used to substantiate them were "not authentic".
Though intelligence officials say there was additional evidence pointing to Iraq's attempt to procure uranium, Whitehall now agrees that the intelligence documents it sent to the IAEA - the UN's nuclear watchdog - and the US were fabricated. "
It's that your direct threat, Straw declared to the commons that Irak had the possibility to attack UK within 45 minute.
Where are the tons of prohibited materials ?
How can you base your legitimation on forged documents ?
Why your inspectors team failed to find anything ?
And don't answer with bullshit like mobile lab...
