Jump to content

Theme© by Fisana
 

Photo

Did Bush Engineer 9/11??


  • Please log in to reply
2019 replies to this topic

#1981 DrJJArville

DrJJArville

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 66 posts

Posted 11 August 2006 - 11:08 PM

Lou Dobbs wakes up to 9/11 "secret truth" ..

About time somebody at CNN ( Crappy News Network) developed a SPINE ..



:Potstir:
  • 0

#1982 Brisas

Brisas

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1134 posts

Posted 04 February 2007 - 07:58 AM

bump
  • 0

#1983 Brisas

Brisas

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1134 posts

Posted 05 February 2007 - 10:11 PM

bump:congrats:
  • 0

#1984 Brisas

Brisas

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1134 posts

Posted 07 February 2007 - 01:33 PM

:2cents:
  • 0

#1985 sb11

sb11

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 46633 posts

Posted 07 February 2007 - 01:50 PM

good for lou dobbs

CNN always climbs onto the band
wagon at the caboose

after attempting to derail the train
and failing
  • 0

#1986 Sammy

Sammy

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 10547 posts

Posted 07 February 2007 - 11:13 PM

This video has been removed due to terms of use violation.


:confused:
  • 0

#1987 Brisas

Brisas

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1134 posts

Posted 13 February 2007 - 12:43 AM

:eek:
  • 0

#1988 Brisas

Brisas

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1134 posts

Posted 16 February 2007 - 04:43 PM

The White House Could Provoke Attacks in the United States
Reporterre

Thursday 08 February 2007

In testimony before the American Senate, Carter's former National Security Advisor considered the hypothesis that the White House could provoke attacks on its own soil to justify an intervention in Iran plausible.

Zbigniew Brzezinski is one of the people most widely respected in geopolitical matters in the United States. Advisor to Jimmy Carter when the latter was President of the United States between 1977 and 1981, he was considered a "hawk among the doves." Since then, he has stayed very attentive to international questions, within the Center for Strategic and International Studies. Notably, he published a widely regarded essay, Le Grand Echiquier [The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy and Its Geostrategic Imperatives] (Hachette, 1997).

Hostile to the war in Iraq, he spoke February 1st before an American Senate committee on the international situation and more specifically on the power struggle with Iran. One passage in his testimony has caught the attention of several observers: the one in which he considers that the White House could provoke a terrorist act in the United States itself to win public opinion over to the idea of an intervention against Iran. Here is the passage:

"A plausible scenario for a military collision with Iran involves Iraqi failure to meet the benchmarks; followed by accusations of Iranian responsibility for the failure; then by some provocation in Iraq or a terrorist act in the U.S. blamed on Iran; culminating in a "defensive" U.S. military action against Iran that plunges a lonely America into a spreading and deepening quagmire eventually ranging across Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan, and Pakistan."

The allusion to a terrorist act in the United States, responsibility for which "would be attributed to the Iranians" is remarkable: an American official at the highest level concedes the idea that the Bush Administration could not only use terrorism to serve its own ends, but even provoke attacks on its own soil in order to justify its aggressive intrigues.

Brzezinski's statements are all the more remarkable in that he himself in his book, The Grand Chessboard, deemed that control of central Asia and its oil resources were necessary for the maintenance of American domination.

But he emphasized that it was difficult to obtain a consensus from the American public to support United States' interventions beyond its borders "in the absence of a sudden threat or a feeling by the population that its well-being was at stake." On that occasion, he recalled the example of Pearl Harbor which tipped American opinion in favor of an intervention in the Second World War.

Consequently, it is not "conspiracy theorists" only who are blowing the whistle on such a corruption of American democracy, even if one must not extrapolate too much from the statements of Jimmy Carter's former advisor. But for several years, many people have, in fact, wondered about the exact unfolding of the events of September 11, 2001 and wonder whether the American administration has not done everything to prevent them [from knowing.] Zbigniew Brzezinski's position provides legitimacy to these questions and undoubtedly constitutes a message addressed to George Bush and his entourage.

Here is the original text:

SENATE FOREIGN RELATIONS COMMITTEE TESTIMONY - ZBIGNIEW BRZEZINSKI

February 1, 2007

Mr. Chairman: Your hearings come at a critical juncture in the U.S. war of choice in Iraq, and I commend you and Senator Lugar for scheduling them.

It is time for the White House to come to terms with two central realities:

1. The war in Iraq is a historic, strategic, and moral calamity. Undertaken under false assumptions, it is undermining America's global legitimacy. Its collateral civilian casualties as well as some abuses are tarnishing America's moral credentials. Driven by Manichean impulses and imperial hubris, it is intensifying regional instability.

2. Only a political strategy that is historically relevant rather than reminiscent of colonial tutelage can provide the needed framework for a tolerable resolution of both the war in Iraq and the intensifying regional tensions.

If the United States continues to be bogged down in a protracted bloody involvement in Iraq, the final destination on this downhill track is likely to be a head-on conflict with Iran and with much of the world of Islam at large. A plausible scenario for a military collision with Iran involves Iraqi failure to meet the benchmarks; followed by accusations of Iranian responsibility for the failure; then by some provocation in Iraq or a terrorist act in the U.S. blamed on Iran; culminating in a "defensive" U.S. military action against Iran that plunges a lonely America into a spreading and deepening quagmire eventually ranging across Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan, and Pakistan.

A mythical historical narrative to justify the case for such a protracted and potentially expanding war is already being articulated. Initially justified by false claims about WMDs in Iraq, the war is now being redefined as the "decisive ideological struggle" of our time, reminiscent of the earlier collisions with Nazism and Stalinism. In that context, Islamist extremism and al Qaeda are presented as the equivalents of the threat posed by Nazi Germany and then Soviet Russia, and 9/11 as the equivalent of the Pearl Harbor attack which precipitated America's involvement in World War II.

--------

Source: The Washington Note.
http://www.reporterr...s-attentats.php

You may also find additional analysis of this testimony at DeDefensa.org.
  • 0

#1989 Brisas

Brisas

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1134 posts

Posted 26 February 2007 - 07:25 PM

Hersh: Bush Funneling Money to al Qaeda-Related Groups
ThinkProgress.com

Sunday 25 February 2007

New Yorker columnist Sy Hersh says the "single most explosive" element of his latest article involves an effort by the Bush administration to stem the growth of Shiite influence in the Middle East (specifically the Iranian government and Hezbollah in Lebanon) by funding violent Sunni groups.

Hersh says the U.S. has been "pumping money, a great deal of money, without congressional authority, without any congressional oversight" for covert operations in the Middle East where it wants to "stop the Shiite spread or the Shiite influence." Hersh says these funds have ended up in the hands of "three Sunni jihadist groups" who are "connected to al Qaeda" but "want to take on Hezbollah."

Hersh summed up his scoop in stark terms: "We are simply in a situation where this president is really taking his notion of executive privilege to the absolute limit here, running covert operations, using money that was not authorized by Congress, supporting groups indirectly that are involved with the same people that did 9/11." Watch it:

Hersh added, "All of this should be investigated by Congress, by the way, and I trust it will be. In my talking to membership - members there, they are very upset that they know nothing about this. And they have great many suspicions."

Transcript:

Blitzer: Near the end of your article, you have this explosive point in there about John Negroponte, who is now going to be the deputy secretary of state, as opposed to the head of U.S. intelligence.

You write this: "I was subsequently told by the two government consultants and the former senior intelligence officials that the echoes of Iran-Contra were a factor in Negroponte's decision to resign from the National Intelligence directorship and accept the position of deputy secretary of state."

Explain what you were hearing, because that is obviously a very explosive charge.

Hersh: Yes. It is probably the single most explosive, if you will, or depressing - or distressing sort of thing I discovered in the last few months, which is simply this. This administration has made a policy change, a decision that they are going to put all of the pressure they can on the Shiites, that is the Shiite regime in Iran, the Shiite - and they are also doing everything they can to stop Hezbollah - which is Shiite, the Hezbollah organization from getting any control or any more of a political foothold in Lebanon.

So they essentially, I quote the - I saw Nasrallah, the head of Hezbollah, and he described it this way, as "fitna (ph)," the Arab word for "civil war." As far as he is concerned, we are interested in recreating what is happening in Iraq in Lebanon, that is Sunni versus Shia. And in looking into that story, and I saw him in December, I found this. That we have been pumping money, a great deal of money, without congressional authority, without any congressional oversight, Prince Bandar of Saudi Arabia is putting up some of this money, for covert operations in many areas of the Middle East where we think that the - we want to stop the Shiite spread or the Shiite influence.

They call it the "Shiite Crescent." And a lot of this money, and I can't tell you with absolute certainty how - exactly when and how, but this money has gotten into the hands - among other places, in Lebanon, into the hands of three - at least three jihadist groups. There are three Sunni jihadist groups whose main claim to fame inside Lebanon right now is that they are very tough. These are people connected to al Qaeda who want to take on Hezbollah. So this government, at the minimum, we may not directly be funneling money to them, but we certainly know that these groups exist.

My government, which arrests al Qaeda every place it can find them and send - some of them are n Guantanamo and other places, is sitting back while the Lebanese government we support, the government of Prime Minister Siniora, is providing arms and sustenance to three jihadist groups whose sole function, seems to me and to the people that talk to me in our government, to be there in case there is a real shoot-'em-up with Hezbollah and we really get into some sort of serious major conflict between the Sunni government and Hezbollah, which is largely Shia, who are basically - or as you know, there is a coalition headed by Hezbollah that is challenging the government right now, demonstrations, sit-ins.

There has been some violence. So America, my country, without telling Congress, using funds not appropriated, I don't know where, by my sources believe much of the money obviously came from Iraq where there is all kinds of piles of loose money, pools of cash that could be used for covert operations.

All of this should be investigated by Congress, by the way, and I trust it will be. In my talking to membership - members there, they are very upset that they know nothing about this. And they have great many suspicions.

We are simply in a situation where this president is really taking his notion of executive privilege to the absolute limit here, running covert operations, using money that was not authorized by Congress, supporting groups indirectly that are involved with the same people that did 9/11, and we should be arresting these people rather than looking the other way...

Blitzer: And your bottom line, Sy...

Hersh: ... and could lead to a real mess...

Blitzer: Your bottom line is that Negroponte was aware of this, obviously, and he wanted to distance himself from it? That is why he decided to give up that position and take the number two job at the State Department?

Hersh: He - that is one of the reasons, I was told. Negroponte also was not in tune with Cheney. There was a lot of complaints about him because he was seen as much of a stickler, too ethical for some of the operations the Pentagon wants to run.


http://thinkprogress...25/hersh-qaeda/
-------
  • 0

#1990 753951

753951

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 4385 posts

Posted 02 March 2007 - 08:38 AM

;)
  • 0

#1991 DirtyHarry

DirtyHarry

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1490 posts

Posted 02 March 2007 - 09:33 AM

Crooks will Die some Day (they think they will Live forever $$ ) = Do you fell Lucky punk ...will do you ?
  • 0

#1992 753951

753951

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 4385 posts

Posted 06 March 2007 - 07:18 AM

;)
  • 0

#1993 Zen

Zen

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 11661 posts

Posted 07 March 2007 - 05:40 PM

"Did Bush Engineer 9/11??"


Yes.:bwadr:
  • 0

#1994 753951

753951

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 4385 posts

Posted 09 March 2007 - 04:19 AM

Yes he did.
  • 0

#1995 753951

753951

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 4385 posts

Posted 10 March 2007 - 08:02 AM

Originally posted by bluedyedshark
These guys think so.

http://www.fromthewi...ges/wtcpic1.jpg

http://www.fromthewi..._nyc911new.html

:cheers:
  • 0

#1996 Zen

Zen

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 11661 posts

Posted 10 March 2007 - 07:55 PM

Originally posted by 753951
Yes he did.

:kowt:
  • 0

#1997 753951

753951

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 4385 posts

Posted 15 March 2007 - 06:23 AM

Originally posted by Zen
:kowt:

:kowt:
  • 0

#1998 753951

753951

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 4385 posts

Posted 17 March 2007 - 09:38 AM

Originally posted by bluedyedshark
These guys think so.

http://www.fromthewi...ges/wtcpic1.jpg

http://www.fromthewi..._nyc911new.html

;)
  • 0

#1999 DirtyHarry

DirtyHarry

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1490 posts

Posted 18 March 2007 - 07:15 AM

BooBush-it ....3,200 Died for the usa kids in Iraqi Oils Wars + + +
  • 0

#2000 DirtyHarry

DirtyHarry

    Registered User

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1490 posts

Posted 18 March 2007 - 04:55 PM

Originally posted by DirtyHarry
BooBush-it ....3,200 Died for the usa kids in Iraqi Oils Wars + + +

7 more usa kids are killed in Bush-it Iraqi Oils War + + +
  • 0




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Copyright © 2020 Pravda.Ru