Did Bush Engineer 9/11??
Posted 20 February 2004 - 02:05 AM
" Ong, save us time and read the timeline. It won't change your conclusion I'm sure, but it will change the process by which you get to it."
Here is the 911 Timeline link:
It goes into exhausting detail about the countless lies and absurdities that the Bush gang and its controlled media issue forth regarding the 911 cover story.
So then, precisely which part of this will change the process by which i get to my conclusions, whatever that means?
Posted 20 February 2004 - 02:16 AM
"...one of the most bizarre ironies of all this is that [the five Flight 77] hijackers lived in a motel right outside the gates of the NSA."
They also lived down the block from the Israeli "art student" spies.
"In one case, some Israeli spies lived at 4220 Sheridan Street, only a few hundred feet from where Atta was living at 3389 Sheridan Street. Israeli spies appear to have been close to at least 10 of the 19 9/11 hijackers. [Salon, 5/7/02]"
Move along, folks, nothing to see here, just Urban Rumors. Move along...
Posted 20 February 2004 - 04:54 AM
Originally posted by Ong'sHat
Re The Beat's comments above.
Yes, this also the very first time that i have heard someone say that they actually saw the plane clearly strike the Pentagon. I would like it if you could explain in detail exactly what you saw. This would be an important documentation.
Meanwhile, here are some exceedingly interesting photographs of the Pentagon scene taken right after 9/11:
Where is the Boeing? Where is the jumbo jet sized damage? They said that the jet bounced off the lawn, but the lawn appears intact.
The very same British-Australian firm that was used to clear away the debris (evidence) at OK City and the WTC was also used here.
And here are some very interesting quotes by some witnesses:
[I]"Velasquez says the gas station's security cameras are close enough to the Pentagon to have recorded the moment of impact. "I've never seen what the pictures looked like," he said. "The FBI was here within minutes and took the film."
"I was convinced it was a missile. It came in so fast it sounded nothing like an airplane."
"There was no huge explosion, no huge rumbling on ground, it just went -pfff.-"
On Sept. 10, a group of top Pentagon officials suddenly canceled travel plans for the next morning, apparently because of security concerns.
There were more than 5 cams that filmed the approach, all off the said the FBI took the tape. Why did the pentagon release some weird extremely slow motion pic of the event? 7 frames was it??
But it shows a loud fireball explosion in that.
Remember condi called her mentor in SF and told him not to fly that day too.
"Please explain this, "Was the real pilot that drunk before he took off?""
Hes talking about the big extra fuel cans or what ever that were strapped onto the plane that hit the WTC. You can clearly see it. Also the webfairy has some flash video on the plane hitting the WTC and it took like seconds before it exploded. Like it did not explode on impact but had to travel through the building. I can understand that, it might have exploded when it hit the steel beams.. but the video of it hitting the building was interesting. Like it disappears into the building.. Nothing concrete I can find just analomies.
Posted 20 February 2004 - 05:04 AM
Which would be even more incredible than they planned all this form caves in Afghanistan. The guy worked for AKAM, I used to own their stock at the time. Rense also had the article by the same guy.. But I cant find the link.
Posted 20 February 2004 - 05:32 AM
Why is it that every time a story starts about the Pentagon, it is "removed" from the journalistic agendas likkety split??
Posted 20 February 2004 - 08:12 AM
Before an audience of the American people, the Commission must ask President Bush in sworn testimony, the following questions:
1. As Commander-in-Chief on the morning of 9/11, why didn
Posted 20 February 2004 - 11:00 AM
Oh yeah one more thing all 9/11 conspiracy theorists wouldn't know a 767 from a Cessna i.e they don't know a thing about commercial aviation.
Dear Miss Astrojet,
You work in civil aviation I take it. Would you mind having a look at
most important page:
and give us your considered opinion on why this plane was allowed to take off with these things stuck to the bottom of the fuselage? Or is it normal for civilian aviation pilots to be ratassed from the night before and not have a quick look at their aircraft before take off?
Thanks very much.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users